This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I saw your edit comment at Graces for Drowning. I just wanted to alert you that, again, if someone nominated "Postcard" for an AFD deletion, it would probably be deleted. Now, I want to help you and work on it and make it so it's keepable, just so you know. I'm not trying to tear down your work or anything, I'm just laying some stuff out there:

1. An article has to establish notability. Mostly, what that boils down to is in coverage in reliable, third party sources. I emphasize the "third party" part, as in info that is not from Wilson, his record label, etc, because they would be considered 1st party, and while useful to use in the article, wouldn't help in an AFD discussion. I point this out because majority of the sources right now are not 3rd party.
2. Check out WP:NSONGS. If a song charts on any sort of important chart, that usually is a good argument for keeping it as well.

Anyways, in conclusion, I'm going to try to find all the third party sources that discuss the song as I can, and work it into the article. Please help me do the same. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:09, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Sure. I'm up to anything and i'm trying to expand it more and more. you're a very good friend to me here Sergecross, and i don't know how to thank you for everything that you did and also your big help on these 2 articles. thanks for your notice. (Reza ^(Talk2Me) 11:45, 30 October 2011 (UTC))

No problem. Also, since the time that I wrote that, I added a bunch of reception to Postcard. Still, the more, the better. Sergecross73 msg me 15:53, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Yeah I saw that. thanks for everything. I was really thrilled when I saw them. I used the Alternative Matter one for the album. it wasn't in that professional reviews list but it wasn't also in Unprofessional list. so I thought we could use it till more reviews come in.(Reza ^(Talk2Me) 18:16, 30 October 2011 (UTC))

The visual aspect to his music does seem to be something important to SW's overall "experience" with his music, so it may be worthwile to include to some degree. Right now, there's nothing in the article about it at all, right? At the bare minimum, we could name the videos and briefly describe what going on in them. However, we wouldn't want to go into the video's "meanings" unless we've got some reliable sources from SW or someone describing it. If we just put our interpretations in there, it'd be original research. Sergecross73 msg me 12:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, you're right, but i think we should do the thing you said. name the videos and briefly describe what going on in them. (Reza ^(Let'sTalk) 14:21, 3 November 2011 (UTC))

Hi. In Anterior (band), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page James Britton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi, i didn't add any link to Anterior (band). there was just some vandalism in that article by an IP which i inverted it back. it maybe added by other wikipedians. you can go and check the history of that article. Reza ^(Let'sTalk) 10:50, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited 54th Grammy Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Reza ^(Let'sTalk) 15:29, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited 50th Grammy Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Racines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

• 54th Grammy Awards is in the USA, not Iran!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ucla90024 (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Wherever, I'm responsible for this page so Suck it up! Reza ^(Let'sTalk) 22:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at 54th Grammy Awards and asserting ownership of that article. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)) below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 22:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Content disputes are not vandalism. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Telling someone you're edit warring with to "Suck it up" is beyond a polite edit war. Toddst1 (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

• Ok, i was rude but what do you call him... because I'm a Persian he can say whatever he likes. Iranian's know what is Grammys and other ceremonies... we have a channel that broadcasted it LIVE and now he comes and say "It's in USA"... come on seriously, i was offending myself... it was like he said "Fuck off!" to me. you're right "Content disputes are not vandalism." but many times he putted that pic and I or the others removed it. after that it's vandalism, right? and ok maybe i'm the victim here but why 48 Hours? Reza ^(Let'sTalk) 00:46, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

No, it's not vandalism - it's edit warring - which is why you're both blocked. And yes, s/he was rude as well. If you can assure me you've learned what WP:EW and you don't WP:OWN that article, I will unblock you. Toddst1 (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

OK, now i learned to be a tough one... Thank you. Reza ^(Let'sTalk) 00:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

That's the answer I was looking for. Toddst1 (talk) 00:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

In defense of Reza.....Ucla90024's repeated addition of this awful image (take a good look at it!) was indeed persistent vandalism (and in no way constructive or an improvement of the article), so, even though it appeared to be edit warring, Reza was actually preventing vandalism. In this case, context is everything. -- Brangifer (talk) 04:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

I'll agree on the image being pointless and adding nothing, and in fact detracting from the article. Peridon (talk) 09:36, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Maybe so, but that does not make it vandalism. No matter how many of us don't like an edit, it is not vandalism unless it is done with the intention of doing damage, and I see no evidence of that. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

It's OK. I'm sorry for my bad language, I was a little bit angry for this blocking thing and now I think I learned my lessons now. but, FYI... i called him a "nerd" because he was being racist, that i can't bear, sorry for that. you said that I "have shown that you think you exercise ownership of the article" no I wasn't thinking like that, i was just protecting it from bad editing and adding nonsense to it. before the show aired i requested twice for the protection cause people were adding artists to the performers line-up without academy confirming it and we; the people who were watching over this article were tired of reverting back their edits and thank them they accepted my requests. and about that picture. that picture was added to the article days ago before the show and somehow someone else came by and removed it from the topic and said "Seriously, a picture of pavement?! Let's not degrade the article with such images" and then again he came by and added it over and over again until i reported him. but it's OK, I know I was edit warring so i deserved this blocking. i should've reported him in the first place. Thank you everyone. Reza ^(Let'sTalk) 13:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

I have undid the user's edits from today and given a final warning. If you catch vandalism such as this, you can also issue warnings to the user's talk page - see WP:UTM for details on procedures and templates which can be used. As for blocking the account, that will need to be done at the administrative level. I'll raise a request at WP:AIV for that. Dl2000 (talk) 22:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

1.) We don't use Radio Songs unless the song did not chart on the Hot 100. 2.) The Hank Williams who does mastering on many country music albums is not the same as Hank Williams, Jr. 3.) There's no need to include the "composer" field from Allmusic, since that's just the names of the people who wrote songs on the album (making it redundant to the songwriter field on the tracklist). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:12, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

• ok. Reza ^(Let'sTalk) 01:20, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Please note that the "building chart" is a mid-week projection for album sales. It is not the final chart released by Nielsen Soundscan via Billboard. Please stop re-addng the March 3 chart to this article until it has been confirmed (Billboard normally does this on Wednesday, with the full chart released on Thursday). Thanks. - eo (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok i got now. Reza ^(Let'sTalk) 17:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Little Broken Hearts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franz Ferdinand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Little Broken Hearts, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stylist and The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello. Feel free to read and supply commentary to this discussion concerning several review sites. Thank you. Backtable ^{Speak to me}_{concerning my deeds.} 01:07, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi Reza! I'm well, and I hope you are too. Yeah, a ways back I had intentions on working more on Grace for Drowning, in which I figured I'd probably see you around, but the album disappointed me a little, so I never got around to working on it much. (Though it's growing on me some, so maybe I'll get back to it...) I have seen you working on the Storm Corrosion articles though. Anyways, hope all is well with you. Sergecross73 msg me 02:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Like Water for Chocolate (Book Cover).png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Like Water for Chocolate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:48, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey Reza! A discussion is currently going on the Talk:2012 Grammy Awards relating to moving back the article titles to "nth" form instead of the year form which SilkTork had done. Please come and support us to bring it back to its old titles. Thank you! Janbryan (talk) 06:31, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Reza 1389! Thank you for bringing back the interest to reverting back the Grammy Awards titles to "nth" form. What you could do is to create an requested move discussion. I don't know how to make these because SilkTork helped by creating those discussions. You could look on the guidelines to build one in Wikipedia:Requested moves, particularly in Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting multiple page moves. Once you create a discussion, I would be there to support you. Thanks again! Janbryan (talk) 22:03, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello! This message is to inform you that Wikipedia:WikiProject U2 needs your input! Please join the discussion on the talk page!Miss Bono (talk) 12:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

You are receving this because your username is listed in Category:WikiProject U2 members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile and move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list.
Cheers.

–pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, it was my fault. The bot does not recognize the <noinclude> TAG and this message has been sent to all the inactive users of Wikiproject U2. Remove this section whenever you want. Sorry once again. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 13:51, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:A Joyful Noise Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)