Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
|
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Araus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 16:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
This is a lack of respect. The Araus article, it's a really good article with many valid references. I don't know why censore my article.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Araus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Araus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Araus. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Remove the AfD template does not end the discussion; it just makes editors of the article unaware that the discussion is ongoing. Do you really mean to stifle discussion that might lead to reasons to keep the article? —C.Fred (talk) 03:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Please, stop with censoring, please. Basta
Hi FLACOPAILO. Two questions
1) Why do you believe that links to camionargentino.blogspot.com.ar and pesadosargentinos.blogspot.com.ar/ are not violations of WP:COPYLINK? 2) Do you have a connection with either blog?
Thanks Jytdog (talk) 04:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
"DONT DELETE the references, are very important and unique. This is a lack of respect with the work of the people.
The trouble are your fascist comment, wikipedia isn't a free encyclopedia. Maybe can think about this before censore the contribs. Right?
(UTC)
Hello, FLACOPAILO. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 17:41, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Another lack of respect... an investigation for censore the investigation. It's sad, really sad.
Wikipedia, the fascist encyclopedia
Quick note on the logistics of discussing things on Talk pages, which are essential for everything that happens here.
In Talk page discussions, we "thread" comments by indenting - when you reply to someone, you put a colon in front of your comment, which the Wikipedia software will render into an indent when you save your edit; if the other person has indented once, then you indent twice by putting two colons in front of your comment, which the WP software converts into two indents, and when that gets ridiculous you reset back to the margin (or "outdent") by putting this ((od)) in front of your comment.
And at the end of the comment, please "sign" by typing exactly four (not 3 or 5) tildas "~~~~" which the WP software converts into a date stamp and links to your talk and user pages when you save your edit.
That is how we know who said what, to whom.
This is as important as "please" and "thank you". Please follow this etiquette. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 05:39, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
It is you who are making attacks on freedom of expression, and of being able to contribute to this "encyclopedia", deleting, censoring and attacking me.
They should reveal the fascism and authoritarianism that they carry within, they are very violent.
My editions are legal, dignified, honest and backed by reliable information. Your prejudices and lack of education do not help one to work in peace.
It is all control, but you like to engender violence in your words.
You made it clear to me that wikipedia is a den of authoritarianism, violence and sectarianism. I already understood everything.
Investigate, what is this? FBI? KGB? good...
Another thing, what is free content? Perhaps "CamionArgentino" and "PesadosArgentinos" are not free? What do they infringe? This "encyclopedia" is full of content that is not free and that has no copyright, and have never made a problem.
It is disrespectful and lacking in education as they are offending me.
and what would be the problem of that? does not violate anything about the license or the useless wikipedia rules. When they finish extorting with all these idiocies, they will realize how wrong they are.
I think this is another lack of respect more. All because it is "blogspot", if it were a common web and there would be no problems? The material is documented WITH SOURCES AND WHAT NOT, is because it is owned by the research group. I have repeated it many times and you are determined to censor me, ban me and expel me from wikipedia. Vomitive, the less. If the RESEARCH GROUP, OWNER OF THE RIGHTS OF CAMIONARGENTINO AND PESADOSARGENTINOS, they accept to add links to wikipedia and they do not oppose, since THEY ARE THEY THEM that add them ... what is the problem? What bothers you so much? "The free reproduction of the material hereby presented (used WITHOUT PURPOSE OF PROFIT), in a partial and complete manner is permitted, and it is necessary and fundamental to mention the site and the author of the article." ENTER BOTH BLOGS, READ WHAT IT SAYS.
First, we only have control over what they have given us and we have obtained the source.
AGAIN, you have not entered the blog and you have not seen what CC we have, so it is difficult to continue explaining.
AGAIN, THIS BLOG DOES NOT VIOLATE ANYTHING RIGHT. We have not received a single claim for anything, everything has been transferred without problems and we do not face any kind of judgment.
We are freer than you and we have LESS PREJUDICE THAN YOU TWO, since we share our works and our material FREELY, WITHOUT CHARGING AND WITHOUT PROBLEMS. Unfortunately, they do not want to understand it and they accuse us of violating copyright, which is not the case.
it is clear that they only want to bother and argue without any sense.
They are reliable sources and have already been added. Stop restricting, annoying, bothering and offending. I do not know how to make you understand.
They do not have to check a source that complies with the required license
I think you're a disrespectful maleducad, since nobody rapes anything. Only you are violating my space, provoking, disrespecting and insulting.
I do not see you so sorry with other "contributors".
What you do is called censorship, lack of respect, fascism, authoritarianism and violence.
When do they start with the burning of books and crimes? I see that they carry authoritarianism and violence in their blood. I do not doubt that they are from a gang of kidnappers and indoctrinators.
I think you are violating the dignity of others, and you are being very disgusting. You should reveal it. You have no right to trample on the work of 100 people, who are in order, UNDER THE LAW.
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:40, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
I do not feel like it, I would like them not to bother, offend or disrespect while another wikipedia is making a GOOD edition, with proven and good quality content.
I think you're being very authoritarian, and this is a free encyclopedia.
THOSE WHO OFFEND with a war of editions ARE YOU, WHO DO NOT UNDERSTAND, do not know, do not interpret, do not read, annoy, assault and offend gratuitously.
I would ask you please to stop attacking me in my discussion page and stop reversing my changes.
It is bad education as you refer to my person without knowing me.
THERE IS NOTHING TO DISCUSS, I want them to leave me alone and stop attacking me.
REGARDS
Hi your use of fascist as a ubiquitous reply to any editing or comments that you don't like shows a certain lack of understanding of the word. Here is a link to the Wikipedia page on the subject that should help you to avoid its misuse in the future. Fascism Domdeparis (talk) 09:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
you are wrong, because here I am being offended, disrespecting, restricting the right to edit with truthful and reliable information.
So, they are being authoritarian, fascist, mediocre and violent.
I got tired of explaining that I am part of two research sites and because of the license they have, there is NO PROBLEM of sharing links and links.
And the information they contain (images, scans, etc.) are mostly from THIRD PARTIES WITH AUTHORIZATION and their own material.
How do I have to make them understand that? Do they do it on purpose?
Hi your use of capital letters is considered here as shouting and is frowned upon by the community. Please look at this link for more info. WP:SHOUTDomdeparis (talk) 09:13, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
there is no scream, there is only BLINDNESS and no desire to read from you.
Only using capital letters it seems that one can attract the attention of people who only harm the one who contributes with respect, information and dignity.
I would ask you please to stop disrespecting me.
That they deny personal attacks on my contributions, is a mockery.
Stop being so lacras and authoritarian, they are very sad and leave much to be desired.
They do not seem pleasant to you, but they are being fascists from the moment they censor me, they put in objection without proof my sources and above they think without knowing.
To avoid the calfique of "fascists" stop writing on my conversation page and retire. Also, stop objection to my contributions and the two projects in which I participate.
They are going to avoid being "insulted and offended".
I will not sign anything, until they retire and lift all the unfounded accusations that I have to endure. They tire me— Preceding unsigned comment added by FLACOPAILO (talk • contribs) 16:06, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
the one that should stop bothering where they do not call it, is you.
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm IdreamofJeanie. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Chrissymad that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 13:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)