Where is he now?[edit]

Has he dropped off the face of the earth? 74.190.138.181 (talk) 22:34, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Most votes for a Libertarian?[edit]

News is still breaking I guess, but it sounds like Gary Johnson just beat his record in this 2012 election. Probably a changing of phrasing is in order... 50.77.230.161 (talk) 08:58, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo[edit]

I may have located a free-content photo of Ed Clark this morning. Trouble is, I gave up on WP:MCQ years and years ago, following a repeated pattern of their regulars giving me answers solely for the sake of saying they answered my queries, all the while saying nothing useful whatsoever. One such question had to do with determining the copyright status of material published after 1977 without a copyright notice. If anyone can offer such help in the case a book published in 1981 without a copyright notice, please let me know. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 23:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 25 January 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 08:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Ed Clark → Ed Clark (libertarian politician) – No WP:PTOPIC. Though he has a slight edge in page views, no "Ed" or "Edward Clark" is more likely than all others to be sought out. In addition to Ed Clark (photographer) and Ed Clark (baseball), Edward Clark (Australian politician) and Edward Clark (artist) both also go by Ed. page views, more page views Schierbecker (talk) 08:52, 25 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 14:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • And why is that? Because he's been out of the spotlight for decades? I can't think of any other excuse. The encyclopedia already has plenty of articles which are terribly named on account of a lack of willingness to find contemporary sources and instead lazily defaulting to Google results. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 03:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.