![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:
Other competitors of note include:
After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the great start to Ocepeia. I figured someone would be doing the article soon. I'll help out where I can. First, have you/will you upload more of the fossil images from PLOS One? Some of the mandible and tooth images would be useful as well as the diagrams. Secondly, and importantly, Gheerbrant et al (2014) found Ocepia to be outside of the Paenungulata in their cladistic analysis, and they classify Ocepia as ?Paenungulata in their Systematic Paleontology, so we should make sure that the tentative placement is emphasized (after all, their title says oldest Afrotherian, not Paenungulate). With the oldest Afrotherian skull claim, this would be a good nominee for Did You Know. --Animalparty-- (talk) 00:24, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
The article Ampelosaurus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ampelosaurus for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 14:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Hey, ok thanks for taking up the forest cobra article review again. I'm going to try to address everything you have requested tomorrow. --Dendro†NajaTalk to me! 03:57, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 14 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ocepeia, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Ocepeia (pictured), a 60-million-year-old afrotherian mammal, is named after a Moroccan mining company? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ocepeia. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 16:06, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Nice work! Kinda looks a bit like Lucy Punch!♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
To answer your question, so far this source doesn't have any material obviously wrong based on what you've added. Howeve,r please keep in mind this is a popular book companion to a TV series and is a summary of science like other kids' encyclopedias, not a valid source for research. Therefore, data type info that contradicts what is already sourced to the primary literature (for example the incorrect age for Eustrptospondylus and its classification as a "carnosaur") should be presumed wrong. Also keep in mind any data is not being found by these authors. "Haines estimated the length to be..." is not right since the book is not actually presenting new research. Haines is "reporting" an estimate and if he did not cite an actual paper, those sources should be ignored as unverifiable. Thank for your contributions from here so far! Dinoguy2 (talk) 20:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for helping. I left a comment on the "climate change" section on the talk page. LittleJerry (talk) 13:49, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, LittleJerry, no luck. I can create a section on WP:REX where you can list any references you would like access to, or just one for this ref, if it is needed so much. IJReid (talk) 01:20, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Anzu at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with ((db-g7)), or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 06:20, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 24 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pareiasauromorpha, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the group Pareiasauromorpha includes parareptiles that lived from 271 to 252 million years ago? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pareiasauromorpha. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Thanks for this Victuallers (talk) 16:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cryolophosaurus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ThaddeusB -- ThaddeusB (talk) 03:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
The article Cryolophosaurus you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cryolophosaurus for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ThaddeusB -- ThaddeusB (talk) 04:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I've long considered getting Raphinae to GA so it could become a featured topic (since Dodo and Rodrigues Solitaire are already FAs), but I never seem to get myself together to do it because of all the duplicate info (tedious for me to write the same stuff again, as I wrote the other two), and now I certainly don't have the time. But if you ever want to give it a shot, I'll be glad to help, I have all the references in handy to send you. You can also copy text directly from the daughter articles, should be a "low hanging fruit". Maybe featured topics give more points for the Wikicup, I don't know. FunkMonk (talk) 14:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the review of the W. green mamba article. I have a request of you - can you please add all the Naja species here. I added Naja samarensis (link here), but it doesn't appear under Naka like the way N. annulifera or N. melanoleuca do. It isn't appearing as a species under "subgroups". I also added the subgenera Afronaja and Uraeus, and you had already made Boulengerina, for example. I want to add the subgenus Naja for those species that fall under theat subgenus (ie. Naja (naja) oxiana, Naja (naja) naja), Naja (naja) atra, etc). There already is a template named "naja" for the genus as a whole, but I need a "naja" as a subgenus too. --Dendro†NajaTalk to me! 19:35, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
A cladogram is available here it can be found on page 9 of the PDF (or pae 817). If you can add that to the Black mamba article (under "Evolution and taxonomy"), I would greatly appreciate it. --Dendro†NajaTalk to me! 04:53, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Narwhal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cwmhiraeth -- Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:10, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cryolophosaurus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Elliot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer Godot13 (submissions) (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist
Adam Cuerden (submissions) (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato.
Cliftonian (submissions), who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.
With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 22:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Back in August last year you helped me by replacing the cladogram at Atlantic Puffin, which happens to be Today's Featured Article, with this edit. The cladogram has been questioned here. Would you be able to respond? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:36, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi there- this is just a quick note to apologise for a small but important mistake in the last WikiCup newsletter; it is not 64 users who will progress to the next round, but 32. J Milburn (talk) 18:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
The article Narwhal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Narwhal for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cwmhiraeth -- Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:31, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
The article Cryolophosaurus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cryolophosaurus for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ThaddeusB -- ThaddeusB (talk) 02:21, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Raphinae, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William Swainson and Robert Ridgeway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Template:Did you know nominations/Martian lava tubes Are you ab le to give this a green tick now? — Maile (talk) 11:32, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Titanoceratops you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 21:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, well, I know that here in English wiki there is always someone uploaded interesting stuff of paleontology, so I've uploading images for the Spanish articles. Well, I'm interested in your idea of work in articles that exists in both wikipedias, and we can start with Nigersaurus, if you want. In fact, many of the dinosaur articles in the Spanish wikipedia needs revision. On another hand, I've worked in some articles of South American Cenozoic animals in Spanish, (more recently in Langstonia), we could make English versions for these. Cheers, --Rextron (talk) 08:20, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
I very much appreciate your willingness to debate the substance of the theory and to engage on an intellectual level. I've been feeling a bit like a visitor to the Maury Povich Show, but your contributions have been refreshing.[[User:Cookiecutteramaru|Cookiecutteramaru](talk) 05:06, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 24 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wing-assisted incline running, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that wing-assisted incline running (WAIR) is a hypothesis about the origin of avian flight used by modern partridges? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wing-assisted incline running. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 14:08, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey, I was wondering if you would review Eastern green mamba for GA status. I'm having a lot of trouble finding people to review my snake articles. The Cape cobra has been nominated for weeks now, and still nobody has started a review. However, I would like to get the eastern green mamba reviewed first. It's pretty much GA status, just take a look at it and see what you think. Thanks. --Dendro†NajaTalk to me! 02:52, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zanabazar (dinosaur), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from Urania's Mirror, lithographs of various warships (such as SMS Gefion) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's
Godot13 (submissions), whose featured list Silver certificate (United States) contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's
ChrisGualtieri (submissions) who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including Falkner Island, on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included
Cliftonian (submissions), who saw three articles (including the top-importance Ian Smith) through featured article candidacies, and
Caponer (submissions), who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated list of plantations in West Virginia) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include narwhal from
Reid,iain james (submissions), tiger from
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and The Lion King from
Igordebraga (submissions). We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to
Czar (submissions) and
Red Phoenix (submissions) for their work on the Sega Genesis topic. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.
192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 17:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
I don't know if you seen the discussion at talk:DYK about the copyvio in this article, but you are the editor who added this. Obviously this raises concerns about other articles. I'd like your comments. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 12:40, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hell Creek Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Prince Creek Formation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:49, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
The article Titanoceratops you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Titanoceratops for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 06:01, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry I had to fail this Ian - just too many articles to check to get into titanoceratops and the close paraphrasing needs addressing. We can revisit this one later. As well, Zanabazar (dinosaur) needs fixing. Sorry. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:02, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
j⚛e deckertalk 05:52, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prosaurolophus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charles Sternberg and William Parks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
I am working on the article Canidae and wondered if you would be able to help me with a cladogram based on Figure 10 of this journal article. I don't think the cladogram would need to include the bear, panda, seal and walrus mentioned at the bottom. It would be great if you could help. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Didelphodon may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I've missed your edits in Nigersaurus, although it seems that you are pretty busy here. Anyways, I want to ask you a favor. Could you make a cladogram for the article of Toxodontidae? I've found a recent paper that includes one, and I don't know how to make cladograms. Greetings! --Rextron (talk) 22:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 25 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Saurolophus angustirostris, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that though many specimens of Saurolophus angustirostris have been found, it was not clearly differentiated as a separate species from Saurolophus osborni until 2011? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Saurolophus angustirostris. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Didelphodon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, do you think you could replicate this[1] cladogram for the quagga article? I know, my version is dreadful... Just write that, and I'll modify the names afterwards. FunkMonk (talk) 02:56, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
After an extremely close race, Round 3 is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years- 321 was required in 2013, while 243 points were needed in 2012. Pool C's Godot13 (submissions) was the round's highest scorer, mostly due to a 32 featured pictures, including both scans and photographs. Also from Pool C,
Casliber (submissions) finished second overall, claiming three featured articles, including the high-importance Grus (constellation). Third place was Pool B's , whose contributions included featured articles Russian battleship Poltava (1894) and Russian battleship Peresvet. Pool C saw the highest number of participants advance, with six out of eight making it to the next round.
The round saw this year's first featured portal, with Sven Manguard (submissions) taking Portal:Literature to featured status. The round also saw the first good topic points, thanks to
12george1 (submissions) and the 2013 Atlantic hurricane season. This means that all content types have been claimed this year. Other contributions of note this round include a featured topic on Maya Angelou's autobiographies from
Figureskatingfan (submissions), a good article on the noted Czech footballer Tomáš Rosický from
Cloudz679 (submissions) and a now-featured video game screenshot, freely released due to the efforts of
Sven Manguard (submissions).
The judges would like to remind participants to update submission pages promptly. This means that content can be checked, and allows those following the competition (including those participating) to keep track of scores effectively. This round has seen discussion about various aspects of the WikiCup's rules and procedures. Those interested in the competition can be assured that formal discussions about how next year's competition will work will be opened shortly, and all are welcome to voice their views then. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 18:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Done. LittleJerry (talk) 23:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Triceratops, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Horner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Raphinae you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cwmhiraeth -- Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:20, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
The article Raphinae you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Raphinae for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cwmhiraeth -- Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing Wildebeest. It was rather unsatisfactory to work on because it dealt with two different species and it was difficult to see exactly what it should include and what exclude. Single species articles are more straightforward. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julius T. Csotonyi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages National Geographic and Steve White. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm confused why my t-rex edit keeps getting undid when it has many plausible and reliable sources. If it's a citing problem i would be glad if you could help me with that because wikipedia does it differently then i've done it.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Corythosaurus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 19:20, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Would you be able to create a cladgram of the living equines? The graph can be found here. LittleJerry (talk) 03:54, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
The article Corythosaurus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Corythosaurus for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 18:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rodent, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Castor and Mus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Prince Creek Formation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)