This is Deondernemers's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zack Guzman (January 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zack Guzman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

thank you for review Deondernemers (talk) 08:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Deondernemers! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zack Guzman (January 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Once again, kindly add references from reliable sources. If you keep adding references from unreliable sources, it will only get rejected. The article needs to meet notability guidelines. Kindly go through the links provided. You may seek help from WP:Teahouse also. Thanks and happy editing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zack Guzman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avi Agarwal (January 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

I would also not advising the user of Mashable links that you are connected to. This would be a direct conflict of interest.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Avi Agarwal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 06:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hello, I just finished reading the article about conflict of interest thx for telling me. I use the Mashable link because i learn about some people through it and because mashable is good source of news.

So i can keep writing articles but can't use mashable link and use some other links? Deondernemers (talk) 07:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reinard Zandvoort (January 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Can you add citations to any uncited lines and also clarify how this meets WP:NPROF? Thank you btw!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reinard Zandvoort and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 20:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reinard Zandvoort has been accepted[edit]

Reinard Zandvoort, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 04:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Journalist at Mashable[edit]

Hi Deondernemers. I noticed that you mentioned your wife is a business journalist at Mashable in your userpage and I also see that you have used many mashable sources in your drafts. Kindly refrain from using any of your wife's articles as a sources in the drafts or main space articles. This will create the impression that you are solely here to promote your wife or her work. Ignore this message if you have not used any of here articles. Please see WP:NOTHERE as well. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The author, Redactie, is frequently seen in many of your drafts. [1] Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hi Jeraxmoira, thx for clarifying this. i used the mashable sources to find articles to write about, but i'll remove the Mashable sources from my drafts and replace them with different ones. also redactie means Editorial staff Deondernemers (talk) 07:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you, I learnt a new word today. The other author is [2]. You can still cite Mashable sources. WP:NOTHERE applies if you only cite what your wife writes. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia <3 Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

yes Georgina used to be her colleague. And i'm not too sure what my wife writes, shes on the editorial team, ill ask her when she wakes up soon Deondernemers (talk) 07:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poybo Media (January 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I cannot tell what this is, frankly, based on the two sentences present. (It's a media company that employs teenagers? It feels like I'm missing something...) Sources look decent but the current phrasing is insufficient for a Wikipedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Poybo Media and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seth Taube (January 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Post is a deprecated source so should not be use (see WP:NYPOST), Mashable is an interview so primary and not independent. The NYT and Forbes articles do not say much about Taube so is trivial coverage about him. The SEC is a primary source so cannot be used to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seth Taube and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moemate (January 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moemate and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 22:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello Deondernemers. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Poybo Media, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Deondernemers. The template ((Paid)) can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: ((paid|user=Deondernemers|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName)). If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sam Kuru (talk) 01:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Etsko Kruisinga (January 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

You have made a good start, but I think you should do more. Looking at your first reference I see that he was very accomplished, but you have almost none of that here. (Please don't go overboard, no exaggerated claims, keep the tone neutral.) I am confident that he will fly through if you do the extra work and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Etsko Kruisinga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 02:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hiram Garcia (January 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Seven Bucks Productions. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hiram Garcia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: House of Skye (January 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Skye Drynan. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject. Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:House of Skye and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jessa Maddocks (January 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article is short on detail of how the subject is notable (she is an American blogger, with two children and runs a business with her sister - yes, but so what!?). Notability (see WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE) needs to be evidenced by significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources (current references appear PR-inspired), ideally outlets (broadsheet newspaper, professional journals, major news broadcasters, etc) with a reputation for accuracy and fact-checking. Interviews are rarely reliable (WP:IV).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jessa Maddocks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 00:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bleed Esports (January 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This would seem to fall short of the WP:GNG. Unfortunately there isn't a lot of guidance on notability for esports teams I can find as it's not considered to be covered under WP:NSPORT. The best I can say is that at present, the article lacks significant coverage (see WP:SIGCOV) from reliable secondary sources. Sports teams aren't self-evidently notable because they exist and have a roster. Part of the problem is that this seems like a new team and so there isn't a lot of information about their achievements, if any. The Entrepreneur source also reads like a puff piece. I think the best approach here is to go back to the drawing board, find more reliable sources that cover the team in detail, and draft more information about their lineup, involvement in competitions and results. Happy to chat on my talk page if you have any questions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bleed Esports and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]