Involved parties

1. Geni (talk · contribs)
2. UnitedNut (talk · contribs)

Articles involved

• Jodi Huisentruit

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Issues to be mediated

• GENI opted to remove an entire file covering the history of the kidnapping of Iowa television reported Jodi Huisentruit. The profile was updated on December 9th with non-copyrighted information pulled from various public and law-enforcement websites covering the case. GENI contention is the material was copyrighted and instead of removing the areas I edited, opted to remove the entire file from Wikipedia. A search of the source material: findjodi.com and http://www.iowaonline.state.ia.us/mpic/Controller.aspx?cmd=personDetailCommand&id=94 will confirm that none of the material referenced in the updates was in fact copy righted. (It would be one thing if the material was extracted from a book published on the subject, but that is not the case here. The material is actually public knowledge and was used to update the minimal information that was appearing on Wikipedia.

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

1. Agree.

Decision of the Mediation Committee

• Reject: First, this is not a matter for mediation: there are no issues framed for mediation, and there is no evidence of previous attempts to resolve the issue. Second, there has been no notice to the other party. Third, the originator has not signed his agreement.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk) 03:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

• Joel on the SOL (talk · contribs)
• Jeffpw (talk · contribs)
• Dev920 (talk · contribs)

Articles involved

• Civil partnerships in the United Kingdom

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

• WP:RFC link
• WP:AN/I discussion

Issues to be mediated

• User:Joel on the SOL disputes the rating this article has been given, and has removed the rating the article has been given at least three times in 3 hours. User:Dev920 and I feel it should be rated as "B" class and improved, and have stated our reasons on the talk page of the article. Jeffpw 19:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Additional issues to be mediated

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

1. Jeffpw 18:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Agree.[reply]
2. Joel on the SOL 19:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Disagree[reply]
3. Agree. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 18:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.

• Reject: The parties do not agree to mediate.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk) 01:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

• Duke53 (talk · contribs)
• Gwen Gale (talk · contribs)
• Sqrjn (talk · contribs)
• Storm Rider (talk · contribs)
• BRMo (talk · contribs)
• Tinosa (talk · contribs)
• Trödel (talk · contribs)
• Wikizach (talk · contribs)
• Visorstuff (talk · contribs)

Articles involved

• Mountain Meadows massacre
• Talk: Mountain Meadows massacre

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

• Mediation Cabal:[1]

Issues to be mediated

• Whether certain words are POV
• Definition of NPOV

Additional issues to be mediated

• Citing sources

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

1. Agree.Tinosa 15:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Agree. WikieZach| talk 16:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. Agree. Storm Rider ^(talk) 16:34, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4. Agree. BRMo 17:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
5. Don't really consider myself part of the dispute, however, I Agree -Visorstuff 16:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
6. Agree. Sqrjn 23:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
7. Agree. --Trödel 21:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
8. Apparently WikieZach| talk's straw poll is going to be delayed a bit longer. I wanted to see how that went first. Agree Duke53 | ^Talk 20:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

• Reject: All parties did not agree to mediate within the seven day window.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk) 04:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

• ShadowHalo (talk · contribs)
• sony-youth (talk · contribs)

Articles involved

Arose from:

• Image:U2photo.jpg

Most recent:

• Image:Sugar_ray_2001.jpg
• Image:ReelBigFish2006promo.jpg
• Image:Catch_22_-_2.jpg
• Image:Have_a_nice_day_innner_album_picture.jpg
• Image:Bananarama2005.jpg
• Image:LasKetchup06.jpg
• Image:Radiohead grass.jpg
• Image:Ordinary Boys.jpg
• Image:BFS promo.jpg

... and many more.

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Issues to be mediated

• Should ShadowHalo be allowed to place the ((Replaceable fair use)) template on all fair-use images that are of living and currently performing artists?

Additional issues to be mediated

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

1. Agree. --sony-youth^talk 00:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Agree. —ShadowHalo 00:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.

• Reject: While there is agreement from the parties to mediate, this isn't an issue for mediation. Mediation between two parties isn't the right way to resolve an issue that affects thousands of contributors; whether to mass-tag entire categories of images is not something that should be decided between two people, which is the point of mediation. This issue is ripe for an RFC, but not RFM.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk) 00:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

• ShadowHalo (talk · contribs)
• sony-youth (talk · contribs)

Articles involved

Arose from:

• Image:U2photo.jpg

Most recent:

• Image:Sugar_ray_2001.jpg
• Image:ReelBigFish2006promo.jpg
• Image:Catch_22_-_2.jpg
• Image:Have_a_nice_day_innner_album_picture.jpg
• Image:Bananarama2005.jpg
• Image:LasKetchup06.jpg
• Image:Radiohead grass.jpg
• Image:Ordinary Boys.jpg
• Image:BFS promo.jpg

... and many more.

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Issues to be mediated

• Should ShadowHalo be allowed to place the ((Replaceable fair use)) template on all fair-use images that are of living and currently performing artists?

Additional issues to be mediated

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

1. Agree. --sony-youth^talk 00:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Agree. —ShadowHalo 00:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.

• Reject: While there is agreement from the parties to mediate, this isn't an issue for mediation. Mediation between two parties isn't the right way to resolve an issue that affects thousands of contributors; whether to mass-tag entire categories of images is not something that should be decided between two people, which is the point of mediation. This issue is ripe for an RFC, but not RFM.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk) 00:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

• ShadowHalo (talk · contribs)
• sony-youth (talk · contribs)

Articles involved

Arose from:

• Image:U2photo.jpg

Most recent:

• Image:Sugar_ray_2001.jpg
• Image:ReelBigFish2006promo.jpg
• Image:Catch_22_-_2.jpg
• Image:Have_a_nice_day_innner_album_picture.jpg
• Image:Bananarama2005.jpg
• Image:LasKetchup06.jpg
• Image:Radiohead grass.jpg
• Image:Ordinary Boys.jpg
• Image:BFS promo.jpg

... and many more.

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Issues to be mediated

• Should ShadowHalo be allowed to place the ((Replaceable fair use)) template on all fair-use images that are of living and currently performing artists?

Additional issues to be mediated

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

1. Agree. --sony-youth^talk 00:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Agree. —ShadowHalo 00:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.

• Reject: While there is agreement from the parties to mediate, this isn't an issue for mediation. Mediation between two parties isn't the right way to resolve an issue that affects thousands of contributors; whether to mass-tag entire categories of images is not something that should be decided between two people, which is the point of mediation. This issue is ripe for an RFC, but not RFM.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk) 00:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

• ShadowHalo (talk · contribs)
• sony-youth (talk · contribs)

Articles involved

Arose from:

• Image:U2photo.jpg

Most recent:

• Image:Sugar_ray_2001.jpg
• Image:ReelBigFish2006promo.jpg
• Image:Catch_22_-_2.jpg
• Image:Have_a_nice_day_innner_album_picture.jpg
• Image:Bananarama2005.jpg
• Image:LasKetchup06.jpg
• Image:Radiohead grass.jpg
• Image:Ordinary Boys.jpg
• Image:BFS promo.jpg

... and many more.

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Issues to be mediated

• Should ShadowHalo be allowed to place the ((Replaceable fair use)) template on all fair-use images that are of living and currently performing artists?

Additional issues to be mediated

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

1. Agree. --sony-youth^talk 00:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Agree. —ShadowHalo 00:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.

• Reject: While there is agreement from the parties to mediate, this isn't an issue for mediation. Mediation between two parties isn't the right way to resolve an issue that affects thousands of contributors; whether to mass-tag entire categories of images is not something that should be decided between two people, which is the point of mediation. This issue is ripe for an RFC, but not RFM.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk) 00:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

• Canuckster (talk · contribs)
• Sarah Ewart (talk · contribs)

Articles involved

• Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

• WP:RFC link
• WP:AN/I discussion

Issues to be mediated

• Issue 1; This is a serious and urgent matter. Sarah made an unfounded accusation that I have an "anti-american agenda". Even though she named Ottawaman, it is directed towards me since she states chategorically that is who I am and she made the accusation in a section discussing me.[2] That section of the incident noticeboard was soon thereafter archived. In this post 9/11 world such an accusation can be quite harmful to me personally in a variety of ways. I would like her to withdraw that accusation and apologize for it within the archived section.
• Issue 2

Additional issues to be mediated

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

1. Agree.Canuckster
2. Disagree. Sarah Ewart 06:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.

• Reject: Parties do not agree to medaite.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk) 08:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

• Geeman (talk · contribs)
• Good friend100 (talk · contribs)
• ShinjukuXYZ (talk · contribs)
• Goguryeo (talk · contribs)

Articles involved

• Toyotomi Hideyoshi

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

• WP:RFC link
• WP:AN/I discussion

Issues to be mediated

• Characterization of opposition forces in the paragraph describing Toyotomi's failed invasion of China through Korea.

Additional issues to be mediated

• Naming the leader(s) in that opposition force.

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

1. Agree. Geeman 23:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Agree. --ShinjukuXYZ 11:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

Reject - Parties fail to show agreement to mediate.

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]} 00:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

• Jpolivares (talk · contribs)
• Hurmeez (talk · contribs)

Articles involved

• Gigablast

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

• WP:RFC link
• WP:AN/I discussion

Issues to be mediated

• The user Hurmeez continues to post false and malicious information which is purposly damaging to the image of Gigablast, Inc. Clearly this user is a former employee or has some relation to a former employee. This is a place for facts, not a forum for opinion and false information.

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Jpolivares agree
Hurmeez agree

Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.

• Reject: Issue is not a matter for mediation; mediations are attempts to reach a compromise on specific issues. The parties have failed to frame any issues whatsoever, but rather filed a request based on an ad hominem attack.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk) 21:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]