If you don't understand one of my edits, feel free to ask me about it! --Synotia
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Hello, Synotia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
<ref> ((cite web | .... ))</ref>
, copy the whole thing).==References== ((Reflist))
Hi - You reverted my edit to "see also" with the edit summary "Undid revision 1119316409 by Dormskirk (talk) The article itself was not linked." If you look at the third paragraph of Oliver Cromwell#Death and posthumous execution, it says "Cromwell's body was exhumed from Westminster Abbey on 30 January 1661, the 12th anniversary of the execution of Charles I, and was subjected to a posthumous execution,..." "Posthumous execution" clearly is linked. Dormskirk (talk) 19:05, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Synotia,
I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!
And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.
Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 02:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Your edit on the first sentence at Lviv violates WP:LEADLANG, which is designed to make the first sentence of the lead readable. All that information about Ukrainian, Russian, etc. forms is in the "Names" section where it belongs. If you want to add all that non-linguistic historical information that has nothing to do with the first sentence and the foreign words there, then do so without reverting the simplification edits in the first sentence that conform to Wikipedia policy. TaivoLinguist (Taivo) (talk) 17:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ((Ds/aware))
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 14:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
For the purposes of editing restrictions in the ARBPIA topic area, the "area of conflict" shall be defined as encompassing
Also,
500/30 Rule: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict. On primary articles, this prohibition is preferably to be enforced by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP) but this is not mandatory. On pages with related content, or on primary articles where ECP is not feasible, the 500/30 Rule may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 Rule are not considered edit warring.
The sole exceptions to this prohibition are:
1. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the methods noted in paragraph b). This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, noticeboard discussions, etc.
2. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required.
3. One Revert Restriction (1RR): Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any edits made to content within the area of conflict. Reverts made to enforce the 500/30 Rule are exempt from the provisions of this motion. Also, the normal exemptions apply. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator.
Note that this means your edits on such pages (which you aren't yet eligible to make) may be reverted by anyone at any time. These restrictions are stricter than those in most other areas because of the problems that we've had in this area. Doug Weller talk 15:37, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, please, avoid excessive use of the Expand language template. It is logical that most Czech municipalities can be expanded with something from Czech wiki, Russian cities from Russian wiki, German cities from German, etc., and yet notice that this template is not everywhere, it is not necessary to draw attention to it. The second thing is that, specifically in Klatovy, most things are unsourced on the Czech wiki (and much of what is in the history with the source is already in English). The content of some sections on the Czech wiki could be against Wikipedia:Too much detail on the English one. Overall, it's not a benefit. FromCzech (talk) 18:05, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
For anybody wondering, I made a mistake, the misunderstanding was clarified on NebY's talk page, not on mine! Synotia (talk) 11:15, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi Synotia! Thank you for your edits to Streisand effect. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Nakba into that page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 03:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello Synotia
I read the MOS:ETHNICITY and the paragraph said Similarly, neither previous nationalities or the country of birth should not be mentioned in the lead sentence unless relevant to the subject's notability. Can you revert the two last unexplained edits by Maciej Mucharski in the Yassine Bounou article. Thank you 196.119.118.98 (talk) 23:31, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Another one did it again. Can you revert him? Thank you 196.119.118.98 (talk) 01:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi, as Berber script is not used on any official documentation in Morocco (or any other country as far as I'm aware), I don't think it should be included in the lead. Of course, with appropriate sourcing, we can add the fact that the person is of Berber ethnicity in the "Personal life" section. Nehme1499 10:57, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Berber activists overwhelmingly favor the use of the Latin alphabet [...] A small number of them prefer the Neo-Tifinagh alphabet. Also, regarding the statement
nearly all Moroccans from Europe are Berbers: each player still needs appropriate sourcing, otherwise it's WP:OR. Nehme1499 11:05, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
In this edit you added the above ref to the article, In the same edit you added efn's without a notelist template. This created red ink ref errors on the page.
Is the material you added copied from somewhere else in Wikipedia? Selfstudier (talk) 16:46, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- GizzyCatBella🍁 19:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Could you please improve the lede in History of Jerusalem by making a summary that includes the Jewish, Christian and Islamic periods in a proportional manner, based on article's body? As of now, there is no meaningful introduction in article simply because some people disagreed on how much weight should be given to Jews vs Muslims. Better to have an unbalanced intro at the beginning and then additional editors can add more text covering other periods, rather than not having almost anything just so nobody will be offended. Thanks.--218.155.177.126 (talk) 17:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi. To be clear, "somewhat relevant perhaps", as you said in your edit summary, is very far from justifying the inclusion of material in an article! The WP:BURDEN of demonstrating the value and verifiability of assertions made is on the people making them or seeking to keep them in the article. Someone tagged the paragraph nearly three years ago, with no satisfaction. And, as I noted, the paragraph appears to be no more than an impermissible personal impression, WP:OR; it relies entirely on somebody conceiving a resemblance between both Dutch i and Dutch j and the Yiddish letter yud. It isn't an objective assertion. Largoplazo (talk) 20:08, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
you cant put a line break without re-indenting, or you can use <p> to insert a break and keep your indent without inserting a line break in your comment. this helps people keep track of who said what. thanks, nableezy - 16:00, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
I mistakenly pinged you at Talk:Joe Biden. Please disregard. My apologies. Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk 21:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
What source?, yes I get some of them from another articles. regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.55.186.33 (talk) 16:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from leaving comments as you did at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates#RD: R. Dhruvanarayana, which is bordering on being disruptive solely to make a point. As WP:ITNRD states, any person or animal with a Wikipedia article is eligible to be posted on RD, no matter how famous or not famous they are. Curbon7 (talk) 13:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
If you are still giggling about April Fool's then maybe you'll think of something to do with this new post office image from Ukraine: [1]. ErnestKrause (talk) 15:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Josip Broz Tito. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. –Vipz (talk) 15:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding your blind revert:
1. If material comes from a particular source, then you have to CITE it. You don't leave a paragraph without a cite.
2. There is more than one NY Times cite in the article, so the ref names should differentiat them.
3. Saying "the bullies in question" makes no sense, since the "bullies" have not been establsihed prior to that passage.
4. Your blind revert removed the publication info I had added to the NY Times cite, specifcially, the archvie info, yet you provided no rationale for this in your edit summary.
If a given passage is supported by a source cited in another passage, then add it. You don't do a blind revert that leaves wording in passages that make no sense, that reverts sensible edits like the addition of distinctive ref names, and which deletes good information from prior edits. That is most certainly disruptive editing. Please stop. Nightscream (talk) 12:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
In Zarasai he was bullied. What do you think he was bullied by, the air?
Good day @Synotia i would like to seek your assistance on the review and approval of Qing Madi page. Thank You.
Tobiladun (talk) 12:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bezalel_Smotrich&diff=prev&oldid=1171305063
Aren't you an extended-confirmed user?--121.168.245.75 (talk) 04:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. You are mentioned here so I am notifying you Lightburst (talk) 15:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
On 15 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Lev Rubinstein, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)