Welcome!

Hello, TabooMatters94, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type ((help me)) on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 15:09, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the Romanian Top 100 was a separate chart. A top 100 played by Kiss FM (Romania) is a different airplay chart that "took over". However, Kiss FM is one radio station; you're linking to a radio station's website. Its inclusion is against WP:SINGLENETWORK. Please read this and don't edit war. Maybe even discuss its inclusion on Wikipedia at Wikipedia talk:Record charts. Thanks. Ss112 10:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian Top 100 was the official Romanian Singles Chart since 1995. In 2012, its publication ended, and it was later replaced with Airplay 100. Airplay 100 is made in the same way Romanian Top 100 was made (compiled by Mediaforest → Radio+TV airplay), and its presented in the same way Romanian Top 100 was presented, with a radio show. The only thing that is different is the name. The Kiss FM radio station is the only source of this chart. I'm linking to the radio station's website because there are uploaded the radio shows where the positions of the songs are announced. Airplay 100 is different from Kiss Fm's own chart, Top 40, where are presented the most popular songs played on the radio station. For example, Look What You Made Me Do peaked at 64 due to TV airplay from music channels, even if the song wasn't in the playlist of the Kiss Fm radio station. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrielflorin01 (talk • contribs) 11:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond here and don't split a conversation between two talk pages. If Media Forest compiles this and they publish other charts themselves, why is it not available on Media Forest's website? Besides, I still think this site being hosted on a radio station's website is something worth bringing up at Wikipedia talk:Record charts because others might see this and think the same as I have. I'm still not sure. Ss112 11:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Airplay 100 is basically putting together all the informations from Media Forest. A song can be number one at in the Airplay Chart published by Media Forest and #6 on the Airplay 100 chart because it didn't had enoguh TV airplay. For example, last week, 'What About Us' by Pink was the most played song on the radio (with 226 plays), but despite that, the song reached #8 on the Airplay 100 because it had only 140 TV plays. Additionally, even if 'New Rules' by Dua Lipa was the 4th most played radio song with only 165 plays, it still managed to remain #1 on the Airplay 100 chart because it was the most TV played song, with 274 plays. Gabrielflorin01 29 December 2017, 17:02 (EET)

Hello, Gabrielflorin01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fall in Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hurts 2B Human, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Truth About Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:44, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hurts 2B Human, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Idolator and Walk Me Home (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Hi! It's amazing what you did of Hurts 2B Human article, very nice work! Congratulations to this. Could you do that with Beautiful Trauma (album) article too, please? It would be so fantastic! TDROTI-fan (talk) 08:07, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I think I'm done with the copy-edit you requested on Hurts 2B Human! If you think I missed anything, please feel free to raise it on my talk page! Thank you, Puddleglum ^2.0 18:47, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not copypaste the same reference onto every page you edit. Adapt the date format of the reference to the date format of the article you're using it on. If the article uses dmy (5 January 2020), change the reference's date to 5 January 2020. You did not do this on December 31 when you copypasted the same reference to at least 10 different articles. Thank you. Ss112 15:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hurts 2B Human you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hurts 2B Human you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hurts 2B Human for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hurts 2B Human you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hurts 2B Human for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:21, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Quarter Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Hurts 2B Human (estimated annual readership: 260,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 14:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beautiful Trauma you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Beautiful Trauma you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Beautiful Trauma for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Beautiful Trauma you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Beautiful Trauma for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:01, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Beautiful Trauma has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:45, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article What About Us (Pink song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 18:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article What About Us (Pink song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:What About Us (Pink song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:41, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article What About Us (Pink song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:What About Us (Pink song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 16:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TabooMatters94. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for What About Us (Pink song)' at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 12:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gabrielflorin01, I found some uncited direct quotations in 'Music video' --> 'Background and development'; I've marked these with ((cn))—per Wikipedia:Likely to be challenged, direct quotations must be cited. I also found some of the text in that section confusing, such as "Steve Annis used a helicopter as a top light for the video, which operated with 40-80mm zoom lenses". Cheers, and good luck with your planned GA nom, Baffle☿gab 12:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TabooMatters94. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for The Truth About Love (Pink album) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Truth About Love (Pink album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kncny11 -- Kncny11 (talk) 04:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Truth About Love (Pink album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Truth About Love (Pink album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kncny11 -- Kncny11 (talk) 17:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Truth About Love (Pink album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Truth About Love (Pink album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kncny11 -- Kncny11 (talk) 17:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Blow Me (One Last Kiss) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Blow Me (One Last Kiss) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Blow Me (One Last Kiss) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:20, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Blow Me (One Last Kiss) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Blow Me (One Last Kiss) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Missundaztood you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 23:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Missundaztood you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Missundaztood for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 04:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TabooMatters94. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Missundaztood at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with FA and all the best, Miniapolis 00:00, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! :) Since I'm retiring, is there any way you can keep some pages on the Romanian charts updated? It would be the following, in case you find time:

• Romanian record charts: Update the UPFR and Billboard charts weekly + update the "as of" template
• List of Media Forest most-broadcast songs of the 2020s in Romania: Update the charts weekly + update the "as of" template + if there is any further info available, such as the most successful radios or labels for a certain year, or a year end chart, add it to the article.

Would help out a lot. Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 09:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cartoon network freak: Hi there! I'll be happy to help from time to time, but won't promise anything though. Greets and best of luck with everything in the future; – TabooMatters94 (talk) 13:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Come On Over you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Come On Over for issues which need to be addressed. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:57, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Come On Over you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TenPoundHammer -- TenPoundHammer (talk) 17:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Come On Over you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Come On Over for comments about the article, and Talk:Come On Over/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TenPoundHammer -- TenPoundHammer (talk) 21:21, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Come On Over, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Come On Over is the best-selling country album and the best-selling album by a female artist? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Come On Over. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Come On Over), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:You're Still the One/GA1. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article You're Still the One you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TenPoundHammer -- TenPoundHammer (talk) 17:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]