This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stewart Brand article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
i don't want to lose pieces of information. general ideas are summarized (or have to be ) and I move here the complete text from the books of Brand:
Urbanization: Traditionally, cities have been seen by Environmentalists as a major source of pollution, and dangerous in its lack of harmony with nature. However, there are some who believe that the Environmentalist movement should embrace the vertical orientation of population, and have shifted criticism towards suburban sprawl.
Nuclear Power: Among its harshest critics, nuclear power has long been associated with extremely harmful waste and potential disaster. But Environmentalists such as Stewart Brand have advocated nuclear power as being atmospherically clean, and argue that it is significantly safer than it was 50 years ago.
Genetic Engineering: In light of new genetic technologies, it may be possible to engineer both cattle and agriculture to sustain higher yields with less waste. However, there is a great deal of cynicism about technology in the Environmentalist movement, with genetically modified foods raising a great deal of concern in particular.
Hunting: The rights of animals have long been associated with the Environmentalist movement. However, other Environmentalists argue that there can be a powerful coalition with hunters and fishers who enjoy a safe, clean, and protected wilderness. They also note that individual hunters are less of a threat to the biosphere than more systemic abuses. However, for many environmentalists, cooperation with hunters and fishers simply goes against their fundamental principles.
Partisanship: Critics have noted that the current strategy of supporting individual candidates with strong environmental credentials is ineffective if that candidate is part of a political party that is largely anti-environment. Others are reluctant, however, to suggest that this means they should unconditionally support a rival political party, especially since what is generally true of a party is not true of all its members. There are also concerns that partisanship may saturate the goals of the environmentalist movement with other goals of that political party, and otherwise undermine the legitimacy of the cause.
If someone has a working contact for Stewart, please let me know. hkhenson@rogers.com, Keith Henson 18:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
I understand the point that the Whole Earth catalog sought to be a general reference and that in that sense it was analagous in function to the Internet, but I think to say that the catalog anticipated or was a precursor to the Internet any more than any other printed catalog or reference book is pushing the point a bit. --Nowa 11:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:Well logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Greetings. Which of the images in commons:Earth belongs in this article? We had the "blue marble" from 1972. I have seen a cover of a 1968 Whole Earth Catalog (I think in this video) that impossibly has that image. Currently I have added the first photo of Earth but omitted another first, this Earth rise. Any opinions? -SusanLesch (talk) 03:05, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
"How Buildings Learn" is a very nice commentary on architecture by an amateur, however, the most important point Stewart writes about is his recanting of geodesic domes which he advocated in Whole Earth Catalog. The book deserves to have more written about it. 143.232.210.45 (talk) 21:08, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
The "American Indian" section of this article is odd: Brand isn't really known, in any substantial or defining way, for work about/with native peoples: they crop up in his various works in the manner which they appeared in a lot of stuff from the 1960's, as a sort of token. By this rationale, every bio of a 60's figure should include such a section. I'm sure he's mentioned African-Americans in his works: should there be a section on them as well? He mentions Costa-Ricans, Africans, Norwegians, Maori, Aboriginies, New Zealanders, etc. in his works as well...should they have sections as well? You see my point, I hope. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.110.123.197 (talk) 22:13, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
It’s probably a mistake for the subject of an entry to read any of the discussion, but I did, so I’ll add some grist to the mill here. My involvement with Indians began in 1963, half a decade before they became a hippy hobby. Back then the only non-anthropologists interested in Indians were (I later learned) Gary Snyder, Marlon Brando, and Ken Kesey. A new book HIPPIES, INDIANS, & THE FIGHT FOR RED POWER, by Sherry L. Smith, begins with my story with Indians and weaves it through the rest of the book. A short version of that story is on pages 235-238 of my WHOLE EARTH DISCIPLINE. The bio page of my website mentions that I created and performed a multi-media show called “America Needs Indians” from 1963-1966. My first published writing was “The Native American Church Meeting” in Psychedelic Review 9, in 1966. As noted in the entry, I married an Ottowa Indian, Lois Jennings, that same year. The Smithsonian Institution invited me to write an article for THE HANDBOOK OF NORTH AMERICAN INDIANS titled “Indians and the Counter-culture, 1960s-1970s.” It finally appeared in 1988 in Volume 4 of the Handbook: HISTORY OF INDIAN-WHITE RELATIONS. Kesey once said to me, “Whatever else you do in your life, you’ll always be known as America-Needs-Indians Brand.” --Stewart Brand — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.112.19 (talk) 22:36, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
I note that there's criticism of Stewart Brand on the internet, alleging that his leanings serve corporate and/or libertarian interests at the expense of the environmentalism he professes. If this argument does exist in print, and has some validity, I think it'd improve the balance of the article.
Here are some links from a quick google search:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2010/nov/05/stewart-brand-pesticide
https://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/07/25-3 66.91.63.239 (talk) 06:26, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Re: Whole Earth Discipline: One main topic area of the book is Brand's reasoned appeal in favor of (and to assuage readers' fears about) nuclear power-plant utilization and proliferation. But now we've lived through a year in which the world public has been barraged by media reportage depicting the effects of earthquake & tsunami on a nuclear plant built and used in a disciplined, modern society - raising issues, to be sure. By any account, what happened in northern Japan has been a huge tragedy. How isolated an event this is remains to be seen. So I'd think readers of this article will wonder what Brand is saying nowadays. If anyone has info on this, it might be worth ammending the article.Joel Russ (talk) 23:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
I wonder if there is a better way to organize this section with the section headings. It seems kind of hard to follow currently. Anyone else feel similarly or have any ideas? AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 00:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Stewart Brand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:19, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Note - The Smithsonian link does not work. I found the following on the Wayback Machine. This is my first recommendation on Wikipedia.
https://web.archive.org/web/20090327075119/http://click.si.edu/Story.aspx?story=31 Tom Christoffel - Northern Shenandoah Valley, Virginia, USA (talk) 04:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Just a few bits of info about S.B and his outlook on emerging prospects for creative world changing. Quotes from publications that sometimes use direct quotes from S.B. himself:
from Andrew G. Kirk, Counterculture Green
“His views on sustainability, ecology, and quality of life were shaped by the world of ideas in which he had enmeshed himself: photography, computers, engineering, design, military service, ecology, music, art, and science…” pg. 42
“Even as he was training to become an ecologist, Brand maintained his fundamental belief in the power of people to fix big problems.” pg. 34
From: "Stewart Brand's Whole Earth Catalog, the book that changed the world" by Carole Cadwalladr
"'We are as gods and might as well get good at it,' wrote Brand on the title page of the Whole Earth Catalog. Up until now, he noted, power has been in the hands of "government, big business, formal education, church". But now "a realm of intimate, personal power is developing – power of the individual to conduct his own education, find his own inspiration, shape his own environment and share his adventure with whoever is interested. Tools that aid this process are sought and promoted by the Whole Earth Catalog."
“While scientists like Doug Englebart (who had, like Brand, taken part in LSD-assisted creativity sessions) came to believe that computers would be part of that. They were were developing the hardware while Brand was articulating a vision of how they might be a new tool to empower ordinary people: small scale, democratic and free." (note Doug Englebart was a good friends of Brand)
“'Lots of people try and change human nature but it's a real waste of time. You can't change human nature, but you can change tools, you can change techniques.'" And that way "'you can change civilisation'".
[above quotes from https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/may/05/stewart-brand-whole-earth-catalog ]
From: "The invention of Google before Google — a radical mail-order 'Catalog'" by John Markoff
"Art Kleiner, editor in chief of Strategy+Business, who worked at CoEvolution Quarterly, a follow-on to the catalog, pegs Brand’s contribution as not just providing people with access to tools, but also instilling in them a deep faith in human progress. 'It was the idea, ‘Let’s take this baby, humanity, out on the road and see what it will do,’' he said."
[above quote from https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-markoff-stewart-brand-whole-earth-catalog-20180328-story.html ]
I plan to cite these publications to support a re-introduction of a short passage that was previously in the S.B. article here on Wikipedia.
Brand was famously anti-metric-system in the 1970s. This seems worth mentioning. Hopefully with fewer expletives than float around in my head. Aldenrw (talk) 03:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
https://www.weareasgods.film/ I just watched this film, We Are As Gods (2021). While it provides a full and fascinating biographical account of Brand’s life and work, it focuses on his current controversial project of restoring ecosystems by bringing back extinct species like the wooly mammoth. I don’t see that aspect of his work covered at all in the current article. I am new to this side of Wikipedia, so would someone out there like to take this on? Ladyalight (talk) 02:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Revirvlkodlaku removed the section about Brand being appointed by Jerry Brown as a special advisor, since it was not referenced. However, that episode in Brand's life is a fact. I'm pretty sure a citation can be made — reliable info to be found in John Markoff's detailed bio of Brand, Whole Earth, (2022, Penguin hardcover). Sorry, can't supply page numbers because I don't own a copy, but borrowed it from the local library a few months ago.Joel Russ (talk) 15:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
From 1977 to 1979, Brand served as "special advisor" to the administration of California Governor Jerry Brown.
Regarding the recently utilized templates indicating unreferenced sections (containing factual info, in my estimation): Most or all substantiation, and hence references, can be provided by page citations from John Markoff's 2022 extensive & intensive biography of Brand, Whole Earth, (2022, Penguin hardcover). I've read the book & reviewed it on Goodreads, however I do not own a copy (borrowed it from the public library).
I feel the image on the current iteration of this article conveys a misleadng impression, and isn't inviting. Please compare it to images used in other Wikipedia biographical articles.
It's true that, if we live long enough, we each become old. But the current image of Brand makes him look moribund. His life has not only been characterized by curiosity, intelligence, creativity, and originality, but by physical vitality as well. One would never suspect this last attribute when looking at the image that's integral to the article's introduction ("first impressions" and all that).
Of course, some of the article's previous iterations incorporated considerably more youthful images of the man. But, forgetting those, I'll suggest going back to this one: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stewart_Brand_in_2020.jpg#file
What do you think?Joel Russ (talk) 21:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)