This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Intel processors article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 100 days

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Electronics Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Computing Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Itanium#Architectural changes|architectural changes]] The anchor (#Architectural changes) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. [[Itanium#Itanium 2: 2002–2010|McKinley]] The anchor (#Itanium 2: 2002–2010) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. [[Itanium#Itanium 2: 2002–2010|Madison]] The anchor (#Itanium 2: 2002–2010) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. [[Itanium#Itanium 2: 2002–2010|Montecito]] The anchor (#Itanium 2: 2002–2010) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. [[Itanium#Itanium 2: 2002–2010|Montvale]] The anchor (#Itanium 2: 2002–2010) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. [[Intel Graphics Technology#Integrated|UHD 770]] The anchor (Integrated) has been deleted. [[Intel Graphics Technology#Integrated|UHD 730]] The anchor (Integrated) has been deleted. [[Intel Graphics Technology#Integrated|UHD 710]] The anchor (Integrated) has been deleted. [[Intel Graphics Technology#Integrated|UHD 750]] The anchor (Integrated) has been deleted. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

It should be noted here that despite everyone saying it was only available as embedded systems, there were still lots of desktop systems (like the siemens pc-d I have in my cellar). it was available with a 80187 fpu and a revolutionary bus system that allowed up to 127 extension cards.. if your case was big enough... and then later I got some 14mb hard drive... ah, those were the times... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.176.232.207 (talk) 19:11, September 10, 2006

I removed this completely nonsensical statement. It was perhaps the intention that some reference be made to support for _virtual memory_, so it's fair to say "had built-in support for multitasking o/s's that require vm".

Shouldn't the Intel IXP product line be listed?

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of Intel processors's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "RCP" in group "lower-alpha":

• From Coffee Lake: Price is Recommended Customer Price (RCP) at launch. RCP is the trade price that processors are sold by Intel to retailers and OEMs. Actual MSRP for consumers is higher
• From Intel Core: Price reflects Recommended Customer Price (RCP) rather than MSRP. RCP is the cost per unit, in bulk sales of 1000 units or more, to OEMs, ODMs, and retail outlets when purchasing from Intel. Actual MSRP is higher than RCP

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Template to the Wikipedia page says the article may have excessive detail. I strongly disagree - this is a fabulous resource in listing most (ideally all) Intel x86 processors, along with detailed info on each (#P & E cores, multi-threading, power, package, etc.) Exactly what I was looking for and had partially created multiple times on my own before finding it. Note that it can be opened in Excel to automatically create a spreadsheet populated with the multiple tables. It is a fantastic resource. Don't reduce the detail. Don't replace it with a separate page for each generation. Thanks to those that created it!!! 24.143.251.106 (talk) 22:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this page was vandalised for the sake of brevity.

It was very useful reference page where all core details were in one place. 87.205.225.245 (talk) 18:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]