This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 105 | ← | Archive 107 | Archive 108 | Archive 109 | Archive 110 | Archive 111 | → | Archive 115 |
Sorry about the dispute, it had nothing to do with me being personally against you. After all, it's an encyclopedia, so I believe no grudges should be held. Take this kitten as a token of gratitude, just don't call me names again please. :P
Telefocus (talk) 23:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This issue is complicated. PRC in de facto and legally, only represents most of China, not all of it. A smaller part of it is controlled by ROC. So China should not be equal to PRC.
( Similar to how Soviet Union should not be succeeded by Russian Federation, but rather by Russian Federation, Ukraine, and remaining republics ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by OrangeLark64 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
That page needed to be deleted because it had no information in it, you did the correct thing, and all i did was notifying it as a stub when i didn't know an atricle with a similar name has been deleted just because i wasn't an administrator... But thanks for deleting it. VirtualizerExtreme (talk) 18:42, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for Turning the page into a redirect that's what I was trying to do, could you please tell me how you did it? N1TH Music (talk) 14:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello Bkonrad,
Recently, I updated the page, Invidious with information about the open source project under the same that that is hosted on GitHub. I made sure that the Wiktionary entry was linked. But my changes were reverted by you, I am wondering for what is the reason?
Thanks!
3kh0 | 3kh0.github.io (talk) 23:29, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, noticed your reverts to Spirit and 'spirit' links from various articles. Trying to fix problems with Spirit (animating force) while following MOS:LINK and MOS:DISAMBIG. Input appreciated on Talk:Spirit_(animating_force)#Requested move 7 April 2022. fiveby(zero) 15:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
I have no idea what you are trying to achieve with your recent edits on Rove. If there were anything to differ over, it should surely be whether the link should go to Glossary of nautical terms (M-Z)#reeve - because that is where the actual explanation of the word is. Perhaps you have a different read of MOS:DAB than me. I am only at the point of curiosity as to what your thinking is - this is nothing like a big problem. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 19:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Apart from the exceptions listed below, piping and redirects should generally not be used on disambiguation pages. This is to make it clear to the reader which topic is the subject of an article title.
Piping may be used when the link is in the description
If a topic does not have an article of its own, but is mentioned within another article, then a link to that article may be included if it would provide value to the reader. In this case, the link does not start the line, but it should still be the only blue wikilink....
It is often useful to link to the relevant section of the target page using anchors and conceal that by making it a piped linkolder ≠ wiser 19:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Greetings! You reverted changes of mine and I do not understand why. I removed indirect links, e.g., Po (disambiguation) and Poo poo (disambiguation) redirect to Po and Poo poo. Are the changes to you reverted to desirable? Helen4780 (talk) 02:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Links to disambiguation pages from mainspace are typically errors. In order to find and fix those errors, disambiguators generate reports of links needing to be checked and fixed. Because these reports cannot distinguish cases where an editor has made such a link with the intent to point to the disambiguation page, the community has adopted the standard of routing all intentional disambiguation links in mainspace through "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects. This makes it clear that such links are intended to point to the disambiguation page.} older ≠ wiser 02:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Have you been following the IT scene, like, at all in the last few years? People talk about Wipro, Infosys, Tata Consulting, Cognizant, and HCL as a unit constantly. T3h 1337 b0y 16:55, 27 April 2022 (UTC)