Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bhonsle dynasty have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place ((Help me)) on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bhonsle dynasty was changed by Chauthcollector (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850763 on 2024-04-18T09:57:14+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bhonsle dynasty. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Broc (talk) 16:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bhonsales are descendant of Sisodiya, kunbi orgin is totally fake Chauthcollector (talk) 20:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kanhoji Angre, you may be blocked from editing. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m spreading correct info, angre are not kolis, angre are descendant of Shakhapal clan of maratha and descendant of rashtrakut Chauthcollector (talk) 05:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Early life of Shivaji. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Siege of Janjira, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Imperial^[AFCND] 13:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Bhonsle (clan). 0xC0000005 (talk) 15:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing as you were warned would happen if you continued to remove article content without giving any valid reason. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  JBW (talk) 19:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shivaji, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SKAG123 (talk) 21:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rejoy2003. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Timoji, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 16:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Maratha dynasties and states, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujrat. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Merta (1754). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has unencyclopedic tone. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ltbdl (talk) 00:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Kota is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Kota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ratnahastin (talk) 06:48, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Merta (1754) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Merta (1754) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ratnahastin (talk) 06:48, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Didwana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Didwana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ratnahastin (talk) 06:48, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Satara (1798), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Mahummad Khan's Invasion of South. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because It has no context. It is a complete mystery what its about, who is doing it or why.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creep^Talk 17:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mahummad Khan's Invasion of South and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 14:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chauthcollector! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes (talk / cont) 14:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]