The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Watch channel → W (British TV channel)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Move to either Watch (channel) or Watch (TV channel) without leaving an additional redirect. Okmrman (talk) 19:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This is a perfectly harmless ((R from other disambiguation)), the other redirect can be created if desired. Watch (disambiguation) indicates this is unambiguous. Thryduulf (talk) 19:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Reaper Eternal as a joke redirect. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft:Windows 8.25 → Windows 10  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Windows 8.25 does not exist. I thought this was the limit when we said Windows 8.2+ doesn't exist in another similar redirect's RfD. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 23:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete. Tagged for speedy deletion under criterion G3, since it was created by a disruptive IP about a week ago for no apparent reason. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• DSRL → Oreo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Dsrl → Oreo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. Acronym not mentioned at target. Both redirects are edit protected, which is why I couldn't tag them. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• From the deleted history: "DSRL is a sport which includes the famous Oreo cookie. Or commonly know [sic] as 'Double Stuffed Racing League'." Followed by a bunch of rules of the sport. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dsrl. Delete as a long-forgotten ad gimic of some sort. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep (Nomination Withdrawn). I assumed that the tag was accurate to the current version of the article, without checking myself. Whoopsie. (non-admin closure) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 11:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Entire (animal) → Neutering  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Was BLAR'd after a discussion held not on its own talk page, not on AfD, but on the talk page of Neutering, at the tail end of a merge discussion that only ever got a single vote for "Yeah no, don't merge, just delete "Entire (animal)" as it'd only ever been a WP:DICDEF."

Term was never added to the article-- the edit that happened the day Entire was BLAR'd only served to remove the merge-discussion notification. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: and remove ((R to article without mention)), unless I'm misreading the lead of the article or what it is you're proposing isn't delete. Neutering currently (and has for a few years) ends the lead paragraph with An animal that has not been neutered is sometimes referred to as entire or intact. So a normal redirect from a related term to our best coverage (with predictable disambiguation in this case). As an aside, I think clear antonyms and synonyms don't always need a mention to be useful redirects. Skynxnex (talk) 02:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Skynxnex. I MOS:BOLDREDIRECTed the term. Paradoctor (talk) 03:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• .....Teaches me to trust that the "R to article without mention" tag is correct without checking the current version of the article. Withdrawing nomination. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 11:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Sam Malone (DJ) → KSEV  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Sam Malone no longer works for KSEV and I am not sure if there is enough to put together a standalone article for him or his current self-produced show. spryde | talk 20:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There was really no reason in the redirect even before. --Викидим (talk) 20:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of The Asylum films#2012: Doomsday. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2012: Doomsday → The Asylum  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to List_of_The_Asylum_films#1990–2000s. (A quick check shows that the reason it's no longer mentioned at the target is that former section has been hived off into its own article.) Ubcule (talk) 22:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to List of The Asylum films#2012: Doomsday. Anchor has been added. Paradoctor (talk) 03:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The F-Bomb (documentary) → Fuck (2005 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No evidence the current target is referred to as "The F bomb". Could just as reasonably refer to The F Word (2005 film), but there's no evidence that's called this either. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The beach that makes you old → Old (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Related meme not mentioned at target. Implausible to be searched on Wikipedia, not including people going onto Google and asking "what's the beach that makes you old", after which point one would find the source film for the topic; also, the Wikipedia page pops up there too. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a search engine. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: This specific phrasing is a meme: see here. jp×g🗯️ 01:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Even as a meme, there is no mention of the meme on the film article, so this is just a joke re-direct that doesn't really help anyone. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Not mentioned at target. CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Paradise Skypark. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Paradise Airport → Harry Reid International Airport  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is an inaccurate redirect. Paradise Airport is a small airfield in Paradise, California, nowhere near Paradise, Nevada (and nowhere near the size or importance of Las Vegas' international airport). Mistaken redirect that should just be deleted; the airport itself is non-notable so its article was converted to redirect in 2022. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as potentially confusing, per WP:R#DELETE item 2. As well as the California "Paradise airport" indicated by the nom [1], there's another in New York state [2], but neither seem to be notable. Rosbif73 (talk) 14:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 23:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Paradise Skypark on which we have an article. It is unclear from the nomination which is the airport article being referred to that was converted to a redirect in 2022. Jay 💬 15:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Paradise Skypark per Jay. No need for deletion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Paradise Skypark unless there are other airports with articles associated with places named Paradise. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Toadette^Edit! 17:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• General Dollar → Dollar General  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a synonym for this brand, and not useful as a search term. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, a plausible word swap for someone unfamiliar with the name of the establishment. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Faulty thinking → Fallacy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I just created this. But to be on the safe side, I wanted to ask for opinions, as this is actually a psychological term that does not appear in the given target as such, in fact. Hildeoc (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. My first thought is that a fallacy is only one type of faulty thinking, others being using incorrect logic, extrapolating from a misunderstanding, etc. Thryduulf (talk) 15:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Uhh, "using incorrect logic" is a formal fallacy, "extrapolating from a misunderstanding" is (at a minimum) an informal fallacy. Paradoctor (talk) 17:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Question this is actually a psychological term Can you provide a source defining this psychological term? The only uses I could find were all literal uses, i. e. talking about thinking that is faulty.
  Thinking is more general than reasoning/arguing, and from what I've seen, a case could be made to target cognitive biases instead, or in addition. Paradoctor (talk) 17:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Paradoctor: Thanks for taking an interest. Well, if you google the term (using quotes), the hits you get are like almost exclusively related to uses in a psychological context; cf., e.g., here. Hildeoc (talk) 05:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  two [...] conceptions of faulty thinking That's two different terms. So we'd need to a) disambiguate, b) find articles to link to, which are defining these idioms. Alternatively a set index article would also be conceivable, though this would require a whole lot more sources.

  More to the point, the hits are uses, not definitions / discussions of the concept. Extracting definitions from usage would be WP:SYNTHESIS Paradoctor (talk) 06:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Ambiguous, and no suitable target. Paradoctor (talk) 02:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) TarnishedPath^talk 11:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Poopoo → Poo poo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect to a disambiguation. This makes no sense. TarnishedPath^talk 07:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Plausible redirect. It's basically the same title as the target, but without the spacing in the middle. Unclear why it doesn't make sense to the nominator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  A redirect to a disambiguation makes no sense to me. TarnishedPath^talk 10:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Well, normalize yourself with this. Redirects to disambiguation pages are many and allowed. Neocorelight (Talk) 10:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a plausible (and perhaps common) alternate spelling. The fact that it points to a dab page doesn't matter for this purpose. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 11:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Main Directorate for Migration Affairs. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Immigration control in Russia → Federal Migration Service  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm not sure this is the best target for this redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Illegal immigration to Russia. Doing a history dive, this was the original target, before being retargeted to Federal Migration Service 20 days later by its own creator. As it stands, this seems like the most relevant, widest-shot page on this topic (Because one agency has not been in control of this issue for Russia's entire existence as a country, retargeting to any one of said agencies would be a disservice.)

...Alternately, we COULD Dabify between Immigration to Russia, Illegal immigration to Russia, Federal Migration Service, and Main Directorate for Migration Affairs. There IS a third agency listed as a predecessor to the Federal Migration Service in its article, but that agency doesn't have a page. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The immigration control is not illegal immigration, but the fight against it (among other things), my first choice is therefore keep. If this is a no-go for some reason, then dabify it per Lunamann. --Викидим (talk) 21:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That doesn't explain why Main Directorate for Migration Affairs, the agency that replaced Federal Migration Service, isn't just as valid a target as Federal Migration Service... 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:52, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Retargeting to Main Directorate for Migration Affairs is better indeed. Викидим (talk) 08:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Dabify or retarget? If dabify, anyone want to draft a dab up?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Main Directorate for Migration Affairs _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk page of the suggested targets Illegal immigration to Russia and Main Directorate for Migration Affairs.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Main Directorate for Migration Affairs. No need to dabify: this is a single subject regardless agencies and articles where else it is covered. I added a lazy section "History", from which one can traced down all previous Russian migration control agencies, as well as "See also" about immigration to Russia. - Altenmann >talk 06:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Pepito. (non-admin closure) Toadette^Edit! 18:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Pepitos → Chips Ahoy!  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. Not mentioned at target. Though retargeting to Pepito as a ((R from plural)) also seems viable. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:01, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Pumpkin seed, with ((R from avoided double redirect|Pepita)) and ((R from misspelling)) Restore to original redirect form: #REDIRECT [[Pepita]] ((R from misspelling)). This is an obvious and easy typo for pepita, that could be made by anyone with imperfect memory of the word and uncertain of the linguistic gender of the Spanish name (which is commonly used at least in the southern and western United States for roasted pumpkin/squash seeds, even if not widely used in English more broadly). If I had noticed the strange change to redirect this to a cookie brand for no source-supported reason (and an edit-summary reason that suggests it is a re-branding trademark of that specific product line but used only in a particular Spanish-speaking country, not within the Anglosphere), I would have reverted it.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  06:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC); revised to fix post-merge error. 21:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • One cannot redirect to a redirect. - Altenmann >talk 06:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    This !vote should be interpreted as "redirect to pumpkin seed as ((R from avoided double redirect)) and ((R from misspelling))" then. Nickps (talk) 13:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Oh! Right. I forgot that that the Pepita article (on roasted pumpkin seeds as a food product) got merged into Pumpkin seed.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Dabify There is Pepito name and Pepito (sandwich). If we trust SMcCandlish, we have three distinct pluralizable items. Not to say that victionary says "pepito" used to be a gold nugget. ... Oh and there were Los Pepitos , see José Luis Cabezas and Charlie Rivel; and Pepitos: The Beak Saga in 80th Venice International Film Festival although seem no more. - Altenmann >talk 07:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • P.S. And there are plenty of "Pepitoses" in latin america es:Chips Ahoy!#Como "Pepitos" : it says that its name changes to Pepitos! for Argentina and Uruguay , so this can be added to chips ahoy, and the DAB page is for good. - Altenmann >talk 07:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • There's already a disambiguation page at Pepito. There are very few items on that page that could be pluralized, though, so targeting the nominated page there may not be appropriate. - Eureka Lott 14:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Pepito (I didnt pay attention that Pepito is a DAB page already, no need another one. - Altenmann >talk 19:01, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Pepito as an ((R from plural)). 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Hmm, but hardly anything on that list is subject to pluralization.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Toadette^Edit! 17:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Dale Becker → Wiren Becker  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Couldn't find Wiren Dale Becker referred to with only his middle name, anywhere. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dale Becker for the original article under that title. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Referred to as such here (one of the sources in the article). - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 03:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep (arguably almost should be moved to Dale Becker but that's a distinct discussion). Additional sources that use just the middle name: [3], [4], and [5] (definitely seem to be the same person). Skynxnex (talk) 16:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).