This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
i am trying to update her information the information that was on their is NOT authorized and reveals very personal information that is NOT for public display
If i can not add to it although I AM authorized then the personal info has to be removed or the page deleted
bottom line
I will try again to remove it NOW and worry about editing it at a later date when i have more time Sharon Savoy18:09, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Savoy1959 (talk) Savoy Prodctions
conflict of interest ??
I have her interest
and as it sits now is a violation of her privacy
Savoy1959 (talk) 18:15, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
You seemed to have allowed me o remove the information i was concerned about
and she is happy with that
but aws she is not good with tech things she has no way of updating and the person who did this originally had NO authorization
So when i have time i will look further into how to do this
but in the meantime thank you for allowing her real name and adoption information to be removed
Sharon Savoy
Savoy Productions Canada
Savoy1959 (talk) 19:47, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
I own Savoy Productions Canada and we are her legal reps so I will read your terms asap we do not usually deal with this site cause we know like this one the information is not authorized Ms Silver was horrified to see this out as public information
So we are all good for now
Sharon Savoy Savoy1959 (talk) 23:20, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
The article Hindustan Movement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Dissident Aggressor 00:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
@C.Fred - I want to edit the article page with valid information about Mushtaq Omar Uddin that is not even disclosed or incorrectly disclosed. Can you please explain I may do that. I tries to make important changes but they keep on being removed and reverting back to the original version. Can the article be reverted to the last edit please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amrak15 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
@C.Fred - I want to edit the article page with valid information about Mushtaq Omar Uddin that is not even disclosed or incorrectly disclosed. Can you please explain how I may do that. I try to make important changes but they keep on being removed and reverting back to the original version when these changes are facts not opinions. Can the article be reverted to my last edit please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amrak15 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
We have been in touch with permissions-commons@wikimedia.org where I have notified them of my released files. What else has to be done at this point? Dinagoldstein (talk) 21:07, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello. You've asked for evidence and I'm here present evidence for the Bad World Tour's title. Here's a review of the Bad World Tour. Here's a CNN article about items being auctioned off including a jacket from the Bad World Tour. Here's an article by Billboard about MJ's manager's death which includes a piece about the Bad World Tour. Us Magazine article that mentions the Bad World Tour. Telegraph article which mentions his pet chimp and the Bad World Tour. IBTimes article also mentions the Bad World Tour. AdAge article. I hope this convinces you. Dash9Z (talk) 23:59, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
this is for the YouTuber wiki page that was deleted. is 3000 views enough to get the page back? Prouzik2 (talk) 20:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hey, User:C.Fred. You probably don't remember me, but i was the guy you helped with his ribbons. Then it was two, but, now it's 5, and i am having trouble. I want the two on top centered like on your ribbon stack, the way it's supposed to be. And i've been forced to use the mini-cookie ribbon. When i tried to use the normal version, instead of the standard 90px it would stay at 800px! Can you help me out please?
Thanks again, --The Haze Master (talk) 21:32, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
User:C.Fred, Thanks! I'm in NJROTC and nothing annoys me more then my userspace ribbons looking out of place. Haha!
Appreciate the help, feel free to put the fixed rack on my talk page if you can fix it, thanks! --The Haze Master (talk) 21:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
User:C.Fred, it's awesome! but when i try and put it in the center, the top two go off to the right.
Thanks again, --The Haze Master (talk) 21:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
User:C.Fred you're the best! Just one more question. I've written 26 articles, member of several Wikiprojects/teams. Over 2,300 edits, but i only have been awarded 2 ribbons from other people, the other 3 being service ribbons, i'm not saying that it matters, but how did you get so many ribbons?
Thanks for all the help! --The Haze Master (talk) 21:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
I have proof from a interview i took a screen shot of the change of rios last name Sahara jade8280 (talk) 22:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
If it weren't for you, my ribbons would never look good, thanks! Feel free to smile back, and/or spread the cheer! Smile at friends, enemies, hell, even random editors!
--The Haze Master (talk) 23:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Theys a video on youtube Sahara jade8280 (talk) 22:08, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
It does have a new source, but he still shouldn't be adding it to Georgia Guidestones and I'm not sure I'm convinced by the new source. Doug Weller (talk) 20:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
[1] User Point by Point contacted me on my talk page. To which I responded on their talk page [2]. I then deleted their message. They then undeleted their message and moved my message to my talk page [3] [4]. I once again removed their message from my talk page. They then started moving it to the articles talk page.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 00:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
None of the listed alums (or very, very few) have sourcing that proves they went to Westminster. Here's a football roster that mentions Candler, however.... http://classic.westminster.net/athletics/catbackers_teaminfo.aspx?TeamID=968 — Preceding unsigned comment added by DtanTheObjective (talk • contribs) 02:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Can i send it to you somehow? Sahara jade8280 (talk) 23:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
With this ever dramatic world and winter coming, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 04:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hey C.Fred. On User talk:BETAKAPPAGAMMA I noticed you said Also, where did you attempt to change your username? I don't see any request.
They filed a request to change their username via Special:GlobalRenameRequest, and not the traditional WP:CHUS and WP:CHUU venues, which is why you didn't see the request. I can verify that they have indeed requested a username change, and I'm waiting on them to be unblocked before performing the rename.
I hope this clarifies some of the confusion. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 01:28, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you deleted the page Epic Tree Care. But I don’t believe there is valid reason for deletion. The page is significant and of importance, especially to people in north-east Scotland and to people concerned with conservation, forestry and wildlife. For example - Epic Tree Care were awarded a 5 year contract for Craig Leek SSSI (Sites of Special Scientific Interest) to remove and control the re-growth of birch trees across the cliff on top of the mountain. The limestone cliffs are habitat for an extremely rare bryophyte, a type of small moss which is only found in one other location in the world, and it is hoped that removing the encroaching birch trees will preserve its habitat and the wide biodiversity for future generations. The contract also benefits a rare stalked puff ball only found in 7 other places in the world.
Additionally, it’s difficult to make adjustments to pages so they meet Wikipedia criteria when they are tagged and deleted so quickly. I kindly request the Epic Tree Care page is restored so the significance and importance can be highlighted. Is that possible, please? In my honest opinion, there are other Wikipedia pages that are less significant and credible than Epic Tree Care..
Thanks. Isfxltd (talk) 00:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
All of the information is Factual, please do not delete and research.... SiliconValley925 (talk) 00:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
From websites and articles.
The information I am posting is all True. SiliconValley925 (talk) 00:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Is my automated computerized account technically illegal here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Inappropriate Content Remover (talk • contribs) 01:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Those images added earlier regarding Guru Nanak,Guru Hargobind,Guru Ram das,Guru Arjan Dev shows guru sahib wearing ear rings which is not correct to Guru Nanak and all ten guru's philosophy. You can change images but do not add those which are not correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hundmanp (talk • contribs) 11:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred. I noticed that you had declined CSD:A7 on Smv academy citing that it can not be applied on educational institutions. I wanted to know that does this hold good only for schools, colleges and universities or also covers various institutes imparting training on various subjects. Lakun.patra (talk) 08:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
hello I ask page protection IETBB and as an educational article and editors have suffered attacks as Joao Xavier please--Vandertor (talk) 17:49, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
ASK your help to contribute in favor of the article IETBB thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vandertor (talk • contribs) 18:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! (Because there's no thanks button for deleting pages.) --Rubbish computer (Trick: or treat?) 02:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Since you've edited the Sonny James article, I was wondering if you could help me out. User:GEORGE LEE ROBINSON added unsourced content to the article. I left him a note on his talk page and he replied. I have two questions based off of his response: A)Would this be considered a COI? and B)This should not be re-added back to the article, correct? Thanks. Corkythehornetfan 02:08, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
The information I have edited is accurate and correct. I know a lot about the person in question. Others who have provided misinformation are misleading and libelous. Thank you for understanding. TruthNeverLies (talk) 17:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
C.Fred I have no problem with the policies. My information is accurate, and sourced and does not cause any conflict in any way. Please do not change this information if you are not aware of the topic in discussion.
Thank you again.
TruthNeverLies (talk) 17:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
No conflict of interest what so ever. The point is this. I will include any citations that are missing. No problem. That should resolve your issue.
I'm not too sure why you are even so worried about something so minuscule. What does this persons information have to do with you, and how is it relevant? Secondly, please do not begin accusing me of things without proof.
Thanks. TruthNeverLies (talk) 17:50, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Unfortunately that is not true. The Account was created in October. Please make sure you double check information before you edit pages without proper knowledge. I am in no way interested in disputing authority, but it is unwise of you to over extend your authority when it is not only unnecessary, but also wrong. Let the community sort out the issue of this article. It always does. Additionally, the sited material is accurate, and the other two paragraphs are being sourced at this very moment.
Thank you. TruthNeverLies (talk) 17:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect information posted about our family. We would like the page removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getyourfactsrightaboutmyfamily (talk • contribs) 21:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CJLippert (talk) 23:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Let's be friends, even though your page does not say you are a MIT student, and I currently am. I am willing to concede your revert if you concede that I wrote the truth, but you need not do that in public. I need input and intellectual debate and I think you could be someone I can rely on for that. Don't take that to mean I am needy!
Rep (talk) 02:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The source says Greece (and or Roman) - The quoted sentence at the bottom page on wikipedia is a reference to how it came to America, not the overall origin. —Loginnigol (talk) 16:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I am a new Wikipedia user and I decided to change Rita Black (or Marita Black's) page because I noticed that the information on her page was completely wrong and out of date. I know this because she is my mother. Again, I am new to Wikipedia so I don't know how I can prove to you that the Rita Black I am talking about is the same one that appeared on Grange Hill. Rita does not work as a screenwriter or actor anymore. The page also states that she was born in England, but that information is completely wrong, as she was born in California and only lived in England for a couple years in her twenties while working on Grange Hill. Here is the link to her LinkedIn page which mentions her background in acting, her drama degree from NYU, and her drama education in London: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ritablack . Here is a link to her picture from when she was in Lust Pollution, and you can see that she is the same woman in the picture from her LinkedIn and the Shift https://s3.amazonaws.com/webassets.ticketmob.com/LS/images/comedians/Lust-Pollution.jpg . I hope that you can understand why I want to change the information, as she hasn't been an actress, screenwriter, or singer in over 20 years! I would just like to mention the fact that she is now a hypnotherapist, because that is a major part of her life. Please stop changing the information on her page because it is completely wrong, and I know this because I am her daughter!
If I don't edit the information on her page, then who can? Again, the information is completely wrong and out of date. She doesn't want false information (including false place of birth and false career information) online. This page needs to be changed, so what can I do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Intellectualadvocate (talk • contribs) 01:16, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Fred,
My sincere apologies on the article i wrote earlier on, didn't expect Wikipedia to be this smart, really impressive I will sure revise and make new adjustments to my article.
Thanks for making Wikipedia a very neutral encyclopedia. Ceddyb (talk) 16:04, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Fred,
My sincere apologies on the article i wrote earlier on, didn't expect Wikipedia to be this smart, really impressive I will sure revise and make new adjustments to my article. Thanks for making Wikipedia a very neutral encyclopedia Ceddy Ceddyb (talk) 16:07, 14 November 2015 (UTC) |
2015/11/14
C.Fred, I suggest that you read authoritative texts about money.
One of the, if not the, best researched and documented works is "The Lost Science of Money", by Stephen Zarlenga...available in multiple languages at monetary.org.
Unfortunately, as cited by the Bank of England, economics text books deliver a message that Central Banks want the public to believe. They clear up a few misconceptions; "Money creation in the modern economy", by Michael McLeay, Amar Radia and Ryland Thomas of the Bank’s Monetary Analysis Directorate, made available by the Bank of England (http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/quarterlybulletin/2014/qb14q1prereleasemoneycreation.pdf) ... which the Federal Reserve, a privately-owned central bank, is modelled upon.
Hope this helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WouNur (talk • contribs) 15:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
I'll chime in here to point out to WouNur that he/she is repeating nonsense that is routinely posted here in Wikipedia: that the "Federal Reserve" is a "privately-owned central bank." It is not. The "Federal Reserve" is a term referring to the U.S. Federal Reserve System. The SYSTEM has both "privately owned" parts and governmental entities. Wells Fargo Bank, for example, is a member bank and is "privately owned." By contrast, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is a U.S. governmental entity.
Let's get down to basics. The Solar System consists of the Sun, some planets, some asteroids, some space dust, and so on. The fact that the Solar System contains asteroids DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE SOLAR SYSTEM IS AN ASTEROID. The fact that the Federal Reserve System contains some privately owned banks does not make the System a "privately owned bank." Famspear (talk) 17:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Hey User:C.Fred. My ribbon rack is growing, and with it, more problems. I have become a Level 1 Journeyman Editor. I've managed to learn how to add stacks, how to add devices, and even medals to the bottom. But I'm having trouble with the journeyman level 1 ribbon. You know the drill, needs to be 90 pixels, behind my Wikipedia Thanks ribbon with gold star. Can you help a brother out once more?
Thanks, --The Haze Master (talk) 17:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Hope that helps! —C.Fred (talk) 19:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks User:C.Fred!
--The Haze Master (talk) 00:36, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for all the help. The Haze Master (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC) |
Hello, Hope you are well. I believe you removed the article about Epic Tree Care. I have made some edits and I kindly request a quick review before it goes into the main space so it's not deleted again. You can see the Draft here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Epic_Tree_Care
All the best. Isfxltd (talk) 19:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for straightening this out. I thought I was reverting to the correct version and somehow I ended up reverting to the wrong version. I am not sure how I ended up confusing the edits but I am glad that you fixed my error and put the right version in place. Donner60 (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi!, Nice to meet you C.Fred. I'm EvenIngSeven. Thank you for the introduction and the cookies!. I would like to tell you that I'm new on this, and I really enjoying it but I'm so sorry for for not being very specific. I would love to thank you aswell for the observations you had and the support.This was what happened: In the article of Aaliyah discography, I guide by the source of Aaliyah, that states the update sales figures. Because the sources that currently supports the sales figures dates to 2008 in the article of Aaliyah discography are dead links so I tried to check for those links were right, but they actually don't exist. So basically that's what I did. So let me know please why this happened. Thank you again and have a wonderful day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EvenIngSeven (talk • contribs) 05:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello C.Fred! I am working on the stub bovine leukaemia virus RNA packaging signal for a class. I noticed the title of the article has misspelled leukemia. I edited the text in the article as well as the picture title to the correct spelling, but am unsure if I can actually change the title of the page. Is this possible? Thanks. Lewatts17 (talk) 16:42, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
It has Characters why don't you look it up.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 90731fly (talk • contribs) 22:59, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Friendly reminder to mark your CSD pages as patrolled. JTtheOG (talk) 04:05, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue 4 • November 2015 • About the Newsletter
|
|
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an editor for whom you left a talk page caution.[5] The thread is Professor JR on political articles. Thank you. - Wikidemon (talk) 10:37, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
smileguy91talk - contribs 18:28, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:How the Poor Can Save Capitalism cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
I'm Just Adding Stuff that I have seen on the internet I just want to have some fun and show the things that are really true" BlueAngel36 (talk) 21:04, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
I'm sorry. Please change everything back as you like. I thought I was helping Tvilaysack88 (talk) 03:02, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Fred I believe you messaged me back saying that I can't publish the page because it is not a notable organization. However, I have more than one reference backing my article. Could you please reconsider your ban on my article? User: PreppyPeach1336 Lambda Sigma Phi (talk) 23:09, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
[[6]] [[7]] Lambda Sigma Phi (talk) 04:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
I, Golden Eye Clicks, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under A7. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it and improve it with newly available reliable notable sources. Golden Eye Clicks -Golden Eye Clicks (talk) 20:35, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for removing this page.
Even though this page was labeled as a Hoax, it was nonconstructive and a bad way to represent Wikipedia, as it is a very good site.
Thank you again for your contributions.
-Matthew — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewethanchowtoy (talk • contribs) 22:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank You for understanding, I will Edit that as you said as a neutrally-toned presentation of information about the academy.
Give me some time
Thanks again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alireza.niakani (talk • contribs) 16:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fred, could you please revert the information back? I was in the process of adding the references and went to save the page...though it did not save because you removed it and it resulted in a conflict. I cannot help that you're faster than me. Sorry.
The global response to Typhoon Haiyan began hours after the storm hit the Philippines on November 8, 2010. USPACOM, in coordination with APAN, launched the Typhoon Haiyan Response Group to provide a centralized location for coordination and communication. APAN was used to provide situational reports on damage. APAN users were able to upload documents, data-sets and files to assist in the relief efforts to decrease response time. Partnering with the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, APAN’s mapping tools provided NGA data to automatically federate geospatial content which was utilized to provide the maps for infrastructure and agriculture.
https://books.google.com/books?id=DGO1CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA36&lpg=PA36&dq=%22all+partners+access+network%22+typhoon&source=bl&ots=M8Y0D0WPEY&sig=EI9PEJX4OpxFftOaDOx28JmVA8o&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjEjpD6z-bJAhVK6WMKHXuqCVUQ6AEIMjAE#v=onepage&q=%22all%20partners%20access%20network%22%20typhoon&f=false
https://community.apan.org/support/b/blog/archive/2013/11/08/typhoon-haiyan-response-community
http://users.iems.northwestern.edu/~dolira/CapturingRealTimeData_WP.pdf
https://sfn.nato.int/meoc-2014/forging-a-global-network-of-navies
http://geospatial-solutions.com/nga-creates-website-to-support-ebola-relief-efforts/
https://community.apan.org/hadr/typhoon-haiyan/p/map — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sa sylvan (talk • contribs) 00:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Fred, I am going to recreate the page and move it from sandbox, could you please read my article and let me know if it is fine to publish. Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alireza.niakani (talk • contribs) 06:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Fred, Thanks for considering to my article. I recreated the page based on your discretion and comment but someone tagged me for deletion again. Could you please advise — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alireza.niakani (talk • contribs) 18:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello again Fred, Thank you and Richrad for stopping to delete my page. Could you please look over my article again and check my references. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alireza.niakani (talk • contribs) 20:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Fred, Rebis Academy has application history at http://www.iacet.org/ and http://www.tcu.gov.on.ca/. Can I name them as references. If not, can you send me an example of article that has something that I should be like that. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alireza.niakani (talk • contribs) 21:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
I'm the Technology Director for West Jefferson Hills School District. The information about our district on Wikipedia is outdated and incorrect. Every time I make an edit, you rest it to the original text. This is getting frustrating, the information I'm entering is correct, while much of the information on Wikipedia is incorrect. What exactly does our district need to do to update the factual information?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Jefferson_Hills_School_District — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjhsd wikipedia (talk • contribs) 00:10, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Got a new user adding unsourced info. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Cheers! — JudeccaXIII (talk) 04:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
The user Koala15 keeps removing what you posted without a proper explanation. can you do something about it? can you lock the article? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_Kingdom I think you can clearly see how biased he is and he doesn't even have a valid reason to remove the banyan tree story. he keeps removing it like wikipedia is his personal blog. I hope you will lock the article or warn him. thanks Ceylonpedia (talk) 13:28, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred. I noticed you've invested some time in the Shroud of Turin article so I was wondering if you could take a quick look at my suggestions to improve the neutrality of some specific wording, outlined at its Talk page and contribute your thoughts? I know with the lead-up to Christmas editors have had other priorities, so if wikipedians do see any merit in my suggestion I'd like the community input. If not, I'll move right along. Much appreciated! 121.216.197.53 (talk) 04:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi
I am just curious about why the page does not meet the requirements to stay on Wikipedia
Faraday Future coming to Las Vegas is groundbreaking:
Automotive OEM coming to the desert
Creating new industry
Creating 4500+ jobs
Green initiative product
The Brand Fan group attracts people from all industries and geographical areas
Besides Fiskars Fisketeers this is looking to be one of the strongest and largest Brand Fan/Ambassador group created
Thank you Farrah D (talk) 18:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
What is more important than life? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Von laupene (talk • contribs) 18:36, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
our valid page [eastlink tech] has been deleted, If you check there are reference web sites are quoted.What i have to do for undelete--Puran Bahadur Thapa Magar (talk) 07:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Aloha C.Fred, I need some of your education, wisdom and experience. Can you please explain why the APAN images were removed? The previous user stated they were removed per licensing agreements. Instead of removing them again, what do I need to add to ensure that they are properly labeled? APAN is a USDOD website that does not utilize licensing agreements. The content is Public Domain. Your assistance and knowledge would be greatly valued. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.80.169.242 (talk) 18:50, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your very quick response. I find this to be unique...where does one put the This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain. - it was placed in the description. Nonetheless, your recommendation is valuable.
Thank you for the information. Is there a page that one can better utilize to locate all of these templates? I am a learner but am rather overwhelmed with all various locations folks have sent me to. One consolidated template page would be valuable, does this exist? I'll be overly descriptive in the image forms in the future. Thank you again for your wisdom in the above post. Sa sylvan (talk) 22:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
dear, the page Maieutics was not redudant. I've added a quote from Plato's book etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maieutics (talk • contribs) 22:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
C.Fred,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
T Curtis grehn (talk) 02:32, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
(Charles R. Knight, 1922)
|
Fred, I wish you and those dear to you golden days of love and joy in a Happy New Year 2016! Best regards, Sam Sailor Talk! 03:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Pass on! Send this greeting by adding
((subst:User:Sam Sailor/Templates/HappyNewYear)) to user talk pages. |
(Unknown artist, Norway, 1916)
|
Sorry about that. I tried to go back to the summary and went too far. It wound up saving it for me. Cadet_BNSF 64.4.232.125 (talk) 05:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
I didnt "disrupt" anything. Everything I put was true. LlamaWhoKnives (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
1) if you respond to this, HOW can I reply again? 2) whT does the logos mean when you warn me about getting blocked? LlamaWhoKnives (talk) 02:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
I cant find the "reply" button to reply to you LlamaWhoKnives (talk) 02:08, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Like this? Sorry I'm new
Idk what that is -LlamaWhoKnives
The thesis link seems to say the person's name is Paul Henry Schachet-Briskin. https://sites.google.com/a/cantorwally.com/cantor-wally-home/home/cantor-wallys-masters-thesis-on-the-history-of-reform-jewish-youth
64.134.65.105 (talk) 04:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Cantor Wally Schachet-Briskin was just created. 64.134.65.105 (talk) 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
I understand the reason for your change of the CSD template, and I don't disagree with what you put- but I had tagged it as a hoax because the dating in the article indicates the person got married at 9 years old (which is illegal in the US) and that his wife is dead already. Seems unlikely to me. 331dot (talk) 01:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, could you help move the old Mualim (District) page to the new page of Muallim (District) as it is a misspelled version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JebatMalaya (talk • contribs) 04:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thank you very much for your help JebatMalaya (talk)
I'm attempting to create a wiki page for my military unit and every time I create a page for a subordinate unit it gets deleted! How do I keep it from being deleted? Arsceditor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsceditor (talk • contribs) 19:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
You know more about WP:ACCESS in terms of colors than I do. I just eyeball it. What would make #DF4601 work with black and white, considering that shade of orange is the Orioles' primary color? – Muboshgu (talk) 20:15, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
In the wake of David Bowie's death, there has been some discussion of the various "Baby Groupies," and I was wondering if Lori Maddox's page should come back because the "Baby Groupies" were not just individual groupies, they were a phenomenon of the period and were in Star Magazine. Other former "Baby Groupies" like Sable Starr and Bebe Buell have pages. Sepideh (talk) 00:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Is the page that I made about Billie Allen good, or is it not approvable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darre123 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
I note that you placed a template on User talk:Heather - Dream to warn against edit warring, but you did little to reach out to this new user to help them understand exactly what the problem was. Your one edit summary ("Listbloat and POV") would be totally meaningless to a new user. A little patient hand-holding might go a long way in this case. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
I do not believe that post from Data Logger was an advertisement. Please verify facts before removing other users activity. Please review notes from additional users about their additional research and verification.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DAQengineer (talk • contribs) 20:43, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi sir i just wanted to know why you deleted his page? His many vine friends have wikipedia pages and they are live? with same refrences — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxParker08 (talk • contribs) 05:20, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
I don't care, because what I am saying (that the game is beta) is the truth, Harada himself said that. If I should be blocked by telling the truth, being blocked is a good thing.
Hey C.Fred I have a quick question because I seem to be in a predicament at this point. The reason I created that page was for my Capstone project at Grand Valley State University where myself and two others are designing a program for the university to assist in classroom renovations. Our professor requires a Wiki page to document the entire design process and the steps we took to implement our program. Do you have any advice on how I can actually keep this page up and running and also give myself the write permissions while giving everyone else strictly read permissions only? This page is intended for academic use and documentation of our design only, no need for citation of other sources will be necessary. Thank you for you help!
CmersinoGVSU (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you C.Fred I appreciate the assistance, have a good day!CmersinoGVSU (talk) 16:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Frank, DNUG is a user group for a range of collaboration products of IBM. As an example our members useIBM Notes or IBM Connections. DNUG is is similar to the Americas' SAP Users' Group, SHARE (computing) or any other user group.
Maybe I was not ale to express this properly as part of my first article. Please provide me help how I can fix this. Jrafflen (talk) 19:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
@C.Fred Thank you for your quick feedback and the helpful information with this. I am going to check for the "widespread coverage in reliable sources" in the next days. Have a nice weekend. Jrafflen (talk) 07:46, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
@C.Fred Here is my first trial to demonstrate the relevance of DNUG by providing own and external links which reference to DNUG's activities. These are mostly in German, but a subset is in English too. Does this already solve the problem? I can try to sort this out in a better way and make this part of the updated / un-deleted article as soon as is available again. As a coincidence your German counter parts want to delete the old article with I updated on yesterday.
Own Links that might help to see DNUG's continuity of all activities
DNUG in Social Media
DNUG hold 42 conferences in Germany. Here you find a set of information about these:
DNUG was present on a couple of CeBIT fairs providing both to their members. Here you find press releases and information about these:
You can find entries in Twitter (hashtag #DNUG) like these ones:
There are Blogs which mention DNUG from time to time:
I hope this clarifies the relevance of DNUG and its entry to wikipedia. Jrafflen (talk) 10:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
[8]. No words. Dat GuyTalkContribs 18:09, 16 January 2016 (UTC) |
There is a controversy about that show, and I added in those links to prove it. @21:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC) and Monster boy1:
I looked it up in the news on Google, and here is what I found. Are these reliable or should I keep looking?
Monster boy1 (talk) 00:56, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Sb8rjXoaFk
Monster boy1 (talk) 21:43, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
I have no idea how the Wikipedia format works, so I apologise if I made a faux pas. I appreciate your feedback and I understand that a link is expected if I want to change something. However, if bad journalism is taken as fact and no retraction is ever forthcoming, or the correct information is available elsewhere, then how would one go about providing a link? What I mean is I know that he only threw one cannister because i watched some of the trial. Would a link to the relevant You Tube channel with the court footage suffice as a link? The "superhero" paraphernalia and "I'm the joker" are both inaccuracies borne of misinformation. No evidence exists anywhere, other than in poorly researched articles like the one you link. No crime scene pictures of paraphernalia, no expression by Holmes himself. Thsee are, at best, trifling matters. But I feel that it's important to try and present the facts in any in the most accurate way possible. Those two issues, the lack of evidence around superhero fandom and the number of gas cannisters, are just the two I noticed on a cursory inspection. Anyway, I have made my point, as laboured and futile as it is, so thank you. Godabove09 (talk) 01:56, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
There was information in there that was A) false, B) Outdated, and C) irrelevant. Beyond how offensive it is that there are people who dedicate their lives to disrespecting the church, there was so many irrelevant and untrue things posted in this article. Have an ounce of respect for the members of this faith please and only post things that are true, relevant, and necessary.
Arealmormon (talk) 02:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Arealmormon 01/16/2016
The older edits in this page are not as visible as ever because the edit history swelled amid the recent vandalism (hundreds of edits in a few hours). Perhaps you should delete the page, then undelete the page with only significant revisions restored, then protect it again? Eyesnore 23:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
THANK YOU for protecting Tyler Joseph! Eteethan(talk) 23:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC) |
Hello, I provided sources and evidence in the talk page. Is that sufficient? Are those sources and explanation valid? Abstrakt8 (talk) 00:43, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Who are you Jojod4smartone (talk) 22:41, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Poorly researched articles and titillating misinformation shouldn't be considered credible. Because I link something doesn't make it gospel. I could link to an article that says the Queen is a lizard, so does that mean I can state this is a fact? Just because a journalist writes something shouldn't mean it is accepted. A link should be checked, verified, research done to confirm or deny and then it is OK. Just blindly accepting it because it suits the Wikipedia articles author diminishes the whole site...it's a slippery slope. Godabove09 (talk) 08:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
"Assumptions" aren't how credible research is conducted. You don't just "assume" something is correct. The two points I mention are both easily disproven by a 5 minute Google search. If this isn't considered important in fact checking the assertions in your articles what's the point? Plus, even though I have told you that your article contaims TWO errors (those are the ones I found upon a cursory inspection) you haven't amended the article. It's the responsibility of Wikipedia, surely, to take the information I have given you, that your artice contains misinformation, check it, and change the article. If you don't have people with the time to do that but have the time to message me I wonder why Wikipedia bothers at all. Or, just easily, you could have checked that I was correct and left my corrections in place. I refer you to the trial on Croaker Queen You Tube channel and a simple Google search to confirm both the gas cannister information in your piece is incorrect and that the "Batman" superhero spiel is also misinformation. This was dismissed by lead counsel for the prosecution, George Brauchler, and is on record. I think it's on the site, Wikipedia, to check the accuracy of its articles and to amend them when necessary...if that's too much trouble then your authenticity and standing as a reliable source of information will be questioned. This is not about Mr Holmes or even myself, it's about an article containing inaccurate information that nobody seems interested in correcting. Godabove09 (talk) 22:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
3.17 to 3.23 (Denver News, Channel 7) You Tube search: James Holmes describes shooting. He clearly states he fumbled the first cannister and had to leave it. This is all the proof necessary and comes from his own mouth. Godabove09 (talk) 23:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
"Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to British Isles, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary"
Ireland is NOT part of the British Isles is not a good enough valid reason for the edits? Perhaps you'd like to take this matter up with the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs: https://dfa.ie/about-us/contact-us/
FredRed2 (talk) 04:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
2 that come up right now are Wylie Buzza (the creator changed it once so far after being altered) and The Brave Little Toaster Goes to Mars (film) (um yeah they keep on changing this to a article instead of the redirect it already is!) Wgolf (talk) 00:06, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
You dope, I sent a POTSTICKER! | |
Thanks for your meaningful contribution to our discussion. Potguru (talk) 16:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC) |
Dear C. Fred,
I have never used the Talk feature nor edited Wikipedia pages until recently. So, please excuse me if I have done some things incorrectly. I am reaching out to you for assistance and clarification. In my point of view, it clearly appears that somebody has an issue with NPU and has made that known by doing the following: 1. removing all relevant information on NPU’s Wikipedia page and replacing it entirely with false information; 2. making false statements with no citations; 3. providing citations that have nothing to do with NPU; 4. providing citations that are from unreliable sources; 5. clearly misstating the citations; and 6. providing citations that misstates the facts. In contrast, information about the truth is provided in the NPU Talk section with a reliable citation to a government entity. This should put the issue to rest.
In my opinion, the matter has not been put to rest because it is clear that the user/s is/are simply using Wikipedia to defame NPU with total disregard of the truth. This is clearly shown when they completely removed all relevant information (prior history, facilities, etc.) and replaced it with their propaganda based on their own agenda. For some unknown reason and for a limited time, you supported this action on numerous occasions. For instance, when I made substantive changes with clear authoritative citations (Accreditation Section), you simply undid my work and reverted the page to show only the false statements. However, it appears that you recently caught your mistake and reverted your own correction. Up until then, I hope you understand when I say that I thought you were a part of this vagrant group based on your actions. I did not know your role (and I still do not understand it completely). In your correction, you allowed my corrections to remain and placed the false statements in the History Section. I assumed that you were trying to do what was fair and right. So, I then proceeded to remove the false statements line-by-line and provide reasons for people (and you) to review. However, you reverted those corrections as well. I cannot figure out why you did so. For example, the first line I removed cited an article that did not mention NPU even once. So, I cannot understand how this is allowed to remain on the page. I similarly gave reasons for the other lines removed.
I have reviewed many other sites regarding controversies and most of them are not posted unless they have significant weight and strong sources. Others are left for discussion in the Talk section. I do not mind controversy. However, there is no controversy here. The truth is very clear and the truth is coming from a reliable and definitive source.
I suggest leaving the matter in the Talk section if people want to continue to dispute a reliable source. Allowing untruthful information to remain on the main page is a disservice to NPU’s students and alumni and their careers and future. Mostly, it is a disservice to the integrity of Wikipedia.
Thank you for your courtesy and attention to this matter. In the meantime, I am also looking into full protection of the page. Patiently waiting your reply.
Pcl00k (talk) 02:12, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
The Half Barnstar | |
this award was awarded by cfred for deleting rosetenville Slobodanmihic (talk) 18:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC) |
i am bibek bhurtel and i am new to to wikipedia how can i add cite in my page also say how to make license to upload images. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bibekbhurtel5 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
I noticed you said a new editor had uploaded this file, but I don't see how that's possible. It's been in use on both the Mustang and Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971 for a while now, maybe years. I think they must have uploaded a copy of it thinking that that was the only way to add it. The original file is properly licensed. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 16:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
You deleted a copyvio at the above location back in 2007. I have recreated the page as a redirect here, as it references the song I was looking for when I tried to check for an actual article. Just wanted to let you know, since you were the deleting admin 8 years ago. Hallward's Ghost (Kevin) (My talkpage) 14:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
I see you deleted a Jonathan Field page a while back. Can you tell me what it included (I don't know how to look up a deleted page)? The JF page I was thinking about creating relates to this person: https://jonathanfieldhorsemanship.net/
Thanks! JackieLL007 (talk) 16:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, wonder if you can help point me in the right direction for this article. The editor Teddy1289 continues to remove content and would not engage on the article's Talk page. What would be the next step? K.e.coffman (talk) 05:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Explanations left on the von Mellenthin talk page. My apologies for being a newb to WP and any anxiousness I may have caused K.e.coffman. Teddy1289 (talk) 00:47, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Teddy1289
we still have an issue on the Russell Willson page. take a look at the issue, if you have the time.Nezi1111 (talk) 14:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Here: Manidhan Marivittan-not sure why this page was patrolled, I would do a deletion for it-but not sure if a AFD would be a good idea yet. (Also I often have more problems with Indian and other foreign language film pages then any other things when it comes to AFDs-some people seem to find tons of sources where I can't) Wgolf (talk) 04:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
BADD COMPANY update provided no links, no website and did not request or ask for visitors. It is strictly informational update as to BADD COMPANY PRODUCTS & APPAREL Limited Liability Company. It certainly did not provide any promotional advertisement. Thank youBadd Girl (talk) 04:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Why did you delete my page? There was nothing wrong with it. :( :( :(
Awesomedjh (2/4/2016 11:43 AM)
Nezi1111 is continuing to make the same edit in spite of the WP:RFC. aqwfyj Talk/Contribs 02:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion of the Ashley Renee Jones page would in conflict with the Wikipedia Guidelines.
"Credible claim of significance" is a two-part test: Credible and significant. A good mental test is to consider each part discretely: a) is this reasonably plausible? and b) assuming this were true, would this (or something that 'this' might plausibly imply) cause a person to be notable? Or, in line with point 6 above, does it give plausible indications that research might well discover notability?
So, a claim that an established local actress is notable and significant would satisfy, since this actress has coverage in sources that would constitute local notability, her involvement increases attendance and sales, and it is very plausible that her continued presence and future performances will lead her from local notability most likely to national notability whether she becomes and A or B presence in film roles or on or off Broadway.
The speed at which you marked this page for speedy deletion indicates it was most likely done by a BOT and not a real person. That is a significant conflict of interest to the public since no BOT can accurately monitor local printed circulations or even every facebook, twitter and orchid accounts which might weigh in the substance and notability of the actress. DanWOrr (talk) 14:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Dano Orr
You just blocked this editor but who cleans up the mess he made? Just curious....not a challenge...the worst Ive ever seen here. Thanks for your quick response to block a vile editor. Buster Seven Talk 03:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
I added a map for Sonqor_County yesterday, and it is a little off center. Do you know why it is off center like that or do you know someone else who might be able to help me with this problem? Sepideh (talk) 15:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
You will have to bear with me as this represents my first article and series of edits. I'm an employee of the division and was asked by the Chief to correct a gap and author a new content page for the department. The photos in use and the department logo come from the department. I would presume they are in the public domain since all county records, including photos are a matter of public record. In this case these three elements (the two images and the logo PNG) were passed to me for use. How would I post them, tag them and notate them to be in compliance with standing policies?
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmorales2016 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Please come back to WP:AIV because some users are still vandalizing. 2602:306:3357:BA0:C147:8BED:78A1:FBC9 (talk) 20:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Sorry about that CSD notice, that was obviously meant for the original page! You must have moved it right before I added that template... KungAvSand (talk) 01:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
May want to see this. Thanks, GABHello! 02:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Please block user:The great one6757 because this account is only being used for vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:383E:3FA3:2868:37E5 (talk) 23:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, on the Madden NFL Mobile game article, you have recently removed a section stating the following; "Alongside Leagues mode, depending on who you play, it is typically easier to score a two-point conversion in this mode. ... Alongside Head to Head mode, depending on who you play, it is typically easier to score two point conversions in this mode." The action in my opinion was unnecessary, but I have a question, as you appear to be an experienced editor, I currently own an updated version of the game, and I have played the game for a while and noticed patterns and such, and one of them is that it is obviously more difficult to get first downs in Season mode than in the other two modes mentioned in the article (Leagues & Head to Head.) I understand that for a majority of information on Wikipedia requires a source, but this one--I do not see the reason why I need a source for these statements.
Please help me out by responding at any time, KnowledgeIsGoodForYou (talk) 23:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
I see that you edited out the "county" entry for the Infobox under Brownsburg High School, citing as reference 'that there is no "County" section in the Infobox'. While I understand that in normal addresses, the counties are not referenced, please realize that out of country users who read the page, may want to know the appropriate county that it resides in. I'm not going to add back in the county, but please see the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_school subsection: Full syntax to note that "Counties" are included. Thanks for all your help! C.Fred | ZCash1104 (talk) 14:41, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred, I noticed you recently warned this editor. I think it is a sock, which I detailed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Guestajh. Regards, Accurizer (talk) 03:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred. Sorry to ask you to do more work but since you got to the last one they recreated it again. This time at Primlyza. It doesn't look like they are getting the point here. Thanks for all that you do. --Majora (talk) 04:43, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
My apologies for the userspace speedy tag; apparently I confused myself late in the day. Thanks for the catch!--Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi C.F! Regarding the article you just A7'ed, Pelo Mayani, can you see if it is substantially the same as Mayani pelo luhabanya from 2 weeks ago, and any/all of the 3 versions of Mayani Pelo from last year? Might have a sockfarm forming. Thanks! CrowCaw 01:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Link Smurf. You can apply the banhammer appropriately. –Fredddie™ 16:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I wonder if you can help out with two articles where the editor, who disagrees with the material, is removing the WP:RS cited content. In addition, they are also editing the cited content, which results in misrepresentation of sources. This appears to be a similar situation to Friedrich von Mellenthin, where you were involved, so I'm reaching out to you. If you could help out and then add this article to your watchlist, that would be great.
Articles:
Diffs: #2 -- removal and changing of citations, after a revert; #1 -- removal of section
Diffs: #2 -- removal (after a revert); #1 -- removal and changing of citations
Please let me know if there are some other avenues I should pursue instead. I also left a msg on Oshwah's talk page, for strength in numbers :-)
Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:35, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed that you reverted the edit I made to the Lexus page. I'm confident that there is no "R" in the Japanese language, as I study the Japanese Language.
Kai2004 (talk) 07:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
I received your reply to my inquiry as to the problem with the specifications of the article. Coney Island Dancers is a music/entertainment group. How can we inform the public via Wikipedia with a profile that meets your standards. We are a community based organization whose sole purpose is to specifically provide FREE entertainment to improve the quality of life of the Coney Island Community. We staffed entirely by volunteers. Our "product" is just that; free entertainment and community uplifiting as our sole reason to operate. We do have a profiler (which I will furnish) that describes the mission statement, history and formation of the organization. One question is there are for profit business that do appear to promote (via information/specifics)products such as General Motors, Pfizer and the like. Any suggested guidelines would be appreciated.
Thank you
3/1/2016 8.12 am EST
13:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)13:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rican Vargas Coney Island Dancers (talk • contribs)
Are you actually reading what you are reverting? Please show me one instance in the history of journalism where there is a comma in the middle of "California man". Not only does it not need a comma, but it breaks up the entire description since in this case, the word "California" is being used as an adjective to the noun, "man". There are times when a comma is appropriate, but this is not one of them. JOJ Hutton 03:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, C.Fred. I was looking through the history of Blood of the Samurai, and it looks like you tagged it for CSD per A11, and then later came back and declined your own tag. I'm sure you were aware of this, but I thought I'd let you know just in case :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:17, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I don't believe we met before. Earlier today you dealt with a page protection request for Pantheon-Sorbonne University. But ummm... look what I found out. Never experienced this before. A user with just 6 edits first reverted a chunk of text on that article. So far I don't mind too much. Half an hour later, he posts a protection request... using my name???? The templates he's manipulating in this request even seem to suggest he knows his way around Wikipedia, doesn't match the pattern of someone with just 6 requests. But anyway, I'm not too happy about this identity theft. As an admin, do you know what needs to be done here? I suppose some kind of disciplinary measures apply? --Midas02 (talk) 19:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
@C.fred: Contest deletion for wiki article:Ravens Grin Inn ; I posted it to resolve a red link found in another article [ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_House ] but because it was a haunted attraction it was labeled as commercial advertising and hastily removed. This page was not created with the intention of advertising.
@C.fred: I had submitted the page as it was to avoid loss of progress; The lack of citation was solely due to my lack of knowing how to actually do that. Ill look around at the help page to find out how to do that properly but until then, is what was posted permanently deleted??? Or is there a way that we could temporarily restore the page? MissMaraclea (talk) 02:24, 6 March 2016 (UTC) MissMaraclea
Excuse me, but I did not create this entry in the first place. The person who did acted without authorization and made numerous factual errors with serious legal and financial implications for our organization, the Jesuits, the Catholic Church, and possibly others. The organization is not part of the Catholic Church, it is not under the administration of the Jesuits, and it does not have anyone with the title CEO. There are numerous other factual and editorial errors that are harmful to our organization. I am in no way trying to use Wikipedia to promote or advertise the organization. Rather, I am responding to some person who took it upon him- or herself to publish a series of inaccurate and harmful statements about the organization. I have indicated with each edit why I was moving the information. There has been no lack of clarity about this. Our preference would be to remove the article completely. I have tried without success to contact the original author. To insist that we explain why we want removal of inaccurate information the posting of which we did not request, initiate, or authorize in the first place is absurd. Please respect our wishes. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoyalawya (talk • contribs) 03:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Excuse me, Fred, but the Society of Jesus (Jesuits) is not the "parent organization" of Center, the team member whom the article lists as "CEO" will be furious as there is no such title and she would not want it for liability reasons, the organization has not published a printed quarterly newsletter called Center Focus for more than three years, and it has not had an agribusiness project for almost 10. These and many other elements of the content implicate the organization's tax-exempt status, its fundraising, and its grant and other contractual relationships. I should know, because I am the president and I am getting tired of this harassment. I don't want to create a puff piece or an advertisement. I want the article off Wikipedia. It is grossly unfair for us to be in the position of having to disprove a series of false statements. We did not ask for any of this. There is no need for an independent editor, or any editor. Please just delete the article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoyalawya (talk • contribs) 03:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Can't we stop Xmirs vandalism on the Panthéon-Sorbonne page? He refuses to talk and his version of the article is clearly lacking of sources and contains clearly false statements. I tried to do my best to remedy at these two issues but he keep going back to the biaised version! --Launebee (talk) 12:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
The pattern of edits which resulted in your revert here is repeated elsewhere on article articles edited by the same IP sock. I made a note at ANI several days ago, but it hasn't yet been picked up. If you had a minute, could you take a look? (RBI only works if the "B" part occurs). Guliolopez (talk) 14:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
March 06. 2016. Why are u deleting my articles and genuine contribution in Wikipedia. What is the point? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarmalinen (talk • contribs) 19:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
hi c fred your so awesome Mikeharrison221 (talk) 19:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC) |
I noticed that you are dealing with the same Cypriot-astronomer issue I wrangled with a bit last week thanks to a presumably entirely different and unrelated user named Benster443. FYI, I just opened an SPI and advocated (with conceded low non-admin weight) that the title be salted at this point. All the best... Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred, I was about to report the editor to the vandalism noticeboard, but would prefer not to go around you as you're engaged with the article and the editor. Thanks for your assistance, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:43, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello! I was assisting in editing a page for Dayne Waldal and me and Wowitsdaven noticed you deleted our page. Is there something we can do to fix the page?Sophiageorgiades (talk) 22:03, 6 March 2016 (UTC)sophiageorgiades
I wanted to see if you could help with fixing an issue. This page had been submitted for review but was moved to an article page and there is a warning at the bottom: How would you fix this? The category is still under Pending AfC submissions. Thanks. Chrisdavidson1004 (talk) 21:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. Chrisdavidson1004 (talk) 22:14, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
He did it again. I can't violate 3 revert rule. [9]Abel Lawrence (talk) 03:18, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
This user [10] has a name same as the page he has edited. I am not sure what to do, so I have told you as you are an administrator. I have also told Materialscientist, but he does not appear to be active.Abel Lawrence (talk) 03:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
First off all it is called christmas and second of all my auto correct From What does the RIley say? (talk) 21:56, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Okay What does the RIley say? (talk) 22:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Thank you for teaming with me What does the RIley say? (talk) 23:01, 11 March 2016 (UTC) |
I read (red) something onine that Betty White died and then I look more in the story and then they said that she is okay and home. I'm so sorry! I thought she dead because that article said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darre123 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Can you give me a idea for this page I really think she should be on Wikipedia. She was a big actress. Thank you for your support!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darre123 (talk • contribs) 22:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
HI, just a quick note about a current discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history (WWII content: Otto Kittel, other GA/FA articles) that you may be interested in. K.e.coffman (talk)
Why is Rms125a@hotmail.com allowed to undo changes I am making , removing FACTS from a page, but when I undo HIS changes I am threatened with being blocked?
Mikkitobi (talk) 18:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
So what I am supposed to do when he keeps undoing my changes of FACT. He is immune? my FACTS get removed?
Mikkitobi (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
I have already done so and he claims I am trying to get 15 minutes of fame. He is not willing to budge so what else am I supposed to do?
Why does HE get to make the changes he wants but I do NOT? PLEASE EXPLAIN.
He was happy when I added in some of the information and I thought we had finally made progress but he then tried to be clever and 'fix' the name of an organisation and he got it wrong. When I reverted his change and pointed out he had erred in the name he was clearly not happy and then reverted to removing my information again! He clearly does not like being told he has made a mistake.
I want an admin to review this case and make a ruling.
Mikkitobi (talk) 18:36, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
He HAS undone my edits at least 3 times in the past 24 hours. How do we warn HIM about violating WP:3RR?
Mikkitobi (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thank you - i have no idea how to start a talk page for the article - or how to access it if there is one.
I can understand how Rms125a@hotmail.com might not agree with what I wanted to add but I am still unhappy that HE is allowed to undo my edits but when I try I get a warning. Also it appears that this has become personal for Rms125a@hotmail.com.
Why did he leave one of my last edits untouched and only remove it again when i pointed out his error on another change. He then reacted by removing my other changes. Surely there must be a wikipedia rule that does not allow such behaviour?
Mikkitobi (talk) 19:10, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
yes I self-reverted.
and this still makes no sense to me. i feel i am justified in making the changes but Rms125a@hotmail.com does not. he will not budge. that means the page stands? and nobody has yet answered my complaint that Rms125a@hotmail.com was happy to leave one set of edits i made until i then undid a different change he had made that was wrong and he then decided to then remove my other edits. i take that as a person attack with no logical reason for doing so. surely there is a wikipedia rule that does not allow changes made in this way simply because somebodies nose is out of joint. Rms125a@hotmail.com believes he 100% correct and nobody can make changes he does not agree with.
Mikkitobi (talk) 19:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
sorry but that is NOT the case here. he made the change to the name of the organisation when the names of researchers were already present in the text on the same line and could not have been overlooked by him! that is a fact - sorry. he only touched my additions when i dared to change his changes to the name of the organisation. There is absolutely no doubt - he did not like being contradicted and decided to remove my changes. Please accept that and dont try to hide behind 'timing' issues.
Mikkitobi (talk) 20:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
i have added something on the talk page. Rms125a@hotmail.com is now keeping his head down and has not responded.
if he does not respond after a certain time period am I allowed to edit the page again? and if he undoes my edits can he be blocked for doing so?
Mikkitobi (talk) 19:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
as you will appreciate i am new here - and i thought wikipedia was all about FACTS - clearly you dont always care to have facts on your pages if somebody thinks they are not relevant. At the moment Rms is acting as G-d and he has decided the facts are not relevant to the article in this case. I say they ARE relevant but my vote does not count.
i know it is too early to expect a response from Rms but I want to know what the procedure is if he doesnt.
If he has not responded by Monday and I make the edit then does he have a right to revert my change when he has not even discussed the matter?
there can only be consensus if he discusses this. And if at the end of the day he says 'no' and i say 'yes' and nobody else participates then that is the end of the matter?
now i will read the links you sent.
Mikkitobi (talk) 20:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
I admitted on the talk page that I was one of the individuals concerned. Stanley Diamond is the Chief Executive of JRI and he has been the main point of contact with both the Gerontology Group and with Guinness. That is why Stanley is the one mentioned on most sites (though many just mention the organisation). However on JRI the full information is given. I located the critical document and Stanley was the person who forwarded it to the Gerontology Group. Stanley will confirm that it was ME who located the critical document and both the Gerontology Group and Guinness know that too and it is referenced in their files. Feel free to contact them!
I agree that if the work we had done was just part of the research around the world that we would not deserve a special mention by name - it would be off topic. However in this case there was just ONE critical piece of evidence that allowed Guinness to confirm Israel Kristal as the world's oldest man. That ONE document was discovered by ME and without it we would not have the current article. I say that is on topic. What do you say?
If you prefer I can get Stanley Diamond to take over this communication and make the page edits? But does that make a difference?
Mikkitobi (talk) 21:50, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
OK and if we can get a representative of the Gerontology Group and/or Guinness to confirm what I have been saying?
Mikkitobi (talk) 21:57, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
You think newspapers always report 100% accurately???
How is an email from Guinness World Records a 'secondary' source?
Mikkitobi (talk) 23:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
emails are primary sources according to this:
http://www.ala.org/rusa/sections/history/resources/pubs/usingprimarysources
Mikkitobi (talk) 23:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
I would appreciate a tactful and polite response to my Contest for deletion, seeing as I am spent hours on the article and no other information, aside from promotion and flame-bait, exists on the Internet. Ante up, sir? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youareceo (talk • contribs) 02:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
I did, at the end of the article. I had only the information for the most part they provided, and since they authored it indirectly, it's going to sound that way, like it or not. The spirit of the rule was not violated, I am not LIFE Leadership and I intended to cast light on shadows about it. I see what you see, but disagree. Sorry we can't come to terms about it.
The issue I have now is about your response (me not taking precautions) rather than the deletion, the sole remaining incorrect information. Secondary references say that someone I cited, cited someone else.[1]
Remaining unresolved, is there a server log with my text so I can post off Wikipedia for the world to see? Again, there is little light shed on this company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youareceo (talk • contribs) 02:45, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Amyleequeer (talk) 04:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)You have accused me of adding false information when I did cite a reliable source. Just because it is popular belief does NOT mean it is true. Humans are herbivorous.[1][2]
References
why have you deleted the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kailam Frostick (talk • contribs) 19:36, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Fred chnprice.com I wrote is not Unambiguous advertising or promotion, I just want to introduce my company. Could you help me to perfect it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mishazhangzsg (talk • contribs) 01:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
How to avoid being deleting? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mishazhangzsg (talk • contribs) 07:41, 14 March 2016 (UTC)