Former good articleMarianne Means was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 5, 2021Good article nomineeListed
February 26, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 24, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Marianne Means was the first woman reporter to be assigned full-time coverage of the White House?
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 13, 2023.
Current status: Delisted good article


External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marianne Means. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marianne Means/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 19:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shall review this for the GAN March 2021 Backlog Drive. MWright96 (talk) 19:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

 Done--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Done--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Done Copy edited accordingly. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 22:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 22:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk)


 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 22:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 22:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 22:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 22:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Early life and education




Career








Societies

Private life

References

 Done removed #2 (dup) --Doug Coldwell (talk) 22:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]










Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 21:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Working Thanks for review. Will start addressing the issues.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @MWright96: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 13:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Doug Coldwell: Reference 1 is missing the author, date, work and accessdate; reference 8 has the error "77}number=78", and there is still no mention of Means' death in the main prose MWright96 (talk) 21:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @MWright96: These additional issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 22:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Doug Coldwell: Now promoting to GA class MWright96 (talk) 11:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment[edit]

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]