The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 13:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:King 810 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox only has 3 relevant links. Jax 0677 (talk) 18:27, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - too few useful links.  gongshow  talk  18:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 13:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Marc E. Bassy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox has only 3 relevant links, aside from 2AM Club. Jax 0677 (talk) 18:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Perhaps a navbox will be warranted in the future, but it's too soon at this stage.  gongshow  talk  18:57, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:慕尼黑地铁6号线 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is written in a language other than English and needs translation. O1lI0 (talk) 13:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or userfy unless effort is taken to translate this. Otherwise, its use is unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 15:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or userfy per User:Steel1943 --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Incheon Electro Land Elephants current roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, almost entirely redlinks Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unused template.—Bagumba (talk) 09:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 13:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Inactive bureaucrat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

<10 transclusions, counting subst's. Not likely to be used Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Pretty sure this is used by a bot. Either way, this message is similar to Template:Inactive admin. Steel1943 (talk) 13:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: it'll be used next time there's an inactive bureaucrat. –xeno^talk 15:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Imposter-suspected (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:08, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:TenPoundHammer: Didn't you notice my edit to WP:ATA? KMF (talk) 13:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@KATMAKROFAN: Whatever edit you are referring to was not recent enough. Could you provide a diff please? Steel1943 (talk) 15:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added "Unused template" as an argument to avoid. KMF (talk) 15:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(For those trying to follow what is being referred, apparently, it's at WP:ORPHS. Steel1943 (talk) 20:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]

From what I read there WP:ORPHS is mainly meant to apply to articles and not templates. Also unused templates are listed as a valid reason for deletion under item number 3- as long as the template isn't being used either directly or via substitution. Sakura Cartelet ^Talk 02:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Accounts with such issues would just be reported to a board such as WP:AIV and have appropriate action taken towards it. Also, other tags exist to place in user pages in regards to accounts that are blocked due to editing issues such as this. That, and if the account is not unblocked, they could just remove this tag whenever they want, rendering the tag useless. That, and Wikipedia:Imposter account currently redirects to a section on s pagr referring to sockpuppetry; so, with that rationale, this template is essentially redundant to ((Sockpuppet)). Steel1943 (talk) 15:04, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Isotope lists headings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Entirely unused.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  06:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WikiProject Christian Hardcore (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Entirely unused. The categories it is supposed to place are all nonexistent. WikiProject never got off the ground.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  06:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Di-no source no license-notice. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 13:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Image-origin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Ancient (2004!) and unused warning. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:01, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The template seems redundant to the purpose of Template:Di-no source no license-notice. Steel1943 (talk) 05:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes, but terser. No longer in use: Archive or delete. 2601:184:4980:7564:7DEB:5DDF:E5B7:DED8 (talk) 11:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to the template that Steel1943 mentioned. While isn't (likely) needed to have both templates, this could be a useful redirect. Sakura Cartelet ^Talk 02:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Idol Nacije (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

barely any links, notnotable Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Idiophones (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, no links Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No links to the template or no links within the template? Hyacinth (talk) 04:57, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All links to the template from the "Template:" namespace stem from pages with titles ending in "/doc". Steel1943 (talk) 05:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean no transclusions? Hyacinth (talk) 19:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, I meant links. But, the template does also have no transclusions. Steel1943 (talk) 01:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why do links to a category affect whether the category should be deleted or kept when it is intended for transclusion? Hyacinth (talk) 19:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I never made a claim to anything you just asked, and have no opinion either way. Steel1943 (talk) 20:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ICReference (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unclear use Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: This template is intended to be substituted; thus, there are no transclusions. Steel1943 (talk) 05:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Horbar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Just type ― if you need it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It could substitute itself every time it was transcluded and be a quick substitute (which would mean there would be no links to it). Or every time a Wikipedian needs to type a horbar you could pick me up and we could go over to their place and show them which key on their keyboard is &#x2015;. Hyacinth (talk) 19:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC) Hyacinth (talk) 19:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It can't be used right now: ((horbar)). Hyacinth (talk) 19:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete as pointless. Easy to type — on my keyboard (option-shift-hyphen). I imagine few editors have problems doing so, given how often it is used in articles. It e.g. is available from the edittools, or you can just copy and paste it from somewhere. This is one of a number of little used templates created by this editor, who is now blocked so who we can’t ask about it, but I suspect they were imported from another wiki, where they are perhaps preferred. Here though there seems no need for it.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 19:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 13:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Holidays of Mauritius (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

None of these are exclusive to Mauritius, template unused, etc. etc. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:28, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• template is not used used, etc. etc. Frietjes (talk) 16:21, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Holiday. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 13:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Holiday abroad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, no reason to have this since it's exactly the same as ((holiday)) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This template contains more customizable parameters than Template:Holiday. If "keep" is not preferred, then weak merge into Template:Holiday. Steel1943 (talk) 05:57, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge or move to my userspace. I don't think "unused" applies to these types of templates, that are meant to be temporary. It's definitely not the same as ((holiday)). You can try to put it together using ((holiday)), and even if you manage to make it look and function the same, it's going to require so much coding that no one is going to remember what parameters to use, etc. That's the whole point of having a separate template. Think of it as a shorthand. Why is that wrong? I shouldn't have to remember all that code to get it to look like I want. Is there another reason why it should be deleted? Our we running out of disk space? All I know is that I use it, and I thought others might too (and they have). This template has been disputed before, including attempts to make it use ((holiday)) at the expense of breaking the intended functionality. Clearly the template-space folks don't like it, and that's OK. I'm not throwing a fit, I promise, I just don't understand the concern. I'm OK with moving it to my userspace, where I will continue to use it, and others are welcome to continue using it there, too — MusikAnimal ^talk 15:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @MusikAnimal: Per the instructions, the only thing I see needing a major change is assigning "Country name" a named parameter. The rest of the merging seems rather straight forward. Steel1943 (talk) 15:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • If I can use ((holiday)) in the same way and just have to add |country=, I'd be content. I kind of like having the taller version with "consequently they may not respond swiftly..." on a separate line, but no biggie. ((User:MusikAnimal/ is more typing and is what I would have to do if it were in my userspace =P — MusikAnimal ^talk 15:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Obvious merge. Identical template with extra features = add the features to the original template (unless they're stupid features :-)  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  05:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:HistoryOfTN (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Historic G20 Leaders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 13:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Hindu_society (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:HeroRussia1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:HeroRussia2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unclear use. Just hardcodes a quote. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Userify. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 13:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:HDPhoto (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• If the template's creator desires to retain the template, userfy. (The template's creator edited a few hours ago.) Otherwise, delete. Steel1943 (talk) 05:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• In that case userfy. I forgot I even did this. I've needed a way to advise people on photos if somehow their question is unanswered, and I find myself looking for a solution in a recent response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 8. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 13:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Group_intelligence (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Grand Masters of the Order of the British Empire (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, fails WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Go-Busters editnotice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unclear use Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:08, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This was probably intended to be used for something relating to Ghostbusters, but since thebtemplate has no transclusions and the template's creator was indefinitely blocked four days after the template's creation (Was there consensus to create such a template?), we may never know. Steel1943 (talk) 15:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:HéctorCamachoRecord (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and massive Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Apparently, at some point in the past, this template was probably substituted in its only applicable page/article, Héctor Camacho. Keeping the chart saved in a separate template page is no longer necessary. Steel1943 (talk) 05:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).