This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I seem to remember you are/were a fan of this outfit. I noticed in the article's singles discography there is reference to "Way Back In The 1960s" / "Chinese White" (Elektra, 1967) which did not exist according to [1]
Reading from that source, their first single release was "Painting Box" / "No Sleep Blues" in March 1968. Is Strong wrong ? Any comments ?
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 12:07, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Re: "...the song SHE sang..." I listened to it to assure myself that I had it correct, and (good grief!) discovered I've been hearing it (and singing it) wrong for the last 40 years. I stand corrected, sir. Stephen Foster (talk) 16:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Rita Abrams at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LittleMountain5 02:58, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Still not sure how to use this really so many apologies if it's wrong. I made an amendment to the Silures page to state that the tribe would certainly not have been kind enough to respect a border that did not come into being for many hundreds of years later. The "footprint" of the Silures on most maps that seriously attempt to place them, including the one on the mentioned page, has the tribe's footprint into parts of what is now England and generally Herefordshire and Gloucestershire, although some have Avon/Somerset as a small part of the footprint. The same can be said for the other British tribes up to the first century as they would not be constricted by any future borders and it is rather a shame to use on certain pages a map of modern day Wales to show historical data when there are much better maps available but I am not skilled enough to be able to make such changes or suggestions. I hope I haven't caused a problem. regards.
77.89.134.201 (talk) 15:35, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
I think your points are valid and I have seen your contributions throughout wiki which generally prove to be well thought out or referenced. It is difficult to determine accuracy on certain matters without more evidence or source material and agree the natural barriers would have formed some sort of border but to show celtic tribes, or indeed the Welsh, within the borders of a 21st century map I believe is misleading since either the border did not exist or was different from what we have now. I see no harm in including the border as a reference point but to show it as a permanent borderline after which something or someone totally different might exist must be false. I believe that to appreciate the data it would be sensible, as some maps already in Wiki do, is merely overlay the area with modern day boundaries for reference only rather than have tribes, kingdoms, etc stop at a boundary which did not exist in context. Appreciate your views. Regards
77.89.134.201 (talk) 09:09, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
I agree, I think the map on this article is fine and the extent of the Silures could either be moved slightly north or south but mostly happy where it is. Anything else would be conjecture I suppose. I think similar maps should be used where similar subject matters are on Wiki. The map at "Ordovices" for example seems to be a generic modern day map that's used in lots of places/pages but falls appallingly short of its intended purpose due to the definitive border and gives a very false impression. Would you agree?
77.89.134.201 (talk) 15:16, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
I would feel much happier referring possible changes to yourself, if you're not overworked, and you can take a view on whether it's an improvement or not. Regards.
77.89.134.201 (talk) 16:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ghmyrtle! I've been adding inline references to The Artwoods article since I noticed the 'unreferenced' template on top of the page. I figured that you've created the article Art Wood. I'm guessing you know about the band. I thought maybe you'd like to see how The Artwoods article look so far? Thanks in advance ~ Elitropia (talk) 10:23, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
The article Jaibi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((dated prod))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:28, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Rita Abrams at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! AngChenrui (talk) 12:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
OK. How about just using the R&B Overseas, as I mentioned in one of my comments, or some such as a heading for a dfferent section? Steve Pastor (talk) 16:48, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Well, either tell me or don't tell but don't give me a lecture. Someone said HighKing is Irish. Is he confusing British with English or something? Genetically, everyone on the British Isles are pretty much of the same stock. Unless, of course, you come from the Punjab or something. I am sorry don't know who you are and I do not remember ever addressing you. Thank you. --Triton Rocker (talk) 15:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
So, it is a kind of Prehistoric, Post-Ice Age, Independence movement thing then? The problem with that is, it was not called Ireland back then either. I am sorry, I still do not understand what you - and their - point of view is. Can you state it clearly? All I saw was a whole load of wordy bad English, where a simple consistency would fix it. For me, what this website is missing is clear editorial consistency which I don't think you can achieve by mob rule. Thank you. --Triton Rocker (talk) 15:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
On July 15, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rita Abrams, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi . As you may have guessed already I am not a native English speaker . But I am still surprised that you have undone my latest edit with the following remark:" sorry, but this is not written in plain English and parts are incomprehensible" . I feel almost sad, and I would have expected that this particular edit of mine could not so easily be undone . I must say, that I am not convinced you are right . So unless you can give any specific examples - which might also be helpful towards succinct phrasing - I am going to revert your edit. Please note that I am not in a hurry . I am aware that my edit is using complex and fanciful language, but this is not 'Simple English', and it was not intended to be that . I would also welcome any comments and criticiscm, regarding content or language phrasing, as I do not feel 100% confident in using English, and also cannot profess infallibility in knowledge of history . Fell free to use my talk page . Many regards, Sechinsic (talk) 07:12, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
I have created User:Sechinsic/migration01 with the text you undid, as it might be more convenient for proofreading . Sechinsic (talk) 07:23, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm half thinking of making up a barnstar along the lines of being accused of being part of a Fenian conspiracy to subvert all that is good and right within the world. --Snowded TALK 08:04, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
It is true that my edit of the 16th was reverted and commented, and I have even found this to be constructive and inducive to refining the rephrasing of the intro and the 'chronology'-section . But it has also been a one-sided experience . Only one editor - namely Johnbod - has found time to comment, or two editors in total when counting you . Both of you have addressed the language, but neither of you has given any feedback on the changes I made .
In your final entry on the talk page you do emphasize your focus on language . Seeing that wikipedia is open for everyone to edit, I presume that your emphasis on language can count as argument for reverting my edit . It is therefore confusing that you write in the informationfield:"No - you need to await comments from others before making these changes, per talk." I am afraid I cannot follow your logic, and to be honest, it looks to me like you do not like what I have written .
But yes, I will wait a couple of days then . Sechinsic (talk) 11:41, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Are you any good with templates ? I tried to edit the AWB's template but it just came up with - '[[Roger Ball (musician) | Roger Ball], Saxophone and Keyboards'. I do not know what to do - any suggestions ? Thanks,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 10:16, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks. I have edited the template accordingly, and raised the problem at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion. Goodness knows if that is the right place, but fingers crossed. Thanks again,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Good work fixing my spelling mistakes and such on the H. P. Lovecraft article. I've basically re-writen the non-original text that was in the article now, but I will be doing more editing and adding new refs to the remainer of the article over the coming days. I just wanted to ask you if you had a reliable third party ref for the sentence about the band's harmonies having been "influenced by folk singer Fred Neil's work with Vince Martin"? I couldn't seem to find a reference to this anywhere yesterday and I just wondered where it came from. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 12:07, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
I've got an aversion to using a phrase like "powerful and soulful" in an article, most especially not in quotes, uncredited and in a lede. It's one reviewer's opinion, and seems to me inappropriate. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:05, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Crayton.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:44, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of UK dialling codes covering Wales , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. 90.208.56.217 (talk) 03:59, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
On 2 August, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article British rhythm and blues, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 18:03, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Hope you had a good one. You will probably have a look in on British R&B when you have got your feet under the desk and reverted 100 pieces of vandalism, so it will become obvious that I decided to post the discussed sections on post 1970, which await some tweaking when you have time and enthusiasm. There is also an issue to be resolved on bands formed from R&B acts that I might need a bit of help with. Finally, I have also realised that the list of significant covers slipped off the agenda, so we may need to get back to that. Also it is a bit of "tag you are it" as I am off to France early tomorrow - although I understand they now have the internet, so I will look on things in the evenings (if my family let me). As a result, no great hurry as far as I am concerned. All the best.--SabreBD (talk) 17:54, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
On August 9, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mike Raven, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Well done on Mike Raven (as above).
Tell me, what do you know about "I Spy (For The FBI)" - Jamo Thomas, Winfred "Blue" Lovett ("Kiss and Say Goodbye" - brilliant song, I thought), The Untouchables, Herman Wesley Kelly, Richard Wylie and Luther Ingram. I swore to myself that I would never do another new article on a song after my "Need Your Love So Bad" experience, and I will not. Equally, this is generally outside of my comfort zone anyway. However Allmusic seems to be in a tizz over the songwriter credit(s) and original performer, and you know how this can get the creative juices flowing. On face value perhaps Jamo needs an article - is he still alive ?
The Template talk:Did you know article relating to the FBI got me wondering, not least because I thought any opportunity to kick such an organisation up the proverbial appealed to my anarchist streak. Somehow "I Spy (For the FBI)" came to mind. Yes, I really should watch more cricket and less Wiki discussions ! Cheers,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 00:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks for the tweaks - by the way, I am now putting together an article on Richard "Popcorn" Wylie. Cheers,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 10:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Could I prevail on you to look up the Billboard Hot 100, and R&B chart, placings for Kip Anderson, please ? It's my new article that's a brewing. I think there are only two or three charting singles to worry about. Also the page number would be good, and then I can copy and past the rest of the book reference in from the Jamo Thomas article. Thanks,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 16:49, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, but I don't think I can add any thing to the article. There is just not enough written about these types of songs that would be considered "reliable sources". Ojorojo (talk) 19:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello, your nomination of Li'l Millet, Dorothy LaBostrie at DYK was reviewed and comments provided. --NortyNort (Holla) 15:31, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Davegodinsdeepsou 4 101b.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:26, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ghmyrtle! It's great that you created the page Aorta. I hope you didn't mind that I created the infobox. If you see any misleading info please do not hesitate to fix. I also would like to create the discography section for the band but then the contents box appears after the long text. Maybe the text could be named as history or similar so that the contents box would appear on top? ~ Elitropia (talk) 10:22, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
On 23 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Richard "Popcorn" Wylie, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:04, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I changed it to "sweepstakes" because that's what the page is called. But Wikipedia respects British spelling, so I'll go ahead and link it to Sweepstakes while calling it "sweepstake". Maybe this page will be of interest to you: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (spelling). Best, Yoninah (talk) 20:19, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
On 26 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Veda Brown, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
On 28 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joe Lutcher, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
On 28 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Li'l Millet, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
On 28 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dorothy LaBostrie, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Ghmyrtle! I'd be happy to fix the diffs on the report you filed to make it more readable if you'd like; as it is, it's not a "proper" report and would most likely be dismissed as such. Let me know if you need help, and Cheers :> Doc9871 (talk) 07:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
I see you are now a part of a widespread nationalistic campaign against all that is good and right with Geography. Next you'll be painting all the bookmarks on Wikipedia green .....--Snowded TALK 06:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
On 29 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Roddy Jackson, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
I have put the Wales article forward for GA status. It just needs tweaking, and maybe a heavy-handed swipe from outside to get it in place. I am writing to those who are constant contributors and defenders of Wales and Welsh articles, to not scream at me for doing this, put help get the article through. If we fail, we fail, there is nothing wrong with that; but Wales should be a Good Article at least and if it takes good intentioned amateurs to reach that then so be it. FruitMonkey (talk) 01:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! I'll post a note on the talk pages of the articles for the two authors, pointing to the deleted material. Very correct of you! I'll also have a look at the blog you mentioned.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 10:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi just wondering how much i need to edit and what to edit on the Bank Hall page i nominated to get it passed as a Did you know page? cheers Bankhallbretherton (talk) 23:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Yeah the article has shrunk due to new pages being created for the area of the hall eg the gardens, estate and the action group which have needed the bank hall article to be edited to show less content on them specific areas so the new pages can be expanded which have been done well. Maybe the Bank Hall Gardens page could be up for a nomination? Bankhallbretherton (talk) 08:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
On 2 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aorta (band), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
On 2 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Illinois Speed Press, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for posting an explanitory note on the user page after my revert for this article. I was a bit pushed for time and didnt get around to it immediately.--SabreBD (talk) 08:38, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal | ||
Firstly I'd like to thank you for you support of the DYK project in general. Then I'd like to note that you have created half a century of your popular articles. Well done, I thought they were eclectic but I see the vein of musicality running through the articles you have mined. Blues, Pop and TV shoes and musicians. Top of the Pops - with over 50 on the wiki list. So thanks for making so many hits - the wiki is all the more richer for your contributions. Thank you. Victuallers (talk) 09:19, 4 September 2010 (UTC) |
On 5 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dale Warren, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestions on crickets at refdesk! The article is now at Crickets as pets and needs some attention to grammar and flow.
Chirp! East of Borschov 08:30, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
It still wasn't very nice. But I'm glad it wasn't you what said it (guv). :) Daicaregos (talk) 17:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip off. It could be a copyvio so I have requested a deletion Victuallers (talk) 07:28, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
...for picking up my blooper, concerning Robert Scot's area & time of birth. GoodDay (talk) 14:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
You've saved me again (at BISE). GoodDay (talk) 22:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello! I am very pleased to see that you have become involved with editing Sid's entry, and have reverted a somewhat clumsy edit by an un-named person. I am still getting to grips with Wikipedia protocols, and other committments in my life mean I cannot yet devote as much time as I would like, to amplifying articles on people who are of interest to me. But I offer this to you, in the hope that you may be interested, and can find a way of weaving it into the text, omitting reference to Jon Cainer, who is perhaps best described as an anonymous benefactor!
Sid (and his immediate family) did live in the Forest of Dean, in a bungalow that had been attached to Blackthorn Farm, Hillersland, just off the B4432 (near Coleford and Berry Hill, though technically, I think it falls under English Bicknor). The bungalow was bought by Jon Cainer the astrologer for the family, when Richard, who owned Blackthorn, and let his land be used for the Forest Fayre in 1992, went bankrupt. The aerial view on Google Earth shows the garden pretty clearly, laid out with earth-works and standing-stones by Sid, and where his remains now lie. Does Wikipedia recognize the Register of Electors as a verifiable source, I wonder? since I rather think that Sid (in his settled manifestation) would have insisted on having his vote, and will have been on the register there for at least the past ten years. g88keeper (talk) 03:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello, your nomination of Bideford Bay at DYK was reviewed and comments provided. --NortyNort (Holla) 11:24, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
You posted this on my page
Are you serious? this was not vandalism in any definition of the word. I was removing some un-referenced material from a poorly researched and badly worded article in order that it wouldn't be misleading. I think by reverting it and posting on my talk page YOU are the one committing vandalism or at least not assuming good faith.----GreatestrowereverTalk Page 20:50, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. ----GreatestrowereverTalk Page 20:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User talk:Greatestrowerever may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you.
GreatestrowereverTalk Page 20:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Mostly because the allegation isn't false.----GreatestrowereverTalk Page 17:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
On 23 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Francis Wilford-Smith, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
I was just browsing WP:HD. The Dick Waterman article could do with an infobox - ((infobox person)) should do the trick. Mjroots (talk) 09:12, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
On 26 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Don Randi, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ghmyrtle/Archive 10!, an article you have contributed to, has been selected for the Wikipedia Version 0.8. offline release on DVD and iPhone. If you would like to make any last minutes changes or improvements, you are most welcome to do so. Deadline is midnight UTC on Monday, 11 October. See also: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Worcestershire/Archive 1#Worcestershire articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release. --Kudpung (talk) 04:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
On 27 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bideford Bay, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
I've written a climate section for the Wales article, per the recommendation at GA review. As geography is your speciality, would you mind taking a critical look at the section and make any improvements you think are needed. Please feel free to add/delete/amend as necessary, and don't spare my blushes. Cheers, Daicaregos (talk) 20:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm glad to help. It only took me 3 years, on and off; the mis-spelling and obscurity of the subject matter didn't help!
CheersPzzp (talk) 14:40, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |