GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mervyn Ingram/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 02:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Initial comment

I am starting the review. I've skimmed the article and it looks like it will need few, if any, corrections. Djmaschek (talk) 02:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Review 1

For GA reviews, I prefer that the nominator make all edit changes. If you disagree with my recommended edits, please argue your case. I make mistakes too. Djmaschek (talk) 03:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • I disagree on this one; I think grammatically it is correct since I'm clarifying the nature of one of the sorties flown. That said, TBH I think that the clarification doesn't add much so have opted to remove the mention of the search and rescue operation to render the issue moot. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • The source doesn't explicitly say; I think it may have been possible that it was a "holding pen" for pilots to wait for a posting but that would be OR. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Agreed. It amazes me that he was a squadron leader, in charge of a bunch of fighter pilots, at the age of just 22 (and he won't have been the only one). I was really wet behind the ears when I was that age. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

GA Criteria.

@Djmaschek: Thanks for the review, it is greatly appreciated. I have responded above with comments and my edits to the article are here. Thanks again. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]