Thank you for your recent contributions to 2010 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. Unfortunately, the recent storm was not actually a tropical cyclone and thus your contributions were out of place. However, please do take a look at the article on the storm: 2010 eastern Indian storm, and contribute to it if you have anything to add.
Have a nice day, ThaddeusB (talk) 19:06, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
I removed the system because their wasn't any Tropical Cyclone in the NIO this week. The system being called a cyclone by the media is in fact a norwester and doesnt count as a part of the season as far as i am aware.Jason Rees (talk) 19:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
I am currently trying to get ahead and write an article up for Conson as it looks like its gonna become the first typhoon of the season and do some major damage to the PAR and China. Anyway im contacting you to see if you would be interested in helping me out as i suck at writing impact up.Jason Rees (talk) 11:26, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jpuligan 12,
Recently, you've been replacing the high-quality (>5,000 x 5,000 px) MODIS images of typhoons with ones of much lower quality (700 x 900 px). Although you may like the lower resolution images, the project always uses the highest-resolution image as the main image for a storm unless there are none available near the peak intensity of a storm. Please refrain from continuing to replace these images in the future.
Cheers, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:04, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PCA tag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 04:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
I submitted a DKY. If you want to suggest a better hook, please do. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:28, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Moved here. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:04, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for the late response, i need a bit more information before i can answer your question, as i believe you may have misinterpreted the question.Jason Rees (talk) 03:03, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Please look again at your source for the TD - my sources show me that it was carried through 0000UTC and was only dropped this morning after 0600 UTC. 18z, 00z, 06z, 12z.Jason Rees (talk) 18:00, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
I only recorded this: http://bbs.typhoon.gov.cn/read.php?tid=47303&ds=1&page=8#1797939 I hope someone else has recorded the complete one. -- Meow 19:03, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Intensity map near Cebu - Negros 2012.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.
Please click here and do the following:
If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.
Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
How many times do we have to tell you to stop using general links such as http://www.usno.navy.mil/NOOC/nmfc-ph/RSS/jtwc/warnings/wp0312web.txt which do not allow for verifiability. Also please remember that the articles are meant to be a summary of the data not every single fact that you can find.Jason Rees (talk) 19:09, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
I saw you remove this 3RR report. Please do not ever suggest that you have more authority to edit any article on Wikipedia simply because you're a member of a project. Wow, just wow. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:14, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. uhm I'm not really saying that I have the more authority in editing. I just want to said that Meow shouldn't delete the articles that I'm putting without notifying me. Jpuligan 12 (talk) 10:23, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
You uploaded Super Typhoon Guchol at peak strength 2012 - 17 - 06.jpg, but the date is not proper at all. You could use 2012-06-17 (under ISO 8601), June 17 2012, Jun 17 2012, 17 June 2012 and 17 Jun 2012 within a filename, but 2012 - 17 - 06 is really not proper and not used anywhere. Besides, a filename without strength (like Super Typhoon) is better. I hope you understand why I meant. -- Meow 09:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Be careful - Some of the impact you say is related to Saola isnt. Saola is pulling invest 97W towards it which is what is causing some of the impact.Jason Rees (talk) 17:57, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
I'll be praying my Philippine friend! I should be lucky to survive Vicente's punch on Hong Kong. Good luck to you, as many tropical cyclones affect the Philippines. -- ✯Earth100✯ ^‿^TalkContribs 13:55, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Jpuligan 12, greetings from Hong Kong, China. There's an ongoing discussion, on whether or not JMA TDs at Tropical Depression intensity should be kept out of the "Other storms section"
Please comment. Sincerely,
-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉TalkContribs 11:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Note: You received this message because you have contributed to tropical cyclone related articles and I thought you may be interested.
Thank You.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉TalkContribs 02:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
never mind.
Hey Jpuligan, Bopha hit your country REALLY hard. How are you doing?--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 12:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 03:10, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Typhoon Utor (2013) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Typhoon Utor (2013), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aurora and Isabela (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
On 8 November 2013, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Typhoon Haiyan (2013), which you substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. |
--SpencerT♦C 17:37, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flood in EDSA.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Jpuligan 12. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tectonic summary of Qinghai. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 25#Tectonic summary of Qinghai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 122.60.46.122 (talk) 10:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pasig Christian Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
—hueman1 (talk • contributions) 08:54, 30 May 2021 (UTC)