![]() | Park51 has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 17, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that while Mayor Michael Bloomberg said it was a "very appropriate place" to build it, 64% of polled Americans felt it was wrong to build the Cordoba House mosque near Ground Zero? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Park51 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Park51 controversy page were merged into Park51. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Index
|
|||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Park51. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 17:15, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:15, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
GA Criteria
|
---|
GA Criteria:
|
Hello there all, if any of you could change the tile of this article to 45 Park Place, there is work for a 50-story skyscraper with the given name, again, if any of you can change the title and subject of this article to the current 45 Park Place, edits for this article have been made to state the current condition of the site, thanks.
Loveroftheworld14710 —Preceding undated comment added 23:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The claim that Stratfor identified Rauf as an FBI asset, and that the project was "undertaken for political reaseons", are not borne out in the source. The leaked email is simoply one Stratfor employee emailing another about an magazine article he read. This article has no proof for its claims (and the reason given is an Islamaphobic conspiracy theory), the Stratfor employee has none as well (and makes no claim about the article’s trustworthiness), and the employee isn’t any sort of spokesperson for Stratfor or otherwise able to speak for the organization’s views. It’s irresponsible to use this to make those claims. Ergative rlt (talk) 01:48, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Hey all, wanted to modify the head of the article to more accurately reflect why the proposed building was so controversial. It seems like the article is stepping around the subject. The head reads like this:
Park51 (originally named Cordoba House) is a development that was originally envisioned as a 13-story Islamic community center and mosque in Lower Manhattan, New York City. The developers hoped to promote an interfaith dialogue within the greater community. Due to its proposed location two blocks from the World Trade Center site, it was widely and controversially referred to as the "Ground Zero mosque".
From an international perspective, it doesn't really seem clear to me why it's controversial. I would submit the following for review:
Park51 (originally named Cordoba House) is a development that was originally envisioned as a 13-story Islamic community center and mosque in Lower Manhattan, New York City. The developers hoped to promote an interfaith dialogue within the greater community. Due to its proposed location two blocks from the World Trade Center site of the September 11 attacks, which were perpetrated by the Islamic terrorism group Al-Qaeda, the proposed building was widely and controversially referred to as the "Ground Zero mosque".
I get that the subject of this article is controversial as hell, so I'm asking other editors for thoughts. Appreciate it! <4 Kobentori (talk) 05:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Source: https://newyorkyimby.com/2020/11/construction-on-45-park-place-remains-stalled-in-tribeca.html