Click 'show' to view an index of all archives
|
Closed mediation cases (accepted requests)
Rejected mediation request pages
|
|
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.
|
Involved parties
Articles involved
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
Issues to be mediated
- The Removed phrase for comprehensible English on the origin section of the article, and the refusing on compromise from a third party's opinion
- The tags issue over the five Göktürk-related articles (qaghans): [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], with a made apologize through reading Template:Unreferenced.
- The trolls about the book, writer, location and publisher questioned by Ghirlandajo (talk · contribs) and me on Göktürks.
- The WP:UNDUE about the NOVA Documentary additions over the controversy section and the subject of WP:OR on the sources being used questioned by Ghirlandajo (talk · contribs).
- The WP:OWN issues over Xiongnu, Ashina, and Göktürks on me
- Making false statement on the ground of printed material extracted from İsenbike Togan's book page 16, and removal.
- Moving to disambiguation page, an issue which had been long ago put out on talk by other editors.
Additional issues to be mediated
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. -- Eiorgiomugini 10:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Decision of the Mediation Committee
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject, parties have not agreed to mediation inside seven days.
- For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 06:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.
|
Involved parties
Articles involved
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted
Issues to be mediated
- The definition of consensus as regards the changes to the Juice Plus article
- How controversial changes are to be made to the Juice Plus article
- How to achieve a balanced article that neither excessively promotes the product, nor excessively denigrates it
- Whether or not to include a section entitled "Adverse effects"
- Whether or not to include lists of all ingredients and nutrients
Additional issues to be mediated
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. --Elonka 01:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree. --TraceyR 07:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree. --Citizen Don 03:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Disagree --Rhode Island Red 00:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Decision of the Mediation Committee
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject, parties do not agree to mediation.
- For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 06:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.
|
Involved parties
Articles involved
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted
Issues to be mediated
- DreamGuy is calling my website spam, when it is clearly related to the subject matter. When I say "I did not add the link to the wiki page" he says "See, you admit to adding the link." which completely contradicts what I wrote.
- This is pop culture topic, so there are no "scholarly articles" on the topic. My site has original research, reviews, interviews, and a podcast about the topic but DreamGuy says is unreliable and insignificant. While it may be insignificant in the the larger scheme it is very significant for the topic. Also, using Wiki's reliable sources methodology, USA Today is the most significant source since it named the Frat Pack. During their 2006 follow-up article, my site was mentioned prominently and I even coauthored a sidebar article with the author of the article. So, my point of view is that this provides enough significance (for this subject matter) for at least a mention.
- DreamGuy mentions removing the entire article, claiming I wrote all of it. While I have done many corrective edits (removing Adam Sandler as a member of the Frat Pack) I have not written extensive sections of the article.
Additional issues to be mediated
- Having DreamGuy understand the difference between me putting a link that's been on the page for over a year vs. adding it for the first time.
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevdo (talk • contribs) 17:02, May 30, 2007Kevin Crossman 05:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Disagree DreamGuy 15:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Decision of the Mediation Committee
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject, parties do not agree to mediation.
- For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 06:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.
|
Involved parties
Articles involved
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted
Issues to be mediated
Additional issues to be mediated
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree IZAK 16:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree --Shirahadasha 17:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree --Rabbeinu 17:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree - [Comment removed.] --ChosidFrumBirth 17:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree [Comment removed.] --Shuliavrumi 18:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Disagree [Comment removed.] --Klezmer 19:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree Itzse 21:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Decision of the Mediation Committee
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject, parties do not agree to mediation.
- For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 06:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.
|
Involved parties
Articles involved
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted
- talk page [[6]]
- talk page of editor [[7]]
- request for third opinion was blanked out by someone [[8]]
Issues to be mediated
- Whether the original CNN citation, which is unbiased, should be replaced with another citation which is critical of Edwards. One editor is agreeable to have both citations but the other editor is opposed to the CNN citation being mentioned at all
- Whether a citation must be entirely about the subject mentioned in the wikipedia article or whether it is acceptable if the citation is about two topics, only one being related to the article and the other about someone else.
Additional issues to be mediated
- At least one party believes the other is not being nice so mediation may help smooth things out.
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. Pipermantolisopa 03:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Decision of the Mediation Committee
Rejected, all parties did not agree within 7 days.
- For the Mediation Committee, ^demon[omg plz]&;;nbsp;12:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.
|
Involved parties
Articles involved
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted
- Example link 1
- Example link 2
Issues to be mediated
- Has Serbia been in war with Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina or not between 1991 - 1995
Additional issues to be mediated
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. Rjecina 22:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Decision of the Mediation Committee
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Request to initiating party: Please provide links to previous attempts of resolving this dispute, in the Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted section.
- For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 07:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reject, parties have not agreed to mediation within seven days, and there has been no evidence provided regarding prior dispute resolution attempts anyways.
- For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 02:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.
|
Involved parties
Articles involved
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted
- Asking for specific citations
Issues to be mediated
- Specific citations needed recognizing disputed titles from governments, royal families or Romanov family members recognizing usage of said disputed titles. No other opinions should be considered.
Additional issues to be mediated
- Vandal Charles relentless removing of citation requests he doesn't agree with.
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree I vonH 02:56, 10 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Decision of the Mediation Committee
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject, no prior discussion on the articles' talk page, or dispute resolution, has been attempted. Please read WP:DR and discuss, or try the Mediation Cabal.
- For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 03:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.
|
Involved parties
Articles involved
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted
- Notice how in the case of the first link the user tried to "resolve" the dispute by asking if I was ignorant? [9] Yeah, that's a really good faith attempt at dispute resolution if I've ever seen one.
- And on the second link the user posted he never even responded to my question, so I don't know how that constitutes dispute resolution in any normal definition of the word? 74.225.36.136 04:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Futhermore, this user has a history of questionable edits [10] and a history of attacking other users [11]. Shame on me for following into his or her trap. 74.225.36.136 05:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Issues to be mediated
- Jeff Bezos is NOT Cuban ethnically or biologically. Being adopted by his mother's second husband does NOT make him Cuban.
- It's not up to you to decide how someone self identifies. Read up on the article of Shania Twain, who though not biologically Ojibwa herself, she identifies herself as an Ojibwa, because it is the tribe of her adopted father. It's not up to you to decide what someone is and what someone is not. Adopted children are just as much children of their parents as biological children are. 74.225.36.136 04:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fantasia Barrino is NOT Cuban due to the fact "a family rumor" says her last name is Cuban. Barrino is of Italian origin, therefore rumor is not sufficient nor confirmable information to validate this claim of Cuban ancestry.
- Really? Barrino is of Italian origin? Do you have any credible evidence to cite that information. The only information I can find on Barrino are that she is African-American and possibly Cuban. African-American is a given, by virtue of being American and of African descent. But unfortunately, as I tried to explain to you earlier in her talk page and you so conveniently decided to ignore it's not as simple for African-Americans to trace their ethnicity. 74.225.36.136 04:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- 74.225.36.136 must not conduct independent research. He must not delete the contributions of others without valid and logical discussion and must not refer to lies of racist behavior.
- I'll address the independent research argument below since you brought it up twice. Lies of racist behavior? I'm not sure I get that. But you instigated all this with your snarky little "comprende" comments. 74.225.36.136 04:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Additional issues to be mediated
- 74.225.36.136 must be informed that he does not own the list
- Where did I say I owned the list? Please provide evidence of that because I would like to see that. 74.225.36.136 04:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- 74.225.36.136 must be made aware that he must cite information that is confirmable and not based on rumors nor independent research
- Really? The information cited is not confirmable? In regards to Fantasia's Cuban lineage, I present an excerpt from her auto-biography from ABC News: [12]. As for Jeff Bezos: [13]. Two articles from reliable sources, how does that constitute independent research?74.225.36.136 04:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Additional Notes
- Why did XLR8TION include the Jeff Bezos article. A simple rundown of that articles history list would show I have never edited that article in my life. That's suspect? 74.225.36.136 04:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. --XLR8TION 03:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree. 74.225.36.136 04:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Decision of the Mediation Committee
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject. All the issues listed above, but especially the behavioural accusations, are not things the Mediation Committee can mediate. They are presented in a way which does not allow for a mediated comprimise. If you wish to refile this case, please wait a week, and also read this and this.
- For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 10:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.
|
Involved parties
Articles involved
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted
Issues to be mediated
- Whether the sentence "The Canadian pianist Louis Lortie has complained that Steinway is trying to establish a monopoly on the concert world by becoming “the Microsoft of pianos.” [22]." should remain in the article.
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. Alexrexpvt 20:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree.THD3 20:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Disagree.KarlKunde 10:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Decision of the Mediation Committee
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject, parties do not agree to mediation.
- For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 10:46, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
|
|
This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.
|
Involved parties
Articles involved
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted
Issues to be mediated
Additional issues to be mediated
- Should the phrase currently on the page, "Along with its archiving at the University of Pittsburgh," be deleted?
- Is the phrase "faculty oversee," which is currently on the page, original research?
- Should the inline external link to Columbia University's Columbia Scholastic Press Association remain as it is?
- Should the reference to the year of inception of Columbia University's Crown Awards remain as it is?
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. --Neigel von Teighen 14:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC) Imaglang is aka Neigel von Teighen, formal advocate before AMA was shut down; now as informal advocate[reply]
- Agree. --0-0-0-Destruct-0 16:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Decision of the Mediation Committee
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.
- Reject, parties have not expressed an agreement to mediation within the seven-day time period.
- For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 11:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]