This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Friday the 13th Part III article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Who played Mrs. Voorhees, the ghost or whatever you call it?ChuckDizzle 19:01, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Due to the trivia of death scenes being cut, in my opinion, the plot summaries should be extended.
Explain to me why camp crystal lake can add links to his film page. Or interviews he's done yet our site isn't allowed to. I only put the page link to our section on the movie. I don't care if it raises search engine listings. I assumed if camp crystal lake online can show their film page I could to. Or is there some sort of first come first serve BS? Same with the interviews. I assumed a fan of Su Charno would like to read an interview with him. How sharing info can be considered spam.
Yes it's an official interview. I'm not the owner of the site I'm a staff member who helped build it. The interviews were done by asking members of our Message board for questions then doing the interview.
The information on who conducted the interview etc. is on each interview. They weren't done at a convention. Usually they were done over the phone.
I thought Wikipedia was for sharing information about the topic. I would think an interview with one of the stars would count. Especially since we tend to get questions others haven't asked. Or if they have the answers haven't been published on the internet before.
Like I said I could care less if it raises search engine listings. I just assumed people would be interested in the information.— Crystallakeafterdark (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 22:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC).
how could it have been misses voorhees? she doesnt have a head? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.247.47 (talk) 04:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was no consensus. JPG-GR (talk) 21:45, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Friday the 13th Part III → Friday the 13th Part 3 — Well some sites use roman numerals (like IMDb), the official site does note ([1]), all of the posters use "3" as do most of the VHS/DVD covers (i've seen some UK ones use roman numerals). I would just move it, but I want to see if there is a consensus. — TJ Spyke 15:55, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.I can't see any good way to decide this one way or another. Neither Wikipedia:naming conventions and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) deal with it at all. Is there some other convention or principle that I'm overlooking? Andrewa (talk) 12:03, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Friday the 13th Part III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)