This article was nominated for deletion on 8 October 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women in Red: #1day1woman (2020) This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. United States: Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American television task force. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. LGBT studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

The Screen Actor Guild Awards for ensemble casts give each actor/actress their own statue at the awards ceremony. Should the following text be included in some way on Savages’ article. (Each source names her as part of the winning cast.):

In 2017 the cast won the Screen Actor Guild (SAG) Award for Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Comedy Series; they had previously won for season’s two and three.^[1][2] In 2018 the cast was nominated for the SAG Award for Outstanding Performance By An Ensemble In A Comedy Series.^[3]

Glee^anon 15:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC) [reply]

• Support as nom, on what planet do we not include major acting awards on an actress’ bio? Glee^anon 15:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Why have you taken this straight to a full-blown thirty-day formal RfC without, so far as I can tell, having observed WP:RFCBEFORE? Surely a simple question left at WT:FILM would have been far easier and also attracted attention from the people most knowledgeable in such matters. But even that might have been unnecessary - assuming it's a mere content dispute, the first thing to do should have been to bring up the matter on this page (without jumping straight for RfC) and discuss it with other people who have recently edited the relevant section of the page - presumably, Largoplazo. Also, the term is not iVote but !vote, which is pronounced not-vote, see WP:!VOTE. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  That one editor is the one who edit-warred it off twice without discussion. It seemed like a genuine waste of time to further engage them to see if they had changed their mind.

  I felt asking for more eyes in this manner was more practical as this seems to have a highly ignored BLP. Glee^anon 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  To be clear, the sequence is that you added it and I removed it with an explanation. Then you added it again, though WP:BRD says you shouldn't have, and then I removed it once more and directed you to WP:BRD. Largoplazo (talk) 20:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Actually, the second time I re-added several years she won and did it as part of the career section. Foolishly I thought that would appease your concerns. Glee^anon 20:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  It stands to reason, for what it's worth, that if I didn't consider it her award after a single instance, I still wouldn't over several instances. Largoplazo (talk) 21:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  That wasn’t the logic I was following but let’s see what others have to say. Glee^anon 21:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Support I came here from WT:FILM, and as Gleeanon409 and Redrose64 have said, this is a simple matter. We include outstanding cast SAG awards as the casts' accolades. Each of the actors is named in the citation so, like with named producers accepting a best film/TV series award, it is the individual actors' award as much/more than the show's. There's never been debate about this, and someone should have pointed that out to Largoplazo. LP may disagree, but it's a fact. Kingsif (talk) 23:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• "... someone should have pointed that out to Largoplazo." Has anyone participated in this conversation before your arrival who was aware of it?

Anyway, if that's already the prevailing practice, then, while I think it's strange, I will consider myself overruled. Largoplazo (talk) 00:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Appears significant accolade.--Astral Leap (talk) 09:37, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• I came here after being notified by the RfC bot. While the award itself is significant, the article should clarify that Savage won the award as a part of the cast and not individually. The current wording in the article doesn't clarify that enough and the current proposed wording is what I'd support. That being said, there's a current AfD discussion on this article and it appears that the dispute over whether this award is "major" enough to establish notability is a big part of that AfD. On that matter I'd like to qualify my support vote that me endorsing this award as being major enough for the article doesn't entail saying it's a major award for the purposes of the AfD discussion currently happening and I don't think this broader RfC should have any bearing on that either. Chess (talk) (please use ((ping|Chess)) on reply) 00:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per Kingsif - Idealigic (talk) 06:56, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not this RFC remains in place, in response to a question Gleeanon409 asked me in the deletion discussion, see WP:OFFTOPIC, on a page providing supplemental explanation of the guidelines in the Manual of Style. People interested in whether OITNB has won awards, whether for ensemble cast or anything else above the level of the individual cast member, can find that information in the OITNB article. While it's true, it's also a bit misleading, as presenting it suggests an implication that it's a distinction of her own when it isn't. That's my evaluation of it, anyway. Largoplazo (talk) 22:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]