Final: (90/23/4); Closed as successful by Useight at 18:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wifione (talk · contribs) – I have been an editor since April 2009. My contributions are relatively modest, compared to some of the other much respected and outstanding editors active on Wikipedia. There have been some months when I have been able to contribute to my satisfaction; but there have been many more when I have not been able to do so. Although I’ve created a few articles and am an autoreviewer, my contributions with respect to new articles are again modest as most of the 250 odd new articles I’ve created are stubs and I have only two dyks. I feel passionate about contributing on the Help Desk and whenever possible, have tried to my best extent to assist users with respect to their queries. I also contribute on the tool server as an accountcreator. Additionally, apart from gnomish work, I also have a fair exposure to new page patrolling. I’ve nominated articles for speedy deletion and have also tried and saved some from deletion. In my last hundred csd nominations that I counted in my previous 1000 edits, three must have been rejected by administrators. On and off, I report inappropriate user names to UAA too; in the last fifty reports, forty seven or so were blocked. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 17:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
I sincerely do believe Wifione holds promise as an administrator, but I'm not certain about his readiness. I fully admit that my point of view includes unfair bias on my part due to recent memories. Indian Institute of Planning and Management had suffered from an onslaught of sockpuppet whitewashing (see investigation) just before Wifione appeared there as a single-purpose account seemingly intent on including arguably promotional information and challenging every source that reported negative information, to the point where Wifione had to address a conflict of interest earlier this year, partly based on observed edits from suspicious IP addresses on both his[1] and my[2] talk pages. That fairly recent history underlies my personal bias.
However, I also can assume that Wifione has acted in good faith. From that low point I described, I have seen Wifione redeem himself, growing into a productive Wikipedian, spreading out to multiple subjects, making positive contributions, becoming someone I would be pleased to collaborate with on just about any article. I think, if this RfA had appeared six months ago, I'd have opposed it. Six months from now, I'd likely give it my full support. But now, given Wifione's answers to some of the questions above (gotta give points for the poetry, though!), I find myself thinking that a bit more experience is in order, so I am comfortably settled into the "neutral" position. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:01, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]