Freedom is good. I am wit@wit.com if you wish to email me.

Wikipedia:Meetup

Reminder of some wiki syntax: 


((NoMultiLicense))
((CurrentTime))
((PhilosophyTasksBox))
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Anti-war]]
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Critical Theory]]
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience]]
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Drugs]]
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Doctor Who]]
[[Wikipedia:MozEx tutorial]]
[[Wikipedia:how-to]]
[[WP:LIVINIG]]


[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Pages_needing_expert_attention Pages that need experts]

[[inclusionist]]

((Boxboxtop|[[Wikipedia:Userboxes|Userboxes]]))
((User:The Raven's Apprentice/Userboxes/User Metric))
<div style="float: left; border:solid (({1|(({border-c|(({id-c|#999999))))))))} 1px; margin: 1px;">
{| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; background: (({2|(({info-c|#eeeeee))))));"
| style="width: 45px; height: 45px; background: (({1|(({id-c|#dddddd)))))); text-align: center; font-size: (({5|(({id-s|14))))))pt; color: (({id-fc|black))};" | '''(({3|incl))}'''
| style="font-size: (({info-s|8))}pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color: (({info-fc|black))};" | (({4|This [[:Category:Inclusionist Wikipedians|user]] is a Wikipedia '''[[M:Inclusionism|inclusionist]]'''.))}
|}</div>
((user DAR))
((User:Disavian/Userboxes/Not Censored))
((User Recently Discovered Userboxes))
((Boxboxbottom))

((user infobox))

((Calm))

2010-((CURRENTMONTH))-((CURRENTDAY)) || ((NUMBEROFARTICLES)) || '''((formatnum:((#expr: ((NUMBEROFARTICLES:R))-3144000))))'''<ref group="a" name="a">Calculated live, so far, as only for partial year.</ref>


I do not dual-license my work
I am against voluntary dual-licensing of Wikipedia contributions.

04:20

  • Optimism should have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
  • Philosophy of social science, has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
  • Exchange value needs to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'Marxist theory'- although it's an important component of Marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the article's weight on Marx is also absurd.
  • German Idealism and the articles related to it may need to be rewritten or expanded to avoid undue weight on Arthur Schopenhauer.
  • Protected values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
  • Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
  • Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
  • Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
  • Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
  • Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
  • Analytic philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
  • Lifeworld A philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
  • Perception Needs the attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only the start of an overhaul of perception and related articles.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Anti-war Wikipedia:WikiProject Critical Theory Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience Wikipedia:WikiProject Drugs Wikipedia:WikiProject Doctor Who Wikipedia:MozEx tutorial Wikipedia:how-to


Pages that need experts

inclusionist

Jeff Carr
— Wikipedian —



Category