This is a subpage of 331dot's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Hello, 331dot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blaux, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for stepping in on this. This is a tough one; I'm pretty sure he has good intentions, but some serious competency issues, given his recent edits to his talk page. Some of this edits to entertainment topics are relatively harmless [1], but outside of altering Disney synopses, we have edits like this [2] and [3] (good faith, but questionable detail inclusion and wording) and this [4] (huh?). Thoughts? OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Re: [5] - you may be interested to know that the user has already created another account, continued with their long-term pattern of nonsensical vandalism, and been blocked again....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
I live in Delhi and know more about Delhi riots than you, so before you undo any change read about it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Burningfire22 (talk • contribs)
Hi thanks for blocking it for the moment. How can i report it or get account access back. Where should i apply? I've mailed to stewards too as emergency suggested there. 103.10.31.47 (talk) 09:20, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Instead of annoying experienced editors who are doing their best to combat vandalism, why not protect the article in question (Scottish Premiership) from idiotic editing? Bye. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 08:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi 331dot I have made a disclosure as per your instructions on my user page. By doing so, do I have the right to make changes on the articles which I have listed?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ijeshe (talk • contribs)
I've just checked some of this user's deleted edits and he's a minor. Deb (talk) 09:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Just a courtesy note to say I've gone to ANI per your suggestion. Thanks. 92.24.246.11 (talk) 15:50, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I am not an active contributor on English Wikipedia, and I do not have a background about the process of moving categories, so can you help me and move this Category to "Kuwait Emir Cup", please? According to the main article. Thanks in advance.--فيصل (talk) 22:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
If you haven't seen this one before, it's pretty good: A vicious culture war is tearing through Wikipedia Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Was this message meant for me? I tried checking the latest entries and didn’t see my username pop up. Perhaps it’s my lousy WiFi just being slow. Celestina007 (talk) 14:18, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for such a prompt response to my question on the Help page. In looking at the Wikitia site, there seems to be no obvious or designated place to make a complaint and, as I pointed out earlier, the process for editing is tied to a payment system which, in the circumstances, seems to be quite wrong. As to my Wikipedia draft article, I have tried to ascertain whether a resubmission is reviewed by the same person or whether it has to await a new review : I'd be grateful if you were able to shed light on this? My thanks again. Hunaniaeth (talk) 20:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback. I included so many references because a previous rejection was based on not having enough. I could certainly have less references. I thought that every statement needs to be supported with a reference. I'll take your advice into consideration. Have a nice day! Bela Adu (talk) 15:33, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Bela Adu
OK, so I can support my statements by using one reference multiple times, rather than adding independent references with overlapping information. Got that! But how would you define a high quality reference? Does it necessarily have to be in English? I do appreciate your help. Bela Adu (talk) 16:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Bela Adu
Thank you for taking the time to answer me! Bela Adu (talk) 16:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Bela Adu
The Civility Barnstar | |
Thank you for putting up with my constant boring torture regarding Sushant Singh Rajput. Hope I didn't piss you off 🙄. Take care - Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talk • contribs) 04:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC) |
Hello there 331dot I've been observing your reviews and the way you have been guiding others I felt is really amazing, I will be pleased to assist you and learn from you , would you mind adopting me? Thanks Suryabeej (talk) 10:59, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
After rejecting the article multiple times, you guys think that the nature of my edit gives the impression that i have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting this topic. I would like to clarify that there is no monetary benefit of me promoting the article. I have worked with the Subject in the past and i think it is important for people to know about the person who has so much to educate about yoga, pranayam, meditation etc. In today's time when people are stressed about so much happening around, i think Yoga is something that can help them in multiple ways. Sanjeev Bhanot created Antastha Yoga series that stimulates the central nervous system, develop your inner strength and flexibility, and regenerate you by activating your lifeforce. Antastha Yoga helps you therefore mentally to manage the challenges of meditation & to understand and use the body mind connection for yourself. Physically it increases your flexibility, lowers your blood pressure, reduces stress hormones, improves your joints & muscle toning as well as digestion & sleep, regulates your cardiovascular & hormone system & increases your general energy level. There is so much that the person has contributed on the same and it is extremely disappointing that you, the reviewers on wikipedia think that it is not notable after providing multiple references for the same.
THERE IS NO MONETARY BENEFIT INVOLVED. If wikipedia meeds a monetary benefit from all the articles that gets published, that is a different matter. And if that is the case i would like to spread this information about wikipedia other digital platforms.
Jyotsanaj03 (talk) 15:11, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
If you template 1 warn an individual on UPE, are they allowed to remove it from their tp? Celestina007 (talk) 00:29, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Can you please help me inprove or aprove my page im begging you— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dogmusic45 (talk • contribs)
Thanks! Emat20211 (talk) 14:20, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Enat20211
I am trying to respond to a message, but I am not sure if I am in the right place.
I attempted to edit the Quantized Inertia article, as the proponent of the theory is too busy. I am not in his employment. I just follow him in Twitter and offered my help. He tried editing the article and his edit was erased, as was mine, then it was restored.
I will not attempt to edit the article again. Other guys better at this, or Mike himself, will. Thanks for your message and I hope you get my reply.
Best regards,
Jose Lopez
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
You wrote such a beautiful paragraph to that person who asked about writing a new article on WP:HELPDESK recently. It seemed so caring and cushioning! I loved it! Abillionradios (talk) 11:04, 4 June 2021 (UTC) |
This is an engagement in malicious rhetoric. Do you think people are stupid and do not realize that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark19651965 (talk • contribs)
The University of Alaska Fairbanks is a reliable source. They were testing a hypothesis. Obviously. But your discussion pages ignore that fact.
This all comes down to ugly rhetorical spin. Language has its own, built-in reliability, independent of "sources". At least it does for reasonable people. For example, a discussion board's use of the word "Truther" pejoratively is evidence of undue bias. Furthermore, "promote" is another incorrect definition of what A&E does. All you need is a dictionary and a grade school education to know that. It is more correct to say: They "advocate".
Look, the presence of undue bias is blatant and that reflects poorly upon Wikipedia. Ultimately, this unprofessionalism undermines user confidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark19651965 (talk • contribs) 09:34, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Address the substantive issues or allow dispute resolution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark19651965 (talk • contribs)
I don't truck with threats. And if it is "just semantics" then you won't mind changing it, right? You know, "semantics" is simply a euphemism for "rhetoric" deployed by people who want to deflect their accountability for intentional persuasion and connotation. Mark19651965 (talk) 09:52, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
It doesn't go "both ways". You said it doesn't matter. I say it does. Therefore, logically, you should change, as it doesn't matter to you. Smarten-up.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Modulus12 (talk) 21:11, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
5.178.202.10 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), whom you blocked for edit warring 4 days ago[6], is back and continues warring in the same article[7]. It seems the block wasn't effective. Any ideas? — kashmīrī TALK 23:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
its me i already started one can you delete it for me please🤗🤗🤗 Deborah Jenkins (talk) 18:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Can you pls delete my blog for me please🍒🤗🤗🤗... Deborah Jenkins (talk) 18:14, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Debbie J
OK.So how do i delete it myself? Deborah Jenkins (talk) 18:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, 331dot. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blaux".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:07, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
I was clearing out CAT:UNBLOCK when I declined this user's unblock request. I did not notice at the time that you were working on it. You did not place the request on hold.
I did not mean to step on your toes. If you feel differently than me about the outcome, you may revert me and replace the review with your own. I won't mind. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 11:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Can you redact User:16ConcordeSSC's personal information in Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion#Semi-protected edit request on 4 June 2021, like you did on Wikipedia talk:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Urgently need willing mediator? -Apocheir (talk) 00:57, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
For working hard at CAT:UNBLOCK I award you the Admin's barnstar! HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 07:33, 9 June 2021 (UTC) |
you sent me a block warning....but I dont think i did something wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamjeed Ahmed (talk • contribs) 12:54, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).
Hello, I found your name on the top of the list of active Wiki admins, so I thought of messaging you. I am a new Wikipedian, so I am seeking help from you. A few days back, I had seen a place in wikipedia, where one could request for sources. I cannot find it now. Can you give me the link???? Thanks. The Dark Lord Returns To The Earth (talk) 08:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
What is the legal and right process to challenge and remove unsourced data in Wiki. I mean, can I just remove it, and right 'unsourced' in the edit summary? Thanks again, The Dark Lord Returns To The Earth (talk) 08:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
331dot, Welcome, I have a important notice for you, the notice is: LG U813 just needs to move to LG U8138. 100.11.109.181 (talk) 12:51, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
WRONG GRAMMAR: LG U813 → LG U8138. I know that is not correct, but it’s OK to incorrect, someone makes LG U813 as a mistake. That’s OK! Don’t worry you can fix this grammar. 100.11.109.181 (talk) 12:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
The page is not protected. See at List of LG mobile phones 100.11.109.181 (talk page) 13:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
I can't find your reply 331 so posting under help; and shocked how poor wikipedia ux is - the furthest thing from user friendly, I can't think of a website that's worse. Fk. I can't find where you took the time to give me feedback after following the link and searching the title several times. Greatly appreciate you effort, if wikipedia were intuitively designed I might be able to better contribute, as well as others. A basic forum is easier to follow than this. TheGremlin Jun 15,2021
My ban has now expired and I User:Thegameshowlad am requesting a Standard Offer for my account to be unblocked. I have spent the last 6 months in reflection, reading policies thinking about what I did wrong and how to can stop it from happening again, I know policies very well and I think I am capable of been unblocked. I regret my actions and I have learned from them and if you give me a chance I will act in a better manner in future. Yours sincerely 82.41.12.175 (talk) 15:24, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi there. Thank you for taking the time to review my draft article.
I totally understand and am aware that I under a conflict of interest when it comes to writing the article. I attempted to follow the guidelines in this page. I disclosed my affiliation with the company in my user page; I have provided five sources to support the content of the article.
What more can I do to put this draft article in a better position for it to be accepted and published?
Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Johan61vv (talk • contribs)
He was already warned several times by different users at his talk page but he is still harassing me.(Last harassment) Could you block this user please?--V. E. (talk) 16:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Some random IP addresses are violating WP:FILMLEAD on the page PAW Patrol: The Movie. Can you please change access to the page to autoconfirmed? This is what they did and why I want the permission to be changed.
Please reply, this is very annoying. Their edits have also been reverted by another editor, see for yourself. Thanks, Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 14:25, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Sunshine! | ||
Hello 331dot! Interstellarity (talk) has given you a bit of sunshine to brighten your day! Sunshine promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day better. Spread the sunshine by adding ((subst:User:Meaghan/Sunshine)) to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding ((User:Meaghan/Sunshine icon)). Happy editing! Interstellarity (talk) 20:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC) |
Happy first day of summer, 331dot!! Interstellarity (talk) 20:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Tried and failed to ping you to a new chapter in that old Armenian parliamentary tale, on account of your small D. Then tried to tell you here, but the sign said you were away. Long story short, relax and enjoy your trip, we'll have everything taken care of (one way or the other) by the time you get back. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
This is an LTA spamming requests. If there's no other edit on the talk page I've just been deleted them as G5s. I'm guessing they're determined to connect to any blocked webhost/proxy they can in order to overwhelm CAT:RFU, so a short term edit filter may be required. @Zzuuzz:, any ideas of what might work?-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:47, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi, please don't block me. PAW Patrol: The Movie is an American-Canadian film and those users are kept on changing it to Canadian since they don't know anything about the movie. So please unblock me. Thank You. Sumtut001(talk). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumtut001 (talk • contribs) 22:08, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Alright! Why not consider removing the extended protection?Erennica (talk) 15:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to ask for the permanent deletion of all revisions in my user page between the 30th of April, 2019 and the 14th of October, 2020 (4 edits in total), if possible. Oqwert (talk) 17:43, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
You blocked User:Chicora26 yesterday for making legal threats to do with Josh Kimbrell , and today two IPs, 2600:6C5E:5E7F:4E29:F1E3:4F70:18C:34E6 and 2600:6C5E:5E7F:4E29:40D0:91A6:1AC0:8748, edited the page, changing the wording of a sentence saying that charges against Kimbrell were dropped due to a lack of evidence to saying that the charges were dropped due to the allegations being false, which paints the charges in a more negative light. This seems similar to Chicora's behavior before making threats, which was to remove the whole paragraph about the original charges and the charges being dropped. A range block might be in order for block evasion Jackattack1597 (talk) 23:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
You might want to fix your link here in case anyone reads the archived question and gets confused.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Will you give me one of those welcome templates? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GBFEE (talk • contribs) 13:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi 331dot. I'm just curious about that last revdeletion you did at the Teahouse earlier today per WP:RD5. Is it something you can discuss? -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thank you so much! You are such a good admin! It was so annoying seeing those users keep changing edits, and happy fourth of july! Signed, Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 14:08, 4 July 2021 (UTC) |
Hi there, I just added a response to your question is "who we is" From Help desk in "15:36:28, 6 July 2021 review of draft by Kwokng". Kwokng (talk) 18:44, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi again, thanks for the reply and clarifying for me. I've replied again. Kwokng (talk) 18:44, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi 331., just a quick note that 5.178.202.10 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) has returned from the block you imposed but continues with the same type of disruption – pushing "American" to non-US companies, corporations and products.[8][9][10][11][12]. Repeated warnings have zero effect. Thanks if you could help again. — kashmīrī TALK 12:30, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Martin did contact me on IRC, but I lost message due to my IRC clumsiness. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:04, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi 331dot, I just saw your message about conflict of interest. I am currently an intern at the organization I'm writing about. I'm more than willing to forfeit my editing privileges for this article, but nonetheless, I think it is a notable organization worthy of its own article. I can site multiple external sources as well as effects from the work they've done, however, I don't think the article would be written unless I do it or encourage someone else to do it. I know Wikipedia discourages people from writing about entities they are affiliated with, but I believe that means it is still allowed, right? Should I avoid this if I'm the only one who will write it? Is there a way I can encourage an unaffiliated editor to right this, or would my encouragement be considered affiliation? I want to thank you very much for how helpful you've been with this, and I hope I'm not being a burden. I also know I have to disclose the organization I work for in my account too, right? Also, does any of this change if I am not being paid for my work? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noahpdoty (talk • contribs)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Super Air Jet. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Amandari. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
Celestina007 (talk) 21:42, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Howdy. Would you be interested in reviewing & closing an RFC at Donald Trump, concerning that article's intro? GoodDay (talk) 18:14, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I have cited articles by TOI and other reliable news websites, The singer is not up and coming. He has made a name in Malayalam music and is trying to establish independent music as well. He is not a nobody. His work has also been listed systematically with listing existing on wikipedia itself. I dont understand how many more articles are needed. The person who declined the article said not adequately supported by resources however in his msg to me he said its not that you have to have a citation for every detail so this is kind of confusing. request you to please review the article once again and if edits are required they can be done. The article is not biased in its writing as well. every line that describes the singing style has been written by another source in a published news piece on known websites. Zeenatameet (talk) 11:36, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
The singer is not up & coming. Most of the musicians are written about when they are interviewed. So you are saying that publishers like TOI, The Hindu and Deccan chronicle interviewing artists is not of any significance?Zeenatameet (talk) 11:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
I recently moved Atta Mills Institute to Draft:Atta Mills Institute and at the same time you tagged it with many tags, so should that page be again restored to an article or is it better as a draft? ExclusiveEditor Notify Me! 07:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
appreciate your feedback
I have explained it to the users, then they just keep putting it back up. i do not know the subject. I am a first user and in addition I had references ready and did even get a chance to use them, there are too any wiki users making assuptions and just acting quickly. Its very hard to make a simple edit it seems..... its like a power game with some of them
now please remove the template -otherwise you will be providing false information. If I can help in any way by showing you L dont know the subject let me know..... its been a very poor experience — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mysteriousmusicman (talk • contribs)
Would you mind doing the honors here? The allegations on that Wordpress site are obviously ridiculous, but nonetheless it's tiresome to have it dredged up by the occasional critical-thinking-challenged user. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:04, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
You have recently edited the article for Dainius Kreivys. I appreciate you protecting the page and blocking me from editing, however There has been quite some movement happening on that page, The user adding those edits has been doing this across several political figures adding speculative and untrue information, whilst using very negatively charged language (for example one paragraph stated that he was “convicted” which is completely untrue and unfounded and even the cited sources does not mention any conviction). This looks like a coordinated approach to negatively portray certain individuals, by using information found on tabloids who themselves speculate what they have written.
I have been removing and monitoring those pages for that purpose, as the person adding those changes cannot based it on reliable sources, I wanted to ask for help for it to be removed please.
Thank you Jovaišai (talk) 11:07, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Alright I will make my case, however please make sure to review.
Thank you Jovaišai (talk) 11:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Both,
I have added a topic in the talk page of the article explaining the ambiguities and inaccuracies there. Please could you kindly review, I have broken down the article and explained (explanation is in brackets below every chunk of text that has a source), many thanks. Jovaišai (talk) 12:25, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Would it be possible to bring in a 3rd party to moderate ?
The IP address that is adding those changes has been doing across other biographies as well, purely adding negative content about them. (Which is incorrectly translated and by my analysis, on purpose) Jovaišai (talk) 13:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know and I will refrain from accusations. Would then it be sensible to suspend the information that is disputed on the page until we come to an agreement?
Thank you Jovaišai (talk) 13:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, the information was added only recently and that is why I wanted to correct it. The status quo was when there was no commentary at all, it is all very recent. I have added my responses to the authors comments.
Many thanks,
Hi 331dot,
Thank you very much for fixing the links for me. I am grateful. I also appreciate your clear and objective information, they are very helpful. They will definitely help me on Wikipedia going forward.
However, going forward, I want to please ask that if I reference the filmography links, will the article be approved? I guess that's the main thing remaining from your assessment.
Looking forward to your response.
Thanks and regards, Segun.
Segunoloye (talk) 18:31, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi :@331dot: I recently help Wikipedia by adding budget of movie along with reference but one user remove the editing along with warning of suspension. What I do know thanks— Preceding unsigned comment added by Oneyatri (talk • contribs)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
Hi there 331dot!
I wonder if you could help me. I'm trying to publish a page for Joanna Lefson, an animal rights campaigner. I believe that the page was originally tagged for speedy deletion because it was viewed as self-promotional. I have since given the page a substantial re-write and bolstered it with legitimate references from reputable media sources. I'm not sure what else needs to be done to convince Wikipedia that this is not a promotional page but a person of legitimate interest? Please advise!
Many thanks. Joanne Lefson (talk) 07:19, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi again 331dot,
Thank you for your prompt response. I am indeed Joanne and I am also creating a page for myself. I do realise that this is a red flag for wikipedia editors, but if you see the page and interrogate the references you will see that I am a person of legitimate interest in South Africa and the wider world of animal rights and animal arts. I have been covered in National Geographic, the UK Times, on the BBC, NBC, ABC, CNN, and across many other media. I had an academic triple check that the copy on this page was written objectively and that the references were legitimate before resubmitting. As far as I am aware, there is no rule against somebody submitting their own page so long as it is objective, neutral, fact-based, and heavily substantiated – which it now is. The error message I receive is that I have used a "deprecated source" but there are approximately 50 sources on my page and there is no indication which source is deemed problematic. Please could somebody therefore provide me with some more specific feedback as to why this page is continuously flagged for speedy deletion.
Many kind regards,
Joanne