The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 28. Primefac (talk) 15:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Municipalities_in_Tyrol (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted by @Fastily - log entry. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Manila Bulletin Publishing Corporation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly plaintext, not links. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Unused. Category:Manila Bulletin is sufficient. Nigej (talk) 07:17, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:37, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Medellín Radio (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox that is almost entirely WP:REDLINKS. WP:EXISTING is thus violated. No changes since 2016. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I've tried cleaning this up and then noticed that all or most of the links are just ((Colombian Radio)). This template (and any that use this style) is bad as it duplicates links, links to non radio articles and to non-Medellin or even Colombian stations, or articles that don't mention Medellin at all. --Gonnym (talk) 08:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Per above. Nigej (talk) 08:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted by @Fastily - log entry. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Minnesota NCAA Division I college baseball venue navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox linking loosely connected items. WP:NENAN Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment WP:ANOEP holds just as much validity as WP:NENAN. Delete as Minnesota has ONE D-I program and the articles are part of the venues section of Template:Minnesota Golden Gophers baseball navbox.No prejudice for recreation IF Minnesota one day has a sufficient number of D-I programs with pages for their baseball teams-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 19:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted by @Fastily - log entry. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Miss Russia winners in the Big Four pageants (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. WP:NENAN Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:58, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Moldovan Footballer of the Year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox that links people with 1 common characteristic. WP:NENAN Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 15:32, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - no longer unused (I've added it to the articles, and the parent article) and is of a fairly common type found in football (see e.g. ((Premier League Player of the Season))). GiantSnowman 15:36, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Zackmann08, some articles were added by GiantSnowman Hhkohh (talk) 16:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @GiantSnowman and Hhkohh: I have struck the unused part of the nomination, but I still feel that this is WP:NAVBOXCREEP. You have to ask, if you are looking at the page for Serghei Rogaciov, how likely are you to want to jump over to Ion Testemițanu just because they won the same award... In my opinion, not likely... For that reason I'm not going to withdraw the nomination, but do appreciate the update that it is now in use! --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Zackmann08, so I did not !vote keep and not ask you to withdraw in this TfD. But I want to wait until other editors (apart from you or GS) commented it. Yes, too many navboxs will cause pages error and disruptive. Also, this kind of navboxs are not very standard. But since the navbox can connect these articles. I cannot vote !keep or !delete for now Hhkohh (talk) 11:02, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

      Hhkohh, sounds good! My only point was that I'm not going to withdraw this TFD as I have with others. I think this one warrants a discussion. :-) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I actually think that it is likely that a reader might want to look at another player who won the same award, and is actually quite standard for awards like this. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 20:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Now in use. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Moose Jaw Radio (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox linking radio stations in small area. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:54, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've remedied the lack of articles using the template. I forgot to add it to the pages when i made the template way back when... RingtailedFox • Talk • Contribs 04:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted by @Fastily - log entry. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Morocco Alaouite Kings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Seems to have been superseded by ((Rulers of Morocco)). Nigej (talk) 08:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:09, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:MissUSAs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox that is redundant to multiple, in use templates. ((MissUSAs 1980–1999)), ((MissUSAs 2000–2019)), ((Miss USA)) etc. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Reuse - Overkill. Nigej (talk) 08:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I'd be inclined to delete the others and redirect to this one. No need to arbitrarily split, when a single template would be preferable and offers superior navigation. --woodensuperman 08:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I agree. Better than 4 separate ones. What we don't need are 2 parallel lists. Nigej (talk) 09:31, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Nigej, Woodensuperman that seems more than reasonable to me. If you both deem it appropriate, go ahead and make that change and then I will withdraw the TFD. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Done 2000 to date to see if anyone complains. Nigej (talk) 18:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Changed all the articles to use MissUSAs. The template itself now needs changing. Nigej (talk) 08:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • • Have redirected all to main template. --woodensuperman 09:21, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and use - delete others and not keep redirects, as the titles are very different than the end result - as in, ((MissUSAs 1952-1959)) will not result in a list of only those winners appearing (WP:SURPRISE). --Gonnym (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 5. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 03:47, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Mosques_in_Lebanon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Mosques in Ireland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with only 4 links. WP:NENAN Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Mosques in Mali (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with only 4 links. WP:NENAN Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. No longer unused, no longer violates WP:EXISTING. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 03:46, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Mosques in South Korea (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox that violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I've removed the red links, added blue links, and transcluded the template from all articles it links to. Granted, three entries plus the title topic is not very much. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:00, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as useful and now used. – Uanfala (talk) 03:06, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Most networked ICT countries (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox that links directly to countries, not to a subpage related to this topic. WP:NENAN Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Unused, more than 10 years out of date, not well refined main article. Nigej (talk) 08:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Multiple BHCC champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox that links people with very loose relationship. WP:NENAN Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - unused and a decade out of date. Perhaps surplus to ((British Hill Climb Champions)). Would be better added as content in British Hill Climb Championship. Nigej (talk) 09:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Munich U-Bahn navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox that simply collates a collation of other navboxes into one. ((Munich U-Bahn U1 navbox)), ((Munich U-Bahn U2 navbox)), etc... These are each implemented on the necessary pages. Putting them all in one template is just too much, plus it isn't used. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Music venues in the United Kingdom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

First and foremost an unused navbox. Secondly though this template is a disaster. NO offense meant towards anyone... The template is just very confusing. If it were to be used, it would really need to be blown up and started from scratch Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:42, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Agreed. An unnavigable jumble. --woodensuperman 09:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Woodensuperman, I appreciate your attempt to clean it up... I see that even after trying to clean it up you reached the same conclusion. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's better now, but I still don't think it's that useful. Best left for categories I think. --woodensuperman 09:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:University of Pretoria F.C. squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox with 25 plaintext names, (not links, not redlinks, just plaintext). The only name linked is the manager. This violates WP:EXISTING. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - does not navigate to anything. --Gonnym (talk) 08:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - another example of where we're trying to maintain a current squad for a relatively minor team. Nigej (talk) 09:26, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 15:32, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per nom, serves no purpose. GiantSnowman 15:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per above Hhkohh (talk) 16:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PTN in Indonesia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is just a link to a single article. Doesn't meet WP:TG. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:25, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Nagoya Municipal Subway Kamiiida Line・Meitetsu Komaki Line. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 01:35, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Nagoya Municipal Subway Kamiiida Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with only 3 links. WP:NENAN Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Template:Nagoya Municipal Subway Kamiiida Line・Meitetsu Komaki Line in which it is included. Thryduulf (talk) 13:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:National Super League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly redlinks and plaintext. WP:EXISTING. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 15:32, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - these kind of league/competition navboxes can be notable, but I don't think we need this one. GiantSnowman 15:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:North Jersey (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. There are are already navboxes in widespread use for each of the counties of New Jersey. No need to this as well. WP:NENAN. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:52, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:North Wiltshire (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Green Bay Packers Draft template list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is used in nemerous navboxes that appear on articles. This links not to the individual articles, but to the templates. This is cross namespace linking that is not done in articles. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. I want to also add that there are more such templates at Category:National Football League draft footer templates. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This template is not displayed when the navboxes that utilize it are deployed on a page (example), and any back end navigational function it may be performing is merely duplicating the already existant category structure at Category:Green Bay Packers draft navigational boxes. I agree with Sabbatino that this should be a bundled nomination of everything in Category:National Football League draft footer templates, as all of those templates are equally non-useful. Ejgreen77 (talk) 18:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator's rationale. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I have no idea why anybody thought this would be a good idea in the first place. Obviously belongs in a category-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 16:18, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Trinity (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Covered both by ((Christian theology)) and ((Christianity footer)) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:49, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Non-Aligned Movement chairpersons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox linking people who held the same position. WP:NENAN Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:47, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per nom. Only loosely connected by being "chairpersons" in some undefined way. Nigej (talk) 19:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 28. Primefac (talk) 15:05, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:KSH_code (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Nipple anatomy and disorders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Niagara River Lions current roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox template. The current roster is listed on the parent page using ((Basketball roster header)) etc. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:New state and territory proposals Australia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:New Zealand national football team results (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with only 1 valid link. WP:EXISTING violated. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 15:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 15:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Even the one link (for 2010) redirects to New Zealand national football team results. Nigej (talk) 16:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• delete unnecessary Hhkohh (talk) 16:50, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Template has little to no use. 111.68.115.165 (talk) 05:14, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 28. Primefac (talk) 14:44, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Nemzeti_Bajnokság_I_(women's_handball)_teamlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Nehru - Feroze Gandhi family (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with many redlinks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:29, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Neoromance games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Unused. No obvious content telling what us a neo-romance game is. Nigej (talk) 16:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:New Orleans District 13 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused navbox with only redlinks and no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:New Orleans District 11 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with only redlinks. No clear parent article. Possibly Eastern New Orleans but New Orleans East District (which is the navbox title) does not exist. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:New Orleans District 10 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with only 1 link. Parent article (Village de L'Est, New Orleans) is a redirect. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:26, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Module:WLink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This module has two seperate usecases.

1. The use of the ansiPercent function to encode URLs. This should be moved to Module:String as it is a string-formatting function, not one having to do with wikilinks
2. The use of the rest module as a former dependency of Module:Format TemplateData (originally called Module:TemplateData): see #Module:Format TemplateData dependencies above

((3x|p))ery (talk) 15:54, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See one above.

• The Module:Format TemplateData used here is of 2017 and lacks a lot of recent functionality.
• As soon as upgraded to a current version (e.g. to show intermediate headlines on a very long parameter list, which is scrollable as well, navigating to headlines from TOC), all these dependencies will be required again.
• You won't be able to rewrite each new release of Module:TemplateData and insert other function calls again and again.
• Therefore, opposing as in 2018.

Regards --PerfektesChaos (talk) 21:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Module:Multilingual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Module:Text (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previous TfDs for this template: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 May 29 § Module:TemplateData dependencies – no consensus

Imported as dependencies of Module:Format TemplateData (then called Module:TemplateData), which has been rewritten by me to no longer need them, so these modules are now unnecessary. ((3x|p))ery (talk) 16:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• See Module talk:Format TemplateData. ((3x|p))ery (talk) 16:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @PerfektesChaos: (this was an import request from dewiki). — xaosflux ^Talk 16:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Strange that they weren't pinged in the previous nomination but are now. ((3x|p))ery (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Please note that de:Module:TemplateData does many, many, many things more which you definitely don't have rewritten.
• See doc for the full picture, which has been rewritten here only with a very poor and small piece of available functionality.
• Wrt “Multilingual” issues please see Test case or an internationalized global template on Bihari Wikpedia with Italian description, or Dutch, depending on current user language, or the similar thing in German Wikipedia but with English description.
• Naturally I am opposing, since that is cutting down internationalized templates.
• Note that you are using an 2017 fork of de:Module:TemplateData which lacks a lot of recent features, while the “rewritten” things are left at 2017 functionality and do not support newer developments.

Best, --PerfektesChaos (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Patriarchates. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:11, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Pentarchy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Patriarchates (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Pentarchy with Template:Patriarchates.
Redundancy. All information provided by Template:Pentarchy is/should already be covered by Template:Patriarchates. PPEMES (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I agree that "Patriarchates" covers "Pentarchy". The first is very comprehensive and not really that easy to navigate. You have to spend time researching it! "Pentarchy" addresses a considerable smaller scope, is differently named (!), requires almost no study. It is a simple navigational template, classically named. "Patriarchates" is not a classical name, though it may be accurate for that template. Pentarchy meets a simpler need IMO. I would Keep Pentarchy. Student7 (talk) 16:20, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge - ((Patriarchates)) is used in 2 articles, ((Pentarchy)) in 27 or so. Seems crazy to have 2 templates. Patriarchates seems easy enough to use, the 5 patriarchates being given prominence. Nigej (talk) 17:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge if Pentarchy can be redirected here. It's a classic term, used within the Patriarchates template. (Changed my mind. See above) Student7 (talk) 20:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:MunicipalityNavigationBar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No need for this as Navbox can be used instead. WOSlinker (talk) 13:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox does not do what I wanted, so it is needed. Which policy arguments do you bring forward to support your proposal? Narwaro (talk) 14:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, not needed, navbox will do the same thing with the proper options set. Frietjes (talk) 15:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per above. Unused after 10 months. Nigej (talk) 16:15, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:The Young and the Restless. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:12, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:The Young and the Restless characters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:The Young and the Restless (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:The Young and the Restless characters with Template:The Young and the Restless.
Cast, characters and families lists are mentioned at both. Only the "related articles" section from ((The Young and the Restless)) is unique to that one, and could easily be added to ((The Young and the Restless characters)) to create a single navbox. Should be combined at the shorter title ((The Young and the Restless)) though. --woodensuperman 13:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nom. --Gonnym (talk) 17:39, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. No strong support, and the sole voice of opposition makes some valid points about how the two templates operate and how that could affect a merger. NPASR if these concerns are addressed/met. Primefac (talk) 23:22, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Display (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Show by date (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Display with Template:Show by date.
No need to have two separate templates for the purpose of showing text at specific times. Given that the template is used in MediaWiki:Watchlist-messages and therefore a TfD notice would show up on everyone's watchlist, I have noincluded the TfD tag. ((3x|p))ery (talk) 00:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Except Template:Display is not intended to be substituted? As indicated by its use in the watchlist notice? :) --Izno (talk) 00:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, meant Template:Show by date. (And, to reply to the edit summary, I decided the TfD tag should be noincluded shortly after starting the discussion) ((3x|p))ery (talk) 00:36, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• If this goes ahead please ensure that Template:Display/watchlist is properly supported and moved to a suitable location — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment ((show by date)) is indeed subject to bot substitution when the by date has passed (e.g. @Anomie:'s ShowByDateSubster), a useful feature that should at least be retained by option if merged to ((display)). Another possibility is to rename sbd to a variant like ((display-temp)) which will help bots to properly detect instances. Dl2000 (talk) 22:40, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Personally, if this is merged I'm hoping the merge goes the other way: keep ((show by date)) and merge ((display)) to it rather than the other way around. Anomie⚔ 22:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    (edit conflict) As I was planning to do (I originally proposed this a deletion of Template:Display, but then realized that it did support some features that Template:Show by date didn't. ((3x|p))ery (talk) 22:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• On further examination, the templates provide substantially different functions - ((display)) displays one text between two given dates, ((show by date)) displays one of two texts depending on whether a single given date has passed. Not sure how these two distinct behaviours can easily be merged, and combined with the bot substitution differences, would oppose merge as planned. However, this need not prevent development of more elaborate date-sensitive text templates and functions, and without prejudice to making other adjustments such as changing the vaguely-named ((display)) to something like ((show between dates)). Dl2000 (talk) 01:05, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Could an admin edit the log date on Template:Display? CoolSkittle (talk) 05:24, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).