< July 15
July 17 >

July 16

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 16, 2023.

Wearables, Home and Accessories

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 24#Wearables, Home and Accessories

'feld

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 24#'feld

Psuedomonas insueta

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Psuedomonas panasis and move Psuedomonas insueta to the correct spelling. Jay 💬 07:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposing deletion for these redirects to stubs on niche microbial species. Misspelling the pseudo- prefix is an implausible typo, exemplified by extremely low pageviews for both redirects. The former is redirecting to a species that has not been classified in the Pseudomonas genus since 1977, further reducing the likelihood of a reader seeking its page through this misspelling. The latter is redirecting to a species with an additional s-->c difference in spelling, leaving it unlikely that a reader would make both spelling errors at once. BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 22:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- To clarify- IF this were spelled correctly then old synonym would be no reason to delete. However I agree this is an unnecessary incorrect spelling. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Draft:Symphonic Cinema

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. WP:IAR early close due to the WP:POINTiness of this nomination. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 20:39, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Second nomination per WP:IAR. The only reason for its existence is my own user error. This page does not help Wikipedia. Merko (talk) 19:34, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dogge

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Dog. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 20:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect title is not mentioned in the target page at all, and I am not seeing any indication that the current target is the primary meaning of the redirect at all. BD2412 T 19:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chinatown, Richmond

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 14:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The target section does not exist. There is a one word mention of Richmond district of San Francisco at the target, in which case Chinatown, San Francisco would be a better target. There is no mention of the Chinatown at Richmond District, San Francisco. However, more than a district, Richmond would be better seen as the cities Richmond, Virginia or Richmond, California, or any of the places in Richmond. Delete as ambiguous. Jay 💬 18:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chinatowns in Florida

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 14:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sections they redirect to do not exist. There is no mention of the specific Chinatowns at the target. There is no information on Chinatowns at the specific state articles. Delete. Jay 💬 18:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cleo Smith (murder victim)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G5. -- Tavix (talk) 23:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cleo Smith wasn't murdered, or even harmed, according to the article. Misleading and an unlikely search term. (Note: Creator has been blocked as a sockpuppet) (NPP action) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 16:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Easy Is the Way(The Black Donnellys)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 14:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect with missing space (WP:RDAB). Correct redirect exists at Easy Is the Way (The Black Donnellys). Gonnym (talk) 16:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

You're the Voice (Alan Parsons song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The confusion with the songs will be resolved by the nom by doing the necessary hatnoting in a day's time. Jay 💬 09:06, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong target, and the song is actually just The Voice. Either delete or retarget to I Robot (album) (although wrong name). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 14:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I now see that, as well as their own song, they performed and recorded the John Farnham song, as described in the section World Liberty Concert in the You're the Voice article. So I guess it should be retargeted to this section, possibly with a redirect or distinguish hatnote mentioning the other song on their I Robot album. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 14:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Replying here, same holds true for the other remark I think.
It is not 'The Voice' but the Alan Parsons live recorded version of the John Farnham song. Live concert recordings can still be found online, here on YouTube. Since the link creation the single was re-released digitally (here on Spotify) and this year it was released in the Netherlands as a vinyl record, here on a generic Dutch marketplace. The album contains the only publication of the instrumental song White Dawn, which make it a notable recording in the discography of Alan Parsons.
So it is a different song and please don't mix them up. If you see opportunity to clarify the Wikipedia pages around this subject, please do so. Nico.rikken (talk) 07:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thank you, I realised that there are two different songs, as I was trying to say above... But because I had already posted here, did not want to mess with the history of the redirect by fixing it afterwards, because it needs to follow the process. Their song "The Voice" is on the DAB page for The Voice, which makes it confusing for users. That needs to be explained there too. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:34, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Laterthanyouthink: I'll close this as keep. Can you make the necessary refining or hatnoting? Jay 💬 06:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, Jay. I'll get onto it tomorrow sometime. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:CLUE

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was WP:SNOW retarget. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 13:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No opinion on the matter at present, apart from that these two redirects target different essays and they shouldn't. Wikipedia:Cluocracy receives significantly more pageviews. J947 † edits 11:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The "cluocracy" essay seems to define clue as similar to consensus: the idea that you make arguments on talk pages that follow PAGs, and the best arguments win. The "having a clue" essay seems to define clue as knowing what you don't know and behaving accordingly. Based on how I've seen the word "clue" used by editors over the last few years when I've been active, I feel the definition of clue is closer to the "having a clue" essay than the "cluocracy" essay. My two cents. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused married name redirects with presumed 0 hits

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 25#Unused married name redirects with presumed 0 hits

Berryman logical image technique

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy retarget (non-admin closure) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edward-Woodrow (talk • contribs) 21:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This specific redirect goes to the author's article, while another redirect with the correct capitalization (Berryman Logical Image Technique) goes to the actual short story. This redirect should probably go to the short story article. Deauthorized. (talk) 05:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
More