|
[[
Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|32px|left|Image Copyright problem]]
Thank you for uploading Image:Argenta-Nancy-2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 06:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Dear Mutt, True that _I_ am not a reliable source. But my added note is not an _opinion_ of mine, but an objective matter of fact. Through the viol hyperlink my note included a reference as proof. Please have a look at pictures of 1. The Hofner model 500/1, 2. A violin, and 3. A viol, by visiting their wikipedia articles. Note the apparent differences to a violin: the viol and Hofner have slanted shoulders and no pointed protrusions delimiting the waist, but corners. It is possible that the Hofner bass got its shape from a double bass scaled down, but certainly not from a violin! Of course, around 1960 the viol was known to but a few, hence the misnomer arose, but with the resurrection of renaissance/baroque instruments since then, it should be pointed out. Go-in (talk) 11:19, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Go-in!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 21:42, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
|
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)