This article was nominated for deletion on 13 April 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was incubate to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Over the Limit (2011).
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Over the Limit (2011) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[Professional wrestling#Disqualification|disqualification]] The anchor (#Disqualification) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors
Why is this page being considered for deletion if it's only a month and a half away?
By the way, I can't find a source for the upcoming Capitol Punishment PPV, is that even real? Juggalo Dan 420 (talk) 02:00, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think if the article is changed to Over the Limit (2011), it would make more since. Only the main page for this PPV should read WWE Over the Limit, I just want to take off the WWE title. Juggalo Dan 420 (talk) 03:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I was just about to say the same thing... I put on a new poster but it's widescreen (it's the only one I found) ... But I think the article should already be post since the PPV it's so close. Kerbymanuel (talk) 23:05, 11 May 2011 (UTC)Kerbymanuel[reply]
The admin who move protected this article User:King of Hearts, has indicated in his protection message as well as on his talk page that the article will be moved into main space on the day the event occurs. I see no problem with this. If you disagree, please take it up with King of Hearts and refrain from admin-shopping.
If it will be published on the day of the event, it might be prudent to change the future-tense sentences in this article to present-tense. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:19, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is the first time this has ever happened. WWE PPV pages are created at least 6 weeks in advanced. And this is a sure occurence on the future. It's not like it will be canceled at the snap of a finger. This is a ready-to-publish article and can be better articulated to add more sections once it is published. It has the Background section in here already, albeit without references which can be added later. |bibboorton| (talk) 09:35, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As I see it, this article will likely be deleted if it is moved into main space because it appears to fail the WP:SIGCOV criteria for inclusion in the Wikipedia:Notability guideline. There needs to be more than trivial mentions in multiple independent secondary sources. Currently most of the coverage appears to be from WWE News, which isn't independent of the event. If you want the article moved into main space now, then add sources that show the event meets the WP:GNG guidelines for inclusion. If insufficient sources exist, then wait until the event, at which time there will likely be coverage. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:33, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All right. I added references from an independent source to the plot summary in the Background section. As for the matches section, I think the WWE.com coverage is sufficient for that. Will the current article be sufficient?|bibboorton| (talk) 16:48, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I added more references from two more sources. One about the matches to take place and another on the plot summary. Is that enough? |bibboorton| (talk) 07:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]