The article Kristeligt Dagblad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 18:39, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Sorry to bring up something from 2008, but people still tend to get confused, telling me the G7 doesn't exist anymore or that the G8 went back to being the G7. In 2007 I tried to change both article (adding about 1/2 a sentence to each of them) to relfect their combined history. To the G8 I mentioned that in fact the G7 does still exist, but it's only meetings of finance ministers and central banks now. To the G7 I pointed out that formerly it had had heads of state meet, but that these meetings had now been supplanted by the G8. Both edits were deleted, the G7 one by you, a number of months later. You commented that people should stop confusing G7 and the G8. Do you still feel the G7 shouldn't mention the old heads of state meetings? If you feel differently I think I'll add something to that effect again. If you feel the same, could you say a little more as to why? Jethro 82 (talk) 02:11, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Since you are a listed member at Wikipedia:WikiProject Badminton I am inviting you to reach a consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Badminton regarding the format of brackets for tournaments, particularly the Super Series competitions.--MorrisIV (talk) 15:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Per WP:DABLINKS, "There is not always a need to add disambiguation links to a page whose name already clearly distinguishes itself from the generic term. However, for some topics this is a good idea. For example, Treaty of Paris (1796) should include a hatnote point to the disambiguation page Treaty of Paris (disambiguation), since many users might not know that there is more than one treaty with this name, and we can't predict what external search engines will link to. In other cases, such a hatnote is not necessary. For example, Solaris (1972 film) is clearly about one specific movie and not about any of the many other meanings of "Solaris", and most users will know to type Solaris in the search box to find other topics." --- In this case, there isn't any other variation of Michael Myers for Halloween that would be confused here. If you go to Michael Myers, you get the disambig page. As a matter of fact, Michael Myers (disambiguation) redirects to Michael Myers. So, there isn't the likelihood that someone would come to Michael Myers (Halloween) by accident, and need to be redirected to the disambig page. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 01:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Pan American Badminton Confederation Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, SVTCobra. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.CIreland (talk) 23:05, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Good spot. WBO Inter-Continental title indeed. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on User:Alochidi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 (talk) 20:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Some comedian keeps removing Israel from the list. Please revert the article back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:C008:1F50:D10C:2261:2326:3E5D (talk) 03:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Same article. some comedian removed the Christian population from Lebanon. The number listed is 4 million, but the total population, including Christians is 6 million.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Talk:Brianna Wu, you may be blocked from editing. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Billions (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SEC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
"And even after Margarito, a U.S. citizen with an American passport, changes his address, that's likely to remain the same." http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jan/23/sports/sp-margarito-mosley23 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danggoshdarn (talk • contribs) 14:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Go to page two of the article for the quote. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danggoshdarn (talk • contribs) 00:15, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
The instructions on how to do RFD are at WP:RFD#HOWTO. Please follow them. ~ GB fan 23:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Unspecified source/license for File:Idyllwild-town-crier.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Idyllwild-town-crier.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like ((PD-self)) (to release all rights), ((self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL))
(to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:45, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Yes, thank you, MifterBot. You are too efficient. Fair-use rationale has been added. Thanks for the edit-conflict, too. --SVTCobra (talk) 23:54, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
The article Idyllwild International Festival of Cinema has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Grayfell (talk) 07:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Morten-frost 400x401.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, SVTCobra. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Observer Media Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 00:47, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Observer Media Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Observer Media Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, SVTCobra. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, SVTCobra. Happy New Year to you! 2019 is coming soon. Can you creat the article "2019 in Denmark" in English Wikipedia? Thanks a lot!
123.150.182.180
17:32, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I've recently started a draft article for Holly Conrad at Draft:Holly Conrad. I was wondering if you could take a look and see if it deserves to be an article on Wikipedia? ExuberantRaptor (talk) 18:52, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ProJared, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asexual (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Friendly reminder that you are now at the limit of 3RR on that article. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 10:26, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
I agree with you that the statements are clearly jokes (though disgusting insofar as they singled out a particular woman and predictably led to harassment of her). But we have to go off of RS, and many RS take the statement seriously to an extent. ALso there is a police investigation of the statements. GergisBaki (talk) 13:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:SVTCobra reported by User:Wumbolo (Result: ). Thank you. wumbolo ^^^ 20:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
I don’t know what entertains you about stalking my contributions on this website and "tattletaling" as if this is a kindergarten, but I’m well within my editorial rights to move a draft I created and someone else who largely contributed to it submitted. If you have a problem with that, oh well. Mind your own business or get some. Trillfendi (talk) 13:27, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeffree Star, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Charles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi there I had a small doubt, why was the YouTube infobox removed and merged with the Twitch infobox on the page Pokimane?. Thank you. Delta fiver (talk) , 09:32 ,17 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi, since you had replied to me, I was wondering if you could help out at my draft Fedmyster. I have done a lot for the draft these past few months and other Wikipedians had not replied when I asked for help. Could you please take a look and maybe improve it, or tell me what needs to be done to make it better, or even if its good enough to end up in the article space. Thank you :). Delta fiver (talk) , 10:37 ,17 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
I'm Keven McDonald (yes, it's actually me). I want to thank you for the positive feedback you gave me on my talk page. A few days ago I set about correcting and updating a wiki page about me that was created by someone else. My goal was to tighten up some of the slightly inaccurate historical information, make some updates to the information box and most importantly fix some of the poor grammar, syntax and sentence structure. Finally, I wanted to add my photo to breathe some life into the page. What an adventure!
With respect to the picture, that issue is being resolved. Penn is claiming copyright and I've sent the form given to me by JGHowes along to the Athletic Department for their review. One of your colleagues called my reaction to the photo issue as "belligerent". To that I will admit to being annoyed at not being able to put my picture on a page about me. I've since come to better understand Wiki's position relative to copyright and, as mentioned, it's being resolved.
As for the other editions, even though everything I updated about myself is completely factually correct I've received feedback from some of your colleagues saying the editions were "unconstructive", "self interested" and "self promotional". In the information box I updated my education level and included some athletic awards omitted on the original page. In the body of the page I also included an update to my education (law school) and the fact that I currently operate my own business. With respect to my own business, I have seen inumerable wiki pages where the subject's business or current place of work was included so I didn't think this was an issue. I find it ironic that if an anonymous writer includes these things it's fine but if the subject includes accurate occupational information it's "self interested". One thing should be mentioned here, in one of my edits I did link back to my website. That was wrong. I should have taken a deeper dive into Wiki's rules before doing that. The link was removed.
Anyway, I want to thank you again for the positive and constructive feedback. Please pass this along to any of your colleagues who you feel should read what I've said here.
By the way, you mentioned you might be able to help me with the photo I tried to upload. As I mentioned above, JGHowes sent me a form which I sent to Penn's Athletic Department for their consent to release it to Wikipedia. I would welcome any insights or advice you may have. Otherwise, it's now a matter of waiting for Penn to decide if they'll release it or not.
Kmacjdwiki (talk) 21:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)Keven McDonald
Hello again "SVT",
I recently received this from one of your colleagues:
I can appreciate that this process has been frustrating. Sadly, we find ourselves in this situation quite often. First, I'd like to point out that although an article might be about you, you are exactly the wrong person to edit it because of your conflict of interest. Because Wikipedia is ubiquitous, many people (and businesses) seek to edit/control the article where they have some equity and we (the volunteer editors) are under what feels like continuous assault from these people. This is probably why Wikipedians tend to be insular and prefer to only deal with other long-term well-accomplished volunteer editors rather than the self-interested drive-by editors. We want the objective best result for the encyclopedia not the specific parochial interests of involved parties tainted by money. Second, over the past decade we've developed a lot of sitewide rules that may seem both obscure and silly to outsiders like you. Again, we deal with tens of thousands of biographies and our solutions might not be to your liking. Finally, my advice to you is to simply forget this article exists. It will only be a sore point for you as you are both powerless to negotiate our bureaucracy and you are dis-empowered from preventing outright vandalism let alone honest disagreements. Honestly, those that have had the most success were journalists able to use their platform to write about Wikipedia's system of business and perhaps attract favorable coverage. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:18, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Kmacjdwiki (talk) 17:31, 18 June 2019 (UTC)Keven McDonald
Frankly, all of this is approaching the realm of absurdity. All I did, as the subject of the page, was to add some accomplishments, tighten up the history, fix some bad writing and attempt to upload a photo. Again, the photo issue is being reviewed by Penn. Any editions I made were completely factual without enhancement or embellishment. Just facts. I have to admit SVT that the logic of some of the comments above completely escapes me. For instance:
1. "First, I'd like to point out that although an article might be about you, you are exactly the wrong person to edit it because of your conflict of interest."
What?? So, the person in the best position to provide accurate edits and updates, the person who's life is subject of the page, has no interest in making sure their life is portrayed correctly? By this logic someone could create a page about someone else that is completely incorrect (perhaps even intentionally false or malicious) and if the subject steps forward to correct it they are deemed to be a "self-interested drive-by editor" and an "outsider" "tainted by money". That is an interesting, if curious, conclusion to jump to.
2. "Finally, my advice to you is to simply forget this article exists."
Again, what?? That comment is absurd on its face.
3. "you are both powerless to negotiate our bureaucracy and you are dis-empowered from preventing outright vandalism let alone honest disagreements."
SVT, I really need your help with this one. Perhaps this sentence sums up the reason why a simple update has led me into this wilderness; the preservation of power in the hands of a bureaucracy and anonymous content monitors. Strange, an original author can put up an incorrect and factually out of date page with apparent impunity but the subject of that page is "dis-empowered" from correcting and updating the page. Hmmm.
Thanks for hearing me out SVT and, again, pass this along to whoever you think should read this.
Kmacjdwiki (talk) 21:04, 18 June 2019 (UTC)Keven McDonald
SVT,
I received yet another notice since the above conversation. This time from "SportsGuy789" who instructed me to refrain from further editing of the page until I join the Conflicts of Interest "discussion". He suggested the discussion should be done on Colton's talk page. You can go there to see my latest post.
As I mention on the post, I don't know what's left to discuss. What I can say is that in the brief paragraph above you have given me more useful information than all the clack I've gotten so far. You are the only only one who has pointed to concrete items that caused the red flags.
First, let's address the business name. It's in all caps because that's the way it is on the business cards, letterhead and website (https://www.mcdonaldpropertiesllc.com). If you visit the site you'll notice that wherever the name appears it's in all caps. I put it in all caps on WIKI merely to be consistent. That issue could have been resolved very easily with Wikipedia if they would have told me of that specific concern rather than send me a plethora of vague notices and directions to an endless stream of articles. Let me hasten to add that on one edition I did, in the External Links section, link back to my site to try to get some search engine optimazation (SEO) juice. Once I realized it violated policy it was immediately corrected.
Yes, I did update the law school information in both the information box and within the body of the page. I really don't see how updating my educational information to include law school could possibly raise a red flag. Perhaps you could tell me.
Yes, the form sent to me by JGHowes is one that Penn has to send back to "Commons" something or other. Whatever, I sent it to Penn's Athletic Department.
What I need help with now SVT is WHAT PRECISELY HAS TO HAPPEN FOR MY EDITS AND UPDATES TO BE ALLOWED? I don't know what's left to discuss. I need exact information on what needs to be done and when and how we can put this odyssey to an end. I don't need another notice. I don't need to be directed to another article. The picture issue is being handled. The edits in the information box and in the text are harmless. The business name in all caps has been explained. If it will eliminate the concern that I'm nothing more than a money-grubbing "drive by editor" I will happily use lower case letters.
I would REALLY appreciate if you forwarded this message where you think it will do the most good.
Thanks again for you useful and SPECIFIC help. Kmacjdwiki (talk) 23:16, 18 June 2019 (UTC)Keven McDonald
SVT,
Once again, I appreciate your specific, reasoned and well thought-out explanations and instructions. Tomorrow I will do exactly as you instruct the same way I did exactly as Mr. Howes instructed me with respect to the photo issue. However, so we both are on the same page (no pun intended!) I need you to define what a "trivial" vs. "non-trivial" edition would be. As you say above, to me they are all trivial. with the exception of the photo which does involve legitimate copyright issues.
After your Rob Ryan experience I understand your concerns about the honesty of my editions. First, I did graduate from Rutgers Law School (Newark) in 1996. I actually went to law school at night while holding a full time job. However, on the wiki page I only mentioned where I went to law school and that I earned a JD. There was no Ryan-like embellishment.
Second, a quick trip to the internet will confirm all the athletic accomplishments I added to the information box. The one's from Penn, Big 5 and Ivy League are easy to find online. The Seton Hall Prep Hall of Fame award can be found if you Google "Keven McDonald Seton Hall Prep Hall of Fame" you'll be taken to a page that lists the inductees by the year they were inducted. Scroll down to 1987 and you'll see my name. Make sure you spell my first name correctly before Googling. Once again, I added them to the page without embellishment.
Third, all the grammar, syntax etc. changes I imagine you can find on the history page.
Fourth, any deletions or corrections should also be found on the history page.
Fifth, my business was included without fanfare as well. I didn't mention anything about the business whatsoever other than the name. No puffery, no salesmanship, just the name. I admit, I had no idea that the name in all caps could possibly be a problem. As I mentioned in a previous message it was done for consistency. Again, once I realized linking to my site from the Wiki page violated policy it was corrected.
I will inform you when I've done as you instructed. I would really like for you to be involved with this since you and Howes seem to be the only ones who can give me specific, helpful and straightforward information. Everyone else seems to only want to wallow in their gatekeeper position.
Kmacjdwiki (talk) 02:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Keven McDonald
Hi SVTCobra. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 20:02, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Onision logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
I reverted your edit. Posting off-wiki info on other editors is outing. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:54, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Posting another editor's personal information is harassment, unless that person has voluntarily posted their own information, or links to such information, on Wikipedia(emphasis mine). Cheers, --SVTCobra 19:05, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ProJared is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProJared until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yosemiter (talk) 22:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Good thing that I saved the article's contents before it got deleted in AFD, even though there is a stronger consensus in keeping the article than deleting it. I'm not particularly pleased with the results of the AFD, and I don't think my deletion review here is gonna go anywhere, either. You can continue working on the article in my sandbox without any worry for deadlines. Take as much time as you need. You could move the draft to your own sandbox if you prefer that, instead. Sk8erPrince (talk) 09:26, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the WP:BLP/Noticeboard regarding WP:NPOV. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Carl Benjamin's rape joke".The discussion is about the topic Carl Benjamin. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --Amaroq64 (talk) 09:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
No One support artist from small village. If he work in digital agency means he also need to earn and help his family and by your process you never support artist than how he earn fame and earn from music. He work in agency and all no problem than say it his TV interview also fake. You can just ruin his career never help him. He left there because caste discrimination no one want he become big on. If you have heart than proof it and help him. Never you never help him because you can only ruin his life. Visit and watch his village you can understand what the feeling is. He belong from Barmer district and approx 26lac + population in barmer and he want to grow up because he already invest his 7 years in it. Please i request to you save his wikipedia and help him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qaciwaa (talk • contribs) 05:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Remove all bad tags you set on Mukesh. You cant insulting an artist like that i just request remove all tags than i self remove this page in 2 days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qaciwaa (talk • contribs) 07:09, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Delete it completely with all tags and talks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qaciwaa (talk • contribs) 14:24, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Badminton World Federation (logo).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)