Hello, Ulichar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Kolbasz (talk) 21:47, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The article Aleksandar Mladenović has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Piotrus, I have now included six points of reference which pretty much cover what is to be found in the article. Are we fine now? Ulichar (talk) 18:13, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
You created the article for Petar Novaković Čardaklija with the name Novaković and Čardaklija, leaving me unsure which name to use in the listas as the surname.--DThomsen8 (talk) 14:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)) below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 03:18, 30 January 2015 (UTC) |
Ulichar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have absolutely no idea why you blocked my account. The only thing that comes to my mind is that years ago (2008/9, I believe) I contributed to Wikipedia with a different account. I could not log onto it again (forgot all the passwords, cannot access the old emails) so I thought it was easier to start another one. Anyway, I read the "Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts" and I can't see what seems to be the problem. I did not join ANY discussions on the articles I previously created and have worked on totally new ones now. If that is not a "clean start under a new name" then tell me what should I do. Or at least explain why you are blocking the account and then, when I learn what I'm accused of, I could reply properly. Ulichar (talk) 14:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Accept reason:
@Ulichar, another SPI clerk/administrator looked at the evidence, behavioral and technical, against you, as well as what you've said here. They lean in favor of unblocking you, which, as it happens, was the way I was leaning before I sought their input. That said, I want you to understand that if in the future there is ever an instance where you are shown to be socking, either with a named account or with an IP, you risk being indefinitely blocked, and the possibility of your being unblocked would be next to nil, at least for quite some time after the block. In other words, you must strictly comply with the stock puppetry policy. As an aside, although not strictly relevant to the sock puppetry issue, in looking at your contribution history, particularly your more recent history, I found that you were often uncivil and even attacking with respect to other users. By contrast, in this discussion, I've found you to be polite and measured in your comments. Obviously, you can be respectful when you wish to be. Please try to carry that over when discussing content with other editors.--Bbb23 (talk) 06:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saint Nicetas, Banjane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Theodore. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Ulichar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)