Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 17 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Rục language. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Requested move 17 February 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Hilst [talk] 12:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ruc language → Rục language

Matches the article, and we usually give diacritics for Vietnamese languages. Theknightwho (talk) 06:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Sennecaster (Chat) 03:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Vietnam has been notified of this discussion. Sennecaster (Chat) 03:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Languages has been notified of this discussion. Sennecaster (Chat) 03:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. WP:COMMONNAME is probably hard to establish, but FWIW, one of the two sources in English cited in the article uses "Rục" with diacritic (Baxter & Sagart 2014), while the uses has "Ruc" without diacritic (Babaev & Samarina 2021). Another specialist source that has "Ruc" without diacritic is (Sidwell & Alves 2021). –Austronesier (talk) 21:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.