Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

NPR

Ryan troyer is a blatant, near-vandalism autbio by a child. Please return to the article and tag it appropriately for deletion, then please review the instructions at WP:NPP again. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC) BTW: I concur with John from Idegon's comments above, and FWIW, the patroller right can be removed at simple admin discretion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Kudpung; Sure, I'll go back and tag and what not. Although I'm going to refer to John's conversation above, I don't patrol often on NP, but I do elsewhere. Also, as a fellow Wikipedian, be nice, as with your second comment. I definitely think that two mistakes in a two-to-three month period isn't a major infraction. As with the possibility of my rights removal, as John didn't take any action for 'whatever its worth', I would rather you respectfully go to WP:INCIDENT if you see my right as improper, rather than just mop them away as that doesn't seem deserved (I'm not a vandal, nor a person to misuse a right intentionally). Were humans, we make mistakes. Adog104 Talk to me 14:29, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
You are too touchy! I was merely offering a straightforward answer to: then you may start a discussion at WP:ANI per what WP:PERM has to say about rights removal. No discussion is needed to remove a minor right - minor rights are easy come, easy go; they are accorded on competency and an expressed intention to use them, they are not badges of merit or rank. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Kudpung; I was going to respond, but now I've run into a tight schedule. So I think we should just head separate ways and drop it for now until we meet one another again sometime if and when that happens. Cheers! Adog104 Talk to me 22:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Adog. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 08:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.

No way! Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 08:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

About becoming an administrator

Wikipedia needs you! Take the poll.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia so far; they are very much appreciated. Your experience and tenure have been an asset to the project.

Have you ever thought of becoming an administrator? It can be enjoyable, challenging, and a great way to help Wikipedia.

To receive feedback on your chances of successfully requesting administrative privileges, consider starting a poll:

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

Thank you!

Are you reading this on another user's talk page? If you are experienced and trusted, and would consider becoming an admin, you are very much encouraged to take the take the poll.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

That Poppy

Hello there. I was wondering if you could please address my message on the That Poppy talk page. It's been there for a few days and I notice you've been rather active there. I'm curious why we're able to list her real name on the EP page but not her own artist page, especially considering that her real name links back to the That Poppy page. Cheers, Percivl (talk) 22:53, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Percivl; Correlation does not imply causation, i.e., the name does not define the character or artist in question for this situation, as with another artist: Marshmello, whose identity is similarly unknown. I believe it's not appropriate to use or identify Moriah Pereira as the character That Poppy, as there is not sufficient evidence from reliable sources directly confirming that she is the artist or character portrayed, as most references provided merely mention the name. I would argue to look at WP:NPF (possibly WP:DOB, however not probably), as stated in previous discussion(s). Adog104 Talk to me 21:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017 WikiCup newsletter

The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:

Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.

So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Buhe (politician)

On 9 May 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Buhe (politician), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 06:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Poppy

Few notes on the Poppy changes you are reverting back: -Her new artist name is Poppy and is reflected as such across all social networks and distribution channels (such as iTunes)
-The image being used is a wildly outdated one and is frankly hard to even find
-The latest music (out today) is released on "I'm Poppy" records via Mad Decent Records
-Please check her YouTube page for the most current channel view count
-"Lowlife" (Featuring Travis Mills) was never an officially released track, it was a demo that was leaked

Coaster500; True the artist name is That Poppy, however, that isn't a reasonable explanation as to why the sourced description of her 'identity' or creation was deleted. The content is backed by sources, and merely gives mention to the ideas behind the subject matter which seems proper at this time with no other information. The image is copyrighted, and is not within our policies (WP:IUP). The latest music video to-date is actually entitled "Computer Boy" which was published on 19 May 2017 with no indication of recording studio in the description or elsewhere (although on her channel, it lists that "Interscope Records" is of her address). The view count is correct on your part, that was my mistake for not spotting that. Finally, Lowlife is a grey-area for Travis Miller and could be discussed further, although I did find a source indicating it was released via Island Records and now it is private. Adog104 Talk to me 23:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello Adog,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 819 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Miami Vice

The statistic is noteworthy, superlative and comes from a source that is verifiable and trustworthy. Leave as is; further reversions will not be tolerated, thank you Sean 2015 (talk) 02:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Sean 2015; I'm sorry, but as from what I've said, Ebyabe, and with reversions from SeminoleNation have tried to explain and convey, we need consensus from the text in question before including it in the article, and I ask you kindly to refer to Miami's talk page. Flipping a summary doesn't help anyone in this situation, especially edit warring by ignoring conversation, so please refrain. From my standpoint, the text in question seems holds WP:UNDUE weight in the article, and especially shouldn't be placed in the lead section as it doesn't summarize anything in the article but itself. Although if you wished, per Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline, you could instead create a section about crime and homelessness that would be applicable in a demographics section (Miami currently doesn't have one). However, just referring to one study in saying "Miami was rated as the worst U.S. city in which to live" should be represented with reliable studies or references further explaining why Miami is rated 'the worst' with statistics. For instance, sections in Chicago#Crime or New York City#Public Safety are great examples of displaying crime and homelessness as a demographic using factual information and refraining for the article to be 'overtly positive'.
Overall, yes, the information was published in a reliable source, which was from the Miami Herald (probably best summarized per WP:ASSERT for 24/7 Wall Street, but the source may need to be discussed further as I'm not fully informed about its publishing besides that it occasionally seems to produce the run of the mill listings and ratings of subjects but again, discussion). However, the way in which the information is presented, where its placed in the article, and the edit warring is why I have a problem with the content looking at it now. Mind you, the others and myself aren't trying to be jerks, we're trying to help out in sorting information properly within the article, and edit warring and being one-sided hasn't and won't work in solving disputes. Adog104 Talk to me 04:32, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

I had typed some comments and a response here and I thought I had saved it, but it is not showing for some reason. I have moved the passage in question to the Economy section where I feel it might be a better "fit". Sean 2015 (talk) 05:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

I have responded on my talk page. --Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 05:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Sean 2015; Thank you for replying and considering my view (and overall ours), although if the others and you would like, in the future we could discuss about developing the economy and demographic sections about information from both sides of sources. I've seen Ebyabe put it in chronological order which also helps :D. It looks great there thus far where it is, and if needed refer to Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline and add further reliable sources. Other than that, if you need any help, feel free to ask. Although next time, make sure if someone reverts an edit, explain to them your side and if that doesn't work then talk it out. :) Adog104 Talk to me 05:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Stop

Bro, what do you mean yt isn't a reliable source? His second channel has 4.8 million subs. There's no denying that. Everybody knows it's true. Then why TF are you removing correct content??? AdiRams12 (talk) 23:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

AdiRams12; To sum up: please read our policies, especially WP:RSSELF and WP:BLP for further information. Adog104 Talk to me 01:00, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

I get it but I don't quite see the problem in mentioning his second channel. I mean, you've allowed the fact that he has 16 million subs on his main channel to be published. Then what's wrong with publishing his second channel subscribers?? They're both pretty much the same thing. Btw I get why you removed the "DramaAlert" thing. If his second channel is considered self published media, why isn't his main channel?? Also, thanks for responding and not ignoring:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdiRams12 (talkcontribs) 14:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

AdiRams12; No problem and thank you for responding and asking questions. :) Mentioning the second channel is fine in the infobox, however this edit listing it under 'name' didn't seem appropriate since its his YouTube channel name not his actual name. If you would like, you could list the statistics of each channel such as those done within Joey Graceffa, Philip DeFranco, Roman Atwood, etcetera etcetera's infobox's under 'subscribers' and 'total views' (although this could be subjected to change if WikiProject YouTube, which you could also join if you wanted, creates a style guide for YouTube personalities articles).
About using his channel as a source, I would see WP:SELFPUB/WP:SELFSOURCE which can help, and I forgot to mention WP:PRIMARY. Generally, YouTube shouldn't be used as a source (as with any social media), but if needed it can and should be used with a reliable secondary source to verify the given information if needed (WP:AEIS). Adog104 Talk to me 22:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Alright. Thanks for clearing that up. Have a nice day :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdiRams12 (talkcontribs) 18:20, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

AdiRams12; No problem, any time, and have a good day as well! :D Adog104 Talk to me 22:18, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Viviane Gauthier

You removed a lot from this article.

Can you please put back the part about her legacy in the first paragraph? I had sources for all of it.


Also, what you called speculation is actually just my surveying the third party sources. And again, I had sources for it.

Most important though please is for you to restore the part about her legacy and her contributions to Haitian dance that I had in the first paragraph as that explains her notability and it came sourced.

Thanks!

--Aliceba (talk) 21:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Aliceba, Rms125a@hotmail.com; I looked at the edit you meant but I feel that Rms will be able to explain better than I could since he was the one to fix the wording.
However, personally by looking at the edit, it seems that the wording is used wrongly in some of lines. For example, the article stated beforehand: "She has also been credited for keeping Haitian dances such as Yanvalou, Nago and Rada alive" when the Aljazeera source states "Viviane Gauthier taught her students the steps to some of Haiti's most famous folklore dances: the yanvalou, the nago, the rada... And without her dedication, some of her students believe Haitian folklore dance would effectively be dead" which seems to be a form of speculation coming from close peers opinions and not from a historical of general public point of view while also not providing a whole analysis of what the source suggests otherwise (leading thus to WP:OR in some instances) — Correct me if that analogy is wrong, I took a peek not an in depth look at the edit.
If you wish to explain further you can do so on my talk page if needed or if wanted it can be moved towards the article's talk page or his talk page. Adog104 Talk to me 23:50, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter

The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Adog, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

Technology update:

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Shorty Awards

You previously commented at the page Shorty Awards.

Perhaps you'd like to see Talk:Shorty Awards for recent developments ? Sagecandor (talk) 16:52, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Sagecandor I commented in 2015, but sure I'll take a look at it after I take a test. :) Adog104 Talk to me 16:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Okay, good luck, thank you ! Sagecandor (talk) 16:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Sagecandor; thanks for the luck. :D Adog104 Talk to me 17:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Adog, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

Technology update:

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 September newsletter

Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Message

I'm not biting any newcomers, the guy is a sockpuppet if you did more research you would know. Why are you reverting my edit? A lazy river is not an "amusement ride". Hawkeye75 (talk) 08:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Hawkeye75; I don't think Special:Contributions/82.132.224.129 is much of an SPI based on the report from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/82.132.247.20. Although fair point about the lazy river, I will revert that one, and others that are like it belonging to water ride so sorry for that slip. Mostly, I was concerned with the edit summary, because even if an amateur/experienced individual was editing on different IP's, we should still treat them as per their actions until there is an undoubted cause about their intent to edit here (citing WP:NOTHERE). I'm not trying to be rude, just wanted to touch up on my statement from my summary. :D Adog104 Talk to me 11:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Water parks and water rides

I've created Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Water parks and water rides, any and all input appreciated. Thank you for your earlier input on the same page. 82.132.242.204 (talk) 13:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Adog, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

Technology update:

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Changing the 'Hypercoaster' wiki drastically

Hi Adog104, I started this Wikipedia account a few days ago with the intentions changing and correcting Wikipedia pages about the amusement branche. I was looking at the Dutch 'Mega Coaster' Wikipage and saw that a lot of things were very, very wrong. I was looking at the English Wikipage about Mega Coasters and this one was contradictory too. Me and a other Dutch speaking Wikipedia author are on a mission correcting these pages drastically and right. I will explain the following in paragraphs numbered 1 till 4:

1. Mistakes Dutch Wikipage 2. Mistakes English Wikipage 3. The starting process 4. Exchanging information

Mistakes Dutch Wikipage

The mistakes made on the Dutch wikipage were too bad. Really. The page told us a Mega Coaster is counted in 3 groups: Mega, Hyper and Giga. What's wrong about these is that 1st Mega a model name is from Intamin AG[1] and Mack Rides[2], second Hyper[3] being the model of B&M, Arrow Dynamics[4] and Mack Rides[5] (larger than the Mack Megacoaster) and Giga[6] being a model from Intamin. All hypercoasters from B&M having the minimal height of a Giga aren't actually a Giga, but still a Hyper. Heights: Intamin Mega Coaster 45 meters (148ft) till 90 meters (295ft) Intamin Giga Coaster 90 meters (295ft) till 120 meters (394ft) B&M Hyper Coaster 50 meters (164ft) no max.

This are the 'approximate' heights of the models and the other companies are using these heights too. With some information from RCDB we will get to it.

Mistakes English Wikipage

The English Wikipage was to be honest a well advanced Wikipage with correct information, but with common mistakes like parting B&Ms and Arrows into Giga's while it's just a model name, where they don't belong to. Read previous paragraph for further information.

The starting process

The starting process is probably the most difficult time for a Wikipage. Common things like "Oh, I forgot about that" "I did not have enough time to involve in any of these Wikis..." etc. When we make a deal, we talk furthermore.

Exchanging information

Information can be found on RCDB, for European coasters we are available for questions, if we are able to ask about non-European coaster to you.

I hope to hear from you soon,

Kind Regards --Rc030 (talk) 20:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

References

References

--- Rc030; Thank you kindly for contacting me and sorting this in an organized way, although if you wanted a bigger outreach towards this problem I would suggest possibly posting this information to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks. I would be glad to help and maybe sort out some problems/misunderstandings, however, I would also like to see others from our project to join in on this also if that is alright (Wikipedia:WikiProject Amusement Parks/Participants)! :D Adog104 Talk to me 23:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Adog, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

Technology update:

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia Asian Month 2017: Invitation to Participate

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results

The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - @Adityavagarwal, Vanamonde93, Casliber, Bloom6132, 1989, and SounderBruce: please send Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018

So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Adog104. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Adog, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

Outreach and Invitations:

New Year New Page Review Drive

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello Adog, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Adog, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!
The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.

Backlog update:

New Year Backlog Drive results:

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.

Our top scorers in round 1 were:

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello Adog, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Notability General notability guideline Subject-specific guidelines Academics Astronomical objects Books Events Films Geographic features Music Numbers Organizations and companies People Sports and athletes Web content See also Notability essays Guide to deletion Common deletion outcomes Why was my article deleted? .mw-parser-output .navbar{display:inline;font-size:88%;font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .navbar-collapse{float:left;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .navbar-boxtext{word-spacing:0}.mw-parser-output .navbar ul{display:inline-block;white-space:nowrap;line-height:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::before{margin-right:-0.125em;content:"[ "}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::after{margin-left:-0.125em;content:" ]"}.mw-parser-output .navbar li{word-spacing:-0.125em}.mw-parser-output .navbar a>span,.mw-parser-output .navbar a>abbr{text-decoration:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-mini abbr{font-variant:small-caps;border-bottom:none;text-decoration:none;cursor:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-full{font-size:114%;margin:0 7em}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-mini{font-size:114%;margin:0 4em}vte

ACTRIAL:

Paid editing

Subject-specific notability guidelines

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

News


To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 May newsletter

The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:

So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

Hello Adog, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

Deletion tags

Backlog drive:

Editathons

Paid editing - new policy

Subject-specific notability guidelines

Not English

News


Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Adog, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!


Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 July newsletter

The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Vanamonde (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello Adog, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules
Editathons
The Signpost

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

You are invited to WikiProject YouTube

WikiCup 2018 September newsletter

The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:

During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:30, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mako (roller coaster)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mako (roller coaster) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gonzo fan2007 -- Gonzo fan2007 (talk) 16:41, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mako (roller coaster)

The article Mako (roller coaster) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mako (roller coaster) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gonzo fan2007 -- Gonzo fan2007 (talk) 18:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mako (roller coaster)

The article Mako (roller coaster) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mako (roller coaster) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gonzo fan2007 -- Gonzo fan2007 (talk) 14:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018

Hello Adog, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.

Project news
As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.
Other
Moving to Draft and Page Mover
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing

  • Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget.
  • In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions.
  • MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues.
  • User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page)
  • User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): npp_num_pages=20; (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50).
  • User:Primefac/revdel.js(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you.
  • User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js(info): Creates a "Page Curation" link to Special:NewPagesFeed up near your sandbox link.
  • User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/deletionFinder.js: Creates links next to the title of each page which show up if it has been previously deleted or nominated for deletion.
  • User:Evad37/rater.js(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: rater_autostartNamespaces = 0; to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

In the news

I'm not sure it was the wrong day. It happened on 30 Sep 2018 in California, and there isn't really any news about it until after 8:00 PM, which would imply that it happened on 1 Oct 2018 UTC, which is how Wikipedia is organized. Am I missing something? McKay (talk) 03:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

@Mckaysalisbury: Ah, no you're good, I only referred to the date (October 1) as the post you made was under the corresponding portal date. Post though according to when it happened in UTC (September 30 in this case). I would also suggest looking at the In The News criteria to make sure the article in question is up-to-par, as ITN doesn't consider stub articles so expand where you can to meet the minimal standard of quality. Adog104 Talk to me 04:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Mako (roller coaster)

On 4 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mako (roller coaster), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that upon its completion in 2016 at SeaWorld Orlando, Mako became the tallest, longest, and fastest roller coaster in the Orlando area? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mako (roller coaster). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Time Traveler (roller coaster), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KFSM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Adog, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Backlog

As of 21 October 2018, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

Community Wishlist Proposal
Project updates
New scripts

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Teladoc

Information icon Hello, I'm TonyTheTiger. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Teladoc have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

@TonyTheTiger:; Wouldn't the introduction or history section need to be reworded because of how aligned they are to different sources [1]? I don't know about that image either, doesn't it seem not to be properly tagged? Kind regards. Adog104 Talk to me 22:10, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
That summary says violation unlikely.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
@TonyTheTiger: You may trout me for that then, perhaps I didn't look at that as well. :P But photo correctly addressed? I'm not an expert in images but it doesn't seem correctly formatted. Nothing big but just a slight concern. Adog104 Talk to me 16:02, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is South Carolina Courcelles (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:

  1. South Carolina Courcelles (submissions)
  2. Wales Kosack (submissions)
  3. Hel, Poland Kees08 (submissions)
  4. SounderBruce (submissions)
  5. Scotland Cas Liber (submissions)
  6. Marshall Islands Nova Crystallis (submissions)
  7. Republic of Texas Iazyges (submissions)
  8. United States Ceranthor (submissions)


All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants:

Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email) and Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email).