Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< October 27 | << Sep | October | Nov >> | October 29 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
I need to move my page to the actual tittle. It says tittle is black listed. I cannot understand. Please explain.
Dezoysas (talk) 02:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
I need help understanding where my submission process is up to. Thank you for your quick reply.
BecDjapovic (talk) 04:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the review feedback on my first ever Wiki page creation, I would like to learn more specific on the overall assessment why it was rated as not notable sufficiently. Is it a topic that I should just give up or is there anything that is still missing in the context that I could continue to fill out the blank to make improvement and eventually it will be accepted for publication?
Streetmilitia (talk) 05:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Dezoysas (talk) 05:23, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your early reply. I understand your concern. You can observe that, I am the author, publisher and the copyright holder of the related source. That is why I got information from the source. But, I added reference. Is that still copyright violation? If you think still it is copyright violation, then let me make a significant change. I need to change the title to "Structured Formal Reverse Proofs with NO Statement Labeling". Still I am editing the article.
Hi, this page was declined, so I'm checking whether it will be possible to get it approved by adding more references or info.
The reason given was not enough independent references. I included about 4, which were all reviews - do we simply need more of these types of reference? Or are these not considered credible enough, and I should bolster them with other types of source that mention the group?
Is there a more general issue with not being notable enough? I took my cue from this page to see what level of fame a troupe should have to get a page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_improvisational_theatre_companies#Improvisational_theatre_companies_in_the_United_Kingdom and I'd modestly suggest Hivemind Improv are more notable than at least 1/3 of the troupes that do have a page! Is there any kind of evidence/citation I can use to demonstrate this?
Thanks!
AlexOBT (talk) 07:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Dear Team Pls Edit Rahul Megh Arya Wiki Page. These Page Reject due to citation and News Source but this page have Already News Source on Google. You Can Check in News or Google . 106.66.43.52 (talk) 08:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
I am not sure what else to cite. Because this is an episode of Looney Tunes, there aren't many professional sources I can site for this. I still believe it should be an article because basically every single episode of Looney Tunes is culturally relavent in its own right and every other Looney Tunes episode has a page of its own.
James Gordon (talk) 14:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I need help as my draft about a cultural organisation has been denied for publication. The reason stated is that I express the company view point and I don’t provide reliable sources. I understand the comment of the reviewer, although I don’t agree with it, but I don’t have more specific informations to try to solve the problem. The organisation (which is not a company) operates in the cultural field and is internationally recognised, it works since twenty years with Italian and International renowned artists and it already has wikipedia pages of art festivals they organized. I have opted for a synthetic text, with only descriptive basic informations about the organisation and its activities, providing links to the already existing wikipedia articles, academic publications related to the their artistic field of research and a couple of articles coming from renowned international art magazines (directly readable online). About the company view point I don’t know if it may be because I tried to be synthetic, but I thought it was better to keep it short, descriptive and to allow potential further interventions. Do you think I should expand the text? Do you have any suggestions possibly more specific on what to edit? Before editing for a new review I would like to hear an extra opinion. Thank you very much for the attention!
Paologabriotti (talk) 15:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Xing is a cultural organization based in Bologna, Italy, founded in 2000. The organization focuses on experimental artistic practices, which it presents in cultural initiatives, festivals and public events.Regardless, better sources are needed to prove that the company is actually notable. Please read WP:NCORP to see what is required. The tldr version is: you need coverage in multiple reliable media sources independent of the subject. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
I want to publish my page I am new on Wikipedia please help me to publish my page
Atharva anil khetle (talk) 17:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Wikiabc123wiki (talk) 21:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Bigboy19189 (talk) 21:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
post it
I am seeking another opinion regarding the subject's notability as a musician. Please see the talk page Draft talk:Debbie Brooks for why I believe the subject is notable per Wikipedia guidelines. Other advice about improving the article is appreciated as well.
Ars Combinatoria (talk) 22:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Inca28a (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
Please, could you help me, with a less complicated vocabulary how can I improve this article?
Thank you so much!
Inca28a (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)