This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alter Aeon redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Alter Aeon" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
I'm not real clear on the way sections like this should be handled. It seems largely like gratuitous advertising, but at the same time says a few minor things which may be of interest to players. I'll try to hack it up and make it more neutral in the next couple of days, unless I get specific guidance otherwise from some of the more dedicated Wiki staff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.138.17.237 (talk) 14:14, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
I doubt anyone will read this, but if the Alter Aeon page is eligible for destruction for this reason, you might as well destroy 90% of the MUD related pages. Clearly I think it's an important entity if I'm bothering to spend time on it, but if it falls below the threshold of validity it would seem unfair to not apply the same standard everywhere.
Understood. I'll see if I can find something more substantial. It's good to see quality control hitting everyone equally.
Bloody hell, after looking at the mud games page and the associated links, if this page goes (with its single reference) it would only be appropriate to immediately dispose of at least 80% of the pages there as well. Most so much as only link back to the primary site.
Just a minor thing - I'm not sure having links to all the gods just point to finger entries is really meaningful, other than to prove that they all exist. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.51.95.68 (talk) 01:11, 29 April 2007 (UTC).
I find it a little worrying that the Audyssey review was accepted as a reliable source (to me, the shocking spelling and grammar suggest a lack of editorial oversight), but I've started a "critical reception" section and move the reference there. I'm having trouble extracting any critical analysis from that review, since the author describes how to play the game but not much else. Any expansion is appreciated. Marasmusine (talk) 09:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC)