.
This case is now closed and pages relating to it may no longer be watched
|
Case clerks: Amortias (Talk) & Ks0stm (Talk) & Lankiveil (Talk) Drafting arbitrators: GorillaWarfare (Talk) & Kelapstick (Talk) & Drmies (Talk)
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
|
Track related changes |
Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator, clerk, or functionary, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.
This is just a quick notification that the Arbs have asked us to keep the workshop open for now, even though we're past the originally planned close date. The fact that it is still open is not an error or omission on our part. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC).
I seem to have posted a lot, so I believe that more evaluation is needed before ArbCom decides to open the Proposed Decision phase and then close the Workshop. Extend the date to several days later? --George Ho (talk) 00:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC)