![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Bling | Content | Userboxen | Editcount | Talk | Guestbook |
Big Events |
It's not just the fact that you are being neurotic; it's also that you're being incredibly hypocritical. Who are you to say that some small facts are useful whereas others are not? Surely it's up to the reader to decide and not you.--Benchmark90 (talk) 19:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
I think you are embracing the Inclusionism cause, and accusing me of being an Exclusionist, and there may be some truth in what you say. However there is an argument that editing out less important information keeps articles crisp and readable. Personally I consider articles as large as Joseph Pomeroy Widney, Jack Kemp or 'Allo 'Allo! (series 5) overly verbose. May I suggest that you have a look at those articles and see if you are comfortable with that level of detail. ϢereSpielChequers 22:37, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Jonathan, thanks for catching the typo from my submission in "Baseball in 1994". Ever since I hurt my finger I have had a hard time typing "t-h-e" properly, and try as I might, I miss a few. I hope all is well in the London area .... it is a great city!TeganX7 03:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks TeganX7, I had a fascinating time when I searched for hte in Wikipedia, it made for some very eclectic reading.ϢereSpielChequers 18:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Thankyou for fixing up the article My Wife Is 18, your efforts are appreciated!! How did you come across the article in the first place? =D Dengero 14:14, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Dengero, I did a search for thier, which can be a place or a surname but mostly on Wikipedia was a typo for their. It has given me some interesting reading ranging from sport, cinema and the history of Assamese tribes to schools and rock music.ϢereSpielChequers 17:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
diffuse -> defuse. Good catch! I wonder why that sillyness was in there so long? RussNelson 18:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, I did a search for "diffuse the situation" and got 24 hits across Wikipedia, mostly from articles that were otherwise good quality. I suspect errors like this where the wrong word is used are harder to spot than ones that a spellchecker can find. ϢereSpielChequers 19:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
You added some material on geology to Easter Island in this edit, but the ref on seamounts was never completed. Someone else has recently reorganised the refs for that article, and this is now tagged as "citation needed". If you still recall the source, could you add it please.-gadfium 19:44, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Done. Thanks for pointing this outϢereSpielChequers 10:20, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
For correcting my spelling mistakes over at union soemthingorother. :) Larklight (talk) 20:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
No problem, that's what I like about Wikipedia, I get to spend the occasional hour searching for and eradicating a particular typo, and in the process get some very eclectic reading.ϢereSpielChequers 21:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Dear Taksen, I use a Linux PC with wordprocessing software that is set to spell check in English. So when I'm editing in Wikipedia I have the advantage that typos are underlined in red. I'm afraid I am just a user of the technology and don't know how to change settings, but I'm sure it would be possible to get your PC set up so you could use an English spell checker or a Dutch one depending on the language you were working in. Alternatively just go on putting in that interesting Art stuff you submit and leave the tidying up to people like me.ϢereSpielChequers 18:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Do you help everyone by cleaning up sloppy edits, or am I special? =) You always seem to cover my sweeping but poorly-spelt changes, thanks again. Larklight (talk) 09:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Bit of both really, if someone thanks me for fixing their typos, and I found their stuff interesting I often go and look at other contributions they've made. Also some people have a blindspot for particular words and if their blindspot creates one of the typos that I search for then our paths will repeatedly cross. In your case looking at the last time I edited something after you, I think you write "becuase" rather than because, plus we both have an interest in British Politics so we may have similar reading material.ϢereSpielChequers 21:53, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I did PROD it originally, but then changes were made to the article to make me not at all sure if it should be deleted. I then added the tags to it then left it for the community to sort out. As I originally wanted to delete it I don't honestly have an opinion at this time. -- roleplayer 23:48, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
I just saw this. :p I don't think anyone has ever added an award directly to that page, and I somehow missed it on my watchlist, but thanks! :D Glad to help. LaraLove|Talk 05:40, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jonathan. It's a good idea in some respects, but I think your edit is not necessary. The topic there is "consistency within articles", and disambiguation pages are not articles. (See Wikipedia:What is an article?.) Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 15:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Oh yes, I take your point. However I got there from a link from Center where I've now twice had rolled back a bunch of edits where someone is promoting American English spelling even where that causes red links. Is there an equivalent guideline for disambiguation pages? ϢereSpielChequers 16:19, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page! --EoL talk 15:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Happy to oblige, lets hope the block works! ϢereSpielChequers 19:15, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I just edited the Metropolis (film) page to remove a reference that does not support the article's statement. More specifically, the article at reference 12 says nothing about a forthcoming Blu-Ray release, nor does it come from "The Digital Bits." You reverted my removal of the reference, apparently because you assumed it was an experiment.75.189.134.151 (talk) 11:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, You deleted the reference from a paragraph and left your edit summary blank, so yes I reverted you without checking in much detail. I've now checked out the reference that you deleted and edited the article inline with the reference. ϢereSpielChequers 12:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
He's a gobshite, a partisan blowhard, and a lazy arse who does all his research from home on his computer. He's also a drunk. My edits were just reflecting that fact.
Plus, his article reads like an advertisement, and should either be completely overhauled or just deleted. Did he write it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.65.38.77 (talk) 11:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I reverted [edit] of Richard Miniter because it looked like vandalism. I've looked again in case I misjudged your edits, and I still think your edits to that page look like vandalism, for example your sentence "This town is generally populated by jerks such as Richie-boy." If you think the article is biased and you have information that would balance it then I suggest you read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons before making any further edits to biographical articles on Wikipedia. Having now Googled him I think it would be hard to argue that he was not noteable enough for an article, I don't think I could judge whether its biased or not, but it does make it clear that he's defending Dubya's Oil Crusade, which in my view is far more damning than any of the epithets you used about him. ϢereSpielChequers 12:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing out my spelling mistake. Yes, I meant to write "crowded", but somehow failed in the task. Thank again for correcting me. --A.S. Brown (talk) 23:53, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
No problem, it's given me an interesting afternoon, I've just been through the 103 articles with crowed on Wikipedia and about half of them were were typos for crowd, crowned or crowded. ϢereSpielChequers 15:20, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
The problem is Splatt5572 keeps putting samples from Santa Ana and Golden State Frwy back to I-5's exit list when they both have thier own Exit list on their page. We have no ration to duplicate exit list. Please do not let Splat5572 disrupt my changes again.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 19:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Can you anwer this quickly please, becasue I'm tire of the continous war, and Wiki is not a mapquest. My unos was valid.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 19:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
OK I'll leave you to it. ϢereSpielChequers 19:42, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
The next time Splat5572 play this type of game, undo his changes. I mention the same thing like 10 ties, we had the same war as we have to US 101 and I-80. I wonder if Splatt5572 is use as same person as 75.47, because both seems to play games around me, most of thier changes is like 2 years ago, and violates WP:MOS, and WP:CASH.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 19:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sufficiently familiar with the subject to get involved, but I think you are both at risk of breaking the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule. May I suggest you leave that page for a day and edit some other article? ϢereSpielChequers 20:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for removing it. We should report this. He is vandalizing PETA article. --SkyWalker (talk) 07:03, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
No problem, as well as your talk page I reverted one of the vandalisms to PETA, issued a Final warning, and because it is clear vandalism after a final warning I reported it to admin intervention against vandalism and within minutes User:Yamaha519vx was blocked. Jonathan Cardy (talk) 07:22, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks ever so much for tidying up the article. It's always so much better when someone with more experience has a good look after new information has been submitted. Very kind of you.The Thunderer (talk) 13:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
No Problem, MV Princess Victoria is an interesting article, a sad and heroic story. ϢereSpielChequers 06:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your assistance re: this user. Unfortunately, the user has once again left a personal, negative message at my talk page instead of directing his or her concerns to the article's discussion page. You'll note more warnings were blanked by the user so he or she is fully aware of what they are doing. I am also not the only editor to have changed or reverted this editors WP:NOR on that particular article (Death). As I do not to wish to directly engage with the user, any help would be greatly appreciated. Best, A Sniper (talk) 23:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
You may also note that "A Sniper" has "blanked" all of the reasons I have given him for my edits. He is "fully aware" that "what [he is] doing" is crying wolf. I am no vandal, and no edit warrior, and no personal attacker, despite what this "A Sniper" may tell you. In football, this person would be known as a flopper.
So it's OK if others repeatedly undo my edits, but not if I undo theirs? How is that fair?
I would just add that "A Sniper"'s continual reversion of my edits without ever addressing the reasons I gave him for making those edits make it quite difficult to "stay cool." That said, the most I have done is describe his behavior as imperious or Kafkaesque or the like. If that constitutes a "personal attack," then so be it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.117.5.88 (talk) 02:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
From your own rules: "Deliberate engagement in edit warring instead of discussion is considered a breach of Wikiquette and may cause a user to be blocked from editing."
I have repeatedly (and mostly politely) tried to engage "A Sniper" in discussion of his edits. He has spurned every such attempt. Instead, he has just unilaterally and continually reverted my edits. If anyone should be blocked from editing for "edit warring," it is he, not I. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.117.5.88 (talk) 02:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I agree that your edits are not vandalism, but mostly politely isn't quite the same as always politely, can I suggest you read this? Also if you edit from an IP address rather than registering as a user you are more likely to be assumed to be a vandal. especially if you forget to sign talk page comments by ending your remarks with ~~~~
That may not seem fair but it is a practical response to a significant minority of unregistered editors. You were actually both vulnerable to the three revert rule but I'm glad to see you are both editing away from Death (band) can I suggest you stay away from that article for a few days? ϢereSpielChequers20:47, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I included the above link on the web page on the basis that the link to La Voz de Albox (an organisation with similar aims and objectives) had already been permitted.
The only difference is that the AUAN covers a number of towns in the Almanzora Valley.
However, I respect your rules. Please remove our link if you see fit.
Regards,
AUAN Webmaster (talk) 09:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
I have reported this user to BSNL but they told they will give the vandal a permanent IP address. As to this it is a dynamic IP and nothing can be done Cheers !Renaulte (talk) 10:23, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Good job blanking Kelly Cipriani and warning the author/vandal. I just thought I'd point out that attack pages can be speedily deleted under criteria g10, so there's no need to wait the five days a prod tag would require. I've changed the tag on that page for speedy deletion instead. justinfr (talk) 18:58, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I did read that. I can't find the reference though.
I'd have thought that however small or insignificant the information, Wikipedia was about bringing as much knowledge as possible to people. A reference to webbed feet may well be a small tidbit, but there are also references to colourblindness and the like which I suggest you also look up if you are going to be so neurotic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benchmark90 (talk • contribs) 18:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
May I suggest you read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, and when you edit controversial articles like David Irving you might want to discuss things on the talk page first. ϢereSpielChequers 18:48, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
A page you created, Sigafoo, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 17:32, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
While I think that Driverside is written like an advertisement, I think the subject is notable and the article has salvageable content. I'm thinking AfD instead. What do you think? RJaguar3 | u | t 18:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Dear WereSpielChequers,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.
chaser - t 03:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey! Hows it going? Recent notability of DJ I.R. has been going around. His 1st and second single have been released on Amazon MP3, Napster, Lala, Emuis and bla bla. So tell me if you think this would be enough to start a new DJ I.R. article and When I Grow Up (I Wanna Be) as well. write back whenever :)! —Preceding unsigned comment added by SayWhat2100 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Your comments about Thor Heyerdahls theories are welcome. I didn't mean to imply that I thought he was entirely reliable. On the contrary I have doubts about other things besides DNA which I understand better. I may add them to the discussion page of Easter Island at some other time. Much of what he wrote is worth considering however with caution.
Thanks Zacherystaylor (talk) 09:12, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
ok thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chuletadechancho (talk • contribs) 20:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments and support on my RfA. Although life has been hectic recently (not just the RfA), I don't always warn if it is an IP address and that's their only edit. Maybe I should, but a lot of those, I think, won't return or will return with a different IP address. Maybe there's some policy guidance I need to read, there's a lot of it about! On the other hand, when someone I warn has several recent edits, I check them, fix them if they are vandalism and haven't been fixed, and warn them for any vandalism that hasn't been reported - sometimes that means all their edits. Nice talk page, I might nick some ideas from it if you don't mind. Doug Weller (talk) 11:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey, does "probably not" mean a no? If so, do you mind if I move it to the "apologies" section on the talk page (which doesn't currently exist, but will). Ironholds 19:29, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the welcoming. I'm trying to contribute with Wolverine and The X-Men, but people always undo what I correct. LOL I'm not sure how this works, because I'm adding the right information, as I'm watching the series daily here in Brazil. lol If I'm doing something wrong, please tell me. I'm not even sure if is the right way to send you a message. :( But thanks a lot, WereSpielChequers! Littlemissgenius (talk) 07:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
((cite episode | title = | episodelink = | series = | serieslink = | airdate = | season = | number = ))
Lastly if the person who is deleting your additions isn't taking part in the discussion on Talk:Wolverine and the X-Men then you could try putting a message on their talk page along the lines of "Hi, I've noticed you edit Wolverine and the X-Men, what do you think of my suggestions on Talk:Wolverine and the X-Men?"
Hope that helps ϢereSpielChequers 09:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
I don't know if it was originally your question or not, but I used the "do you agree with all policies..." question. If you do not want me to use it anymore please tell me. RockManQ (talk) 03:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
to see who you were since you commented at the RCC FAC. I was wondering what your name could possibly mean - I thought it might be something in another language but was pleased to discover its real meaning. Neat name (a bit long though)! NancyHeise talk 22:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for you comments at FAC. I was wondering if you vote on articles as well as comment on them? The JPStalk to me 08:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your prompt reply. I'm having big problems editing certain articles in that attempted edits take so long that I'm timed out (Error Message 500 appears). This is frustrating as it's happening with articles to which I've made major contributions and/or created, in particular the following: Paisley, James Black (bishop) and Philip Tartaglia. Any help would be much appreciated. (Ulysses54 (talk) 12:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC))
Seems to be just on Wikipedia that there's a problem - and only with certain articles or sections of articles eg Paisley. I tried rebooting but to no avail. I'm still unable to edit on those articles I mentioned above. (Ulysses54 (talk) 15:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC))
You should get in touch with User:AndrewRT about WLA; he was put up as a local contact person for this project at the recent IRC meeting of Wikimedia UK. Thanks for your help!--Pharos (talk) 01:15, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Thanks for your message on my talk page. I've expressed an interest in getting involved and as a Board member of wikimedia v2 I think Pharos wanted me to play some kind of coordinating role but I'm not sure. At this stage I can't tell you any more, but I'll try to take this further this weekend and will get back to you! AndrewRT(Talk) 22:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, just to let you know, we've worked out some more details about this and I've put up a summary page at WP:WLA@V&A. V&A are hosting a launch event on 1st February and we're hoping to get as many people there as possible. Please:
Cheers! AndrewRT(Talk) 23:52, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
--SmashvilleBONK! 23:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (166/43/7). I appreciate your comments and in my actions as an administrator I will endeavor to maintain the trust you have placed in me. I am honored by your trust and your support. Thank you, Cirt (talk) 01:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC) |
Hey there! Just a note thanking you for supporting my RFA which successfully passed with 60 supports, 0 opposes and 2 neutrals. I hope I'll be able to live up to everyone's expectations, and thank you for trusting me! All the best, Ale_Jrbtalk 20:30, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:06, 27 September 2008 (UTC) |
Congratulations, I'm sure you'll make a great admin. ϢereSpielChequers 19:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi WereSpielChequers! Thank you very much for your support in my RfA, which passed yesterday. I hope not to let you and the others down, and use the tools for the benefit of the project. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 22:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Special thanks go out to Wizardman and Malinaccier for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for the trust the community has placed in me. A special Christmas song for you all can be found at the right hand side of this message! |
![]() |
Have an unyielding beer on me.
Let the amber nectar flow all day and night. Let it run down the mountains and through the caverns and across the rich lawns to swamp the streets. Let it rain beer. Let the heavens open and shine forth beer. Let it all be beer. Wonderful beer. And let it be as deep as the heart of a lion.
|
I see you have added the image of Borchgrevink's hut to the article. You must be wondering why I didn't use such an obvious Commons image in the first place. The answer lies in the peer review, during which I removed this (it was my lead image) on the advice of User:Elcobbola, who had doubts about it (see peer review). I am a little nervous about its reappearance during FAC - would you please look at the PR & see what you think? Brianboulton (talk) 22:37, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments. If you have any more suggestions, please leave them on FAC discussion. All the best for your RFA. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 08:05, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
When wanting to search Hanna Schwarz's name being misspelt as Schwartz (one page hit) and wondering who else may be suject to the same problem, I typed in Scwartz by mistake. This got 11 hits. Ive resolved 8 to Schwartz and two to Schwarz and I think I know what the other should be, but the reference is to a 1972 paper only cited online by the wiki page in qustion and its clones. I'm sure you could entertain yourself for months sorting the Schwartzs from the Schwarzs, if you wanted.--Peter cohen (talk) 19:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Will do. You'll suffer a similar problem to me, methinks; as well as simple "I disagree with your new advice" it will be "no! Old advice is fine! It should be kept until the point when it causes problems!" the Conservative Party view. I can also see a couple of "people don't read it anyway so why bother"'s coming up. I will, however, put in my two cents (0.5 pence in the current economic climate). Ironholds (talk) 14:51, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Whats your probulem! --24.23.52.150 (talk) 22:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for clearing up after me:). You and User:Choess should form a "cleaning up after Ironhold's crappy copyediting skills" team; whenever I see either of you two on my watchlist it's correcting one of my mistakes! Ironholds (talk) 21:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC).
I really dont have anything to say in that RfA thingy... Nor do i know a Palestine better than you stuff. Im just a 13 year old boy, I just joined wikipedia to help it in ways i can. Sorry man. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 22:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
You are quite right, I mean Middle-East (Israel/Palestine) articles, and I have clarified that now. I have perhaps been editing too much in the area, since I start taking such "internal" shortenings for granted (so no, you are *not* dim for not understanding ;-) ) Regards, Huldra (talk) 18:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Do NOT ever touch my Userpage again. You have no right to change it, as I have the right to post what I please on my page. You DO NOT have the right to edit anything on it except this page on my user page. Cbreseman (talk) 01:30, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Eat my shit and die, dick licker (nominate that for speedy deletion ass wad) Cbreseman (talk) 11:35, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
You god damn ass snatch Cbreseman (talk) 11:36, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Also discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive489#Block review
Thanks! I tagged it for speedy deletion. It'll be the kids from school messing about - thanks for pointing it out! Dendodge TalkContribs 14:20, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, sorry about that. I kinda got carried away? Well, its fixed now. Thanks for bringing it up. II MusLiM HyBRiD II Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja 22:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
For your comments at Roman Catholic Church. I am sorry to inform you that we failed FAC but will again be at peer review in a few weeks to sort things out. Hopefully we will make it through next time. We will be contacting all supporters and opposers of the article when we open the next peer review to hopefully get all issues addressed and hashed out before the next FAC try. Thanks again for your time and attention to this important article. NancyHeise talk 01:05, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
The problem is that "ending a pregnancy" is doublespeak that comes from the pro-choice camp. Its deliberately obfuscative, when the actual action isn't in fact terminating a condition in the mother, but is rather terminating a condition in the fetus. -Zahd (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
I'll try to find the sources. The Liz Habib thing was pretty notorious (my Journalism class talked about it), but the Chamberlain thing will be harder to find. Will start looking. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 02:13, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
I suggest you don't "waste" level-1 warnings on him anymore. He's not making any constructive edits, and it's obviously the same vandal showing up at different IP addresses. VG ☎ 09:49, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, but I really couldn't think of anything better. I'll consider it, though.
When I saw that note on my talk page, I thought I was in trouble! Lady★Galaxy 19:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for thinking of me -- when I get a chance, I will look at the RfA discussion and add whatever input my itty-bitty brain can generate. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Ecoleetage (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding ((subst:Smile)) to their talk page with a friendly message.
Yes, I saw your edit notice...but to be sure...and to give you a handy little link to the section in question... :D ((tb|the_ed17|Signature))
Thanks! —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 05:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Nah, we don't ban people for not writing articles. As long as he's not a hindrance (which he certainly doesn't seem to be), we should just let him be. However, it might be prudent to post a kind message on his talk page asking him to help contribute to the encyclopedia. --Hemlock Martinis (talk) 20:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
What kind of fool uses automated tools anyway? ;) I should note that I'm probably a lot closer to you now anyway, that list is very out of date. At least I assume I have more than 2000 edits now... —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 23:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Way more than 2,000 - your on 6,985 according to this this, but I think I'm still slightly ahead. Though editcountitis is way overrated, or at least I hope it is as I'm planning to spend more of my time at wp:fac so my monthly edit count is probably falling. ϢereSpielChequers 00:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting Rajhans Vidyalaya. Please also correct vidyalaya To Vidyalaya. Thanks again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.186.179 (talk) 09:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Done - I've moved it to Rajhans Vidyalaya and fixed some links. ϢereSpielChequers 10:19, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Rajhans Vidyalaya
Thanks for prompt favour! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.129.200 (talk) 11:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
WP:OUTREACH now exists in larval stage. Please visit the talkpage to help it pupate. //roux 21:42, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
I think it's likely more pages will be protected over time, and that would be a good thing. However, before people actually know which kinds of pages would be more likely to be protected, this idea may scare some people. - Dan Dank55 (send/receive) 15:12, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
WSC, thank you for sending me some wikilove. I celebrate Christmas which is why I am a bit scarce on Wikipedia right now. What do you celebrate? NancyHeise talk 02:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Seasons greetings to you too! Sorry about pasting your own template here, but it's the thought that counts, right? ;D
Chamal talk is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate the Winter or Summer Solstice, Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah or even the Saturnalia this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding ((subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec08)) to your friends' talk pages.
Chamal talk 02:54, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks.
— neuro(talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate the Winter or Summer Solstice, Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah or even the Saturnalia this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding ((subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec08)) to your friends' talk pages.
^ I'm a bitch. — neuro(talk) 13:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Cyclonenim is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate the Winter or Summer Solstice, Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding ((subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec08)) to your friends' talk pages.
Steal your template! Have a great holiday. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 13:25, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Merry Christmas! | ||
Christmas, and here's also hoping that all your family and friends are well. Lets all hope that the year coming will be a good one! If we've had disputes in the past, I hold no grudges, especially at such a time as this. If you don't know I am, I apologise, feel free to remove this from your page. Come and say hi, I won't bite, I swear! It could even be good for me, you know - I'm feeling a little down at the moment with all of these snowmen giving me the cold shoulder :( — neur ho ho ho(talk) 00:15, 25 December 2008 (UTC) | WereSpielChequers, here's hoping you're having a wonderful
Thanks for the Eid Greeting. I had a good one. You might be wondering who i am.. Well, yes its, Me. So hows life? Btw, Verizon, my ISP offers me dynamic IPs, so i might no reply back on the same IP. Anyways, thanks again. Nice to see someone cares. xD ^^Toodles Spiel. M.H.ITrue Romace iS Dead01:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.195.110 (talk)
Thanks for the eid message. Heres yours i guess.
15:39, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Unfortunately, it turns out that because a bot is scoring the contest, alternate accounts can't be taken into consideration. Sorry for the inconvenience. Garden. 14:12, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
The 2009 WikiCup will begin on January 1, 2009. The first round will run through March 31, 2009. For more information on this tournament, read the "about" section on the main WikiCup page.
This year, we have a different system in calculating points. At User:Garden/WikiCup/Submissions, you will find information about submitting your article (and other) work to earn points. Each contestant will have their own individual subpage for submitting completed work to us.
This year, User:ST47 will also be running one of his bots to calculate mainspace edits and read your submission subpages to calculate the point values you receive based on our scoring chart.
Questions or comment? Ask at the talk page or go directly to Garden or IMatthew's talk page. Good luck and Happy Holidays! -- ayematthew ✡ and Garden. 14:19, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |