This article was nominated for deletion on 20 November 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
Apparently the article neutrality is disputed and that's discussed on the talk page. I don't see such discussion. What is the issue, so it can be addressed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikipediaUser4176 (talk • contribs) 04:27, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
this article meets the notability guidelines because of the sheer amount of articles that reference david sirlin
so booyah
so somehow this is still not notable? what do you want for sirlin to appear in the super bowl or something? seriously. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Sirlin#References --nothingxs (talk) 16:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Should add this: "Common misconception" Sirlin does in fact, not hate Europe. - Random.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on David Sirlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on David Sirlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello there, in the edits a previous addition bringing up DMCA take-downs against Yomi Hustle and Yomi Domini was removed. I went to add it back in with citations. Though for the moment the edit was filtered (perhaps due to Yomi Hustle's blog post title, ouch), I want to discuss about the citations of it.
Since this issue was done in private, our only true source of what happened is comments by the lead developers and David Sirlin himself. For this reason I think Twitter sources should be adequate, since under WP:RS it states social media sources may be used for claims on themselves. Is there anything else we should require for documenting this or are we okay to add it back in?
In addition, I wished to add this citation https://store.steampowered.com/news/app/2212330/view/3648510249328555762 as this provides a formal announcement from the development team referencing the legal dispute over the name and the decision to change the title. Unfortunately this title is filtered, because it contains too many exclamation marks (!) in a row. Could someone get this added? Tarquinous (talk) 13:35, 13 May 2023 (UTC)