This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
May I know the reason why you have reverted the edit made to native name? Every city has its native name depending on the region it belongs to.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Prameetc (talk • contribs) 12:26, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
@Prameetc: Yes. Any article related to India. — LeoFrank Talk 12:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering what you would think about this situation. The official name for the Gwalior airport is "Rajmata Vijaya Raje Scindia Air Terminal" per AAI. However, the article is titled Rajmata Vijaya Raje Scindia Airport – with a capital A in Airport, suggesting that is the proper name when it is not. Do you think the title should be changed to "Rajmata Vijaya Raje Scindia Air Terminal" or simply "Gwalior airport"? I hope I am not nitpicking! Regards — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 03:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I know this message is long but please read it complete. I had placed that "threatening comment" in the infobox of the page with passenger movements which you removed along with figures of passenger movements. I had placed two comments (firstly the longer one and later the shorter one) only to prevent repeated IP vandalism to which that page was target for long time (this page was not protected at that time, I requested its protection yesterday). Even despite of the longer comment, some IP vandals shamelessly altered figures of passenger movements, aircraft movements and cargo tonnage as per their choice. Just see the page history of Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport. That's why I placed another short comment (before figures of passenger movements) which warned (not threatened) IP vandals and new users not to change the figures or else their editing privileges will be affected. Moreover, the earlier and longer comment (placed after passenger movements figures) was an explanation of how the statistics were calculated for CY 2016. That comment also urged users not to modify figures. I can see some logic in your removal of first comment but why did you remove figures of passenger movements and the explanatory comment ? Is there any logic behind it ? Let me tell you that both comments are needed to prevent IP vandalism in the article. This page has been protected only for 1 month. It will become available for editing to IP users after that. Those comments will serve as instructions for them and they don't have any "threatening" element.
You are a senior editor and that kind of thing of indiscriminately removing passenger movements figures is not expected from you. It's really unfortunate that disruptive edits by IP vandals are not even noticed quickly and constructive edits of users like us get reverted for no reason. Do you know how much time it took for me to calculate all the statistics for 2016 and putting them with elaborate sources ? Just see reference 1, 2 and 3 of article Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport. I have updated 2016 statistics for many other Indian airports all by myself. Please do care to see the content before removing it. I have placed back passenger movements figures and longer explanatory comment but not the warning comment. Thank you. Please let me know your views on this. Vibhss (talk) 18:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
@LeoFrank:: That's certainly rude of you. By the way, the comment was for IP vandals who now and then, shamelessly changed figures of statistics. PLEASE SEE REFERENCE 1,2 AND 3 OF ARTICLE. But why are you removing passenger movement figures and let remain Aircraft Movements and Cargo tonnage figures? The latter two also have been calculated from adding by two sources. Statistics for many other Indian airports have been calculated in the same manner. (Since AAI upload its annual figures on fiscal year basis (April to March), this is the only way to calculate statistics for Calendar year (January to December). All major international airports around the world compile their statistics as per CY and same is reflected in Wikipedia. To maintain uniformity with oversees airports, statistics of Indian airports must be mentioned on calendar year basis.) See good articles Kempegowda International Airport and Rajiv Gandhi International Airport and other articles Indira Gandhi International Airport, Chennai International Airport, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose International Airport and so on. Will you remove passenger movements figures of these articles also ? Well, I am not understanding the logic of different sources here. There is a single single source Besides the source provide details about calculation Are you bullying me or Wikipedia as a whole by your chauvinistic behaviour ? Vibhss (talk) 11:47, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jackninja5. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. This is not an acceptable edit summary for removing this. The Ninja5 Empire (Talk) 12:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Please try to get what I am saying. See ref no. 63 of article Kempegowda International Airport and compare it with reference 1 of article Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport I have used same methodology for calculation of statistics. Vibhss (talk) 12:19, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Some of the recent editing on Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport which you have been involved in looks like edit warring. Please be careful not to repeatedly revert edits or re-add material that has been challenged by reversion without first securing talk page consensus. Edit warring is regarded as a form of disruptive editing and can result in administrative sanctions if it persists. If you are having a content dispute there are multiple avenues for resolving the disagreement. See WP:DR for suggestions. Note: This message is being posted on the talk pages of multiple editors. If you have any questions or comments please ping me or drop a line on my talk page as I am adding not your talk page to my already insane watchlist. Thank you for your cooperation. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC) |
In Visakhapatnam main article it is stated that economy of Visakhapatnam is 26 billion USD,but in economy of Visakhapatnam article it is stated that economy of Visakhapatnam is 48 billion USD.How can you write two different GDP incomes of the same city without any clarity of what is the actual GDP of Visakhapatnam?please rectify your mistakes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sai krishna 98 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
You are telling that cited sources say that it is 26 billion USD.I agree with you.But one cited source is saying it is 26 billion USD ,but the another cited source("The top 15 cities in India" by worldlist mania.com ) is saying it is 48 billion USD.Which article is correct in these both as Wikipedia gives two articles as sources.It is telling Visakhapatnam has 26 billion USD ,then how can it be in the 8th largest city as Surat has 40 billion USD.please reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sai krishna 98 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
You removed few destinations in Madurai Airport page citing no reference. I am surprised to know you being not aware of aviation. Not all new destinations are announced in the media. If you check indigo website, you can find Madurai to Pune flight via Chennai (with same flight number). This hasn't come in any media. But it is available for booking. Same with Jet Airways non-stop Mumbai flight. --Amdmustafa (talk) 06:53, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Regarding your previous discussion with Amdmustafa (talk · contribs), I want to tell you that [[Jet Airways] has indeed started operating Madurai to Mumbai non-stop flight from 26th March. This flight is actually a direct flight from Madurai to Delhi with layover at Mumbai, catering to passengers from both Madurai and Mumbai. I don't think we need a source for flights which have already commenced operations but if you need, here it is. As I said, this flight has already begun operations by the date I am writing this message to you. I really don't know about the second "disputed" flight though (IndiGo flight from Madurai to Hyderabad). Thank you. Vibhss (talk) 17:54, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I could have responded to your message on my talk page but I thought otherwise. I checked Google Flights which was showing Air Costa flights also among non-stop flights for many pairs of destinations I checked. May be (or may not be) it was silly on my part to drop at conclusion just after checking on Google Flights. Can you please throw light on this ? Vibhss (talk) 16:59, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. I've noticed that you have been a party to several conflicts involving articles about south Indian airports. It is true that the folks you are warring with are largely introducing unsourced content. However, this is not a reason to edit-war with them. Revert them once, and if the behavior persists, ask for page protection, or a block. Second, under no circumstances should you be using the remarkably inappropriate tone you have adopted further up on this page. If folks are trolling you, report them, or ignore them. Don't get into a slanging match. Finally, the fact is that much of these disputes center on lists that are unsourced in the first place; and so any demands for sources ring a little hollow. If you are concerned about the sourcing in those lists, you should fix them, or remove them. Don't simply let them sit there, and revert entries that are really no worse, a priori, than the material in the article to begin with. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 05:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
The information which i post on CSIA and DEL airport about Indigo Was a correct Information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vnk414 (talk • contribs) 08:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi LeoFrank. I actually need your help. This message can be a bit long but I kindly request you to read it full. I had inserted those explanatory comments in article Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport against selected direct flight destinations of Air India. Well I was prompted to do that only because many IPs and even new users were removing those (direct flight) destinations again and again not knowing the difference between Direct flight, Non-stop flight and Connecting flight. Since many editors use Google Flights to verify the flight destinations in Wikipedia and Google Flights mixes up Direct flights among many Connecting flights, it's obvious what those editors will do who don't know the difference. You can witness same type of vandalism in Madurai Airport. An IP even inserted a comment urging users to not include direct flight destinations as according to his POV, only non-stop flights are direct flights. How can we deal with such users ? I had to restore the removed destinations with "explanatory comment". You yourself reverted an editor who removed Newark from Ahmedabad Airport. Similarly, a user removed Chicago (served by direct flight via Delhi) from destination list of Hyderabad Airport. I had to restore it with comment. I think only explanatory comments can guide such "immature" editors.
Besides, while removing the notes/ comments from article of Mumbai Airport, you mistakenly removed even names of destinations like Newark (non-stop flight), Osaka and Shanghai (both served by direct flights). Check here. I restored the names but not comments. But I think that such comments are needed since "Airlines and Destinations" section is often very long and any irrelevant removal/ addition doesn't come into notice of other editors easily. Another user is pushing his imaginative POV by removing direct flight destinations of Air India from articles O'Hare Airport, JFK Airport and Newark Airport and citing a source he himself misinterprets. Since the message is getting very long, I will explain that to you in detail in next message after your response. For now, I have reverted edits of that user. Since you frequently edit aviation related articles, can you please keep track of these three articles also ? It's a request. If you can't, please suggest some wiki editor's name from whom I can seek help. Also, please explain your viewpoint regarding comments/ notes in your response. Regards. Vibhss (talk) 14:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I was reviewing your request at WP:RFPP and after doing some digging came up with this link which states that Alliance Air (India) has a fleet of 8 ATR-72s. I am not sure which is correct as this link only says they have 5 but wanted to let you know. Best, Mifter (talk) 18:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Will page protection (semi-protection) prevent auto-confirmed yet "immature" editors from vandalising articles ? It is easy to become auto-confirmed just after 3-4 days and 10 edits and edit protected pages. If comments can hint them about the concept of different kinds of flights, what is the harm in keeping comments ? While the comments were there, I never witnessed any disruption with concerned destinations of concerned airport articles. Last month, I requested semi-protection of page Mumbai Airport and it got semi-protection for 1 month period. But mostly, requests for page protection are rejected unless there is "enough disruptive activity" to justify protection and also vandalism must not be limited to a single user. What say ? Vibhss (talk) 18:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
If you doesn't read any news then kepp quite. Don't give a message saying blocking me the information I added in pune Airport was fully correct.I will put that information again. Enter the flightradar page it has also added Kolhapur airport which will be a destination of air deccan.Under the UDAN scheme [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vnk414 (talk • contribs) 09:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, This is Upanshu. As per your concern about Lal Bahadur Shastri International Airport wiki page; I hereby abide about vandalism of the page. I added the information about flights to Kanpur as per Udaan Yojana schemes provided by Government Of India. Flights between Kanpur and Varanasi will start this coming September.Air Odisha has been awarded for this route.You can check out the list at Udaan Yojana scheme website. And Iam also the regular user of wiki pages. And I am providing the most accurate data available through the genuine sources. You must also look into the matter. Please keep the page upto date. LeoFrank
Thank You Upanshu upanshu (talk) 07:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Can you please join this discussion ? I have pointed out all facts to the initiator of this discussion but I need more editors' viewpoints in the discussion and establish a sort of consensus. The initiator of this discussion is somewhat trying to impose his imaginative POV. Your help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Vibhss (talk) 17:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
The content I had edited in IndiGo was sourced and not unsourced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashutosh2978 (talk • contribs) 03:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, regarding this edit, I did it because of MOS:TABLES, which states, "Prose is preferred in articles as prose allows the presentation of detail and clarification of context, in a way that a table may not." So I don't know how this is ignoring the rules, and I don't see the harm caused.
A similar situation happened here, and an admin agreed with me.
Also, please look at each edit that you intend to rollback with Twinkle, as two of my edits simply replaced the name "Air India Regional" with "Alliance Air" in other parts of the article. Anyways I have reapplied these edits. Regards — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 21:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
I thought I'd create a new section for this. You have stated that ch-aviation is not a reliable source, for example here. Why do you find them unreliable? I had written about this on my talk page here. Also take a look at the Wiki article for ch-aviation. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 14:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
You could see the Air India timetable, friend. It doesn't fly to Bengaluru from Male. Buddhi93 (talk) 18:23, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Please check before editing go air is going to fly to ahemdabad via mumbai from may 1.if indore and lucknow are in list thn there is nothing wrong in my edit. Pink 86 (talk) 17:19, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I need a clarification...... "No Indic script" message was left.However, it is my conviction reading wikipedia India, that most pages have Indic name below them. 1.Why is Indic script under native name not allowed ? 2.My edit on Mudumalai made 3 line Indic ed it to 1 line for simplicity.But it was again reverted back to 3 line Indic name.Please explain me why ?
I would prefer shorter explanations than reading longer descriptions available of Wiki.Since , it did not answer some of my questions.Hope you will answer it soon . Thank you from a learner Happy sage (talk) 03:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Even featured wikipedia pages have Indic scripts in it . eg: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karnataka"
good article with indic script : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerala — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happy sage (talk • contribs) 05:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
@LeoFrank You did not still explain your revert on Mudumalai though. Care to explain
Happy sage (talk) 03:51, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Please check on go air flight schedule from may 1 it flys with a 35mins layover at mumbai its the same flight.i go through every details before editing so please check. Pink 86 (talk) 02:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC)