Until my block is reviewed. I’ll be logged out but that doesn’t mean I will use another account. I’ll just take a break from Wikipedia until my block is reviewed. I have notifications on for my email as well. As of November 14, 2023 though I am logging out.
If you an admin sees this. Please check my block and review it. Once again I’ll come back by the end of the month but of course right now there’s no need to use this account.
Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cupid (Fifty Fifty song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 00:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jena Rose, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:50, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Thatsoddd!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
|
Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Thanks for your contributions to Girls Like Me Don’t Cry. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
So this is your third account so far? Valereee (talk) 16:32, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Just added references and more to my article on Girls Like Me Don’t Cry. Thatsoddd (talk) 18:50, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Please don't add sources like this one to any article, much less one about a living person. An online people search tool is not in any way a valid citation for anything. Valereee (talk) 10:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Thuy Girls Like Me Don't Cry sped up.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the ((di-fails NFCC)) tag itself.
An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука13 08:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Girls like me dont cry sped up.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Girls like me dont cry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Thuy girls like me dont cry sped up.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding your creation of Love Lee, you copy-pasted text from various sources you cited throughout the article without putting it into your own words (paraphrasing or rewording it) or indicating that what you copied was a quote. This is a significant problem on Wikipedia and you need to stop doing it immediately going forward. It is a copyright violation to do this (per WP:COPYVIO) and repeated instances of it can get your account blocked. I am sure you can see why copying text from a publication when copyright law exists is a problem. You need to paraphrase, put things in your own words, and explicitly mark with quotation marks (" ") parts of text that are direct quotes—like when a critic offers an opinion of a work. You should additionally not be copying PR text from sources describing songs or albums. We word things neutrally on Wikipedia (WP:NEUTRAL) and text copied directly from sources describing songs as "catchy" and "clever", aside from the aforementioned copyright issues and unless it is indicated as a quote, is not appropriate. Thank you. Ss112 04:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Thatsoddd, you've been using the Jjjjfghh2 account again. Is there a reason you're alternating between accounts, sometimes at the same article? Valereee (talk) 15:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Thatsoddd, there was no reason to move Love Lee to Love Lee(AKMU song). There is nothing else of the name Love Lee on Wikipedia, therefore there is no need for the incorrect disamibguation per WP:NCMDAB (it is incorrect as you didn't add a space between the last letter of the title and the parenthesised disambiguation, and even if you had spaced it, it is not necessary). Ss112 04:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Supreme Leather Varsity Jacker Spring Summer 2015.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eteethan (talk) 01:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Valereee (talk) 10:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Thatsoddd (talk) 13:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Thatsoddd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I couldn’t get into my account at the time. Presumably because I’m going from device to device. Things get frustrating as I don’t wanna have to log in every single time. To add to that I didn’t see anything that says publishing through another account on Wikimedia commons is a bannable offense and I know I shouldn’t have have done this but my intentions were not to cause harm to the platform. I also did message you immediately when this happened but I deleted. It can be found in the history though. Once again I’m so sorry that this happened. I should’ve just logged in if I wanted to post or edit something. Thatsoddd (talk) 15:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thatsoddd (talk) 10:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC):
..My intention was not to cause damage or harm to the website. The reason placed "not here to build an encyclopedia" I assume refers to the 'gaming the system' part. Everything I did was primarily due to me being unaware of certain guidelines despite being reminded by the admins due to this I continued to break the rule and after reading the rules again, I recognized the problem and immediately addressed it. I messaged one of the admins through my talk page. After a day, I deleted my message. There was never any vandalism done to the website when using an ip address or another account. I am once again asking for my ban to be shortened or simply removed as of January 16, 2024 because I swear I will not use an ip address again to edit again. I understand why it was placed, I should've known better but I will not let this happen again.)) Thatsoddd (talk) 10:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:AKMU Love Lee Promotional Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
I had no idea what I was doing and I was uninformed on most rules which I should’ve known. I’m asking my block request be reviewed by an administrator. Thank you.Thatsoddd (talk) 21:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Thatsoddd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As I am now more educated on certain rules such as the sockpuppetry rule and a lot more. I believe that I am ready to get my account back. I broke the rules as I never read them. Now that I have a better understanding. I'm willing to change and to adapt as a Wikipedia editor, I will no longer use any other account to edit articles nor deleted templates and add citations that may be false Thatsoddd (talk) 19:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your request because you have continued to evade your block by editing while logged out, according to multiple independent checkusers who have examined Wikipedia's technical logs, even as this appeal was pending. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
((Checkuser needed))
to see if the user has evaded their block following the decline by Yamla above. As noted in the quick SPI request, I'd summarily decline this if there is evidence of block evasion (and this user should not be stale). — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Thatsoddd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I had no idea what I was doing and I was uninformed on most rules which I should’ve known. I also didn’t realize I couldn’t edit with an IP either while blocked. Also keep in mind I didn’t know that I wasn’t allowed to do that.
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, I am are unable to unblock you at this time. I recommend waiting at least six months before you again request unblocking. (You should not evade your block by editing the English language Wikipedia from a different account or while not logged in during this time. It would reset the six month timer.) It would work in your favor for you to constructively edit a different Wikipedia or Wikimedia project during this time, for at least six months and at least 500 edits. You will then need to concisely and clearly tell how your editing merited a block, what you would do different, and what constructive edits you would make. A list of Wikimedia projects can be found at META:List_of_Wikipedias . Before again requesting unblocking, please read the Guide to Appealing Blocks. Please read and heed any other advice you have received in unblock declines or discussions. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 8:41 am, Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thatsoddd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My intention was not to cause damage or harm to the website. The reason placed "not here to build an encyclopedia" I assume refers to the 'gaming the system' part. Everything I did was primarily due to me being unaware of certain guidelines despite being reminded by the admins due to this I continued to break the rule and after reading the rules again, I recognized the problem and immediately addressed it. I messaged one of the admins through my talk page. After a day, I deleted my message. There was never any vandalism done to the website when using an ip address or another account. I am once again asking for my ban to be shortened or simply removed as of November 11, 2023 because I swear I will not use an ip address again to edit again. I understand why it was placed, I should've known better but I will not let this happen again.
Decline reason:
Spicy found block evasion on January 8, 2024, User does not evince understanding of the problems and how to not repeat them. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thatsoddd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will continue further to make my point clear. The ip address that was used was used by accident to edit articles at first . It was not however meant to harm the platform. I specifically forgot to log in. I did log in too by the way but then it logged me out AGAIN. Soon after I was banned and didn’t see any issue with using my IP adresss. I am asking for a removal of this ban. I assure it won’t happen again. I didn’t realize logging out and editing would cause a problem.
Decline reason:
Your account was blocked, so you evaded your block by editing without logging in by accident? I don't even know what that is supposed to mean. When your account is blocked, you are not permitted to edit at all. In six months time, you can request unblock per the standard offer. Girth Summit (blether) 17:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thatsoddd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
1.The account has been blocked because of sockpuppetry which I knowingly engaged in. My other accounts were not active when this account was used and this account was not made to circumvent a block.It wasn't until after I made this account through a different IP address I realised this was sockpuppetry but I continued to use this account and that was my fault. I should have stopped using the account immediately and waited for my block on my other accounts to be removed.
2. The IP addresses are different because I made this account on a different IP address but it was not created to disrupt or abuse the platform. It was created because I didn't see how making an account on a different IP address would be a problem however I realised quickly that it is in fact sockpuppetry and take full responsibility in knowingly engaging in that.
3. This account has not made disruptive edits and the talk page is quite clean and is free of complaints. It never was created to bypass any restriction. My account was blocked on the other IP address and has yet to be unblocked and I didn't want to wait 3 months to get unblocked when I have clearly improved and am willing to understand the rules of Wikipedia. I won't do it again because I now understand Wikipedia takes sockpuppetry very seriously. I understand that many of my articles and edits will be removed and already have been.
4. I believe I should be unblocked because I am not a distriptuve editor nor did I engage in sockpuppetry to disrupt or abuse the platform. I am aware that I knowingly engaged in sockpuppetry but it will not happen again. If unblocked I will ONLY use this account from now on and I will NOT use another account or IP adresss to circumvent any block again. Lastly, I understand that I engaged in sock-puppetry and I will not do it again.
Decline reason:
The only possible pathway forward here is the standard offer; the six months period starts now. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
User: 331dot Six months?? That would mean I’d get unblocked around September 12 of this year?? It’s March 12, 2024. There has to be a way to shorten this from six whole months. — Thatsoddd (talk) 10:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Thatsoddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Love Lee(album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Thatsoddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:It Girl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Thatsoddd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Love Lee".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Thatsoddd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "It Girl".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Girls Like Me Don't Cry Thuy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)