This Talk Page

If you leave a message for me here, I will probably reply on your talk page unless you ask me not to do so,

Trying to follow discussions between users can be important, and it becomes so much easier to work out who said what to whom, when and why if those discussions are available in one place.

If I leave a message, or a reply to you on your User talk page, I will reflect that here to keep the record of our discussions less fragmented.

Archive
Archives
This user is an administrator.The Janitor's Cupboard

Talk To Me[edit]

Start a new section here

RfA Stuff[edit]

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 18:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online


ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

Administrator changes

added
removed
renamed BeeblebroxJust Step Sideways

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

Administrator changes

added Clovermoss
readded Dennis Brown
removed

CheckUser changes

added
readded Maxim
removed

Oversighter changes

added
readded Maxim
removed

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed Worm That Turned

CheckUser changes

removed Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

G8 speedy deletion of User talk:Kuldipem[edit]

If I'm not mistaken, doesn't WP:G8 explicitly exclude user talk pages? Thanks! ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 13:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ User:Chaotic Enby, Oops, yes you're correct, looks like my mistake. More haste, less speed etc. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, I have now restored the page. --Cactus.man 14:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

G4 deletion of Ayaz Sheikh[edit]

Hi, I saw you declined the G4 deletion of Ayaz Sheikh as the page was speed-deleted earlier. However, the page is just a copy of the recently deleted one following AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayaz Sheikh, which was closed just a few hours ago. Should I open a second AfD, even it it's rather clear that the page is a recreation of a deleted one? Broc (talk) 16:47, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Broc, thanks for your message.
I understand your point and agree to some extent, but technically a new Speedy nomination falls afoul of the G4 criteria. I'm not a big fan of process wonkery and generally frown upon it, but the "rules" have evolved over time, usually for a good reason. So I think the best course of action in this instance is to take the article to AFD.
Best wishes --Cactus.man 18:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Cactus.man. In the future I think you can accept a G4 in this situation, per Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Repeated Speedy Deletions (or: is AfD sovereign?). Hope this clarifies things. –Novem Linguae (talk) 02:58, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Novem Linguae.thanks for the note. I still find the wording of the G4 criteria a bit confusing, no matter how many times I read it. To my simple brain, it veeers into the semantic complexity and impenetrability of logical thinking involving Double negatives. I'll ponder over this longer, but thanks to User:Thryduulf, whose commentary in that thread on the interpretation of the wording I found the most helpful.
Thanks again. --Cactus.man 12:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary![edit]