THIS IS A TALK PAGE ARCHIVE Please do NOT edit this page. If you leave a message here, I will not respond to it. |
Please undo your swap of Talk:Jon Jafari/Archive 1 with Talk:JonTron/Archive 1. It was a mistake. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 04:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
... especially when hatted by a regular editor rather than an admin as part of an official discussion "closure". But whatever.Volunteer Marek (talk) 19:42, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Oh, and I got an edit conflict while editing, I didn't actually mean to revert you because, like I said, don't really care that much. Volunteer Marek (talk) 19:42, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
This template is placed at the top of a discussion (and ((hidden archive bottom)) or ((hab)) at the bottom), and is used to close a discussion and discourage further editing without removing it completely from the page.
Hi there! As I mentioned in the edit summary, although Marcus Hutchins may be initially known for stopping the attack, I believe the subsequent coverage regarding his arrest belong to a separate article, because the arrest is not due to his role in the WannaCry ransomware attack. Hutchins seems to have received sufficient reliable coverage to meet the general notability guideline on his own. Thanks, Tony Tan · talk 01:39, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure how to prevent changes or protect an article. For whatever reason there is, people have been editing or deleting relevant information from the Abella Danger article. Any information on how to prevent this. Along with any help, would be greatly welcome. Thank you. Scenicview1 (talk) 16:08, 6 August 2017 (UTC)Scenicview1
Wow, I must say, this is probably the first time I've ever run across a set of edits where another editor was considering moving a page the same time I was. I think we ran across some edit conflicts, and in the process, I had to create Moose (drink game). You moved Moose (Drinking Game) to Moose (drinking game) at about the same time I was going to. I mean wow ... huge coincidence? Steel1943 (talk) 23:51, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for the recent notice. I have tried to talk with the user and attempt to find out why he continues to undo my edits (see edit history). What options do i have? I have added referenced copy to the article, the items being added are controversial, but truthful. I believe that I am editing by the rules, howvever the user undoing the edits admits to being the person referenced in the article and seems to want to keep any negative material offline, you can appreciate that it would be hard to get conscientious in this instance. This isn't the first time that he has done this, see see the May/June edit. Any help/advise you can offer would be appreciated. Thetruthabouthockey (talk) 17:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Please add a new review http://www.compulsivereader.com/2017/08/01/a-review-of-prisms-particles-and-refractions-by-carol-smallwood/
Please clean up my entry about an article conflict. Like the one above, they have been reviewed by editors about relationships.
Thank you for volunteering!Carol Smallwood (talk) 20:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Dear Skywarrior, the Source for my edits on Joseph Lycett is an online scan of the ORIGINAL burial certificate (provided by Ancestry). The facts all fit with the man: name (unusual), age, exact place. So, my edit should stand. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.223.197.101 (talk) 21:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
The results of ANEW reports are really only meant to serve as a quick reference to other admins - I purposely marked mine as disputed (twice) in the results. Please do not non-admin clerk ANEW. Thanks -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Cheers!WikiEditCrunch (talk) 20:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 09:11, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Hey SkyWarrior,
Hope you're doing well.
I came across your page through researching the edits of a few music-related Wikipedia pages and wanted to get in touch as I'm currently working on a blog to discuss best practices / tips for Wikipedia and thought I'd reach out to see if this is something you'd want to be involved in.
Let me know your thoughts. I would email you but I already emailed a few people today and that action is currently throttled for me. Please email me back (on my user page) if you’re interested. Thanks!
CMCreator900 (talk) 23:57, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
I did NOT make an edit on any page recently. Please get your facts together before accusing someone of something. Ridiculous!! Bye!
I've followed some of the discussions about the autopsy photo here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_autopsy#The_gunshot_wound_to_the_head
and read the relevant guideline pages you've linked in previous reverts.
Are exceptions to these guidelines not warranted in some cases? I was reading the page in question today and I think it is important to acknowledge that seeing that image without warning may be upsetting for some people. It certainly is a gruesome photograph and not something a reader would expect to see without warning. News, video and audio media often preface gruesome content with a warning, allowing the viewer/listening to decide if they would like to continue. I'm not advocating removing the image. Previous edits required revealing a box to see the image? Why is this not a suitable compromise in an exceptional case?
Thanks.
SabreWolfy (talk) 15:29, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, sorry to bother you. I have an article in second review and I have not heard yet whether the article has been accepted or not. Is there any way for me to contact the reviewer or ask for a speedier reviewer? What are the rules? And the etiquette? Can you help? ExNeddiesBoy (talk) 02:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)ExNeddiesBoy
MY PLOT SUMMARY WAS BEAUTIFUL AND PERFECT WITH NO FLAWS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.104.109.235 (talk) 19:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
@SkyWarrior: Just wanted to say thanks for everything you did with this. Every time I went to revert their vandalism, you already had. Well done. And it's noticed. Operator873CONNECT 02:16, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
My sincerest apologies, I thought I looked through all the pages, guess not. It won't happen again. JE98 (talk) 02:15, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
I am having a difficult time understanding how to edit Wikipedia. Will keep trying. Reply not necessary. Laceheart22 (talk) 04:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Well, quite; per this, the discussion in question itself has been deleted. Happy days. Take care, — fortunavelut luna 16:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, SkyWarrior! If you take a closer look at the page before my edit, you'll notice that the whole page is essentially printed twice, i.e. duplicated. If you will kindly reinstate the change or refrain from reversing the change that I will make again right now, we will be able to solve this issue.
Thank you, alexdloia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexdloia (talk • contribs) 03:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
...where? There I am, minding my own business, responding to something....and suddenly it ain't there. I get called away to a phone call, and now I find it's on ANI. I do not think that is the place to discuss whether closing an ongoing discussion 5 or six times constitutes edt-warring...and, of course, whether re-opening the same &cet. Anmccaff (talk) 05:01, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Alright, Anmccaff, so I looked a little deeper into this. I'm assuming the situation involves this diff, among others, right? If so, then here's my take on it. Let's start off with this: edit warring involves two parties; you are equally guilty of edit warring as Beyond My Ken. Furthermore, I only saw 3 closures, not 5-6.
I initially wrote a long post explaining my view on this, but I realized that I don't know who is right in this situation; to be quite honest, I believe both of you are in the wrong. So I'm just going to answer your initial question, which I believe I finally got correct: is it appropriate to close a discussion 5-6 times? Well, it depends on the situation. If WP:NOTFORUM applies, then yes, I would argue it is appropriate to repeatedly close it. However, if the discussion was closed simply because it was discussed in the past, then I would argue that no, it's not appropriate to repeatedly close a discussion 5-6 times, and thus would constitute edit warring, unless consensus says otherwise, which I do not see afaik. Does this whole thing constitute edit warring in this situation? Well, for starters 3RR was not violated, as I only counted 3 re-closures from BMK, not 5-6. I'm going with a solid "maybe" here, as I honestly can't tell.
I'm also just going to get this out of the way: I'm probably not the best person to talk to about this, as I don't usually deal with edit warring. I only moved the AN3 discussion to ANI because I personally believe it did not belong at AN3, not because of the issue at hand (and to be quite frank, I really don't care about the issue at hand that much). SkyWarrior 04:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Children in order: Jason McCullough, Michelle McCullough, Mark McCullough[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmccull9039c (talk • contribs) 20:57, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
References
Thanks for the information! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmccull9039c (talk • contribs) 21:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
It was announced in an internal email - I do not yet have a media source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.180.253.107 (talk) 16:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Yes its mistak we dont have just one leader we have general secretary Hanibaal lecter (talk) 16:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
The information provided in Wikipedia under the current listing is not from me. Some of the information is inaccurate. My campaign website has my accurate biography. How do I proceed with correcting the listing on Wikipedia if I cannot cite my campaign's website as a reference? Please advise. Thanks!
Nicholas Oliver www.OliverForEP.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by OliverForEP (talk • contribs) 17:03, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
hi you could of reverted only the coaster number part instead of the whole thing, but isn't gemini 2 coasters, since they are 2 different tracks? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JudgeJake40 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Yes I think it was a mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by JudgeJake40 (talk • contribs) 03:20, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
I misread died (d) in 1908 as born (b) in 1908 and so the math of squeezing 5 generations in that short a time period seemed off. I recognized my mistake right away and removed my talk section. The page edit never took in the first place. I was wrong. I am sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.211.117.192 (talk) 00:55, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Whoops, prematurely saved. Thanks for fixing. Do I need to add the brackets in or is it already taken care of? JacobMW (talk) 01:04, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, SkyWarrior. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Changed 'Music' to 'yMusic' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YMusic), because the band is incorrectly named in this paragraph: "In 2011, Clark composed "Proven Badlands," an instrumental piece based on "The Sequel" from her sophomore release Actor, for ensemble Music's album Beautiful Mechanical.[62]"
Seriously... how is the TØP page timeline on wikepidia vandalism? It helps people know who was in band at what time, and who was on what album and all the parts they played - very simply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiEditsAnnon (talk • contribs) 16:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for moving Lissy (actress). I think Lissy may also require a dab since there are Lissy commune and Lissy (film). There is no primary topic, I believe. Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 18:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello User:SkyWarrior,
I have add the link to Photoshop Lightroom again in the article Canon EOS 40D, as the article already exist. It is the link to 'Adobe Photoshop Lightroom' and NOT 'Adobe Lightroom CC'. Please leave the link, except the article 'Adobe Photoshop Lightroom' will be deleted, or discuss it beforehand.
--GodeNehler (talk) 21:06, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey. Erm, would you please double-check your reversion in the Microsoft Photos article? The change and the edit summary don't match, and I don't know which one is wrong.
I mean ... I double-checked and triple-checked because this isn't something you would do. I though maybe MediaWiki has gone haywire. (Although if it was true, double-checking wouldn't have helped anyway.)
FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 15:22, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Helllo
You have reverted my changes to James Daniel Mays article, concerning the addition of his 1 week old new alias given to him by his two co-presenters due to an Identity theft.
I do not know why you took that action nor do I think you are failiar with the source material.
Sincerely yanninator — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yanninator-ofc (talk • contribs) 15:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
SkyWarrior, thank you for your interest in the account creation process. I have verified that you are identified to the Wikimedia Foundation and approved your request.
You may now access the interface here pending a tool root marking your account as identified in the tool database. Before you begin handling requests, please ensure you have read and understood the account creation guide and username policy to familiarise yourself with the process.
Please subscribe yourself to the private ACC mailing list following the instructions on that page. I also advise that you also join us on IRC #wikipedia-en-accounts connect where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and you can get real time advice on how to handle requests.
Please note failure to correctly assess requests will result in suspension of tool access. Account creation is not a race, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Releasing personally identifying information (such as IP and email addresses), whether intentionally or unintentionally, is treated very seriously and will generally result in immediate suspension.
Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, and you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked as "Flagged user needed" on the interface. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM/ACC.
Please don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:43, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello SkyWarrior: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, —MRD2014 Merry Christmas! 02:06, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
You deleted my changes they were not wrong please put them back
Respectfully, VoteBingBong — Preceding unsigned comment added by VoteBingBong (talk • contribs) 01:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
I don't get exactly what is wrong with my edit on Wall-e. how exactly was it "Unconstructive"? let me know what I did wrong.
OK — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:183:C602:4020:8C7A:72F5:1D4B:9F2E (talk) 18:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey...I made a legit edit, not a test, and you cut it. Can you please re-add it so I don't have to redo it? Wiki article was for "Paul W. Rainwater". Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjgreen55 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- No political offices - No business experience - Increasing alienation - Failure to win in Alabama STEVE BANNON IS NOT GOING TO RUN! http://www.newsweek.com/steve-bannon-not-running-president-2020-trump-756264 Snobbish editors such as yourself need to leave well enough alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.122.172.42 (talk) 21:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, could you please join in these two move discussions – Bhavana (actress) and Robin Hood (2009 film). Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 18:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
There is a mistake in your reversion. I made a correction on the article, citing true information from the single source of that article. The previous version was invented. A copy and paste from the website www.bcnisnotcat.es. Filiprino (talk) 18:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Sky Warrior, I admire you greatly and believe that you are a very respectable being. May you forever prosper!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whoute28 (talk • contribs) 04:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
The Beach Boys album "Sunflower" and the individual song articles indicate that Dennis Wilson did in fact play drums and Bruce Johnston was on bass and keyboards. A lot of the journalists fail to fact check and realize the truth: The Beach Boys did in fact play on their own records, contrary to popular belief, and an often erroneous belief is that Dennis was replaced exclusively by studio drummers. I think you sent me the message by mistake. 04:28, 4 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.221.128.210 (talk)
I've added some citation needed templates for the time being and please don't take my words as personal attacks by any means. Until a reliable source is found, they'll have to do.203.221.128.210 (talk) 04:33, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Let me know if you spot any other trouble and I'll take a look. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 04:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Dear SkyWarrior,
I have seen his doing so in the video, but am unsure how to use this as a reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Msw0odRETPE
Can you help me?
--Mick2 (talk) 20:35, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
<ref> your source </ref>
). A more complex way of adding a source would be to use, in this case, Template:Cite AV media or Template:Cite web (the visual editor can streamline this process for you).Hello,
I’ll dumb this down as much as I can but........
THERE IS NO SUCH LANGUAGE AS BRITISH ENGLISH !
There’s English and American English. Look at the international book country indexing system.
Why would you re-edit someone who makes accurate edits?
Weird.
Regards, Dave
An Englishman from England which is part of Great Britain which is part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and hopefully soon no longer part of the proposed United States of Europe...lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.9.4.252 (talk) 20:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
TonyBallioni (talk) 19:13, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Please see User talk:TonyBallioni/Archive 15#Sarah Jane Brown: I'd undo the close, relist, and continue with the progressive closes of subsections that were never going to make it, as Primefac was doing, for another week or two before closing. Please keep the discussion in one place as much as possible, i.e. TonyBallioni's talk page for the time being. Thanks. --Francis Schonken (talk) 06:55, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
You don't understand!
We're going to lose our net neutrality within a month!
If we don't do something before April 23, 2018, they're going to take our internet freedom away! --LooneyTunerIan (talk) 03:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Fripthesamuria (talk) 22:27, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of other notable roads in Toronto. Since you had some involvement with the List of other notable roads in Toronto redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:43, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi SKyWarrior
In the past week, I've gotten at least two notifications (from you?) that I've vandalised the page "Samuel Lane" because apparently the editor had been using my IP address. I do not remember visiting, let alone editing, the page until I received these unusual notifications and I am honestly perplexed. I did not actually edit "Samuel Lane" personally and no-one else has been using my device, so I do not understand why I am being conflated with the person making unauthorized edits on 'Samuel Lane". I feel that this is an error. Please find a solution as soon as possible as these notifications are confusing, fo not pertain to me, and are becoming frequent.
Thankyou. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.62.28.16 (talk) 04:03, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I would like to add YateBTS documentation ( https://wiki.yatebts.com/index.php/GSM_Concepts ) as external links to the wiki GSM article.
I've read the documentation and seems they have been explaining pretty well Radio/GSM concepts.
What do you think about that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul.bichis (talk • contribs) 14:04, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, SkyWarrior. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Bill Oddie is my granddad and you removed me off his page lol
go watch his episode of Who Do You Think You Are?
I'm the smaller baby.
Put me back on his page.
82.35.83.80 (talk) 08:57, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi I am Penguins Ball. I am here to tell you, that GSIA is real. I saw GSIA as an unfinished page, so I done some research, and added this page. It is not any kind of promotion. So please add the page back. Thank you for understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Penguins Ball (talk • contribs) 06:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Pinoy pop is need to redirected it on P-pop beacuse Pakistan Pop need to redirected their article so Pinoy pop and Pakistan Pop is same in shortly name (P-pop) so please we need to take action about this let's redirected it. Thank you Mruizkr34 (talk) 06:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Please Mruizkr34 (talk) 06:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know about the policy that "a checkuser cannot confirm whether Bmv maximuz and the IP are the same user due to privacy concerns" in your reply on the Administrator intervention against vandalism page. That definitely makes sense. palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 06:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello Skywarrior. Please restore the old neutral version of the page. Thanjavur siva is blocked as a sockpuppet. Sockpuppet edits must be reverted. His edits are not neutral and and promotes caste pride which is leading to caste violence everywhere. These casteists don't understand this. It also has unreliable depreciated sources tag. Kindly revert the sock edits. Thanks 2409:4072:6C8A:C8A5:7F09:EF7B:213A:F26 (talk) 06:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Dear SkyWarrior,
It's Ash. I just wanted to let you know that the info I wrote is correct for the 2012 Pro Bowl. I hope you will understand that I had to change it because in the play by play, the plays were incorrect and in a different order. I mean no offense, but I don't think you know anything about American Football.(Not football as in like the Europe version of soccer.) I hope you understand. Have a great day!
108.54.78.250 (talk) 22:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)Your Wikifriend, Ash
I am not 100% how you edit a page and then supply all back up info. I am Al Barrow and made the edits. I understand why you do this to stop anyone adding what they want for other people but I wish the information to be reposted please.
How do I confirm this is me and that the information I edited is correct.
Also can I get a copy of that info for further edits once I have figured out how to do it on the page.
I apologise for my ill education in this matter and I understand why you do this but any advice would be great thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.169.135.252 (talk) 18:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
((request edit))
.I think you meant to write "so people don't forget to include it" or "so people remember not to omit it" at WT:Centralized discussion. --Fyrisdal (talk) 09:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Hurry up then Luke. How much longer can you all keep up the lies? There isn't one human left here. Jack the ultimate x — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:76E7:2E00:940F:E1BA:A31E:6668 (talk) 03:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello Skywarrior. User talk:Ihaveabandonedmychild is spreading wrong messages, which creates the violation to all the pages including Kallar (caste) page. And the given link also not correct and not valid. So please block him permanently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by விக்னேஷ்வர் பா மாளுசுத்தியார் (talk • contribs)
I am a reporter that's covered this story from the beginning of the saga in 1996. You proposed to "delete" my article and you are completely wrong about the pretense and have zero background information about the history and truth about the slogan "RAIDERNATION." You are censoring the truth, free speech and didn't even give me a chance to edit the page. You said I had until May 2!?! Why is the article down on April 28? You are playing favorites and you are actively censoring multiple opinions. Wikipedia is supposed to be an online encyclopedia yet you're taking sides and have allowed a lie to perpetrate as truth. There is more than one page for a lot of topics but you assumed my article wasn't accurate when it was with first hand accounts of my investigations. Wikipedia's community guidelines state you are "hands off" so why are you so "hands on" with my article which is the TRUTH!!! AND you had the nerve to delete my photos which are MY PROPERTY. THEY DON'T BELONG TO ANYONE ELSE!! Who are you and why do you have a personal vendetta against my publication of the TRUTH. The other page is a LIE. And...the original brand is RAIDERNATION NOT Raider Nation.
I am extremely disappointed and thought there was some authenticity to Wikipedia. Word on the street amongst "programmers" is that a FEW of you play favorites and moderate what you think is best. So much for truth and journalism. You've made this process a disgrace. Shame ON YOU!
--FlowerChild1969 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flowerchild1969 (talk • contribs) 02:48, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Furthermore...I've documented the so-called deadline for editing my article which is accurate and throughly investigated was May 2, 2021. But in your playing "GOD" with the truth you deleted it early and then redirected it to the false page? Raider Nation and The RAIDERNATION are legal names with distinct differences. They are not the same. Please remove the entire page and DO NOT REDIRECT MY ARTICLE to that of the other. I am going to be sure to follow-up on any dispute process I am afforded as a reporter. You obviously are into circumventing the First Amendment rights of the U.S. Constitution making Wikipedia Fake News. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flowerchild1969 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying the obvious. How are you a public/private entity? This is a non-profit organization that has you censoring content? Why? Why you? So...Wikipedia is an "online encyclopedia" that welcomes contribution as long as it meets SkyWarrior and DiscoSpinster's specifications. That is absurd. You lack understanding. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flowerchild1969 (talk • contribs) 04:36, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
I have written an article on Dalhousie University on my website as per the best of my knowledge and experience. A part of that article has been contributed to a Dalhousie University Wikipedia page. I linked that paragraph to my written content for in-depth study and a better understanding of the reader. Can I also Feature my link to the external links section of the Dalhousie University Page of Wikipedia or not — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhavik Bansal 777 (talk • contribs) 14:56, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Some of Alice's song sound like indie/pop rock, and punk to me so that's why I put that in.
Thanks for the assistance in fixing the move issues! I've protected P-pop to prevent further headaches. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:05, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
In a recent edit revert you stated, "Don't use google drive". While this editor concurs the use of Google Drive is not ideal, the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) has moved its access to the links to its Highway Resolutions (highway history) and Highway Referencing (highway details and mileage) to Google Drive, see DATA, TECHNOLOGY & ANALYTICS DIVISION: DATA AND ANALYTICS. While at least some of the previous direct links to some of these documents still work, the main webpages for looking them up no longer link to the desired information (Old link to highway referencing & Old link to highway resolutions). Given that Google Drive is were UDOT posts these essential reference documents, how do you suggest this issue be handled? An Errant Knight (talk) 17:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
@An Errant Knight: I reverted my edit. I may have incorrectly assumed that there is no good reason why Google Drive should be used. Truthfully there’s no real policy that explicitly says one can’t use Google Drive, and since UDOT officially uses Drive to upload all their documents, then I suppose it’s fine to use in this instance.
Now, if someone else says that Google Drive shouldn’t be used, then try looking for an archive of the previous reference on the Wayback Machine or other Internet archive site. SkyWarrior 15:26, 30 June 2021 (UTC)