This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
An image used in this article, File:Stalingrad battle for the factory.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC) |
Wouldn't the series of French revolutions throughout the 19th century be a good place to talk about developing tactics? Such as the infamous Barricade? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.188.56 (talk) 23:36, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
((cite web))
: CS1 maint: date format (link)This article contains enough information to form the bases of a section on how the US armed forces conducts urban warfare in the early 21st century. -- PBS (talk) 13:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
This is an article about Urban warfare it is not a list of cites under siege from 1846. The only sieges which should be listed are those in which urban warfare tactics developed significantly, so for example the Battle of Monterrey, Mexico describes how tunnelling could be used. But entries such as "Battle of Panama City" and "Siege of Sarajevo" in no way enhance this article which is about Urban warfare. The "Second Battle of Fallujah" would be a useful addition if the section included details of the tactics used by both sides but at the moment it does not. -- PBS (talk) 10:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Picture says "Mlving down the escape corridor". Maybe he's moving up? He's pointing the gun upwards. Gevorg89 (talk) 08:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC)