This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
I could be wrong, but I don't recall this being accurate. I'm bad at conveying pronunciations, but I think of "cosmos" being pronounced "Kahz-mose", whereas, I thought I recalled "KOS-MOS" being pronounced more like "Kose-mose". The pronunciation didn't seem to be in the source given either. The rest of the sentence was good and sourced, but I think the part above needs to be reworked or dropped. Sergecross73msg me18:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the Reception section should be rearranged so that they scholarly, detailed sources, are mentioned more upfront in the section. I think its more important, and honestly I think it'll help dissuade people from wanting to re-merge it again. The non-scholarly stuff is fine...but its also a lot of the stuff that editors use to try to pad out non-notable character article. Just a thought. Sergecross73msg me19:41, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]