This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 10, 2024.
Grind Time Now
Salt evasion of Grind Time. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
William Melling (actor)
Wally Francis (CBSO)
Salt evasion of Wally Francis. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt, can be reconsidered and unsalted if/whenever Wally Francis is unsalted, which it was salted, unsalted, and salted again looking at the logs. A version with a disambiguator won't ever need to exist as long as the first title is creation-protected. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt Clearly this is just a trick to avoid an already salted article title. The Banner talk 22:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt as per Utopes and Banner. D'ya think he'd prefer Himalayan salt or sea salt? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 03:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt per above. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:52, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Galactic Federation of Free Alliances
Star wars unmentioned fancruft redirect. Has some mentions on Wikipedia but a good chunk are in disambiguation pages, people searching for the "free alliances" don't currently have anything to read about at the target page, it seems. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gagori Kokalot
This apparently is a song recorded by Zubeen Garg... but there is no way of knowing this as it is not listed as one of his songs. It IS listed as a song by [[
Beauty Sharma Barua]] (Kokalot Gagori) recorded in 1977 (Garg was born in 1972, and did not record that song when he was 5). Anyway, this search term causes confusion for people that might be looking for the 1977 song, but instead are taken to a page by a completely different singer, without the song present to begin with. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gagori (album)
While Gagori as a search term might have different possibilities, there is no such album referred to at the target, meaning that people that specify an album as a search will receive zero information about it. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gagori
No such album called Gagori is mentioned at the target article. There are several different Gagori titles that exist on Wikipedia, including..... [never mind they are also unmentioned]. Gagori still is referred to though around Wikipedia though as a canal in Nauru, and a ward in Bamu Rural LLG, as well as being a song by two other people? I'm guessing on the second one, as it's also not mentioned, but at least one other in Beauty Sharma Barua. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gabby and Ty
No characters called Gabby or Ty mentioned at the list of Pokemon characters, or anime characters. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
$10 calculator
Too ambiguous. Likely not only ten dollar calculator Okmrman (talk) 22:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- COMMENT ACTUAL REDIRECT IS $10 calculator Okmrman (talk) 22:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Okmrman:
Done. Fixed. I've now added the correctly spelled redirect to this nomination. CycloneYoris talk! 22:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
$299
too ambiguous Okmrman (talk) 22:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If I recall, this was also the original US price of the Nintendo Switch. Steel1943 (talk) 03:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - While I can understand the context of it, it's a grossly unlikely search term due to it being hopelessly vague without that. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 17:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - I keep waffling in my opinion whether this should be deleted as ambiguous, as lots of things cost $299, and wanting to keep it because the mention of $299 at the 1995 E3 is actually extremely notable, and is the sort of thing a researcher or marketing student may actually want to search for directly on wikipedia. In the end, I think I lean ever so slightly more towards keeping it, but I fully understand the delete rational as well. This is a hard decision, really. Fieari (talk) 06:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, too vague and unhelpful pointed at one location. Lots of things are known for being $299, even if not necessarily encyclopedic. Nobody would want to get to the Sony section of E3 1995 by typing a three digit number, instead of the totally natural search of E3 1995. This case is simply, the creation of a redirect, for the sake of redirecting. No logical use with zero context. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sonichu.com
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by User:Quarl. --BDD (talk) 21:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not a good idea given Sonichu was deleted and salted. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt, can be reconsidered and unsalted if/whenever Sonichu is unsalted. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: IIRC, I created this from an AFC/R request, not realizing the non-domain name was salted. DrowssapSMM 23:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt as page creator. Had I realized Sonichu was salted, I wouldn't have created it in the first place, and likely would have requested salting myself. DrowssapSMM 23:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt, this quite clearly was requested as a method of getting around the Sonichu salt. The creator who fulfilled said request already has come forth and supported deletion, which I'm fairly certain means we can now do so speedily? Not sure how speedy salting can be, though. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 00:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Probable speedy delete since author requests deletion. Okmrman (talk) 01:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt per above --Lenticel (talk) 05:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt as with everything else related to it and its creator. (An argument could be made that this redirect just furthers the ongoing harassment campaign.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 17:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy delete, salt, and look for the nearest source of eyebleach cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: user:Quarl Thanks for deleting the page, d'ya think you could also close the discussion here? Unless you're waiting for someone who has salt permissions? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 04:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- (There is no concept of salt permissions - any admin can salt. I'm not doing so because I'm WP:INVOLVED here, but I technically could) * Pppery * it has begun... 04:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I submitted a salt request. Okmrman (talk) 04:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
...And now I'm just confused over why Quarl would delete the page without closing the discussion, if they would logically have the ability to salt it then... why are we still here? why isn't the page salted...?
𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (
talk) 04:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
- It wasn't so much about closing the discussion early, as much as it was about promptly handling the G7 speedy deletion that was requested, which speedy deletion is a lot simpler than rfd closing and salting. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Eh, fair enough. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 09:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Season 7, 2016
Hopelessly ambiguous. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pehli Nazar Mein Dari Thi
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay
Salt evasion of Oncotype_DX. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, this was accepted through AfC in 2012 and BLAR'd in 2017, while Oncotype DX was salted at the same time in 2017, so not salt evasion. Unless there was something visible in the deleted histories that you saw, @Pppery:. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope. That matches what I can see. Still not mentioned at the target, though, so should still be deleted. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- If this isn't salt evasion then, it should be restored and sent to AfD if non-notable, as this is an article which made it through AfC by User:Graeme Bartlett and survived as a standalone topic for years, before being BLAR'd into a page without mention. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mahjong Horoki Classic
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Insurance goal
Not mentioned at the target page. Tea2min (talk) 15:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Wiktionary redirect to wikt:insurance goal. There it's given in the context of soccer but it's the same meaning. Preferable to adding it back to the list of hockey terms since it also applies to other sports. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Add back to the list, or delete per WP:REDYES for both the soccer/football and hockey terms. This search for "insurance goal on Wikipedia returns a surprising amount of articles that mention the phrase for its soccer/football and hockey uses, but surprisingly none of the results are articles that define the term. For this reason, the phrase seems notable enough in some regard to be included and defined either in an existent article or a standalone article. Steel1943 (talk) 20:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hockey bag
Not mentioned anymore at target page Glossary of ice hockey terms. (Which used to say "a duffel bag for hockey equipment" but was cleaned up in 2011.) Tea2min (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak retarget to Holdall, which is the target of gym bag, and which notes that it is also known as a sports bag in UK English although Sports bag does not exist. It does not discuss hockey, though. Our article ice hockey equipment does not describe bags, and duffel bag doesn't mention hockey; I haven't found anything better. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Newbridge Capital
The redirect target was a section on TPG Inc. that had been practically unsourced for a decade (there was one source, but did not mention "Newbridge Capital"). Didn't seem notable enough to TPG to warrant an entire section, so I massaged the content that could be sourced into TPG Inc. History. Pegnawl (talk) 21:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Efinancialcareers.com
Deletion, eFinancialCareers is no longer owned by DHI Group or Dice.com[1] Mjhobson (talk) 13:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Also bundle Efinancialcareers.com which used to be a more comprehensive article before being redirected at its AfD. Jay 💬 17:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled with the other similar redirect mentioned by Jay.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and WP:REDLINK Okmrman (talk) 22:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep both. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Efinancialcareers.com concluded in 2017 that Efinancialcareers.com was not notable and that the website should redirect to Dice.com. The majority ownership of eFinancialCareers has been transferred from Dice.com parent company DHI Group, Inc. to eFC's management team. The press release quoted by the nominator says, "DHI will retain a 40% equity interest in eFC and have board representation." This is still significant ownership. This does not mean that eFinancialCareers should no longer redirect to Dice.com, where it is mentioned twice (once in the "History" section and once in the "Acquisitions by DHI Group, Inc" section. The remedy is to update Dice.com to note that eFinancialCareers is now 40% owned by Dice.com, not to delete the redirects. The redirects remain useful for readers who can read information about eFinancialCareers in Dice.com. Cunard (talk) 05:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jeez
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:
When I nominated this title in 2015 (Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 September 12#Jeez), the result was "delete", even though I had suggested redirecting to the Wiktionary page, which existed when I created the discussion in 2015. Of course, this does not make this redirect eligible for WP:G4 since the redirect did not target Wiktionary back then, but no participants, besides myself, had voted for retargeting to Wiktionary. For this reason, I'm bringing this up for discussion to see if the redirect should be re-deleted, kept in its current form, or something else. (For consistency's sake, I support the previous consensus ... "delete".) Steel1943 (talk) 21:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; seems harmless enough and gets you to the right target. I'm unsure why Wiktionary lists "Jeez" as an alternate spelling of "Geez", and then turns around and defines "Geez" as a minced oath for "Jesus"-- the minced oath part is correct, but I'd think that "Jeez" would be the primary spelling, given it's closer to the spelling of "Jesus". Maybe "Geez" is older or something?Interestingly enough, Geez actually redirects to Ge'ez, aka Classical Ethiopian, with not a single mention of a minced oath (though it does hatnote to Geez (magazine).) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 01:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Moira Sullivan (Smallville)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- While not directly mentioned with the surname, the character Moira is mentioned at Smallville season 6#ep128, though only appears in that one episode. The character's name in full is listed at Lynda Carter#Filmography and Superman (franchise)#Recurring cast, so I would suggest retarget to that episode description or to Lynda Carter's article, though leaning closer to the episode description as it does offer more details on this character and Carter's role than the other two sections do. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Linda Baldwin (Coronation Street)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Linda Baldwin is an alternative name for Linda Sykes listed at the target article. While the name was updated at some point in the list (it used to say Baldwin), the redirect was not. Now updated. Ooh, Fruity (talk) 11:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fucktarded
Salt evasion of Fucktard. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This is an encyclopedia, the word is now mentioned at the target, and the word is a "disability-related term with a negative connotation". --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and WP:SALT per nom, mentioned at the target or not. Steel1943 (talk) 02:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt as per nom and Steel. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and recreate Fucktard as a redirect with the same target, both with indef full protection. The word is mentioned at the target and WP:WINC. Nickps (talk) 19:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt, really not a good idea. Just because we can have unmentioned versions of a mentioned slur doesn't mean we should. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bhumi(Chennai)
Nonsense redirect. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The variation with the proper spacing, Bhumi (Chennai), does not exist (and I'm not sure if it should exist.) Steel1943 (talk) 03:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to malformed modifier --Lenticel (talk) 22:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:RDAB. Considering the fact that BHUMI operates in many cities, I do think BHUMI (Chennai) or Bhumi (Chennai) should be created unless specific mentions are added at the target. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Double the Trouble (album)
Salt evasion of Double the Trouble. Not mentioned at the current target or The Pussycat Dolls discography. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This existed in April 2007 before the salting on December 2007, this is not salt evasion. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The base name was unprotected in 2011 and re protected a few weeks later. I'm anyway not sure such salting should be indefinite as people who re create often go and notability changes. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Desmond Cook (Lost)
Apparently a name it was at one point incorrectly thought the target would be known by. Not mentioned and not likely years later. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cort and Fatboy Show
Salt evasion of Cort and Fatboy. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This existed for 2 years before Cort and Fatboy was deleted even for the first time, this is not salt evasion. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cheaper by the Dozen 3: The White House Wreck
Salt evasion of Cheaper by the Dozen 3. Apparently a sequel than never went anywhere. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bella Bathrooms (company)
Salt evasion of Bella Bathrooms. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt, can be reconsidered and unsalted if/whenever Bella Bathrooms is unsalted. Neither are mentioned at the target, likely won't ever need to be as long as the base name stays salted. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt per nom --Lenticel (talk) 22:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt per nom. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Beavecoon iCarly
Salt evasion of Beavecoon. Minor plot element not mentioned at target and oddly formatted. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Balita sa IBC Huling Ulat
Salt evasion of Balita sa IBC. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aegis Limited (BPO)
Salt evasion of Aegis Limited. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Adi Gallia (Star Wars)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. 4 unanimous keeps. WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) Okmrman (talk) 18:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Completely unnecessary disambiguation, as Adi Gallia already exists and points to the correct target. Delete. TNstingray (talk) 13:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Kitster
Unimportant character not mentioned at the current target nor anywhere else on Wikipedia, not even on the article for the movie he appears in. Delete. TNstingray (talk) 13:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This is more in Wookiepedia's alley. --Lenticel (talk) 22:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not mentioned at the target page. This character does indeed have another mention, at C-3PO, but that's not enough to substantiate a retarget. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
G-Whizz
The specific spelling "G-Whizz" does not appear in the targeted article about the car, though the different "G-Wiz" does. Also note that we have yet another spelling, "G-Wizz", currently redirecting to a TV channel. I came across this particular redirect while trying to clean up Greg (GWhizz) Nesbit, who annoyingly spells his stage name a whole bunch of ways, and his article has been nominated for deletion which could be relevant for the fate of this redirect. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Po Nudo
Incredibly minor character not mentioned anywhere at the target page nor elsewhere on Wikipedia. Delete. TNstingray (talk) 13:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. DrowssapSMM 14:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This is more in Wookiepedia's alley. --Lenticel (talk) 22:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not mentioned at the target. This character is mentioned elsewhere, and is listed on the disambiguation page for Nudo. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Democratic Labor Party (historical)
Redirect to a disambiguation page. I don't see the point of this. TarnishedPathtalk 10:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Democratic Labor Party is already a disambiguation, this is not needed. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I don't see any need for the historical parenthesis. Since the move has targeted a labor party of different name. No one will say "historical". Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget The original redirect pointed to Democratic Labor Party (Australia, 1955) as a result of a page move. Why this was changed to a link to a disambiguation page is beyond me, the actual change also did not give any info why. The Banner talk 12:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I changed it because it's not the only defunct political party with this name, and hence an incomplete disambiguation. No opinion on whether this should be kept or deleted, but oppose retargeting. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I oppose retargeting as there is more than one party listed at the target which could be described as "historical." - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not a useful disambiguation. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Before this is closed as delete someone should fix the many incoming links. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Joever
Per WP:SSRT. Do we really need to include such 4-chan internet slang with no encyclopedic value, a "word" not used in any articles? Fram (talk) 08:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Augastus Ekka
Declined G6. Implausible misspelling. Target article was at this title and then moved shortly after creation. CycloneYoris talk! 05:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, swapping an A and a U seems like a pretty plausible misspelling, given that the page used the name "Augastus" for three days before being moved, and CSD'd right after. Someone thought this name was correct, I don't see the harm here. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: per Utopes. DrowssapSMM 13:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as plausible misspelling / mishearing --Lenticel (talk) 22:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Clorinda (Once Upon a Time)
No mention of a "Clorinda" among the characters in Once Upon a Time; currently exists as an unhelpful and confusing redirect that does not support readers searching this term. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I apologize for this if I did anything wrong. I will try to fix this.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This may be harder to fix than I thought. According to a Wiki, she appeared in the first season, and was a stepsister to Cinderella, but Cinderella is not a character in the first season. Then when I look up the actress, it says she appeared in season six. She has a sister Tisbe. The Wiki says the same characters were later called Anastasia and Drizella. I can't tell which was which. I don't really have time to deal with all this right now but I'll try later.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I know that I didn't use reliable sources. I used two Wikis and something called Hello Giggles but I feel reasonably confident that this edit can be used to keep the redirect, with this change: List_of_Once_Upon_a_Time_characters#Ella. If that's not enough, I'll try something else. As for the tables and lists of less important characters, I don't feel confident about trying to include her there because there may be a system for doing it. One of my sources said she did not actually appear until the sixth season but was only mentioned.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I think I have a solution. As I was doing further research, I discovered another redirect. How about Ugly_sisters#Once_Upon_a_Time_depictions? There is actually more detail there than anywhere else, regardless of whether my recent edits are accepted.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try for comments. Vchimpanzee, I urge you to leave a bolded !vote to clarify your intent or preferred target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget to Ugly sisters#Once Upon a Time depictions as per Vchimpanzee, as that is, currently, where the most information we have is. I will note, however, that it is currently an unsourced section, and barring the addition of credible sources, may end up removed in the future-- in which case we're back where we started. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Amazonas Region
Currently redirects to Department of Amazonas, Peru, but I believe something like Amazonas#Places would be a more appropriate target. BaduFerreira (talk) 02:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Raman Raheja (entrepreneur)
This is a weird case. The only reason this page exists is due to the creator working around the Raman Raheja title salt. The base name had been speedily deleted 3 times for A7 and G11, and this variant title lasted less than 24 hours as an article, before being WP:BLAR'd into the cricket league. Because there is only a passing mention of Raheja at the target, and no indication that Raheja is an entrepreneur, this redirect does not seem very useful without any content about Raheja being an entrepreneur at the cricket league page. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, while the redirect IS pointing to the correct location as per the BLAR'd article, I'm similarly in Utopes's boat in that I'm unsure Raheja counts as an entrepreneur. The only reason this redirect would be any help, is... to get around the salt, because nobody can put a redirect at Raman Raheja either-- because we don't, and can't, have the page Raman Raheja, someone typing Raman Raheja into the searchbar would quite quickly have their query autocompleted to Raman Raheja (entrepreneur), which... would then lead them to Legends League Cricket.On the one hand, as shown by it being the only thing said BLAR'd article talked about, it's pretty clear that Legends League Cricket is the only thing Raheja is notable for, meaning a redirect to here (where he's the CEO) is warranted; however, THIS redirect is probably a bad idea. The only possible way forward I can think of is to Delete this redirect, then-- with a big MAYBE attached, because I'm not sure that we should do this-- unsalt and create Raman Raheja as a redirect to Legends League Cricket, before immediately protecting the redirect. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 00:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- For the record, I am not opposed to the solution proposed by Jay and Rosguill. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Restore pre-BLAR version, and if the article is not deleted at AfD, move to Raman Raheja. Jay 💬 06:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete salt evasion. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Restore and move to Raman Raheja - the pre-BLAR version is significantly different from the articles speedy-deleted at that title, several years ago. signed, Rosguill talk 15:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Flying Theme
Multiple flying themes exist inside and outside of soundtracks. Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (soundtrack) describes a flying theme, The Matrix Reloaded mentions a flying theme, Flying (Taehyung Theme) exists as a redirect to BTS World: Original Soundtrack, as well as any other theme that plays while flying. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget to a disambiguation page (yet to be created) consisting of the aforementioned pages. signed, Pat talk 01:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- After some thinking, I think having this Retarget to a disambiguation page wouldn't hurt. Okmrman (talk) 04:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing to Dabify per above Okmrman (talk) 21:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think this should retarget to the dab page-- I think this should BE the dab page. Dabify. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 11:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and let search results do the work. The treatment of "flying theme" in the articles identified so far in this discussion is too brief for a disambiguation to be useful to readers. signed, Rosguill talk 14:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Big Nose
Apparently, one of the characters in the movie used to be called Big Nose during production and was changed before release so it somehow warrants a redirect? Big Nose only appears in a hatnote and not the main article. Okmrman (talk) 19:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- disambiguate there being Big Nose Kate, Big Nose George, Francis I of France king of France known as Big Nose, a character from Pink Panther and Pals, a character from Big Nose the Caveman, a character from The Enemy (Higson novel), a variant of the Belgian Railways Class 54 locomotives, Big Nose Mountain in Jocotenango, a song by Poison Clan off the album Poisonous Mentality, a racist allusion to the Jewish nose or the Germanic nose -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 07:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Dabify per anon --Lenticel (talk) 07:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. 'Big Nose' is not a term that is notably associated with this film. It refers to a very minor charachter (not even on the main cast list), and their name was changed to 'Debbie the Dog Mom' for the main release. Not worth disambiguating. Aszx5000 (talk) 11:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Dabify on my own discussion. not really any harm in trying to make it a disambig Okmrman (talk) 02:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Disambiguate: per IP. DrowssapSMM 13:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mos:english idioms
A recently created "mos" redirect created minutes after the correct pseudo-namespace version of MOS:English idioms. "Mos" is not a widely accepted pseudo-namespace and there is general consensus to not be creating more of these; "MOS" titles don't need a "Mos" or "MoS" counterpart, as the search bar takes care of capitalization variants. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nashid Al-Huriya
Not mentioned in page. The only place on the internet I can find this referenced is wikidata item Q25634003, which does put it as the anthem of the Republic of Egypt doesn't explain where the name comes from. I suspect an unlikely transliteration but don't know Arabic well enough to confirm this. Rusalkii (talk) 22:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- "Nashid al-Huriyya" is mentioned in the article Walla Zaman Ya Selahy. Peter James (talk) 08:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]