The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:10, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Alemanya → Names of Germany  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

per WP:RLANG, "Alemanya" is just Germany in Catalan and Filipino. greyzxq ^talk 22:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Per OP. Pax Brittanica (talk) 23:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as mentioned – it has quite the affinity to a target that lists the Names of Germany in various languages! J947 † ^edits 23:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  If you look at WP:RLANG, these should be deleted. What connection does Germany have to Catalan and Filipino? greyzxq ^talk 06:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  As I said, this name has a big connection to Names of Germany. J947 † ^edits 07:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  It doesn't really… we don't have redirects from País del Mig to Names of China, which I believe is the only other article which actually says the names of the country in loads of different languages. The only connection is that it means Germany, and if this redirect is okay shouldn't every name for Germany in each language redirect to this article? But that goes against WP:RLANG, which was my original reason for deletion. greyzxq ^talk 00:50, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Many more redirects should exist than do – non-existence of redirects for similar terms is not an accurate barometer of usefulness in the slightest. To the second sentence: yes, quite right, other redirects should be created. This redirect does not fall afoul of RLOTE – read through that page's rationale and please explain how any of that applies to redirects to a Names of article. J947 † ^edits 04:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• keep per J947. CapitalSasha ~ talk 11:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RLANG. The keep case is even weaker here than the one below. (t · c) buidhe 14:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per J947 and K3. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 16:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:58, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Nemecko → Names of Germany  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

per WP:RLANG, "Nemecko" is just Germany in Slovak (and Czech if you ignore diacritics). greyzxq ^talk 22:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Per OP. Pax Brittanica (talk) 23:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as mentioned – it has quite the affinity to a target that lists the Names of Germany in various languages! J947 † ^edits 23:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  If you look at WP:RLANG, these should be deleted. What connection does Germany have to Slovak? greyzxq ^talk 06:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  As I said, this name has a big connection to Names of Germany. J947 † ^edits 07:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:RLANG. (t · c) buidhe 07:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per J947 and K3. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 16:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per J947 - this isn't a generic "random word in a non-English language" redirect. There is enough historical connection between Czechoslovakia and Germany (as noted above, this is the non-diacritic form of the name of Germany in Czech). Walt Yoder (talk) 04:31, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Repetitive designation → Chekhov's gun#Repetitive designation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target, unclear relevance. -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 21:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The "Repetitive Designation" target section was removed 11 Jan 2012 with the edit summary: "remove OR section added by user with a history of misusing citations - see Wikipedia:Jagged_85_cleanup". This redirect hasn't been relevant for a long time. Schazjmd (talk) 21:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• HDMS Indfødsretten (1887) → HDMS Indfødsretten (1776)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

1887 is more than a century after the ship sank in 1783, and although it is from a move no pages link to it greyzxq ^talk 19:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗plicit 23:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Boston town meeting → Town meeting#Open town meeting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Boston Town Meeting → Town meeting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

"Boston" is mentioned in passing a few times but not discussed at the target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to E-Type. ✗plicit 23:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Type E → Audi Type E  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to E-Type (a disambiguation page). Rather than primarily being a particular model of sports car produced by Audi c. 1912–1923, 'Type E' could refer to various topics, such as the Type E power plug and socket used in France, which is a topic more familiar to the general public. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• See also Type A, Type B, Type C, Type D, Type F (newly created by me, not disambiguated!), Type G (currently a red link), Type H (currently a red link), Type I, Type J, etc. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per nom as evidently ambiguous. I'd do the same for all the similar redirects matching Type ([A-Z])→$1-Type. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:03, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm Unhappy → My World (Aespa EP)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

very ambiguous, but is more likely to simply mean unhappiness (which redirects to sadness) than a song greyzxq ^talk 17:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. With that exact phrasing and capitalization, it's more likely to refer to the song. HotdogPi 17:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The song is still unreleased, but the group has already performed it live and released a track video recently. MotherofSnakes (talk) 18:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A valid redirect, and per HotdogPi, with this capitalisation it's likely to mean the song than somebody wanting to find what sadness means. Ss112 08:49, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:58, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Ayesha Erotica → Slayyyter  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Artist is only briefly mentioned in the "2017–2018: Early approaches to music and first single releases" section, and is not exclusively associated with Slayyyter. Sock (tock talk) 13:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Parc Felindre → Felindre#Felindre works site  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target destination ~ Eejit43 (talk) 12:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Zombie portals → Wikipedia:Glossary#Zombie portal  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The target page doesn't describe this content at all, so it must be deleted. Q𝟤𝟪 10:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as G8, at least for now. It appears that the references to zombie pages and zombie portals were removed from the glossary, which has left this redirect as a redirect to nowhere. This entry may not be necessary because the zombie portals, or at least most of them, were successfully destroyed in the Great Portal Wars of 2019, but with considerable collateral damage (because war is a tragic bloody activity). Either the glossary entry should be restored, or the redirect should be deleted, and the glossary entry may refer to an extinct subspecies and so may not be needed. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:12, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• 2022 New York City Subway massacre → 2022 New York City Subway attack  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Brooklyn Subway massacre → 2022 New York City Subway attack  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A "massacre" without any deaths, term not in use for this event. Fram (talk) 09:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brooklyn Subway massacre redirects to the same and should also be deleted. Fram (talk) 09:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete: per nom, also delete Brooklyn Subway massacre greyzxq ^talk 23:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom (maybe even speedy delete per R3, since these redirects are only a few days old). Duckmather (talk) 14:08, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - both links are technically incorrect because no one was killed, so at best this is misleading. However, the redirects were also recently created, so I agree that these qualify for speedy deletion under R3. Had the pages been created shortly after the attack, it would have been reasonable to have these redirects because it wasn't yet known whether anyone had died. But this is more than a year out, when we know no one was killed, and every victim has long since been discharged from the hospital. – Epicgenius (talk) 22:02, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 10:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Chemical scaffold → Nano-scaffold  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

N Delete. "Chemical scaffold" is not mentioned anywhere in the target article. It is a redirect with possibilities, but cannot have a target article yet because scaffold (chemistry) has yet to be created. — CrafterNova ^{[ TALK ] [ CONT ]} 09:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:23, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Oscarrak 2023 → 95th Academy Awards  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of this title on the subject article. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 05:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:RLOTE. In general, I don't have a strong opinion on non-English redirects, and in some cases I think they can be useful. This redirect, on the other hand, is a clear-cut case, as the event has nothing to do with Basque. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 14:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 07:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• A List Of Indian Chef → List of Indian chefs  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The "A List Of" in the title left over from a March 2015 move may or may not be helpful to people, but the singular form in the redirect makes this implausible (also, it hasn't gotten very many pageviews since July that same year). Not sure how it's still useful. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 05:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 07:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Toho Eiga → Toho  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No direct mention of this phrase. The only time "Eiga" appears in the article is in the title of a film, which doesn't bear much reference to the title of the redirect. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 05:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Argentina vs France → 2022 FIFA World Cup final  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm sure Argentina have played France many other times - and not just in football...!! Better to be disambiguated than redirected, but deletion is just as easy I guess Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 05:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Under WP:R, one of the purposes of redirects is "less specific forms of names, for which the article subject is still the primary topic". This is the same reason why Obama redirects to Barack Obama (despite there being many people named Obama), Croatia vs France redirects to 2018 FIFA World Cup final (despite France vs Croatia having played in other games), and 7-1 redirects to Brazil v Germany (2014 FIFA World Cup) (despite other games, both in soccer and other sports, having ended with a scoreline of 7-1). Given these examples, and the fact that the 2022 World Cup final is the most notable game between Argentina and France, I think that the redirect is good to stay. 4hrue2kd83f (talk) 14:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The only other articles on Argentina–France competition that I can find are 1960 France rugby union tour of Argentina and Uruguay, 1998 France rugby union tour of Argentina and Fiji, and 1985 France rugby union tour of Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay. Three other Argentina–France football matches get sections in larger articles: 2018 FIFA World Cup knockout stage#France vs Argentina, 1930 FIFA World Cup Group 1#Argentina vs France, and 1978 FIFA World Cup Group 1#Argentina vs France. All six of these articles combined get a tenth of the views that the 2022 game gets. This is the clear primary topic; if there were a disambiguation page it could be linked in a hatnote. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 14:09, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Get on the Dance Floor. No consensus to disambiguate, so retargeting per WP:NCRET. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Get On The Dancefloor → The Creeps (Get on the Dancefloor)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm a bit lost on how to fix this issue. For one, the properly capitalized version of this redirect, assuming title case, Get on the Dancefloor, does not exist. However, there is an article at Get on the Dance Floor. Due to the fact this redirect is a subtitle-ish WP:PTM of its target, I'm not really sure if the ultimate solution here is "keep", "delete", or "retarget to Get on the Dance Floor". Right now, my thought is weak retarget to Get on the Dance Floor, but will yield to any convincing arguments against this stance. Steel1943 (talk) 20:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate This is not a PTM, and there is no obvious WP:PTOPIC. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Get on the Dance Floor as an ((R from incorrect name)), which is much more similar to the redirect title than the other suggested target, and hatnote to the other target The Creeps (Get on the Dancefloor). Since there are only two suggested targets, WP:TWODABS applies. Duckmather (talk) 00:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:26, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The Important Steps of the American History → History of the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unclear what this redirect is meant to define. Steel1943 (talk) 22:48, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The page history appears to have some outline of notes about US history but I don't see this as having any real encyclopedic value. CapitalSasha ~ talk 16:19, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:25, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Kylie Sasse → Kylie Minogue  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible redirect. Minogue never married actor Joshua Sasse, and their engagement only lasted for about a year before calling it quits in 2017. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The time to create this redirect would've been if Ms. Minogue did change her name (which...why would she?! She'd remove her last name before taking someone else's!), not on spec a year before the fact that never occurred. Nate • (chatter) 16:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 07:25, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Patrick sugrue → Pádraig Ó Siochfhradha  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of this surname on the target page as far as I can see, even if it doesn't have a capital letter like it should...! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 04:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 07:25, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• NJPlates → Vehicle registration plates of New Jersey  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No context of "NJPlates" even being a thing, nor is that likely to be a reasonable misspelling of the target article. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 04:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 07:26, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Alternative '80 → Libertarian National Convention#Alternative '80  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Isn't notable, most common return on Google is for alternative music of the 1980s. No where did the Libertarian national Convention pop up. This might confuse users. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 03:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:40, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Murder by abuse or neglect → Murder in Delaware law#Murder by abuse or neglect  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

overly broad and may confuse people Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 03:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:40, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Football Stadium in Grivka → Ak Bars Arena  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirects to a stadium in Russia. The article on Wikipedia Grivka directs to a town in Bulgaria. Clearly this redirect is not needed. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) J947 † ^edits 23:41, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Saskatoon Chief Mistawasis → Saskatoon Northwest  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Google hits are all about a bridge, not about an electoral district. CapitalSasha ~ talk 02:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Canadian electoral districts have names instead of numbers (unlike the USA). Saskatchewan has finished redistributing (redistricting) the districts for the provincial legislature after the 2021 census. As part of this reconfiguration, the current district of Saskatoon Northwest is being renamed Saskatoon Chief Mistawasis. You can look at the maps on the boundary commission's website. https://www.saskboundaries.ca/maps/

I am preparing these new articles ahead of time for the roughly ten to-be-renamed districts in the province, and am setting them to be redirected to the current article...this way those searching for the new names now are redirected to the correct article under the current names, and not just given a 'not found' error. In the coming weeks/months, I will be updating all the articles to reference these upcoming changes including the new names.

When the next election is called (which is when the new boundaries and names will take effect), I will migrate the content for the districts being renamed from the old article to the new article, and then will redirect the will-be-old name to the new (and will-be-current) name.

Let me know if any other questions.

Thanks! Brycecordry (talk) 02:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thanks. Is this really a "renaming" of the electoral district? Looking at the maps it seems that the new district will include area from several current districts. CapitalSasha ~ talk 11:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you compare the changes as I have, about 90% of the area that’s in Saskatoon Northwest right now remains in the Chief Mistawasis riding, and it just gains some largely undeveloped territory from Saskatoon Silverspring-Sutherland and Saskatoon Willowgrove, similar to how other electoral districts gain and lose territory from redistribution. Also all districts in Saskatchewan are gaining population due to record population growth over the last decade. It no longer makes sense to call it Saskatoon Northwest because it will now pull in the northeast corner of Saskatoon, but in principle it’s the same riding, just new/expanded boundaries. Same thing could be said for Regina Mount Royal being a renamed/expanded Regina Rosemont, but I’m still debating on how to handle that one. Brycecordry (talk) 19:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• El Paso genocide → 2019 El Paso shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No Google hits for this term, seems unlikely that this is a real term people use for this event. CapitalSasha ~ talk 01:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Completely inappropriate use of the term. WWGB (talk) 01:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Before I noticed the deletion tag, I was about to nominate this. This is an obvious misuse of the term 'genocide'. Waddles 🗩 🖉 01:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This is not what the word "genocide" means. Also, this term is not used by any reliable sources at all. Epicgenius (talk) 22:03, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as a nonexistent misnomer. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 01:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Buffalo genocide → 2022 Buffalo shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Google hits all refer to killing of bison, not of this mass shooting. CapitalSasha ~ talk 01:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Completely inappropriate use of the term. WWGB (talk) 01:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for the same rationale I gave on El Paso genocide. Clear misuse of the term 'genocide'. Waddles 🗩 🖉 01:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Absolute a misuse of the word genocide. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This is not what the word "genocide" means. Perhaps this should be retargeted to Bison hunting#Bison population crash and its effect on Indigenous people, but "buffalo genocide" isn't technically mentioned at that article. Epicgenius (talk) 22:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Experimetn → Experiment  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't think this is a very plausible or significant typo. However, it's definitely not patent nonsense (I declined a WP:CSD#G1 tagging), and since it has existed for three months, I believe it's too old to delete as WP:CSD#R3. ^Complex/_Rational 00:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, harmless. J947 † ^edits 00:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per J947. To further back up this claim, the redirect could also be a misspelling for Experimenting due to the "n" being at the end; however, since Experimenting targets Experiment, the current target of the nominated redirect, nothing is lost in this case. Steel1943 (talk) 06:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep transposition errors are a very common form of typo -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 06:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).