The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Campaign Fundraising (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Template is used, but NPASR if other rationale is given Primefac (talk) 00:40, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cabinet of President Ulysses S. Grant (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TenPoundHammer: -- "Unused"? This template is being used in the Ulysses S. Grant article, in the Cabinet section. As of now, it is also used in the Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant article in the Cabinet and replacements section. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 00:56, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• TenPoundHammer explain how this is unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the template in question has for some time been and continues to be used in the Bibliography of Ulysses S. Grant article. Apparently an honest oversight. Since being "unused" was the only basis for the proposed deletion I went ahead and removed the tag from the template. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 19:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:40, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Contemporary writers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Conic sections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• The template was discussed at WP MATH in 2012: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive/2012/Mar#Conic sections template. – Uanfala 19:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 15. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Collective_entity (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Coalyard Miniature Railway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, no navigational purpose Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:43, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Coia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used once, overly bitey, there are better templates that say the same thing Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, not widely used. Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:43, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Climate change 1RR editnotice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, related to Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Climate_change_probation which is long defunct Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 16. Primefac (talk) 00:52, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Clist_trust_care (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Climate Sanction enforcement request (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, reltaed to long defunct Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Climate_change_probation Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 02:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cleanup image accessibility (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to ((Cleanup image)) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• It's a more specific wrapper, explaining a certain reason and providing a link to learn about the problem and solution. We have a whole bunch of Category:Image quality templates for specific types of cleanup concerns. DMacks (talk) 09:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow Keep. Template-space is not Hammer's userspace. KMF (talk) 03:59, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cite London Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Overly specific citation template Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 16. Primefac (talk) 02:08, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cinema_of_Mali (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:CanadianFrench (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, contains too few links Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Campaign Silesian Uprisings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, only navigates between sections of one article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Box-US (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, unclear use Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Quite frankly, I do not remember what this template was intended for. Yours aye,  Buaidh  16:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 18:51, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Boeing 737 MAX orders and deliveries (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Used at Boeing 737 MAX and List of Boeing 737 MAX orders and deliveries. SempreVolando (talk) 23:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: This template is used the two articles listed above. The Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates/1 that lists this template is 4 months old. --Finlayson (talk) 16:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• TenPoundHammer explain how this is unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bassbaba Sumon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, fails WP:NENAN. None of his solo work has an article Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no navigational benefit. Jellyman (talk) 13:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 15. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 18:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:BanatJosephinischeLandaufnahme,1769-72 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Baoruco Province (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, almost all redlinks anyway Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Baltic states busiest airports (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and outdated, would only have a single use anyway Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:48, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bahama Islands (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:48, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:BSC Glasgow F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, fails WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, lacks useful links and not currently any potential to expand. Jellyman (talk) 13:56, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 16. Primefac (talk) 02:08, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Obama_confirmations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Translated page. Primefac (talk) 02:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Eowp based (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unlikely to be used Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:59, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Template:Translated page since similar titles currently redirect there as well. Steel1943 (talk) 22:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 16. Primefac (talk) 02:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Olivet_Comets_men's_basketball_coach_navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. This is leaning more towards keep because the original nomination reason is no longer valid, but valid arguments for deletion were presented. NPASR if those (or other) reasons are given instead. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Grasshopper Manufacture (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:43, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Not sure what happened here, but it's no longer unused. This is a standard company navbox connecting the company's products. It has some overlap with ((No More Heroes)) and ((Suda51)) but I suggest that those be wrapped into this one. The Suda51 navbox (the company's director) goes against WP:PERFNAV and WP:FILMNAV as it connects anything he worked on rather than, say, ((Shigeru Miyamoto)), which outlines only his works both directed and designed. (Suda51's navbox similarly could be repurposed into "works directed by him", if that suits the navbox rules.) No More Heroes is a small series that could also fit within a section of the company's navbox. (not watching, please ((ping))) czar 18:23, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• I would say:
  1. Delete ((Grasshopper Manufacture)); there's no encyclopedic purpose in navigating between articles on works in a by publisher manner. Imagine if we tried to do that with, say, Universal Pictures or Oxford University Press. Even from a company navbox perspective, we do not list every product ever made by the company (see, e.g., ((Microsoft)), though that's bloated in other ways, e.g. the entire "Acquisitions" subtable should probably be axed).
  2. Restrain ((Suda51)) to works for which he's the primary creator, per our normal author/artist/producer navbox practices.
  3. Leave ((No More Heroes)) as-is; it's a normal franchise navbox.

 — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  22:22, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The publisher is the main connection between these articles. Meanwhile our navbox precedent specifically recommends not creating navboxes for any arbitrary works to which a person (film director/performer, for instance) contributed. Some of the articles don't even mention Suda51 once, but they do mention the company, as they are affiliated with its brand. Even if you view Suda51 as an auteur, the low bar of "any game on which he worked" is not suitable for navbox navigation. The Miyamoto example above is different in that it's works designed and directed by the individual, not every game he's every touched. As for the "by publisher" claim, we don't do such navboxes for large companies like Nintendo or Sega, to match against your Universal Pictures example, but we do it for every other small- or medium-size publisher, such as this one. czar 15:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - This is a standard VG company navbox, currently in use. Smaller companies list all of the games, bigger companies tend to list franchises. If that's not desirable, that is a broader discussion. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 22:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Martin Schulz series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, mostly links to various sections of the same article or to unrelated articles. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 17. Primefac (talk) 12:19, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Map-intro (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 02:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Massachusetts Rivers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Huge honking template, better suited for category Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• There are a lot of this kind of template; ((Rivers of New Hampshire)) (even bigger), ((Rivers of Florida)), ((Rivers of Georgia (U.S. state))), and similar, but, less huge templates like ((Rivers of Georgia)), ((Rivers of Victoria (Australia))), ((Rivers of Japan)), ((Rivers of Ireland)) (basically any nation or state) and many, many, more. Mr rnddude (talk) 07:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Monarchs of Italy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, massive and better suited for category Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 18:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Music venues of Minnesota (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• keep, part of a series of templates. Frietjes (talk) 15:20, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 02:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Flavor of Love (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Cast templates are not allowed. Take away the cast and you fail WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:41, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• keep, seems fine to me. Frietjes (talk) 16:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep, but remove cast; the 11 remaining links seem sufficient, but I might be persuadable otherwise.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  21:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 17. Primefac (talk) 12:19, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Genderspivak (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 18:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:GeoWhen (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused EL template Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a useful template, I just forgot to make use of it after creating it. I've now started to use it in articles. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 16:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete and redirect to Template:Help desk. Primefac (talk) 12:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Helpdesk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and overly terse warning Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Template:Help desk. However, with that being said, since the two templates are not alike, I guess my vote is more of a "delete then create redirect to Template:Help desk". Steel1943 (talk) 21:48, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 18:40, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Group intelligence (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, parent article was renamed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The "parent article" was not renamed; the article was blanked and redirected. I cannot find a discussion forming consensus for the blanking and redirecting. Either way, worse case scenario, this template should be renamed to match the current name of its "parent page's" target. Also, this template has 2 transclusions in the article namespace. Steel1943 (talk) 05:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Hinduism. Primefac (talk) 12:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Hindu society (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unclear use Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Template:Hinduism. Merge any missing info if necessary. Steel1943 (talk) 05:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with ((Hinduism)). Nihlus 18:35, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Insignia-Sweden (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, overly specific Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 17. Primefac (talk) 12:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:International_Humanist_and_Ethical_Union (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:International Herald Tribune (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, site no longer exists Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:REFUND applies iff the task gets back up and running. Primefac (talk) 12:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Intitle-inline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

"Temporary" template from 2015, purpose likely served by now. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Del: Two years is enough time to have gotten the work done, and if it hasn't been this template hasn't helped get it done.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  04:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: It is waiting onT123093 (TStarling). It is an important artifact of a minor cosmetic, but major philosophical problem: WP:SELF. Even now, thousands of violations of WP:SELF exist, and are growing. To help, or to get understanding, perhaps start at template talk: in title. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpiral (talk • contribs) 18:33, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: not convinced by the keep rationale whatsoever. If there are problems, fix the problems, don't hack around them. --Izno (talk) 16:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:International Socialist Tendency (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Ituri (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:45, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:27, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Jared Leto (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, not enough links to warrant. Last discussion relisted several times and failed to reach consensus. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:00, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Too little to navigate between. I don't think all of the navigations targets themselves (especially VyRT) should have this navbox on them, so that's a contraindication right there.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  04:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• keep, Jared Leto filmography and List of awards and nominations received by Jared Leto are not in any other navboxes. Frietjes (talk) 14:50, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:PERFNAV. It also works as a duplicate of Template:Thirty Seconds to Mars.--Earthh (talk) 15:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Jelly Belly riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. No opposition. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 01:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Jeremy Sims (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN, too few links Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:11, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Jersey deputies election, 2005 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, can just be subst'd if needed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Number 57 08:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:25, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:La Dusseldorf (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant to ((Klaus Dinger)) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 17. Primefac (talk) 12:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Lego_films (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Latinenglish (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Light tactical vehicles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unclear inclusion criteria, unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:12, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Line of rulers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, just use a basic succession template if needed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:List of X-Men film series releases (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, just subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Location of California Capital (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, not a good navigational tool Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was procedural keep. Page is in use, therefore deletion rationale is invalid. No other comments on the TFD. Primefac (talk) 00:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Magilla Gorilla (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:00, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Major West Indian Cities (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused map Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Manhattan West (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Loosely connected topics at best. Links are either red, nonexistant, or unrelated. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Man v. Food (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:56, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. No opposition. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 01:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:MastiBarnstar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Barnstars are usually substituted, which would explain the lack of transclusions. However, when would this barnstar be used and/or awarded? Steel1943 (talk) 14:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Mecheng (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, apparently incomplete Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:00, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Meetup-Orissa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused meetup template Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:MiaArtwork (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Minor Candidates (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Miss México (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, subjects are not related and fails WP:NENAN anyway. Each individual show listed here has its own template. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Montenegro city (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Template is not actually in use, but WP:REFUND applies should there be a need for it. Primefac (talk) 00:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Montevideo Radio (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN, unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

'Keep' as it's not unused, Wikipedia just doesn't have enough information about Montevideo radio yet!Stereorock (talk) 14:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Mosques in Belgium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mosques in Jordan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mosques in Libya (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mosques in Nigeria (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mosques in Oman (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mosques in Serbia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mosques in South Africa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN, have only one or two links. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:08, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Mosques in the United States (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Massive template, better suited for category Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:08, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Most intense Category 4 Atlantic hurricanes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 16. Primefac (talk) 01:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Multimeet (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. NPASR Primefac (talk) 01:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Music venues in the United Kingdom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Overly large, better suited for category Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - the relevant guidelines tell us that categories, navigation templates, and list class articles are "not inappropriately duplicative" but instead that they complement one another. Their use is not dependent on determining a "best suited" format but rather to use each appropriately. This template does not contravene the guidelines in any way.--John Cline (talk) 11:37, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 18:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Music venues of Minnesota (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• keep, part of a series of templates. Frietjes (talk) 15:20, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NCBI taxonomy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, overly specific Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:24, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NFaudiooveruse (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:National Symbols of the United Arab Emirates (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:34, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:National Symbols of Algeria (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:34, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Need Vietnamese (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, not in proper format Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:35, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 16. Primefac (talk) 01:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Newtown_Jets_squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Noise Unit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, fails WP:NENAN as none of the members is unique to this band Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. NPASR if other reasons are given Primefac (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Norden (East Frisia) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, now that most of the red links have been fixed. --Bermicourt (talk) 18:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Bermicourt has implemented it where appropriate. Nihlus 18:24, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Template remains unused, but the link now works. NPASR in say, a month?, to allow for usage to occur. Primefac (talk) 01:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Norwegian Media Authority (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, site appears to be dead Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Site is not dead, just moved: Example. https://www.medietilsynet.no/filmdatabasen/20297?q=Wolf%20Creek. I've updated the template and the description. Nsaa (talk) 16:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ALeagueVenue NSO (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unlikely to be used template. It has not been edited since 2014 and it has no links as seen at [1]. Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Ayasrah family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, doesn't contain a lot of links Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 12:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for the same reason. Historyfeelings (talk) 13:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 16. Primefac (talk) 01:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Drishyam_character_map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was procedural close. Evidence has been presented to show that the template has, at some point, been used. NPASR provided a new rationale is given. Primefac (talk) 01:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Authorship claims (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural keep. No valid rationale for deletion: template is subst-only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uanfala (talk • contribs) 09:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Even checking for substs, I found no uses of it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 12:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • How did you check for substitions? I see it's been used for example on User talk:Anwaar gilani#Authorship claims, User talk:Clecli#Authorship claims and User talk:Lalri#Authorship claims. – Uanfala 13:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Austrian economics enforcement (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Enforcement dates back to 2013 and is no longer valid Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Template has been added to articles where appropriate. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 18:12, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:American Revolution sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• @TenPoundHammer: I initially agreed with you but I don't understand WHY this template isn't used. I think this is a case where the best approach is to add it to the pages, not delete it. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• @TenPoundHammer: I forgot I had worked on this template and do not know why I never applied it to any pages. If someone would like to do this that would be great.   Spartan7W §   15:10, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• @TenPoundHammer: Agree with the above. This template should be used more often, not deleted. Vyselink (talk) 00:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 18:17, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:AfDh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. No reason to put a discussion "on hold"; just close it or let it relist. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Of course it would appear unused: it's meant to be used only temporarily until a discussion is closed. For long and difficult discussions it's customary for a closing admin to put them on hold while they're deliberating on the close so that a) it's clear no further participation is needed; but more importantly 2) another editos doesn't attempt to close it in the meantime. – Uanfala 09:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Unused" is not a proper argument. KMF (talk) 03:56, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, KMF, "unused" gets used as a sole rationale for deletion way too often. It takes a prominence place in User:Uanfala/Arguments to watch out for in TfD discussions, a little draft essay I started but which never got finished. – Uanfala 09:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Creating an indefinite number of future templates is unnecessary. This can be recreated or undeleted when the 18/19 season is actually being played. Primefac (talk) 00:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2018–19 NFL playoffs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, WP:CRYSTAL Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, as this will be used for next season and wll be implemented on that year's playoffs article. Z.I. Barbour (talk) 16:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Can be created when it will be used. By the logic of "it will be implemented" we can theoretically create one for the next fifty years. Nihlus 18:14, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. There exists a Commons version of this template, which implies it does have use, if only temporarily on the en-wiki to alert the editors transferring to Commons that it should be tagged as such. Unless a consensus can be demonstrated that we shouldn't be tagging images-to-be-copied with this template, a renomination would likely be viewed as asking the other parent. Primefac (talk) 02:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:De minimis (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, overly specific Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; looks like a test page that went undetected for so long. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:09, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It only "looked like a test page" because the TfD template broke the display. This template is to be used as analogous to commons:Template:De minimis for marking images with "de minimis" assets (non-free elements that are too minor to constitute a copyright violation but should be noted nevertheless). If it's unused, it's because images that use it tend to be transferred to Commons. Without the template, it would be harder to prep images for transfer to Commons. czar 21:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The inclusion of a work in another work only qualifies for de minimis if the inclusion is unimportant for the actual use of the included work. This template refers to the included work and this template wouldn't have appeared on the file information page if it weren't for the fact that the work had been included on the file information page, so the included work suddenly becomes an important part of the use of the picture on the file information page and therefore no longer qualifies for de minimis on the file information page (although it may still qualify for de minimis on other pages using the picture). In other words, if you put this template on a file information page, you turn the file information page into a copyright violation, although the copyright violation can be fixed by retracting the template. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Noting the de minimis element does not somehow make its usage not de minimis... nevertheless turn the image into a copyright violation (because the "violation" is de minimis and not a violation.) This is the exact same template used on Commons, and its notice is a courtesy for visitors who reuse a free use image with non-free elements. czar 18:26, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The incorporated work is only de minimis if removal of the incorporated work wouldn't affect how the image is presented. If the incorporated work were to be redacted from the image, then someone would argue that the template should be removed from the file information page. Therefore, the inclusion of this template on a file information page is dependent on the incorporated work being there, so the use of the incorporated work on the file information page can't be de minimis as long as the template is present on the file information page. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:19, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My point remains. The "de minimis" element can exist in the work, not affect its overall presentation, and still be useful to recognize in the info section for purposes of reuse or those unfamiliar with how de minimis works, as it's done across Commons. czar 16:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. If the included work affects the text accompanying the image, then the included work isn't de minimis with respect to that use of the image. The included work might be de minimis when the image is used in a different context, though. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Virgin America airplane interior.jpg is a standard usage of the template, only implemented at Commons and not at enwp. (Having the template at enwp helps for importing to Commons.) If you're implying that the template should be removed from Commons as well, you're going to have to link some support for that position, as I don't see where commons:Commons:De minimis supports your interpretation. czar 03:54, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to that page, It may be relevant how the image is described or classified: it will be difficult to argue de minimis if the photograph is described as illustrating "an advertising poster" and is placed within the category Advertising posters. And that's exactly the problem here: if the non-free work affects the text accompanying the image, then the non-free work doesn't constitute an unimportant part of the image. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:51, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).