![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Here's a few examples of Neopalpa donaldtrumpi, a newly named species of moth, being referred to as the Donald Trump moth:
It's looking likely that Donald Trump moth will become increasingly used as a synonym for Neopalpa donaldtrumpi as the moth becomes well known because of who it's named after and its very close resemblance to him. Undeclining the declined redirect request will be helpful to people who only know of Neopalpa donaldtrumpi as the Donald Trump moth, enabling instant navigation to the article for this important species of moth.
78.146.172.211 (talk) 01:25, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
References
Got it. Thanks. DavidPatBoyle (talk) 20:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
not into instant portals - shipwrecks and Australian maritime history dont have them yet, and dont want no artificial crap - I want a real smiling wreck for a proper portal and link - cheers - etc JarrahTree 13:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I would like to ask for your advice to improve my article on Vision for a Nation Foundation. Can you provide some guidance please?
Gladyschoy225 (talk) 02:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
I've noticed a good number of outright bad declines at AFC/R. Examples:
All of these are at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects/2017-01. Without very good reason, declining such candidates is disruptive. Would you mind explaining carefully your very good reasons for declaring all of these bad redirects? Nyttend (talk) 14:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Can you please re-read my page I made?
Hello,
You recently declined my article called 'Smartpay' because it does not adequately show the subject's notability, however I believe that I have provided significant evidence that show the subject's notability. All the sources I have used are from a notable third-party website and not Smartpay's own website and I have included them wherever necessary. Could you please explain how I could provide further evidence of the subject's notability as I thought I had already done so.
Thanks, Ben
Please explain to me how to cite the information that I received by in person interviews. My last paragraph has the link to the website and stated where the information was from.
There are thousands of businesses with wikipedia pages. I in no way marketed anything in my article. I simply provided basic information on the company and it's founders.
Examples of business wikipedia pages:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald's
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgan_%26_Morgan_PA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sears
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Astaire_Dance_Studios
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walmart
If there is something wrong with my article, please give me a specific example instead of just saying wikipedia isn't for business listings. Because that isn't really true considered the thousands of businesses with wikipedia pages.
I have transcluded Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahar Ghoreishi in the lists Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women and Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Iran. While WP:IRAN isn't terribly active, WP:WOMEN is, and in any case I think it is important that both WikiProjects are informed about the discussion, so we at least try to reduce gender- and geo-bias. AfD discussions that falls into CAT:AFD/B are almost always sorted into at least one geographical list apart from topical lists. WP:DELSORT/FLAT comes in handy.
Speaking from my own experience, tagging articles for deletion - except maybe for those cases that are very clearly eligible for deletion under one of our strict criteria for speedy deletion - without performing a search for sources is a bad habit. For some "good" examples, check out the blue-linked titles in this log file, and in the archives of that log file, and the red fields here. Yes, ((facepalm)) applies, that's for sure. The mantra I keep repeating to myself these days is "Do your WP:BEFORE, Sam, and consider WP:ATD before tagging for deletion", and I believe this credo at least has reduced my share of inept tags.
In this diff you tagged Kireeti Damaraju with ((citation style)), ((unreliable sources)), and ((lead missing)), and two-and-a-half minutes later in this diff you proposed Sahar Ghoreishi be uncontroversially deleted, and gave the short rationale Fails NACTOR
. If we are to believe the two articles prima facie, then Damaraju has four roles to his credit, none of them starring AFAICT, in the last four years, whereas Ghoreishi has 38 roles on her CV in the last 7–8 years. Twenty-nine of these productions are blue-linked in her article on Farsi Wikipedia. On English Wikipedia we have at least Guidance Patrol?! where the infobox lists her as starring. So, the BLP with the shortest career and the fewest credits of the two you slap maintenance templates on, and the BLP with ~twice as long a career and ~9 times as many roles you PRODNOM? Could you tell me where the logic is?
I get 90.000+ Ghits on "Sahar Ghoreishi" and I get 500.000+ Ghits on "سحر قریشی". Numbers like these in my experience shout WP:NPOSSIBLE and tells me to look more carefully to see if I can find reliable sources with significant coverage. A more narrow search using the intitle:
parametre reveals that there are currently 200+ Gnews hits on her Farsi name. In the title. A straight Gnews search returns 160.000+ hits. This is in my opinion not a PROD case. I am aware of WP:MUSTBESOURCES and WP:GHITS, which is why I have commented at AfD rather than casting a !vote, but I regard your deletion rationale as a WP:VAGUEWAVE argument. Assuming that your "PROD stands" and that you speak Farsi - I have no idea how anyone would think they reasonably could pass a judgement on a subject about which the majority of the sources are in a language they do not speak, although I have once heard the baffling argument made at an AfD discussion that a PROD nominator upheld his "delete" !vote and discounted French language sources because he did not read French - could you please return to AfD and help me understand why none of the sources are useful? Should you upon further consideration and vetting of the available sources have a change of heart and a wish to withdraw the nomination, the instructions found at WP:WDAFD may be followed. Regards, — Sam Sailor 18:45, 1 February 2017 (UTC) P.S. You have an unclosed <big>
tag in your editnotice.
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Emmafuent". The reason given for Emmafuent's block is: "vandalism, see also edit filter log". Was currently editing on a school IP and autoblocked me! *sigh* :/
Hi. I deleted it again because it reads like an attack page to me. Deb (talk) 21:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
We now have 820 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.
The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.
Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.
This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
How do we add sources?
You've rejected my draft because of insufficient references. The issue with that is I was writing about myself so I don't think I need to explain to anyone where I get information about myself. Please reconsider, okay...
Category:Paid parking, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Toohool (talk) 21:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. You state the Melody Composer Squared page needs "Major app reviews" before it is approved. Where should I post links to these? Do I need to link them within the content somehow? How many should I post?
Thank you kindly.
MelodyCS (talk) 20:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
On 11:33, 28 January 2017, you had created a redirect page called Time Spike, The Alexander Inheritance in addition to separate redirect pages for Time Spike and The Alexander Inheritance. Was the creation of Time Spike, The Alexander Inheritance redirect page just the result of a simple typing mistake? Thought you might want to know since your work is usually great and under appreciated. –cheers 68.45.25.137 (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Why did you undo my edit to the Abington Senior High page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.114.243.209 (talk) 00:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "DabonDIck". The reason given for DabonDIck's block is: "Vandalism-only account". Was autoblocked again from a school IP. :/
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.
Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this userright to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.
Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked (through the use of CheckUser) periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).
I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Yamla (talk) 14:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
UNCUT music magazine has links to prove the band is a band. The website has a press kit with public appearance listed. We seek help as we didn't join wiki to Edit. Musicbyshineywater (talk) 21:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
I noticed that a message you recently left to a newcomer may have been unduly harsh for a newcomer. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 22:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi sir,i want you to re-review the article because this artist is capable to be on wikipedia,i am his die-hard fan and he has thousands of followers,i have inserted some references his facebook page,his fans page and movies youtube link which he has composed music.thank you.
Hi there. I'm writing/editing the Melody Composer Squared page, which was rejected by you for lack of sources last week. I have added app review references to the page. Can you please tell me if I"m on the right path to getting this page approved? If not, what am I doing wrong? Thank you kindly!
Melody Editor (talk) 21:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey Trucker, Thanks for your help in making my page super-awesome. Not really requesting a re-review yet as I've only added six references so far, and the person I'm writing about has lots of theatre roles and stuff that I ought to add. Just wanna know which sort of references you prefer - which references are super trust-worthy or whatever. Should the references all just appear at the bottom of the page or do you want some halfway through the text? Another Wiki page that needs some reviewing (about a subject I work on) is the page on the Roman Aqueduct called the "Aqua Traiana" - perhaps you can help kill the nonsense in that page so it can be sorted out. I discovered part of that aqueduct [1] so I sort of feel it's my duty to improve the truly aweful Wiki page. Let me know, Ted O'Neill
Ted.archeologia (talk) 23:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
References
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
stalking with sprays like that you might catch something very very very nasty [1] on with the gloves, and the triple strength face mask, and safety glasses, and step back slowly you never know where the horse might have been JarrahTree 14:53, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Good afternoon! On what basis is blocked article Ustinov Artur? You make mistakes. If you continue to do this action, I will complain of you. This is a decent man. Anastasia Sanders — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.162.65.42 (talk) 06:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I completely agree with the previous speaker. Why do you make artificial problems for publication? I do not understand it. For all your discontent you've already got the answer. Pierre Rui
The article should not be deleted. You are making a mistake. And you violate the principles of Wikipedia is free information. Any person should have the right to see the information, and you do invented obstacles. Sting Loure — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.220.43.73 (talk) 20:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
You shouldn't have bent to this [2]. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello KGirlTrucker81, this is ANIRBANB724. I am very new to writing articles on wiki. I created an article on Calcutta Social Project which on initial draft missed out references. Based on your comments, I have now included all the references which I used to create the same. Calcutta Social Project is a NGO based out of Kolkata, India. I do understand that there is a huge backlog but would truly appreciate your help in re-reviewing the article and approving it for publishing.
Please let me know if I can provide any additional information. I apologize for bothering you but would appreciate your guidance and help.
@KGirlTrucker81:
KGirlTrucker81, just checking if you were able to defer it to another AFC for review. Also, please note that I added few more references to the article. Would appreciate your help and approving the article.
@KGirlTrucker81: I have now removed Facebook reference. Would appreciate if you re-review and approve the same.
@SwisterTwister: Hello SwisterTwister, KGirlTrucker81 wanted me to ping you to come and take a look at this article. Can you please review and approve the same.
Thank you to both of you.
Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.
We now have 820 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
My page has recently been declined due to lack of references. I was wondering how I could reference my page better, such as photos, property papers etc?
Hugo Timmis (talk) 15:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
The biography page I submitted for Marnix Koumans is clearly sourced by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency webpage. I'm a little confused.
Hey, I saw you on a Speedy Deletion Post then checked out your user page, was wondering if you could mentor me on all things Wikipedian. Can you? Aaryan33056 (talk) 15:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC) PS: there's a spelling error on this big notice you have. Pls fix I have Grammar Police issues.
Noice, I think this is fixed!
Stop Everyone just stop here before leaving a message! Stop
If my talk page is protected due a vandal attack or something, I have my alt talk page just in case. I'll pefer discussions unfragmented but please talk to me here if my main talk is unprotected. Please sign your posts by typing four tildes at the end of your message (MPS1992 (talk) 22:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)). Being rude to me will take you into the road to nowhere.
The above is the additional text due to the current user. Why is it necessary?
Personally, I find it rather strange. Perhaps we could fix it? MPS1992 (talk) 22:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
I have tagged Parra fiction with ((db-madeup))
. I don't know what was "slightly promotional" about it. — Sam Sailor 02:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi my name is Romeo Brown, first i wanna thank you for looking my draft up..am new here and i want to be part of wikipedia contributors but its hard for me to attach my ref in a standard way. The artist am writing about is notable and well known for his song igebulikwe and other songs,,so please how do i attach my ref? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romeobrown (talk • contribs) 17:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Please can i retrieve my codedruns article you deleted ? Jeffsnorth (talk) 18:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jesse Eisenberg you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MatthewHoobin -- MatthewHoobin (talk) 01:21, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi KGirlTrucker81, I'm writing you about my rejected article on the card game Jewels.
The reason for rejection was lack of reliable sources, so I was wondering if adding a section called "Reception and critics" would help? There I could write about the reviews the game has received, and add the sources.
I think the game deserve to be included here since it managed to successfully complete a kickstarter campaign, and to create a small player audience. The game can't be purchased new at the moment, so I'm not trying to promote it or anything like that (in fact I'm not associated or connected to them). I just think that's a small gem (no pun intended :D), and deserves to be remembered/listed among the notable card games since it received positive reviews and has a score of 7.1 on Board Game Geek out of 65 ratings.
If you have any tips on any other way to improve the article, please let me know.
Thanks, Zell01 (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Zell01Zell01 (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Zell01 (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Dear Mam, I had added the citation. Is it correct now? I was new to Wiki's that's why I missed to add citation. Thanks & Regards, Credox Talkies
Credoxtalkies (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
methinks copyright infridgement nonappilcable. i am the owner of contents kickstarter, account just deleted, blog is kept alive by kickstarters. same content is on wordpress, indiagogo, amazon.com. truly sorry to have broken wiki rules. newbie will behave. Poggio Bracciolini (talk) 11:46, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for helping me to improve the page: Craig McGuffie. I'm still very new to Wikipedia (only joined yesterday)! Since you left the notice about the article relying on only one citation, I've added many more sections and citations. Would it be ok to remove the notice now? Maesterial (talk) 21:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Appreciate your assistance. Muzr1009 (talk) 14:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ravi Singh -- Wheat Breeder. Since you had some involvement with the Ravi Singh -- Wheat Breeder redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sakuura Cartelet Talk 00:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
At Hamza Laalioui; three minutes after creation. More haste less speed, eh. Sorry to have to post here. Take care, — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 12:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
My colleague created a page with some mistakes - [[Draft:SAP_Web_IDE]]. I (195.93.234.8 (talk) 06:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)) have taken care of all the concerns -- notability, sourcing -- and believe it is ready to be released. It is as sourced and notable as hundreds of already approved Wikipedia pages on similar subjects. Can you re-review the page? If OK, should I remove the warnings? Thanks for reviewing in the first place.
Do not delete the page Frany Dejota, help me to keep it and provide information and references about the artist, thanks. MiguelG28 MigueG28 (talk) 16:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
I don't think this meets A7, see [3] 86.20.193.222 (talk) 18:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
hi i am trying to make a wanderbots page. he is a youtuber and I just wanted to start a page that his fans could contribute to. I am having a hard time with making the page and when I asked someoneto help they put it for deletion. I am aware that I am not wander but I don't think that youtubers are even aware of them until they find out an example would be the pewdipie page. all I want is to have a page for one of my favorite youtubers.
ßisk (talk) 21:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect DDENSIDH. Since you had some involvement with the DDENSIDH redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Rschen7754 17:12, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi KGirlTrucker81. Thank you for reviewing the draft page for Emma Fay. Are you able to give more specific feedback on why the page was declined? I would like to improve the draft and appreciate any guidance you may have.
...this joke which you rightly reverted, I have to say I've seen worse ones. :) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 01:11, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Atlantic306. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, James Tratas, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Atlantic306 (talk) 03:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Currently in the process fo building the references and such that an entry requires, and hope you can slow down a bit on the rush to kill..
Barbwires.Com is a site instrumental in building music support WAY BACK to the 2000s, and worked locally to help musicians build VIDEO presence BEFORE YOUTUBE - currently you will find - "well.... google didn't return anything..." and that is part of the problem, Please try a YAHOO or BING search and you will see we are reaching audience and HAVE BEEN for 17 YEARS as BARBWIRES.COM I did add some additional detail into the ARCHIVE.ORG as reference and need to add much more, but it is coming.
See, we refuse to PAY google, they took away an advertizing account - took the money we were due, and shut us out - SO I went back to the weak competition DOUBLECLICK had when google bought them, and signed agreements with them as publisher to affilate their ads. It seems clear to me they have some MECHANISM for pushing web-site OUT OF EXISTANCE.
Please TruckerGirl81, give some time to complete the reference I HAVE SPENT MY LIFE BUILDING THIS COMPANY and RADIOSTORM my other company from 1998 got sold out to Atlantic Records, and then broke because AD revenue dropped out of viable in 2003. I am working and HAVE AGREEMENTS with SEVERAL RECORDING LABELS IN GERMANY, DENMARK and elsewhere, and This NET Radio STATION MATTERS.
We have 10,000 followers now on @barbwiresradio and I am working my *ss off on @onyourturntable to keep ties with industry friends. Won't you be my neighbor? thanks, 74.92.41.77 (talk) 19:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)ZzeonBlue currently doing the quickie anon thing
wordy - sorry - if can can give some helpful info that would speed up passing review - very much appreciated! thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.41.77 (talk) 19:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fast and Furiousa. Since you had some involvement with the Fast and Furiousa redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 00:40, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, this is Eddie and I have added much of the detail which needs to be in place for a 'closer to final' type review, could you please take a couple moments and let me know how I am doing? Thanks KGT81
ZzeonBlue (talk) 16:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for suggestions and encouragement I recently starts editing I create that article for experimental learning I learning editing and creating article as soon as possible once again thanks. Sri Harsha Malempati (talk) 13:17, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey there, you fixed up some of my messy parts on an article edit to Seeker (media company). I just merged a duplicate page into it, and wanted to ensure i did everything properly. Would you mind taking a look and letting me know what I overlooked? Thank you! Frankoali (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi KGirlTrucker81, thanks for converting my recent article on Joanne Frye to a Draft. I'm a relatively new user (this is my fourth article). When one of my recent articles was accepted, it included the message that I may now begin to create articles in the mainspace, or submit them if I wish. I began the article on Joanne Frye in my Sandbox, but the only option it gave me from there was to "Submit for review" (which, I imagine, is how it got to you). Since I am a logged in user, is there a way to transfer it directly to the mainspace? I'm happy to have it reviewed, but if it would save other editors time, I'm happy to upload it myself. Many thanks! Christacraven (talk) 17:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Please do not delete the Soccerama magazine page. The magazine has a significance with the community of soccer journalism in the UK and has contributions from key people within its sphere. If the page needs editing, then perhaps we should form a consensus and take it from there. Best wishes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.38.20 (talk) 18:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
what would you know about anything to do with australia? youre american right? as for socks, you understand smelly ones ? JarrahTree 12:21, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you very much for moving my A.M. Pattison piece from the sandbox to the draft space. This was my first Wikipedia posting so I had a lot to learn, and thanks to you I now know where to start should I write another one. Enjoy the cupcake! Ian.fraser1 (talk) 21:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hi KGirlTrucker81, thanks for your response to my question. I read the editing page but I'm still confused. How do I change "jazz musician" to "musician." It's at the top of this page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guillermo_E._Brown#Biography
Thank you so much for your help.
--JazzKatherine (talk) 17:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you so very much for approving my draft! I have two remaining others. Would it be possible for you to please kindly approve of them too?--79.179.101.6 (talk) 16:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Well, I may upload that later on when we get back home because we're on vacation. But you can request it at files for upload to let another editor do it for you. Otherwise working on that but I'm busy. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 17:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
I was just wondering if a picture of me in the play called BEDLAM is sufficient as proof? I have written to Cal State University to see if they can send me proof of his teaching there. So, would a communication from the school be sufficient?
I did a mistake and got warned, or the reason is just tagging pages? --Kostas20142 (talk) 11:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Dear KGirlTrucker81 Thank you for your taking the time to review my article. As a new editor, I need to understand the problem you point out first before I can provide a solution. "A problem understood is a problem half-solved". In which way are sources from "Kansas City Business Journal" and "Silicon Prairie News", "too closely associated with the subject" as said in the warning tag. Thank you for your cooperation. Hidefall (talk) 12:19, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I just want to let you know that J.J. Barea needs to be moved again. It needs an space on "J.J.", for example J. J. Barea just like J. J. Redick. Seriesphile (talk · ctb) 19:11, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for your edits. I agree maybe it is not notable enough for now. I had seen the article in the Boston Herald last weekend and I thought I should include him on Wiki because transgender physicians are very rare. I believe he is receiving a few other national interviews at this time and when those are released I will go ahead and add those sources as well, if that would help satisfy the notability guidelines?
Thank you so much, Physician Edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhysicianEdits (talk • contribs) 14:41, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
HI there,
I was able to find some medical publications that were peer-reviewed by Dr. Weinand. They seemed to be of significant impact to the medical community so I thought I would re-submit the article for publication. Thank you in advance,
Physicianedits — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhysicianEdits (talk • contribs) 15:06, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Great, let me remove that edit and substitute it for a more substantial source. I had not realized, thank you so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhysicianEdits (talk • contribs) 03:18, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello KGirlTrucker81,
I thought I was comfortable having my information on Wikipedia but I no longer am, and as such have opted to remove information that identifies me from this talk page. My apologies, as I know talk pages are meant to be records of discussion but, again I do not want my name, school and personal issues out there for the world to see.
Thank You and Regards,
Psych.ta (talk) 14:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I'm new to Wikipedia and accidentally published my draft of 'Felix Tiu', and it has been proposed for deletion by you. I am aware it was posted with no cites but that has now changed. Although my page isn't finished yet, I have added cites to every area where it is needed as I go just incase I add information to expand on later. Hopefully you can take back your deletion proposal? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joaquincamarista (talk • contribs) 12:59, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Does anyone know how I can insert an information box into a page I am editing? What I mean by an information box, is that box that you usually find on the left side of the article when you are viewing a famous person, celebrity etc, which is stating their name, age, children, spouse, occupation etc.? Here is what I mean, look on the left side, that whole box where Ariana's photo is is what I am after. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joaquincamarista (talk • contribs) 13:35, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
The article Jesse Eisenberg you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jesse Eisenberg for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MatthewHoobin -- MatthewHoobin (talk) 03:41, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
KGirlTrucker81:
First, thank you for your work on Wikipedia. Your work is important and I appreciate it.
Thank you for reviewing my submission. I'm confused on why my submission was not accepted. You mentioned that I did not have any reliable sources. I did submit two different references. CEB or the Conference Executive Board is thought to be one of the world's thought leaders on talent development and talent analytics. They are a very reliable source. Almost anybody that works in training and development would recognize the work of CEB. The other source I cited was a blog posting by the Association for Talent Development (ATD). ATD has thousands of members in the talent development field and are also widely recognized for their contributions to the field of training and development.
Cody Siewert — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csiewert (talk • contribs) 21:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi!
How come when I search the person who I am writing about on Google - there Wikipedia page does not come up? How can I make this happened?
Thank you. Joaquincamarista (talk) 05:18, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Joaquincamarista
Because the general notability guideline doesn't precisely define "significant coverage", I would appreciate it if you could answer the following two questions about your Delete comment in the Slate Star Codex AfD, to help me in future.
1. Could you describe what was it about the reliable sources that we cited in the article that made their coverage of Slate Star Codex not significant, in your view?
2. Can you give me an idea of what changes (e.g. more reliable sources, more in-depth coverage in a reliable source) would have changed your mind on this AfD - and what is the minimum you would require to change your mind?
For reference, the article has been automatically preserved by Deletionpedia here.--greenrd (talk) 08:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
The change at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mass_surveillance_in_the_United_States&type=revision&diff=773345693&oldid=772674210 was reverted by KGirlTrucker81 in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mass_surveillance_in_the_United_States&type=revision&diff=773345745&oldid=773345693
Can you please provide more information about why this change was reverted. The original commit message adequately described why the change was occurring: "SEAndroid is the use of SELinux on Android. This functionality has nothing to do with surveillance, and it's presence is misleading and detracts from the primary purpose of the article"
Please revert your revert or further explain why the revert is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.185.1.203 (talk)
This shows the normal signs of being a hoax article: signs that it's from a kid's fantasy life (attended Yale, "now lives in a mansion in Beverly Hills") etc, complete lack of evidence on Google that this person exists. I've moved to speedy deletion. Blythwood (talk) 00:08, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
I don't know whether that editor, who submitted a blank sandbox to AFC three times, is being a troll, or is confused. Either they should ask for help or they need blocking. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:14, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing the article I made and for your kind words on my talk page! Muralidaran3499355 (talk) 19:41, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Or LTA? KGGirlTucker81? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrissymad (talk • contribs) 18:59, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Kgirltrucker81. I left the source for you. Did you get it? Robert W. McKnight
Robert W. McKnight (talk) 22:46, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
girltrucker81: How many sources establish notability? I have also provided a second reference, which is a business lookup tool which is established and moderated by a government body; does this not count? Anozzi (talk) 07:19, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi KGirlTrucker81, could you direct me to the section, which needs to be changed for SCW to be accepted or any specific words that need to go. I perceive it as neutral, but we all have different views. Thanks for the hint. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AnRoCa/sandbox AnRoCa (talk) 07:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
You reverted an edit I inadvertently approved on Pending Changes in the article April 6, just wanted to say thanks. ProgrammingGeek talktome 21:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)