This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: Interstates / Indiana Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics  Interstate Highways   Locations  Indiana   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.   United States: Indiana Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Mid-importance).

The contents of the Southern Indiana Toll Road page were merged into Interstate 69 in Indiana. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Routing and potential interchanges based on [1].

County	Location	#	Destinations	Notes
Vanderburgh	Evansville		Veterans Memorial Parkway – Downtown Evansville	??, haven't seen what they are going to do with the rest of I-164
			Green River Road	Where will it split off??
Warrick		5	SR 662 east (Covert Avenue)
Vanderburgh	Evansville	7	SR 66 (Lloyd Expressway)
		9	SR 62 (Morgan Avenue)
		10	Lynch Road
		15	Boonville-New Harmony Road
		18	SR 57 south	South end of SR 57 overlap
Gibson		21	I-64 / SR 57 - Louisville, St. Louis
		22	SR 68 / SR 57	North end of SR 57 overlap
		27	SR 168
		33	SR 64
Pike		46	SR 56 / SR 61
Daviess		62	US 50 / US 150
		76	SR 58
Greene		78	US 231	Current Northern end of the South Section of I-69
			SR 45	Under Work, To open in late 2015-early 2016
			SR 54	Under Work, To open in late 2015-early 2016
Monroe	Bloomington		SR 37	South end of SR 37 overlap, Under Work, To open in late 2015-early 2016
			Fullerton Pike	Open
			SR 45 (2nd Street)/Tapp Road	South end of SR 45 overlap; Under work to be upgraded to Interstate Standards
			SR 48 (3rd Street)	Under work to be upgraded to Interstate Standards
			SR 45 / SR 46	North end of SR 45 overlap; Under work to be upgraded to Interstate Standards
			Walnut Street	Partial interchange (Southbound exit only), up to Interstate Standards
			Sample Road	Under construction
Morgan			Liberty Church Road	Under construction
			SR 39 to / SR 67	Southern terminus of SR 39, SR 39 North to SR 67, Trumpet interchange built to interstate standards.
			Ohio Street	Unbuilt.
			SR 252 (Hospital Drive)/ SR 44 (Rueben Drive)	Unbuilt Split-Diamond interchange
			Henderson Ford Road	Unbuilt Diamond Interchange
Johnson			SR 144	Unbuilt Diamond Interchange
			CR 900 N (Smith Valley Road)	Unbuilt Diamond interchange
			County Line Road	Unbuilt
Marion
			Southport Road	Unbuilt
			I-465	Unbuilt, at-grade diamond interchange currently. Combined interchange with I-69 and Harding street to be constructed.

Updated based off Preliminary Alternatives Screening report for Section 6 ^[1] Froo (talk) 15:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The image File:ITRLogo Color.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that sections of I-69 in Indiana are under construction, and that there has been some controversy about the extension, but this article needs several issues addressed. I've outlined them below. Until they're fixed, this article can't be upgraded to B-Class. Imzadi 1979 → 19:48, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• The infobox should have a current length for the highway as well as some summary of history added.
• The lead needs to be a better summary of the article. Nothing in the lead should be unrepeated in the body of the article, and all sections of the article should be summarized in the lead in some fashion.
• The Route description is written backwards. It should start at the south and work north. In fact, since there are sections in the south unbuilt, if a summary of where the finished highway will go once completed can be written from reliable sources, it should be included in the RD as well.
• History and Future sections:
  • The History needs expansion. It should start with the original planning and designation of the freeway and continue through all completed activity previous to today. Yes, once something from the Future section (see next point) is done, it should be moved into the History.
  • "Interstate 69 extension planning and construction" should be renamed "Future". The MOS specifies that the subject of an article should not be repeated in heading names, and WP:USRD/STDS specifies that a section on confirmed future activity to a highway should have the "Future" name.
  • Items from that section that have been completed should be moved into the History section. Eventually when the extension is completed and opened to traffic, there will not be a Future section in the article, unless there is some other project started at a later date warranting coverage.
  • The "Rest Areas and Weigh Stations" heading should be renamed "Services" and moved as a subheading of the "Route description". If it isn't renamed, it needs to be recapitalized to "Rest areas and weigh stations" per the MOS.
• The various bits and pieces about the various studies and controversies really should be summarized and simplified. There's too much detail in places that smacks of WP:RECENTISM. Additionally, most of it needs better and more citations.
• Most of the notes above the "Exit list" can be removed or simplified. If any of the mileage or exit numbers are not listed in an official planning document or on a map, they need to be pulled.
• There are additional issues with the exit list based on MOS:RJL, the MOS section that governs exit list formatting.
  • Single interchanges with A-B suffixed exit numbers should not be listed separately. Combine the interchange into a single row of the table and mention the split in the notes like "Signed as exits 21A (west) and 21B (east)".
  • If necessary, use a range of mileage to indicate an interchange, "0.00–0.40" works to combine a single interchange into one row of the table.
  • Spell out the words "Avenue", "Expressway", and "Road" in proper names. Not all foreign readers will be familiar with "Ave", "Expy" and "Rd".
  • Old exit 112A/B, new exit 296A/B should be one row of the table. "Signed northbound as exits 112A (south) and 112B (north)" works just fine rather than split into two rows of the table when it is one interchange. Additionally, if they were left, they should be "112A–B" and "296 A–B" with en dashes, not slashes.
  • Don't abbreviate NB and SB, spell out northbound and southbound, which are not proper nouns, but adjectives, and don't get capitalized.
  • Only capitalize directions when they are part of a roadway's proper name. In other words, "County Road 200 West" only if there is a "County Road 200 East". Note that "County Road" can be abbreviated "CR" as well just as "State Road" is abbreviated "SR".
  • "Boonville-New Harmony Rd" should have an en dash (–) in the name, which means it would be rendered as "Boonville–New Harmony Road" because it runs from Boonville to New Harmony.
• General notes:
  • Use abbreviations correctly and consistently for highway names. All Interstate names should be abbreviated throughout the article except the very first time "Interstate 69" is spelled out in the first sentence in the lead with "(I-69)" after it.
  • The first first time a US Highway is mentioned, spell out the name in the link followed by "(US ##)" after it. Make sure that a non-breaking space ( ) is used instead of a space between the US and the number. Do not use periods in the abbreviated form of a US Highway; that is the AP Stylebook recommendation, but it is not consistent with how ((jct)) formats the abbreviation and DOT usage.
  • INDOT only needs to be linked and spelled out in full once, on first usage in the lead. Leave it abbreviated and unlinked afterwards. Ditto FHWA and AASHTO.
  • The first time a state road or county road is mentioned, spell out "State Road ##" followed by "(SR ##)" and spell out "County Road ##" followed by "(CR ##)". Once again, use a non-breaking space is used. Don't use "State Route" unless for some reason a highway in Ohio or Illinois is being mentioned.
  • After the first mention of a highway of each type (Interstate, US, State, County), use abbreviations only, making sure that non-breaking spaces are used whenever there is a space in the abbreviation.
  • Link to Interstate XX in Indiana or U.S. Route XX in Indiana instead of the Interstate XX or U.S. Route XX links. Even if a state-detail page doesn't currently exist, it will at some point.
  • Use the full state name in any link to a city or town in any state, and pipe the link to drop "Indiana".
  • Except for the exit list, do not drop the state from any non-Indiana locations in links unless there's no ambiguity over the location of that city. If a state name appears after a city, it needs to be followed by a comma.
  • If a full Month DD, YEAR date is used in prose, follow the year with a comma as well.
  • Fix the court names. It is the "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit", not the 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals". Likewise, the correct name is the "Supreme Court of the United States". Personally, I'd drop the periods from any abbreviation for "United States" to stay consistent with the highway abbreviation. The Chicago Manual of Style's 16th edition no longer recommends periods in that abbreviation anymore, which follows foreign and DOT usage.
  • Constructions like "east–west" and "north–south" should have en dashes, but "east-to-west" or "north-to-south" are hyphenated.
  • "Indiana Commerce Corridor" should not be in boldface text. That is a separate roadway what would have been an outer beltway around Indianapolis. The redlink was appropriate since an article about it could/should be written at some point.
• References
  • Complete citation information should be added. The various citation templates (((tl|cite web}, ((cite news)), ((cite book))) help keep the formatting consistent. At a minimum, make sure ever source has an author, date, title, publisher and any page or map section numbers. For online sources, an access date should be added. Publication locations should be added for any books. If a newspaper's title doesn't contain a city, add the location as well.
  • If an online resource is published in PDF format, indicate that using the format parameter of the citation template.
  • Court case names as well as website, newspaper and book titles are properly rendered in italics. Individual webpages, articles and book chapters are in quotation marks.
  • Highway name abbreviations can be changed in titles for consistency. The AP Stylebook says to use periods in US Highway abbreviations, but they can be quietly dropped for consistency.
  • Use the same date format always. Personally, I wouldn't use ISO formatting for any dates in references.
  • Press articles from TV stations should use the station's call letters with "-TV" and the station location instead of any station branding. "Indianapolis: WISH-TV" instead of "WISH-TV Channel 8 Indianapolis".
  • DOT or advocacy group press releases should be indicated as such. ((cite press release)) will do that for you. Finding articles in the media that are contemporary to any press release though would be better.

Plain and simple, no high-quality highway article in the US has such a table. Interstate 68, Interstate 70 in Colorado, Interstate 70 in Utah, Interstate 355 are four Featured Articles on Interstate Highways, and they have prose-only history sections. Imzadi 1979 → 22:35, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I-69 was originally constructed in sections, with each section containing one or more individual projects. The table below lists each section using the most current reference post data, and as such the mileage totals may vary slightly from what was reported at the time of completion (due to overlapping project boundaries, structure locations, temporary connections, and other factors).

The table says exit 200 is 200 miles away. But just above the table there's a brief statement that implies exit 200 will in fact be only 183 miles away. What does this mean?? Georgia guy (talk) 20:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that we should make I-69 along the I-465 beltway to I-65 or US 31. It would be unsigned, though. I think that this would imply for people researching on the route of I-69 on wikipedia, saying that I-69 will run on the beltway. -EBGaming (December 25, 2015, Christmas Day) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.170.220.27 (talk) 17:03, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, not until INDOT signs it. Anything else would be speculation until they do so. Imzadi 1979 → 18:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Interstate 69 in Indiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071014175041/http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070325/LOCAL19/703250428 to http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070325/LOCAL19/703250428

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Interstate 69 in Indiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070210072049/http://www.indystar.com:80/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061110/LOCAL/61109043 to http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061110/LOCAL/61109043
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110726163519/http://www.deis.i69indyevn.org/DEIS_Sec2/2D_Appendix_U.pdf to http://www.deis.i69indyevn.org/DEIS_Sec2/2D_Appendix_U.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Interstate 69 in Indiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080514153630/http://www.wishtv.com:80/Global/story.asp?S=7262468 to http://www.wishtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7262468

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Interstate 69 in Indiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150505003116/https://www.insideindianabusiness.com/newsitem.asp?ID=70518 to https://www.insideindianabusiness.com/newsitem.asp?ID=70518

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Interstate 69 in Indiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615200707/http://www.in.gov/indot/files/StateWide_2004.pdf to http://www.in.gov/indot/files/StateWide_2004.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928082406/http://www.i69indyevn.org/Tier_1_Reeval.pdf to http://www.i69indyevn.org/Tier_1_Reeval.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120309073917/http://highwayexplorer.com/EndsPage.php?id=3069&section=1 to http://highwayexplorer.com/EndsPage.php?id=3069&section=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Interstate 69 in Indiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.insd.uscourts.gov/Opinions/APE420O1.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20061110%2FLOCAL%2F61109043
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20070325%2FLOCAL19%2F703250428
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928082406/http://www.i69indyevn.org/Tier_1_Reeval.pdf to http://www.i69indyevn.org/Tier_1_Reeval.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Interstate 69 in Indiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716124112/http://www.wane.com/dpp/news/local/construction-next-to-i-69-is-for-a-new-rest-stop to http://www.wane.com/dpp/news/local/construction-next-to-i-69-is-for-a-new-rest-stop
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721043028/http://www.465-69northeast.in.gov/ to http://www.465-69northeast.in.gov/
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120801161359/http://www.i69indyevn.org/section-1-deis/ to http://www.i69indyevn.org/section-1-deis/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160402054229/http://www.dailyjournal.net/view/local_story/I-69-to-be-built-through-Johns_1459269226 to http://www.dailyjournal.net/view/local_story/I-69-to-be-built-through-Johns_1459269226
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130902025547/http://www.infrainsightblog.com/2013/07/articles/ppps/indiana-finance-authority-shortlists-4-proposers-for-its-i69-section-5-project/ to http://www.infrainsightblog.com/2013/07/articles/ppps/indiana-finance-authority-shortlists-4-proposers-for-its-i69-section-5-project/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927194751/http://www.earthfirstjournal.org/article.php?id=222 to http://www.earthfirstjournal.org/article.php?id=222
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100419184158/http://www.in.gov/indot/div/interchange/maps/69/ic034_69.pdf to http://www.in.gov/indot/div/interchange/maps/69/ic034_69.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100419184230/http://www.in.gov/indot/div/interchange/maps/69/ic156_69.pdf to http://www.in.gov/indot/div/interchange/maps/69/ic156_69.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304065113/http://www.indychamber.com/files/5914/1815/8205/LegisAgendaFullPages.pdf to http://www.indychamber.com/files/5914/1815/8205/LegisAgendaFullPages.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928082406/http://www.i69indyevn.org/Tier_1_Reeval.pdf to http://www.i69indyevn.org/Tier_1_Reeval.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When will we get to add exit numbers to the proposed section?? Georgia guy (talk) 00:54, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 69 South Bound will be Illustrated Exit 4B with Indiana 37 South Bound, Harding street North Bound, South Bound it will no longer end at Interstate 465 South Bound it closed Tuesday March 15TH 2022 the detour is Interstate 74 West Bound Interstate 465 West Bound & Indiana 37 North Bound Interstate 69 North Bound will be Illustrated Exit 164 with Interstate 74. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.174.135.246 (talk) 15:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems long. Is it considered too long where users have a hard time reading it comfortably? Just wondering Cwater1 (talk) 02:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article has 50,744 characters and 7,843 words of prose, so it's not particularly long. Since the southern part has been under construction for ten years or so, there have been a lot of updates, and some stuff that seemed important at the time needs to be shortened. However, it might be better to wait until the construction is completed in 2024 and the article is more stable. Indyguy (talk) 04:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. Thank you. I may help with the cleanup of article then depending on if I'm still contributing to Wikipedia then and if I get time. I do see your point on what you said. Cwater1 (talk) 03:30, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In order to avoid adding something that may be not notable enough to include, I thought I'd bring it up here first. This article talks about how the bridge over Robinson Creek in Allen County is being completely torn down and rebuilt. Is this noteworthy enough to add? ChessEric 16:54, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't look like this bridge reconstruction is a significant upgrade in capacity for the highway. If we list it, we'd need to list every other bridge reconstruction that has occurred. Indyguy (talk) 18:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so. Thank you for your input. ChessEric 18:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell the exit ramp for I465EB onto exit 4 Harding St (current SR37) has already moved to be well before the merge from future I69N. The new ramp goes parallel to the mainline for about a mile. I'm pretty sure the only way to Harding St. from I-69N will be to exit at Epler Ave.

That being said, I-69 is obviously not open yet, so I am fine leaving the revert until I-69 is actually designated on the loop. KelleyCook (talk) 01:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]